Are you tired of wasting time and resources on developing software without getting the results you want? Say goodbye to those frustrations with our Capitalized Software in Software Development Knowledge Base!
This comprehensive dataset includes 1598 prioritized requirements, solutions, benefits, results, and case studies/use cases for Capitalized Software in Software Development.
It is designed to guide professionals in the software development industry by providing the most important questions to ask based on urgency and scope.
Not only does this dataset offer a vast amount of information, but it also stands out from competitors and alternatives.
Our Capitalized Software in Software Development Knowledge Base is specifically tailored for businesses and professionals looking for a cost-effective and efficient solution to their software development needs.
With its easy-to-use interface and detailed overview of product specifications, our dataset is perfect for both beginners and experienced developers.
Whether you are looking for a DIY/affordable alternative or a specific product type, we have you covered.
But don′t just take our word for it – extensive research has been conducted on Capitalized Software in Software Development, and the results are clear.
It is the go-to resource for businesses and professionals alike, offering countless benefits such as increased productivity, improved efficiency, and higher quality results.
Plus, with our product, you won′t have to worry about the usual drawbacks of software development – our Capitalized Software in Software Development Knowledge Base lays out all the pros and cons for you to easily navigate.
So what are you waiting for? Take your software development game to the next level with our Capitalized Software in Software Development Knowledge Base.
Say goodbye to frustration and hello to success.
Get yours today!
Are capitalized software development costs limited to costs incurred after steps have been taken?
Capitalized Software
Yes, capitalized software development costs are limited to costs incurred after steps have been taken, such as coding and testing.
1. YES, ONLY COSTS INCURRED AFTER INITIAL PRODUCT CODING ARE CONSIDERED CAPITALIZED SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT COSTS.
-Clarity for calculating and reporting capitalized software development costs.
2. YES, ANY COSTS THAT CAN BE ALLOCATED TO A SPECIFIC SOFTWARE PRODUCT CAN BE CAPITALIZED.
-Allows for more accurate allocation of costs to specific software products.
3. NO, ONLY DIRECT MATERIAL AND LABOR COSTS ARE CONSIDERED IN CAPITALIZING SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT.
-Simplifies the calculation process and reduces potential errors.
4. YES, COSTS RELATED TO IMPROVING EXISTING SOFTWARE CAN BE CAPITALIZED UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES.
-Encourages continuous improvement and innovation of existing software.
5. NO, INTEREST EXPENSES ON BORROWED FUNDS CANNOT BE CAPITALIZED AS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT COSTS.
-Promotes accurate financial reporting and prevents misrepresentation of software development costs.
6. YES, CAPITALIZED SOFTWARE COSTS CAN BE AMORTIZED OVER THE ASSET′S USEFUL LIFE.
-Allows for more consistent and accurate allocation of costs over time.
7. YES, CAPITALIZED SOFTWARE COSTS ARE SUBJECT TO REGULAR REVIEW FOR IMPAIRMENT.
-Ensures that the value of capitalized software remains accurate and reflects its actual worth.
8. NO, RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT COSTS CANNOT BE CAPITALIZED UNDER US GAAP STANDARDS.
-Prevents misclassification of costs and maintains consistency with accounting standards.
9. YES, CAPITALIZED SOFTWARE COSTS SHOULD BE REPORTED SEPARATELY FROM OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS.
-Provides transparency and allows for better analysis of the company′s investments in software development.
10. YES, CAPITALIZED SOFTWARE COSTS CAN BE USED TO SUPPORT R&D TAX CREDITS.
-Incentivizes companies to invest in software development by providing tax benefits.
CONTROL QUESTION: Are capitalized software development costs limited to costs incurred after steps have been taken?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
Yes, capitalized software development costs are limited to costs incurred after steps have been taken.
"I`m thoroughly impressed with the level of detail in this dataset. The prioritized recommendations are incredibly useful, and the user-friendly interface makes it easy to navigate. A solid investment!"
Introduction:
Capitalized software development costs refer to the expenses incurred by a company in developing or obtaining software for internal use or for sale. These costs are recognized as a capital asset and amortized over its estimated useful life. The main objective of capitalizing software costs is to match the cost of software with the revenue it generates, rather than expensing it immediately. However, there has been debate on whether capitalized software development costs should be limited to costs incurred only after specific steps have been taken in the software development process. In this case study, we will examine the situation of a client facing this issue and provide recommendations based on consulting methodologies and industry best practices.
Client Situation:
The client, a mid-sized technology company, was in the process of developing a new software product to strengthen its presence in the market. The company had been expensing all software development costs for its previous products, but due to the significant investment required for this new product, they were considering capitalizing the costs. However, there was a lack of clarity within the organization regarding the capitalization criteria for software development costs. Some stakeholders argued that only costs incurred after a certain milestone or step in the development process should be capitalized, while others believed that all costs related to the project should be capitalized.
Consulting Methodology:
To address the client′s situation, our consulting team adopted a three-step methodology:
1. Analyze the current accounting practices: The first step was to thoroughly analyze the client′s current accounting practices for software development costs. We reviewed the company′s financial statements, project plans, and discussed with key employees involved in the software development process.
2. Benchmark against industry standards: The second step involved benchmarking the client′s practices against industry standards and regulatory requirements. We reviewed relevant accounting standards, such as ASC 350-40 (formerly FASB Statement No. 86), which provides guidance on the accounting treatment for software development costs.
3. Develop a capitalization policy and implementation plan: Based on our analysis, we developed a capitalization policy that clearly defined the criteria for capitalizing software development costs. We also developed an implementation plan to ensure the policy was effectively communicated and implemented within the organization.
Deliverables:
Our consulting team delivered the following key deliverables to the client:
1. A detailed analysis of the client′s current accounting practices for software development costs, highlighting areas for improvement.
2. A benchmark report comparing the client′s practices with industry standards and best practices.
3. A comprehensive capitalization policy that provided clear guidelines on when and how to capitalize software development costs.
4. An implementation plan to ensure the successful adoption of the new policy within the organization.
Implementation Challenges:
The main challenge faced during the implementation of the new policy was the resistance from some stakeholders who were accustomed to expensing all software development costs. There was also a lack of understanding among employees regarding the rationale behind capitalizing software costs and the impact it would have on the company′s financial statements. To overcome these challenges, we conducted training sessions and informational workshops to educate employees on the benefits of capitalizing software development costs and the importance of following the new policy.
KPIs and Other Management Considerations:
To measure the success of our intervention, we identified the following key performance indicators (KPIs):
1. Percentage of software development costs capitalized: This KPI measures the proportion of software development costs capitalized under the new policy.
2. Compliance with accounting standards: We monitored the compliance of the company′s financial statements with relevant accounting standards, such as ASC 350-40.
3. Impact on financial statements: We assessed the impact of capitalizing software development costs on the company′s financial statements, specifically on its profitability and cash flow.
In addition, we recommended that the company conduct regular reviews of its capitalization policy to ensure it remained in line with changing accounting standards and business needs. We also recommended establishing a cross-functional team to monitor and review the capitalization process to ensure consistency and accuracy.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, our analysis and recommendations helped the client establish a clear and consistent policy for capitalizing software development costs. The company successfully adopted the new policy, resulting in improved accuracy and consistency in its financial statements. The implementation of the policy also led to a better alignment of costs with revenue, providing a more accurate representation of the company′s financial performance. By following industry best practices and regulatory requirements, the client was able to effectively manage its software development costs while remaining compliant with accounting standards.
This comprehensive dataset includes 1598 prioritized requirements, solutions, benefits, results, and case studies/use cases for Capitalized Software in Software Development.
It is designed to guide professionals in the software development industry by providing the most important questions to ask based on urgency and scope.
Not only does this dataset offer a vast amount of information, but it also stands out from competitors and alternatives.
Our Capitalized Software in Software Development Knowledge Base is specifically tailored for businesses and professionals looking for a cost-effective and efficient solution to their software development needs.
With its easy-to-use interface and detailed overview of product specifications, our dataset is perfect for both beginners and experienced developers.
Whether you are looking for a DIY/affordable alternative or a specific product type, we have you covered.
But don′t just take our word for it – extensive research has been conducted on Capitalized Software in Software Development, and the results are clear.
It is the go-to resource for businesses and professionals alike, offering countless benefits such as increased productivity, improved efficiency, and higher quality results.
Plus, with our product, you won′t have to worry about the usual drawbacks of software development – our Capitalized Software in Software Development Knowledge Base lays out all the pros and cons for you to easily navigate.
So what are you waiting for? Take your software development game to the next level with our Capitalized Software in Software Development Knowledge Base.
Say goodbye to frustration and hello to success.
Get yours today!
Discover Insights, Make Informed Decisions, and Stay Ahead of the Curve:
Key Features:
Comprehensive set of 1598 prioritized Capitalized Software requirements. - Extensive coverage of 349 Capitalized Software topic scopes.
- In-depth analysis of 349 Capitalized Software step-by-step solutions, benefits, BHAGs.
- Detailed examination of 349 Capitalized Software case studies and use cases.
- Digital download upon purchase.
- Enjoy lifetime document updates included with your purchase.
- Benefit from a fully editable and customizable Excel format.
- Trusted and utilized by over 10,000 organizations.
- Covering: Agile Software Development Quality Assurance, Exception Handling, Individual And Team Development, Order Tracking, Compliance Maturity Model, Customer Experience Metrics, Lessons Learned, Sprint Planning, Quality Assurance Standards, Agile Team Roles, Software Testing Frameworks, Backend Development, Identity Management, Software Contracts, Database Query Optimization, Service Discovery, Code Optimization, System Testing, Machine Learning Algorithms, Model-Based Testing, Big Data Platforms, Data Analytics Tools, Org Chart, Software retirement, Continuous Deployment, Cloud Cost Management, Software Security, Infrastructure Development, Machine Learning, Data Warehousing, AI Certification, Organizational Structure, Team Empowerment, Cost Optimization Strategies, Container Orchestration, Waterfall Methodology, Problem Investigation, Billing Analysis, Mobile App Development, Integration Challenges, Strategy Development, Cost Analysis, User Experience Design, Project Scope Management, Data Visualization Tools, CMMi Level 3, Code Reviews, Big Data Analytics, CMS Development, Market Share Growth, Agile Thinking, Commerce Development, Data Replication, Smart Devices, Kanban Practices, Shopping Cart Integration, API Design, Availability Management, Process Maturity Assessment, Code Quality, Software Project Estimation, Augmented Reality Applications, User Interface Prototyping, Web Services, Functional Programming, Native App Development, Change Evaluation, Memory Management, Product Experiment Results, Project Budgeting, File Naming Conventions, Stakeholder Trust, Authorization Techniques, Code Collaboration Tools, Root Cause Analysis, DevOps Culture, Server Issues, Software Adoption, Facility Consolidation, Unit Testing, System Monitoring, Model Based Development, Computer Vision, Code Review, Data Protection Policy, Release Scope, Error Monitoring, Vulnerability Management, User Testing, Debugging Techniques, Testing Processes, Indexing Techniques, Deep Learning Applications, Supervised Learning, Development Team, Predictive Modeling, Split Testing, User Complaints, Taxonomy Development, Privacy Concerns, Story Point Estimation, Algorithmic Transparency, User-Centered Development, Secure Coding Practices, Agile Values, Integration Platforms, ISO 27001 software, API Gateways, Cross Platform Development, Application Development, UX/UI Design, Gaming Development, Change Review Period, Microsoft Azure, Disaster Recovery, Speech Recognition, Certified Research Administrator, User Acceptance Testing, Technical Debt Management, Data Encryption, Agile Methodologies, Data Visualization, Service Oriented Architecture, Responsive Web Design, Release Status, Quality Inspection, Software Maintenance, Augmented Reality User Interfaces, IT Security, Software Delivery, Interactive Voice Response, Agile Scrum Master, Benchmarking Progress, Software Design Patterns, Production Environment, Configuration Management, Client Requirements Gathering, Data Backup, Data Persistence, Cloud Cost Optimization, Cloud Security, Employee Development, Software Upgrades, API Lifecycle Management, Positive Reinforcement, Measuring Progress, Security Auditing, Virtualization Testing, Database Mirroring, Control System Automotive Control, NoSQL Databases, Partnership Development, Data-driven Development, Infrastructure Automation, Software Company, Database Replication, Agile Coaches, Project Status Reporting, GDPR Compliance, Lean Leadership, Release Notification, Material Design, Continuous Delivery, End To End Process Integration, Focused Technology, Access Control, Peer Programming, Software Development Process, Bug Tracking, Agile Project Management, DevOps Monitoring, Configuration Policies, Top Companies, User Feedback Analysis, Development Environments, Response Time, Embedded Systems, Lean Management, Six Sigma, Continuous improvement Introduction, Web Content Management Systems, Web application development, Failover Strategies, Microservices Deployment, Control System Engineering, Real Time Alerts, Agile Coaching, Top Risk Areas, Regression Testing, Distributed Teams, Agile Outsourcing, Software Architecture, Software Applications, Retrospective Techniques, Efficient money, Single Sign On, Build Automation, User Interface Design, Resistance Strategies, Indirect Labor, Efficiency Benchmarking, Continuous Integration, Customer Satisfaction, Natural Language Processing, Releases Synchronization, DevOps Automation, Legacy Systems, User Acceptance Criteria, Feature Backlog, Supplier Compliance, Stakeholder Management, Leadership Skills, Vendor Tracking, Coding Challenges, Average Order, Version Control Systems, Agile Quality, Component Based Development, Natural Language Processing Applications, Cloud Computing, User Management, Servant Leadership, High Availability, Code Performance, Database Backup And Recovery, Web Scraping, Network Security, Source Code Management, New Development, ERP Development Software, Load Testing, Adaptive Systems, Security Threat Modeling, Information Technology, Social Media Integration, Technology Strategies, Privacy Protection, Fault Tolerance, Internet Of Things, IT Infrastructure Recovery, Disaster Mitigation, Pair Programming, Machine Learning Applications, Agile Principles, Communication Tools, Authentication Methods, Microservices Architecture, Event Driven Architecture, Java Development, Full Stack Development, Artificial Intelligence Ethics, Requirements Prioritization, Problem Coordination, Load Balancing Strategies, Data Privacy Regulations, Emerging Technologies, Key Value Databases, Use Case Scenarios, Software development models, Lean Budgeting, User Training, Artificial Neural Networks, Software Development DevOps, SEO Optimization, Penetration Testing, Agile Estimation, Database Management, Storytelling, Project Management Tools, Deployment Strategies, Data Exchange, Project Risk Management, Staffing Considerations, Knowledge Transfer, Tool Qualification, Code Documentation, Vulnerability Scanning, Risk Assessment, Acceptance Testing, Retrospective Meeting, JavaScript Frameworks, Team Collaboration, Product Owner, Custom AI, Code Versioning, Stream Processing, Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality Applications, Permission Levels, Backup And Restore, Frontend Frameworks, Safety lifecycle, Code Standards, Systems Review, Automation Testing, Deployment Scripts, Software Flexibility, RESTful Architecture, Virtual Reality, Capitalized Software, Iterative Product Development, Communication Plans, Scrum Development, Lean Thinking, Deep Learning, User Stories, Artificial Intelligence, Continuous Professional Development, Customer Data Protection, Cloud Functions, Software Development, Timely Delivery, Product Backlog Grooming, Hybrid App Development, Bias In AI, Project Management Software, Payment Gateways, Prescriptive Analytics, Corporate Security, Process Optimization, Customer Centered Approach, Mixed Reality, API Integration, Scrum Master, Data Security, Infrastructure As Code, Deployment Checklist, Web Technologies, Load Balancing, Agile Frameworks, Object Oriented Programming, Release Management, Database Sharding, Microservices Communication, Messaging Systems, Best Practices, Software Testing, Software Configuration, Resource Management, Change And Release Management, Product Experimentation, Performance Monitoring, DevOps, ISO 26262, Data Protection, Workforce Development, Productivity Techniques, Amazon Web Services, Potential Hires, Mutual Cooperation, Conflict Resolution
Capitalized Software Assessment Dataset - Utilization, Solutions, Advantages, BHAG (Big Hairy Audacious Goal):
Capitalized Software
Yes, capitalized software development costs are limited to costs incurred after steps have been taken, such as coding and testing.
1. YES, ONLY COSTS INCURRED AFTER INITIAL PRODUCT CODING ARE CONSIDERED CAPITALIZED SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT COSTS.
-Clarity for calculating and reporting capitalized software development costs.
2. YES, ANY COSTS THAT CAN BE ALLOCATED TO A SPECIFIC SOFTWARE PRODUCT CAN BE CAPITALIZED.
-Allows for more accurate allocation of costs to specific software products.
3. NO, ONLY DIRECT MATERIAL AND LABOR COSTS ARE CONSIDERED IN CAPITALIZING SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT.
-Simplifies the calculation process and reduces potential errors.
4. YES, COSTS RELATED TO IMPROVING EXISTING SOFTWARE CAN BE CAPITALIZED UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES.
-Encourages continuous improvement and innovation of existing software.
5. NO, INTEREST EXPENSES ON BORROWED FUNDS CANNOT BE CAPITALIZED AS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT COSTS.
-Promotes accurate financial reporting and prevents misrepresentation of software development costs.
6. YES, CAPITALIZED SOFTWARE COSTS CAN BE AMORTIZED OVER THE ASSET′S USEFUL LIFE.
-Allows for more consistent and accurate allocation of costs over time.
7. YES, CAPITALIZED SOFTWARE COSTS ARE SUBJECT TO REGULAR REVIEW FOR IMPAIRMENT.
-Ensures that the value of capitalized software remains accurate and reflects its actual worth.
8. NO, RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT COSTS CANNOT BE CAPITALIZED UNDER US GAAP STANDARDS.
-Prevents misclassification of costs and maintains consistency with accounting standards.
9. YES, CAPITALIZED SOFTWARE COSTS SHOULD BE REPORTED SEPARATELY FROM OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS.
-Provides transparency and allows for better analysis of the company′s investments in software development.
10. YES, CAPITALIZED SOFTWARE COSTS CAN BE USED TO SUPPORT R&D TAX CREDITS.
-Incentivizes companies to invest in software development by providing tax benefits.
CONTROL QUESTION: Are capitalized software development costs limited to costs incurred after steps have been taken?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
Yes, capitalized software development costs are limited to costs incurred after steps have been taken.
Customer Testimonials:
"I`m thoroughly impressed with the level of detail in this dataset. The prioritized recommendations are incredibly useful, and the user-friendly interface makes it easy to navigate. A solid investment!"
"As someone who relies heavily on data for decision-making, this dataset has become my go-to resource. The prioritized recommendations are insightful, and the overall quality of the data is exceptional. Bravo!"
"The variety of prioritization methods offered is fantastic. I can tailor the recommendations to my specific needs and goals, which gives me a huge advantage."
Capitalized Software Case Study/Use Case example - How to use:
Introduction:
Capitalized software development costs refer to the expenses incurred by a company in developing or obtaining software for internal use or for sale. These costs are recognized as a capital asset and amortized over its estimated useful life. The main objective of capitalizing software costs is to match the cost of software with the revenue it generates, rather than expensing it immediately. However, there has been debate on whether capitalized software development costs should be limited to costs incurred only after specific steps have been taken in the software development process. In this case study, we will examine the situation of a client facing this issue and provide recommendations based on consulting methodologies and industry best practices.
Client Situation:
The client, a mid-sized technology company, was in the process of developing a new software product to strengthen its presence in the market. The company had been expensing all software development costs for its previous products, but due to the significant investment required for this new product, they were considering capitalizing the costs. However, there was a lack of clarity within the organization regarding the capitalization criteria for software development costs. Some stakeholders argued that only costs incurred after a certain milestone or step in the development process should be capitalized, while others believed that all costs related to the project should be capitalized.
Consulting Methodology:
To address the client′s situation, our consulting team adopted a three-step methodology:
1. Analyze the current accounting practices: The first step was to thoroughly analyze the client′s current accounting practices for software development costs. We reviewed the company′s financial statements, project plans, and discussed with key employees involved in the software development process.
2. Benchmark against industry standards: The second step involved benchmarking the client′s practices against industry standards and regulatory requirements. We reviewed relevant accounting standards, such as ASC 350-40 (formerly FASB Statement No. 86), which provides guidance on the accounting treatment for software development costs.
3. Develop a capitalization policy and implementation plan: Based on our analysis, we developed a capitalization policy that clearly defined the criteria for capitalizing software development costs. We also developed an implementation plan to ensure the policy was effectively communicated and implemented within the organization.
Deliverables:
Our consulting team delivered the following key deliverables to the client:
1. A detailed analysis of the client′s current accounting practices for software development costs, highlighting areas for improvement.
2. A benchmark report comparing the client′s practices with industry standards and best practices.
3. A comprehensive capitalization policy that provided clear guidelines on when and how to capitalize software development costs.
4. An implementation plan to ensure the successful adoption of the new policy within the organization.
Implementation Challenges:
The main challenge faced during the implementation of the new policy was the resistance from some stakeholders who were accustomed to expensing all software development costs. There was also a lack of understanding among employees regarding the rationale behind capitalizing software costs and the impact it would have on the company′s financial statements. To overcome these challenges, we conducted training sessions and informational workshops to educate employees on the benefits of capitalizing software development costs and the importance of following the new policy.
KPIs and Other Management Considerations:
To measure the success of our intervention, we identified the following key performance indicators (KPIs):
1. Percentage of software development costs capitalized: This KPI measures the proportion of software development costs capitalized under the new policy.
2. Compliance with accounting standards: We monitored the compliance of the company′s financial statements with relevant accounting standards, such as ASC 350-40.
3. Impact on financial statements: We assessed the impact of capitalizing software development costs on the company′s financial statements, specifically on its profitability and cash flow.
In addition, we recommended that the company conduct regular reviews of its capitalization policy to ensure it remained in line with changing accounting standards and business needs. We also recommended establishing a cross-functional team to monitor and review the capitalization process to ensure consistency and accuracy.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, our analysis and recommendations helped the client establish a clear and consistent policy for capitalizing software development costs. The company successfully adopted the new policy, resulting in improved accuracy and consistency in its financial statements. The implementation of the policy also led to a better alignment of costs with revenue, providing a more accurate representation of the company′s financial performance. By following industry best practices and regulatory requirements, the client was able to effectively manage its software development costs while remaining compliant with accounting standards.
Security and Trust:
- Secure checkout with SSL encryption Visa, Mastercard, Apple Pay, Google Pay, Stripe, Paypal
- Money-back guarantee for 30 days
- Our team is available 24/7 to assist you - support@theartofservice.com
About the Authors: Unleashing Excellence: The Mastery of Service Accredited by the Scientific Community
Immerse yourself in the pinnacle of operational wisdom through The Art of Service`s Excellence, now distinguished with esteemed accreditation from the scientific community. With an impressive 1000+ citations, The Art of Service stands as a beacon of reliability and authority in the field.Our dedication to excellence is highlighted by meticulous scrutiny and validation from the scientific community, evidenced by the 1000+ citations spanning various disciplines. Each citation attests to the profound impact and scholarly recognition of The Art of Service`s contributions.
Embark on a journey of unparalleled expertise, fortified by a wealth of research and acknowledgment from scholars globally. Join the community that not only recognizes but endorses the brilliance encapsulated in The Art of Service`s Excellence. Enhance your understanding, strategy, and implementation with a resource acknowledged and embraced by the scientific community.
Embrace excellence. Embrace The Art of Service.
Your trust in us aligns you with prestigious company; boasting over 1000 academic citations, our work ranks in the top 1% of the most cited globally. Explore our scholarly contributions at: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=blokdyk
About The Art of Service:
Our clients seek confidence in making risk management and compliance decisions based on accurate data. However, navigating compliance can be complex, and sometimes, the unknowns are even more challenging.
We empathize with the frustrations of senior executives and business owners after decades in the industry. That`s why The Art of Service has developed Self-Assessment and implementation tools, trusted by over 100,000 professionals worldwide, empowering you to take control of your compliance assessments. With over 1000 academic citations, our work stands in the top 1% of the most cited globally, reflecting our commitment to helping businesses thrive.
Founders:
Gerard Blokdyk
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gerardblokdijk/
Ivanka Menken
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ivankamenken/
