Are you tired of struggling to evaluate your board′s effectiveness? Are you looking for a comprehensive and efficient solution to improve your corporate governance practices? Look no further!
Our Board Evaluation Process and Board Corporate Governance Knowledge Base is the ultimate toolkit for any business professional seeking to optimize their board′s performance.
With 1587 prioritized requirements, solutions, benefits, results, and real-life case studies, our dataset provides unparalleled support for board evaluation and corporate governance.
We understand the urgency and scope of these tasks, which is why we have strategically curated the most important questions and solutions that will guarantee results.
Unlike other alternatives, our Board Evaluation Process and Board Corporate Governance Knowledge Base is designed specifically for professionals like you.
It is a one-of-a-kind product that offers a DIY/affordable alternative to costly consulting services.
With our product, you have direct access to all the knowledge and tools needed to effectively assess and improve your board′s performance.
Our dataset covers all aspects of corporate governance, making it the ideal resource for businesses of any size and industry.
It offers a detailed overview of board evaluation processes and best practices, giving you the confidence to make informed decisions for your organization.
Plus, our product is constantly updated with the latest research and developments in the field, ensuring that you stay ahead of the game.
But don′t just take our word for it - our satisfied clients have seen significant improvements in their board′s performance after implementing our Board Evaluation Process and Board Corporate Governance Knowledge Base.
And with its affordable cost, it′s a no-brainer investment that will provide long-lasting benefits for your organization.
Don′t settle for mediocre board evaluations and subpar corporate governance practices.
With our Board Evaluation Process and Board Corporate Governance Knowledge Base, you will unlock the full potential of your board and drive your business towards success.
Upgrade your evaluation process today and see the difference it makes in your organization.
Has anybody on the board or in senior management been the subject of or been affiliated with your organization that has been under investigation? Are there any skills or abilities identified during the board evaluation process that should be prioritized for more intensive board education programs? How effectively does the general manager include the board and the staff in the planning process?
Board Evaluation Process
The evaluation process ensures that board members and senior management have not been involved with any organization under an investigation.
1. Independent external review: Utilizing an unbiased third party to conduct a comprehensive evaluation can identify potential conflicts of interest.
2. Confidential surveys: Anonymous feedback from board members and senior management can reveal any concerns and areas for improvement.
3. Self-assessment: Board members and executives can reflect on their own performance and identify areas where they need to improve.
4. Performance metrics: Setting measurable goals and targets can provide a clear understanding of the board′s effectiveness and areas of improvement.
5. Training and development: Providing resources and education can enhance the skills and knowledge of board members, improving overall performance.
6. Rotating membership: Rotating board members on a regular basis can bring fresh perspectives and reduce the risk of entrenchment.
7. Diversity and inclusion: Having a diverse and inclusive board can bring different perspectives and promote effective decision-making.
8. Clear roles and responsibilities: Clearly defining the roles and responsibilities of board members can ensure accountability and prevent conflicts of interest.
9. Clear communication channels: Establishing open and transparent communication channels among board members can promote teamwork and trust.
10. Regular evaluations: Conducting regular evaluations can foster continuous improvement and enhance the overall effectiveness of the board.
CONTROL QUESTION: Has anybody on the board or in senior management been the subject of or been affiliated with the organization that has been under investigation?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
By 2030, our board evaluation process will have successfully identified and addressed any potential conflicts of interest or unethical behavior among members of the board or senior management. Our organization will have a reputation for top-notch corporate governance, with a track record of transparency and accountability. We will have adopted best practices for board evaluations, including regular external reviews and self-assessments, to continuously improve our decision-making processes and ensure the highest levels of integrity and effectiveness in guiding the organization towards its mission. Our board will consist of diverse, highly qualified and dedicated individuals who are committed to upholding the values and ethical standards of our organization. By setting the bar high for our board evaluation process, we will not only safeguard the reputation and success of our organization, but also serve as a model for other companies striving for excellence in corporate governance.
"I can`t believe I didn`t discover this dataset sooner. The prioritized recommendations are a game-changer for project planning. The level of detail and accuracy is unmatched. Highly recommended!"
Introduction:
In today′s corporate environment, board evaluations have become an essential tool for assessing the effectiveness of a company′s board of directors. It is considered a best practice to conduct regular board evaluations to ensure that the board is functioning optimally and meeting the expectations of shareholders and other stakeholders. However, conducting a thorough and unbiased board evaluation is not an easy task, especially when there are potential conflicts of interest involved. In this case study, we will examine a situation where members of the board or senior management have been subject to an investigation and how it impacted the board evaluation process.
Client Situation:
The client in this case study is a multinational company in the pharmaceutical industry. The company′s board of directors consists of ten members, including the CEO, two executive directors, and seven independent directors. Recently, the company had been under investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for potential accounting fraud and misrepresentation of financial statements. This investigation was triggered by a whistleblower complaint, which alleged that one of the executive directors and the CFO were involved in fraudulent activities to inflate the company′s financial performance.
As a result of the investigation, the company′s stock price had plummeted, and there was significant pressure from shareholders to replace the board members involved in the alleged misconduct. To address these concerns, the board decided to conduct a comprehensive board evaluation to assess its effectiveness and identify areas for improvement. However, given the ongoing investigation and potential conflicts of interest, the board faced several challenges in conducting a fair and unbiased evaluation.
Consulting Methodology:
To address the challenges faced by the client, our consulting firm proposed a comprehensive methodology that incorporated best practices from industry experts and academic research. The first step was to gather information on the board′s composition, roles, and responsibilities, and past performance through document review and interviews with the board members. We also conducted a separate interview with the whistleblowers to understand their concerns and allegations.
Based on the information gathered, we designed a questionnaire that covered various aspects of board performance, including strategy development, risk oversight, financial reporting, and board dynamics. The questionnaire was distributed to all board members to capture their individual responses and perceptions of the board′s functioning. To ensure confidentiality, the responses were collected anonymously and aggregated for analysis.
The next step was to conduct in-depth interviews with each individual board member to discuss their responses and gather additional insights. These interviews were conducted by our team of consultants who had significant experience in board evaluations and were trained in conducting unbiased and non-judgmental interviews. In addition, we also conducted a review of the company′s corporate governance policies and practices and benchmarked them against industry standards.
Deliverables:
The deliverables of this project included a comprehensive report that summarized the findings of the evaluation and provided recommendations for improving the board′s effectiveness. The report included a detailed analysis of the questionnaire responses, insights from the individual interviews, and benchmarking data. It also identified specific gaps in the board′s performance and provided actionable recommendations to address them.
Additionally, we also provided a presentation to the board that highlighted the key findings and recommendations. The presentation also included a discussion on best practices for addressing conflicts of interest and maintaining objectivity in board evaluations. Our team also conducted a training session for the board members on effective board governance practices and their roles and responsibilities in maintaining high standards of corporate governance.
Implementation Challenges:
The main challenge faced by our consulting firm was to maintain objectivity and impartiality in the board evaluation process given the ongoing investigation and potential conflicts of interest. We addressed this challenge by ensuring that the evaluation was conducted independently by our team of experienced consultants who had no prior affiliation with the company or its board members. In addition, we implemented strict confidentiality measures to protect the identity of the whistleblowers and prevent any leaks of sensitive information.
Another challenge was to obtain honest and candid responses from the board members, especially those who were under investigation or had affiliations with the company. To overcome this challenge, we emphasized the importance of honest and transparent feedback in improving board effectiveness and also assured confidentiality of individual responses.
KPIs:
The key performance indicators (KPIs) for this project included the completion of the evaluation process within the agreed timeline, the quality of insights and recommendations provided, and the satisfaction level of the client. We also tracked the implementation of our recommendations and any changes in the board′s composition or functioning following the evaluation.
Management Considerations:
The management of the company played a critical role in supporting and facilitating the board evaluation process. They provided timely access to information and ensured the confidentiality of the evaluation. They also actively participated in the training session conducted by our team and showed a willingness to implement our recommendations.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the board evaluation process was a success despite the challenges posed by the ongoing investigation. The evaluation provided valuable insights into the board′s functioning and identified specific areas for improvement. The company implemented our recommendations and showed demonstrable progress in addressing the gaps highlighted in the evaluation. It also helped restore trust and confidence in the board among shareholders and other stakeholders. This case study highlights the importance of maintaining objectivity and impartiality in board evaluations, even in situations where potential conflicts of interest may arise.
Our Board Evaluation Process and Board Corporate Governance Knowledge Base is the ultimate toolkit for any business professional seeking to optimize their board′s performance.
With 1587 prioritized requirements, solutions, benefits, results, and real-life case studies, our dataset provides unparalleled support for board evaluation and corporate governance.
We understand the urgency and scope of these tasks, which is why we have strategically curated the most important questions and solutions that will guarantee results.
Unlike other alternatives, our Board Evaluation Process and Board Corporate Governance Knowledge Base is designed specifically for professionals like you.
It is a one-of-a-kind product that offers a DIY/affordable alternative to costly consulting services.
With our product, you have direct access to all the knowledge and tools needed to effectively assess and improve your board′s performance.
Our dataset covers all aspects of corporate governance, making it the ideal resource for businesses of any size and industry.
It offers a detailed overview of board evaluation processes and best practices, giving you the confidence to make informed decisions for your organization.
Plus, our product is constantly updated with the latest research and developments in the field, ensuring that you stay ahead of the game.
But don′t just take our word for it - our satisfied clients have seen significant improvements in their board′s performance after implementing our Board Evaluation Process and Board Corporate Governance Knowledge Base.
And with its affordable cost, it′s a no-brainer investment that will provide long-lasting benefits for your organization.
Don′t settle for mediocre board evaluations and subpar corporate governance practices.
With our Board Evaluation Process and Board Corporate Governance Knowledge Base, you will unlock the full potential of your board and drive your business towards success.
Upgrade your evaluation process today and see the difference it makes in your organization.
Discover Insights, Make Informed Decisions, and Stay Ahead of the Curve:
Key Features:
Comprehensive set of 1587 prioritized Board Evaluation Process requirements. - Extensive coverage of 238 Board Evaluation Process topic scopes.
- In-depth analysis of 238 Board Evaluation Process step-by-step solutions, benefits, BHAGs.
- Detailed examination of 238 Board Evaluation Process case studies and use cases.
- Digital download upon purchase.
- Enjoy lifetime document updates included with your purchase.
- Benefit from a fully editable and customizable Excel format.
- Trusted and utilized by over 10,000 organizations.
- Covering: Remuneration Committee, Board Refreshment, Strategic Planning, Board Succession Planning Process, Disclosure And Transparency Policies, Board Succession Policies, Financial Oversight, Conflict Of Interest, Financial Reporting Controls, Board Independence Reporting, Executive Compensation Package, Corporate Social Responsibility Reports, Audit Effectiveness, Director Orientation, Board Committees Structure, Corporate Culture, Board Audit Committee, Board Assessment Tools, Corporate Governance Models, Stakeholder Engagement, Corporate Governance Review Process, Compensation Disclosure, Corporate Governance Reform, Board Strategy Oversight, Compensation Strategy, Compliance Oversight, Compensation Policies, Financial Reporting, Board Independence, Information Technology, Environmental Sustainability, Corporate Social Responsibility, Internal Audit Function, Board Performance, Conflict Of Interest Policies, Transparency And Disclosure Standards, Risk Management Checklist, Succession Planning Strategies, Environmental Sustainability Policies, Corporate Accountability, Leadership Skills, Board Diversity, Director Conflict Of Interest, Board Ethics, Risk Assessment Methods, Director Performance Expectations, Environmental Policies, Board Leadership, Board Renewal, Whistleblower Policy, Transparency Policies, Risk Assessment, Executive Compensation Oversight, Board Performance Indicators, Ethics And Integrity Training, Board Oversight Responsibilities, Board Succession Planning Criteria, Corporate Governance Compliance Review, Board Composition Standards, Board Independence Review, Board Diversity Goals, CEO Succession Planning, Collaboration Solutions, Board Information Sharing, Corporate Governance Principles, Financial Reporting Ethics, Director Independence, Board Training, Board Practices Review, Director Education, Board Composition, Equity Ownership, Confidentiality Policies, Independent Audit Committees, Governance Oversight, Sustainable Business Practices, Board Performance Improvement, Performance Evaluation, Corporate Sustainability Reporting, Regulatory Compliance, CEO Performance Metrics, Board Self Assessment, Audit Standards, Board Communication Strategies, Executive Compensation Plans, Board Disclosures, Ethics Training, Director Succession, Disclosure Requirements, Director Qualifications, Internal Audit Reports, Corporate Governance Policies, Board Risk Oversight, Board Responsibilities, Board Oversight Approach, Director Responsibilities, Director Development, Environmental Sustainability Goals, Directors Duties, Board Transparency, Expertise Requirements, Crisis Management Protocols, Transparency Standards, Board Structure Evaluation, Board Structure, Leadership Succession Planning, Board Performance Metrics, Director And Officer Liability Insurance, Board Evaluation Process, Board Performance Evaluation, Board Decision Making Processes, Website Governance, Shareholder Rights, Shareholder Engagement, Board Accountability, Executive Compensation, Governance Guidelines, Business Ethics, Board Diversity Strategy, Director Independence Standards, Director Nomination, Performance Based Compensation, Corporate Leadership, Board Evaluation, Director Selection Process, Decision Making Process, Board Decision Making, Corporate Fraud Prevention, Corporate Compliance Programs, Ethics Policy, Board Roles, Director Compensation, Board Oversight, Board Succession Planning, Board Diversity Standards, Corporate Sustainability Performance, Corporate Governance Framework, Audit Risk, Director Performance, Code Of Business Conduct, Shareholder Activism, SLA Metrics in ITSM, Corporate Integrity, Governance Training, Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives, Subsidiary Governance, Corporate Sustainability, Environmental Sustainability Standards, Director Liability, Code Of Conduct, Insider Trading, Corporate Reputation, Compensation Philosophy, Conflict Of Interest Policy, Financial Reporting Standards, Corporate Policies, Internal Controls, Board Performance Objectives, Shareholder Communication, COSO, Executive Compensation Framework, Risk Management Plan, Board Diversity Recruitment, Board Recruitment Strategies, Executive Board, Corporate Governance Code, Board Functioning, Diversity Committee, Director Independence Rules, Audit Scope, Director Expertise, Audit Rotation, Balanced Scorecard, Stakeholder Engagement Plans, Board Ethics Policies, Board Recruiting, Audit Transparency, Audit Committee Charter Review, Disclosure Controls And Procedures, Board Composition Evaluation, Board Dynamics, Enterprise Architecture Data Governance, Director Performance Metrics, Audit Compliance, Data Governance Legal Requirements, Board Activism, Risk Mitigation Planning, Board Risk Tolerance, Audit Procedures, Board Diversity Policies, Board Oversight Review, Socially Responsible Investing, Organizational Integrity, Board Best Practices, Board Remuneration, CEO Compensation Packages, Board Risk Appetite, Legal Responsibilities, Risk Assessment Framework, Board Transformation, Ethics Policies, Executive Leadership, Corporate Governance Processes, Director Compensation Plans, Director Education Programs, Board Governance Practices, Environmental Impact Policies, Risk Mitigation Strategies, Corporate Social Responsibility Goals, Board Conflicts Of Interest, Risk Management Framework, Corporate Governance Remuneration, Board Fiduciary Duty, Risk Management Policies, Board Effectiveness, Accounting Practices, Corporate Governance Compliance, Director Recruitment, Policy Development, CEO Succession, Code Of Conduct Review, Board Member Performance, Director Qualifications Requirements, Governance Structure, Board Communication, Corporate Governance Accountability, Corporate Governance Strategies, Leadership Qualities, Corporate Governance Effectiveness, Corporate Governance Guidelines, Corporate Governance Culture, , Board Meetings, Governance Assessment Tools, Board Meetings Agenda, Employee Relations, Investor Stewardship, Director Assessments
Board Evaluation Process Assessment Dataset - Utilization, Solutions, Advantages, BHAG (Big Hairy Audacious Goal):
Board Evaluation Process
The evaluation process ensures that board members and senior management have not been involved with any organization under an investigation.
1. Independent external review: Utilizing an unbiased third party to conduct a comprehensive evaluation can identify potential conflicts of interest.
2. Confidential surveys: Anonymous feedback from board members and senior management can reveal any concerns and areas for improvement.
3. Self-assessment: Board members and executives can reflect on their own performance and identify areas where they need to improve.
4. Performance metrics: Setting measurable goals and targets can provide a clear understanding of the board′s effectiveness and areas of improvement.
5. Training and development: Providing resources and education can enhance the skills and knowledge of board members, improving overall performance.
6. Rotating membership: Rotating board members on a regular basis can bring fresh perspectives and reduce the risk of entrenchment.
7. Diversity and inclusion: Having a diverse and inclusive board can bring different perspectives and promote effective decision-making.
8. Clear roles and responsibilities: Clearly defining the roles and responsibilities of board members can ensure accountability and prevent conflicts of interest.
9. Clear communication channels: Establishing open and transparent communication channels among board members can promote teamwork and trust.
10. Regular evaluations: Conducting regular evaluations can foster continuous improvement and enhance the overall effectiveness of the board.
CONTROL QUESTION: Has anybody on the board or in senior management been the subject of or been affiliated with the organization that has been under investigation?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
By 2030, our board evaluation process will have successfully identified and addressed any potential conflicts of interest or unethical behavior among members of the board or senior management. Our organization will have a reputation for top-notch corporate governance, with a track record of transparency and accountability. We will have adopted best practices for board evaluations, including regular external reviews and self-assessments, to continuously improve our decision-making processes and ensure the highest levels of integrity and effectiveness in guiding the organization towards its mission. Our board will consist of diverse, highly qualified and dedicated individuals who are committed to upholding the values and ethical standards of our organization. By setting the bar high for our board evaluation process, we will not only safeguard the reputation and success of our organization, but also serve as a model for other companies striving for excellence in corporate governance.
Customer Testimonials:
"I can`t believe I didn`t discover this dataset sooner. The prioritized recommendations are a game-changer for project planning. The level of detail and accuracy is unmatched. Highly recommended!"
"Kudos to the creators of this dataset! The prioritized recommendations are spot-on, and the ease of downloading and integrating it into my workflow is a huge plus. Five stars!"
"I can`t imagine going back to the days of making recommendations without this dataset. It`s an essential tool for anyone who wants to be successful in today`s data-driven world."
Board Evaluation Process Case Study/Use Case example - How to use:
Introduction:
In today′s corporate environment, board evaluations have become an essential tool for assessing the effectiveness of a company′s board of directors. It is considered a best practice to conduct regular board evaluations to ensure that the board is functioning optimally and meeting the expectations of shareholders and other stakeholders. However, conducting a thorough and unbiased board evaluation is not an easy task, especially when there are potential conflicts of interest involved. In this case study, we will examine a situation where members of the board or senior management have been subject to an investigation and how it impacted the board evaluation process.
Client Situation:
The client in this case study is a multinational company in the pharmaceutical industry. The company′s board of directors consists of ten members, including the CEO, two executive directors, and seven independent directors. Recently, the company had been under investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for potential accounting fraud and misrepresentation of financial statements. This investigation was triggered by a whistleblower complaint, which alleged that one of the executive directors and the CFO were involved in fraudulent activities to inflate the company′s financial performance.
As a result of the investigation, the company′s stock price had plummeted, and there was significant pressure from shareholders to replace the board members involved in the alleged misconduct. To address these concerns, the board decided to conduct a comprehensive board evaluation to assess its effectiveness and identify areas for improvement. However, given the ongoing investigation and potential conflicts of interest, the board faced several challenges in conducting a fair and unbiased evaluation.
Consulting Methodology:
To address the challenges faced by the client, our consulting firm proposed a comprehensive methodology that incorporated best practices from industry experts and academic research. The first step was to gather information on the board′s composition, roles, and responsibilities, and past performance through document review and interviews with the board members. We also conducted a separate interview with the whistleblowers to understand their concerns and allegations.
Based on the information gathered, we designed a questionnaire that covered various aspects of board performance, including strategy development, risk oversight, financial reporting, and board dynamics. The questionnaire was distributed to all board members to capture their individual responses and perceptions of the board′s functioning. To ensure confidentiality, the responses were collected anonymously and aggregated for analysis.
The next step was to conduct in-depth interviews with each individual board member to discuss their responses and gather additional insights. These interviews were conducted by our team of consultants who had significant experience in board evaluations and were trained in conducting unbiased and non-judgmental interviews. In addition, we also conducted a review of the company′s corporate governance policies and practices and benchmarked them against industry standards.
Deliverables:
The deliverables of this project included a comprehensive report that summarized the findings of the evaluation and provided recommendations for improving the board′s effectiveness. The report included a detailed analysis of the questionnaire responses, insights from the individual interviews, and benchmarking data. It also identified specific gaps in the board′s performance and provided actionable recommendations to address them.
Additionally, we also provided a presentation to the board that highlighted the key findings and recommendations. The presentation also included a discussion on best practices for addressing conflicts of interest and maintaining objectivity in board evaluations. Our team also conducted a training session for the board members on effective board governance practices and their roles and responsibilities in maintaining high standards of corporate governance.
Implementation Challenges:
The main challenge faced by our consulting firm was to maintain objectivity and impartiality in the board evaluation process given the ongoing investigation and potential conflicts of interest. We addressed this challenge by ensuring that the evaluation was conducted independently by our team of experienced consultants who had no prior affiliation with the company or its board members. In addition, we implemented strict confidentiality measures to protect the identity of the whistleblowers and prevent any leaks of sensitive information.
Another challenge was to obtain honest and candid responses from the board members, especially those who were under investigation or had affiliations with the company. To overcome this challenge, we emphasized the importance of honest and transparent feedback in improving board effectiveness and also assured confidentiality of individual responses.
KPIs:
The key performance indicators (KPIs) for this project included the completion of the evaluation process within the agreed timeline, the quality of insights and recommendations provided, and the satisfaction level of the client. We also tracked the implementation of our recommendations and any changes in the board′s composition or functioning following the evaluation.
Management Considerations:
The management of the company played a critical role in supporting and facilitating the board evaluation process. They provided timely access to information and ensured the confidentiality of the evaluation. They also actively participated in the training session conducted by our team and showed a willingness to implement our recommendations.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the board evaluation process was a success despite the challenges posed by the ongoing investigation. The evaluation provided valuable insights into the board′s functioning and identified specific areas for improvement. The company implemented our recommendations and showed demonstrable progress in addressing the gaps highlighted in the evaluation. It also helped restore trust and confidence in the board among shareholders and other stakeholders. This case study highlights the importance of maintaining objectivity and impartiality in board evaluations, even in situations where potential conflicts of interest may arise.
Security and Trust:
- Secure checkout with SSL encryption Visa, Mastercard, Apple Pay, Google Pay, Stripe, Paypal
- Money-back guarantee for 30 days
- Our team is available 24/7 to assist you - support@theartofservice.com
About the Authors: Unleashing Excellence: The Mastery of Service Accredited by the Scientific Community
Immerse yourself in the pinnacle of operational wisdom through The Art of Service`s Excellence, now distinguished with esteemed accreditation from the scientific community. With an impressive 1000+ citations, The Art of Service stands as a beacon of reliability and authority in the field.Our dedication to excellence is highlighted by meticulous scrutiny and validation from the scientific community, evidenced by the 1000+ citations spanning various disciplines. Each citation attests to the profound impact and scholarly recognition of The Art of Service`s contributions.
Embark on a journey of unparalleled expertise, fortified by a wealth of research and acknowledgment from scholars globally. Join the community that not only recognizes but endorses the brilliance encapsulated in The Art of Service`s Excellence. Enhance your understanding, strategy, and implementation with a resource acknowledged and embraced by the scientific community.
Embrace excellence. Embrace The Art of Service.
Your trust in us aligns you with prestigious company; boasting over 1000 academic citations, our work ranks in the top 1% of the most cited globally. Explore our scholarly contributions at: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=blokdyk
About The Art of Service:
Our clients seek confidence in making risk management and compliance decisions based on accurate data. However, navigating compliance can be complex, and sometimes, the unknowns are even more challenging.
We empathize with the frustrations of senior executives and business owners after decades in the industry. That`s why The Art of Service has developed Self-Assessment and implementation tools, trusted by over 100,000 professionals worldwide, empowering you to take control of your compliance assessments. With over 1000 academic citations, our work stands in the top 1% of the most cited globally, reflecting our commitment to helping businesses thrive.
Founders:
Gerard Blokdyk
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gerardblokdijk/
Ivanka Menken
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ivankamenken/
