Are you a procurement professional or a business owner facing contractual disputes? Do you often find yourself struggling to prioritize and effectively address these issues? Look no further, because our Contractual Disputes and Procurement Strategy Knowledge Base is here to help.
Our dataset includes the most important questions to ask in order to get timely and effective results for your contractual disputes, based on urgency and scope.
With over 1585 prioritized requirements, solutions, benefits, and real-world case studies, this Knowledge Base is a comprehensive and valuable resource for professionals like yourself.
But what sets our Contractual Disputes and Procurement Strategy dataset apart from competitors and alternative solutions? It provides a thorough and well-researched overview of the subject, making it an unmatched product for professionals in the field.
Its easy-to-use format allows you to quickly access the information you need without wasting time sifting through irrelevant data.
Not only is our dataset a top choice for businesses looking to resolve contractual disputes, but it is also an affordable and DIY alternative to expensive consulting services.
Our product detail and specification overview give you a clear understanding of its contents and how it can benefit you and your company.
Don′t waste any more time and money on inadequate solutions.
Invest in our Contractual Disputes and Procurement Strategy Knowledge Base that offers everything you need to know about effectively handling contractual disputes.
Not only will it save you costs in the long run, but it will also provide you with invaluable knowledge and insight into the subject.
Take advantage of our product′s superior research and organization to minimize the risks and consequences of contractual disputes for your business.
Our dataset is designed specifically for businesses and professionals like you who value efficiency and effectiveness.
But don′t just take our word for it, try our Contractual Disputes and Procurement Strategy Knowledge Base for yourself and experience its benefits firsthand.
You won′t find a more comprehensive and useful tool anywhere else.
Don′t let contractual disputes slow down your business and drain your resources.
Invest in our Contractual Disputes and Procurement Strategy Knowledge Base today and see the positive impact it can have on your operations.
With our product, you can confidently navigate through any contractual dispute and come out on top.
Don′t wait, get your copy now!
Have all outstanding contractual, legal or other disputes between your organization and the external supplier been resolved? Does your organization have any current or ongoing legal or contractual disputes? Has management granted annual leave outside the parameters of the local agreement to employees who should have been used as auxiliary assistance?
Contractual Disputes
Contractual disputes refer to conflicts or disagreements between an organization and an external supplier regarding their contractual agreement. These disputes can include legal issues, breach of contract, or other disagreements that need to be resolved in order for both parties to fulfill their obligations under the contract.
1. Contractual agreements and terms should be clearly defined and agreed upon to avoid disputes.
2. Seeking legal advice before signing contracts can help identify potential issues and mitigate risk.
3. Regular communication and collaboration with suppliers can help prevent misunderstandings and conflicts.
4. Incorporating dispute resolution mechanisms in contracts, such as mediation or arbitration, can help resolve issues quickly and fairly.
5. Maintaining thorough records of all communications and transactions with suppliers can serve as evidence in case of any disputes.
Benefits:
1. Clear contractual agreements provide a solid foundation for a successful buyer-supplier relationship.
2. Legal advice helps protect the organization′s interests and minimize financial losses.
3. Strong communication and collaboration improve trust and promote a positive working relationship.
4. Dispute resolution mechanisms can save time and expenses compared to lengthy legal battles.
5. Detailed records support the organization′s position and strengthen its case in disputes.
CONTROL QUESTION: Have all outstanding contractual, legal or other disputes between the organization and the external supplier been resolved?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
In 10 years, our organization aims to have completely eliminated all outstanding contractual, legal, and other disputes with our external suppliers. We will achieve this by creating a culture of open communication and collaboration with our suppliers, focusing on building strong relationships based on trust and mutual benefit. We will implement efficient and effective dispute resolution strategies, such as mediation and arbitration, to swiftly resolve any issues that may arise. This goal will not only save time and resources but also positively impact our reputation in the industry, leading to increased partnerships and growth opportunities. Our commitment to resolving disputes fairly and amicably will set us apart as a leader in ethical business practices and solidify our position as a top-choice supplier for all our partners.
"This dataset has helped me break out of my rut and be more creative with my recommendations. I`m impressed with how much it has boosted my confidence."
Case Study: Resolving Contractual Disputes between Organization and External Supplier
Executive Summary:
In the increasingly competitive business landscape, organizations rely heavily on external suppliers to provide goods and services. These partnerships are established through legally binding contracts that outline the terms and conditions of the relationship. However, as with any business relationship, disputes can arise between organizations and their external suppliers. These disputes can disrupt operations, cause financial losses, and damage the reputation of both parties involved. Therefore, it is crucial for organizations to have effective mechanisms in place to resolve contractual disputes in a timely and efficient manner.
The client, ABC Corporation, is a multinational manufacturing company that sources raw materials from various external suppliers. Over the years, the company has faced several contractual disputes with its suppliers, resulting in significant financial losses and damaged relationships. As a result, the company sought the assistance of our consulting firm to assess the current state of dispute resolution within the organization and to help implement a more effective process for resolving future disputes.
Consulting Methodology:
The consulting team conducted a thorough analysis of the existing contractual dispute resolution process at ABC Corporation. This included reviewing past disputes, examining the contract management procedures, analyzing internal communication channels, and evaluating the resources available for dispute resolution. Additionally, the team conducted interviews with key stakeholders, both within the organization and its external suppliers, to gather insights and perspectives on the current process.
Based on the findings, the team devised a comprehensive framework for resolving contractual disputes. The framework includes five key stages:
1. Early identification and prevention: The first step in dispute resolution is early identification and prevention. This involves regular contract reviews, establishing clear communication channels, and setting expectations for both parties involved.
2. Negotiation: If a dispute does arise, negotiation is the first step towards resolution. This stage involves open and transparent communication between the two parties to reach a mutually satisfactory outcome.
3. Mediation: In cases where negotiation fails, mediation allows for a neutral third party to facilitate and guide the dialogue between the two parties in dispute. The aim is to reach a resolution without resorting to legal action.
4. Arbitration: If mediation is unsuccessful, the next step is binding arbitration. This involves a more formal process, where an independent arbitrator reviews the evidence presented by both parties and makes a final decision on the resolution of the dispute.
5. Litigation: As a last resort, litigation involves taking the dispute to court. This can be a lengthy and costly process, and should only be used when all other methods have failed.
Deliverables:
The consulting team provided ABC Corporation with a detailed report of their findings, which included an assessment of the current dispute resolution process and recommendations for improvement. The report also included a step-by-step guide on how to implement the new framework, along with templates for contract management and dispute resolution documentation.
Additionally, the team conducted training sessions for key personnel within the organization on the new framework, emphasizing the importance of early identification and prevention of disputes, effective communication, and the use of alternative methods such as mediation and arbitration.
Implementation Challenges:
One of the primary challenges faced during the implementation of the new framework was resistance from some external suppliers. Many of them were used to the previous dispute resolution process and were hesitant to adapt to the new approach. To address this, the consulting team held one-on-one meetings with the suppliers, explaining the benefits of the new process and addressing any concerns they may have had.
Another challenge was ensuring all employees within the organization were aware of the new process and understood their roles and responsibilities in its implementation. To overcome this, the team worked closely with the HR department to integrate the new framework into the company′s training and onboarding processes.
KPIs and Management Considerations:
To measure the success of the new framework, KPIs were established, including the number of disputes resolved within a specific timeframe, the cost of dispute resolution, and the satisfaction of both parties with the outcome. These KPIs were regularly monitored and reported to senior management, highlighting any areas for improvement.
Management was also involved in the implementation process, providing support and guidance to employees, and ensuring all necessary resources were allocated for the smooth implementation of the new framework. Regular communication between management and the consulting team was maintained to address any challenges or concerns as they arose.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the new framework successfully transformed ABC Corporation′s contractual dispute resolution process. By emphasizing the importance of early identification and prevention of disputes and promoting alternative methods such as mediation, the company has been able to resolve conflicts more efficiently and effectively. This has not only reduced financial losses and improved relationships with external suppliers but has also strengthened the company′s overall reputation in the market.
References:
1. Watkins, M., & Rosegrant, S. (2018). Contract Dispute Resolution: Current Trends and Challenges. Whitepaper. Retrieved from https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/dispute_resolution/resources/2018_new_trends_and_challenges_in_contract_dispute_resolution.pdf.
2. Landler, M., & Tatum, J. R. (2015). A New Framework for Managing Contract Risk. McKinsey & Company. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/operations/our-insights/a-new-framework-for-managing-contract-risk.
3. Blackaby, N. (2019). Contractual Dispute Resolution: A Guide to Effective Tactics and Strategies. International Construction Law Review, 36(1), 39-58.
Our dataset includes the most important questions to ask in order to get timely and effective results for your contractual disputes, based on urgency and scope.
With over 1585 prioritized requirements, solutions, benefits, and real-world case studies, this Knowledge Base is a comprehensive and valuable resource for professionals like yourself.
But what sets our Contractual Disputes and Procurement Strategy dataset apart from competitors and alternative solutions? It provides a thorough and well-researched overview of the subject, making it an unmatched product for professionals in the field.
Its easy-to-use format allows you to quickly access the information you need without wasting time sifting through irrelevant data.
Not only is our dataset a top choice for businesses looking to resolve contractual disputes, but it is also an affordable and DIY alternative to expensive consulting services.
Our product detail and specification overview give you a clear understanding of its contents and how it can benefit you and your company.
Don′t waste any more time and money on inadequate solutions.
Invest in our Contractual Disputes and Procurement Strategy Knowledge Base that offers everything you need to know about effectively handling contractual disputes.
Not only will it save you costs in the long run, but it will also provide you with invaluable knowledge and insight into the subject.
Take advantage of our product′s superior research and organization to minimize the risks and consequences of contractual disputes for your business.
Our dataset is designed specifically for businesses and professionals like you who value efficiency and effectiveness.
But don′t just take our word for it, try our Contractual Disputes and Procurement Strategy Knowledge Base for yourself and experience its benefits firsthand.
You won′t find a more comprehensive and useful tool anywhere else.
Don′t let contractual disputes slow down your business and drain your resources.
Invest in our Contractual Disputes and Procurement Strategy Knowledge Base today and see the positive impact it can have on your operations.
With our product, you can confidently navigate through any contractual dispute and come out on top.
Don′t wait, get your copy now!
Discover Insights, Make Informed Decisions, and Stay Ahead of the Curve:
Key Features:
Comprehensive set of 1585 prioritized Contractual Disputes requirements. - Extensive coverage of 235 Contractual Disputes topic scopes.
- In-depth analysis of 235 Contractual Disputes step-by-step solutions, benefits, BHAGs.
- Detailed examination of 235 Contractual Disputes case studies and use cases.
- Digital download upon purchase.
- Enjoy lifetime document updates included with your purchase.
- Benefit from a fully editable and customizable Excel format.
- Trusted and utilized by over 10,000 organizations.
- Covering: Government Procurement, Efficient Workforce, Business Process Redesign, Supply Chain Security, Stakeholder Management, Local Government IT Strategy, Procurement Process, Site Interpretation, Collaborative Relationships, Market Trends, Responsible Sourcing, Brand Reputation, Procurement Standards, Spend Management Software, Repeat Purchases, Transportation Management, Asset Life, Procurement Communication, Procurement Goals, Demand Management, Operational Excellence Strategy, Procurement Systems, Process Improvements, Contract Oversight, Project Management For Procurement, Procure To Pay Process, Cost Savings, Sourcing Policies, Indirect Procurement, Sourcing Strategies, Total Cost Of Ownership, Payment Terms, Procurement Strategies, Sustainable Sourcing, Root Cause Analysis, Pull Between, Strategic Management, Sourcing Needs, Procurement Maturity, Incentives And Rebates, Strategic Sourcing, ERP Finance Procurement, Supplier Vetting, Service Delivery Approach, Cost Reduction, Procurement Legislation, Procurement Technology, Supplier Contracts, Procurement Policy, Supplier Strategy, Productivity Metrics, Process Re-engineering, Repeat Business, Demand Forecasting, Category Strategy, Quality Control, Supplier Benchmarking, IT Systems, Sourcing Strategy Implementation, Benefits Realization, Collaboration Solutions, Outsourcing Strategy, Procurement Contracts Management, Return on Investment, Demand Planning, Procurement Tools, Secure Vendor Management, Sourcing Evaluation, Procurement Strategy, Procurement Contracts, Procurement Transformation, Performance Reviews, Spend Visibility, Measurement And Metrics, Sourcing Effectiveness, Sourcing Models, Benchmarking Analysis, Service Level Agreements, Electronic Invoice Processing, Procurement Excellence, Procurement Automation, Continuous Improvement, Risk Management, Request For Proposal, Procurement Optimization, Supply Chain Optimization, Corporate Social Responsibility, IATF 16949, Efficient Procurement, Renewable Materials, Health Benefits, Supply Chain Execution, Global Sourcing, Automated Procurement, Collaborative Buying, Business Continuity, Sourcing Efficiency, On Time Delivery, Inventory Optimization, Best Practices, Energy Efficiency, Procure To Pay, Stakeholder Engagement, Performance Monitoring, Market Entry Barriers, Market Intelligence Tools, Stakeholder Analysis Strategy, Supplier Scorecards, Inclusive Procurement, Diversity Initiatives, Supply Chain Integration, Environmental Sustainability, Maximizing Value, Receiving Process, Evaluating Suppliers, Growth Strategy, Supply Chain Mapping, Effective money, LEAN Procurement, Sourcing Process, Logistics Management, Supplier Audits, Compliance Issues, Posting Schedule, Procurement Outsourcing, Spend Analysis, Product Innovation, Digital Workflow, Government Project Management, Value Creation, Supplier Selection, Technology Upgrades, Supplier Diversity, Change Management, Pricing Strategy, Procurement Audits, Construction Plan, Procurement Ethics, Negotiation Techniques, Supplier Risk, Energy Management, Management Team, Local Sourcing, Procurement Transformation Strategy, Commodity Procurement, KPI Development, Raw Material Sourcing, Supplier Relationship, Contract Formation, Strategic Alliances, Market Competition, Contractual Obligations, Cost Benefit Analysis, Category Management Process, Supplier Sourcing, Software Selection, Electronic Procurement, Inventory Management, Sourcing Analytics, Supplier Integration, System Outages, Creating Engagement, Leadership Goal Setting, Agile Contracts, Supplier Incentives, Contract Management, Foreign Trade Regulations, Supply Market Analysis, Materials Sourcing, Forecast Accuracy, Gap Analysis, Category Management, Technology Strategies, Supplier Contracts Review, Supplier Partnerships, Disaster Recovery, Supplier Consolidation, Stakeholder Communication, Alternative Suppliers, Supplier Performance, Procurement Guidelines, External Spend Management, IT Staffing, Procurement Training, Market Intelligence, Self Service Password Reset, Intellectual Property, Operational Readiness, Outsourcing Providers, Cost Effective Solutions, Control System Engineering, Asset Management Strategy, Management Systems, Contingency Planning, Systems Review, Supplier Due Diligence, IT Procurement, Regulatory Policies, Innovative Strategies, Ethical Sourcing, Service Delivery, Import Export Management, Legal Framework, Corporate Vision, Data Analytics, Asset Decommissioning, Sourcing Strategy Development, Standardized Work, Procurement Budget, International Trade Agreements, Corporate Climate, Capacity Planning, Demand Aggregation, Reducing Waste, Sourcing Strategy, Vendor Management, Dynamic Sourcing, Inventory Control, Procurement Governance, Supplier Feedback, Functional Profiles, Supplier Performance Scorecards, Contractual Disputes, Third Party Risk Management, Contractual Terms, Purchasing Power, Reverse Auction, Sustainable Procurement, Procurement Governance Framework, Indirect Spend Management, Project procurement, Talent Management, Staff Inputs, Procurement Reporting, Reverse Logistics
Contractual Disputes Assessment Dataset - Utilization, Solutions, Advantages, BHAG (Big Hairy Audacious Goal):
Contractual Disputes
Contractual disputes refer to conflicts or disagreements between an organization and an external supplier regarding their contractual agreement. These disputes can include legal issues, breach of contract, or other disagreements that need to be resolved in order for both parties to fulfill their obligations under the contract.
1. Contractual agreements and terms should be clearly defined and agreed upon to avoid disputes.
2. Seeking legal advice before signing contracts can help identify potential issues and mitigate risk.
3. Regular communication and collaboration with suppliers can help prevent misunderstandings and conflicts.
4. Incorporating dispute resolution mechanisms in contracts, such as mediation or arbitration, can help resolve issues quickly and fairly.
5. Maintaining thorough records of all communications and transactions with suppliers can serve as evidence in case of any disputes.
Benefits:
1. Clear contractual agreements provide a solid foundation for a successful buyer-supplier relationship.
2. Legal advice helps protect the organization′s interests and minimize financial losses.
3. Strong communication and collaboration improve trust and promote a positive working relationship.
4. Dispute resolution mechanisms can save time and expenses compared to lengthy legal battles.
5. Detailed records support the organization′s position and strengthen its case in disputes.
CONTROL QUESTION: Have all outstanding contractual, legal or other disputes between the organization and the external supplier been resolved?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
In 10 years, our organization aims to have completely eliminated all outstanding contractual, legal, and other disputes with our external suppliers. We will achieve this by creating a culture of open communication and collaboration with our suppliers, focusing on building strong relationships based on trust and mutual benefit. We will implement efficient and effective dispute resolution strategies, such as mediation and arbitration, to swiftly resolve any issues that may arise. This goal will not only save time and resources but also positively impact our reputation in the industry, leading to increased partnerships and growth opportunities. Our commitment to resolving disputes fairly and amicably will set us apart as a leader in ethical business practices and solidify our position as a top-choice supplier for all our partners.
Customer Testimonials:
"This dataset has helped me break out of my rut and be more creative with my recommendations. I`m impressed with how much it has boosted my confidence."
"I`ve been searching for a dataset like this for ages, and I finally found it. The prioritized recommendations are exactly what I needed to boost the effectiveness of my strategies. Highly satisfied!"
"I can`t recommend this dataset enough. The prioritized recommendations are thorough, and the user interface is intuitive. It has become an indispensable tool in my decision-making process."
Contractual Disputes Case Study/Use Case example - How to use:
Case Study: Resolving Contractual Disputes between Organization and External Supplier
Executive Summary:
In the increasingly competitive business landscape, organizations rely heavily on external suppliers to provide goods and services. These partnerships are established through legally binding contracts that outline the terms and conditions of the relationship. However, as with any business relationship, disputes can arise between organizations and their external suppliers. These disputes can disrupt operations, cause financial losses, and damage the reputation of both parties involved. Therefore, it is crucial for organizations to have effective mechanisms in place to resolve contractual disputes in a timely and efficient manner.
The client, ABC Corporation, is a multinational manufacturing company that sources raw materials from various external suppliers. Over the years, the company has faced several contractual disputes with its suppliers, resulting in significant financial losses and damaged relationships. As a result, the company sought the assistance of our consulting firm to assess the current state of dispute resolution within the organization and to help implement a more effective process for resolving future disputes.
Consulting Methodology:
The consulting team conducted a thorough analysis of the existing contractual dispute resolution process at ABC Corporation. This included reviewing past disputes, examining the contract management procedures, analyzing internal communication channels, and evaluating the resources available for dispute resolution. Additionally, the team conducted interviews with key stakeholders, both within the organization and its external suppliers, to gather insights and perspectives on the current process.
Based on the findings, the team devised a comprehensive framework for resolving contractual disputes. The framework includes five key stages:
1. Early identification and prevention: The first step in dispute resolution is early identification and prevention. This involves regular contract reviews, establishing clear communication channels, and setting expectations for both parties involved.
2. Negotiation: If a dispute does arise, negotiation is the first step towards resolution. This stage involves open and transparent communication between the two parties to reach a mutually satisfactory outcome.
3. Mediation: In cases where negotiation fails, mediation allows for a neutral third party to facilitate and guide the dialogue between the two parties in dispute. The aim is to reach a resolution without resorting to legal action.
4. Arbitration: If mediation is unsuccessful, the next step is binding arbitration. This involves a more formal process, where an independent arbitrator reviews the evidence presented by both parties and makes a final decision on the resolution of the dispute.
5. Litigation: As a last resort, litigation involves taking the dispute to court. This can be a lengthy and costly process, and should only be used when all other methods have failed.
Deliverables:
The consulting team provided ABC Corporation with a detailed report of their findings, which included an assessment of the current dispute resolution process and recommendations for improvement. The report also included a step-by-step guide on how to implement the new framework, along with templates for contract management and dispute resolution documentation.
Additionally, the team conducted training sessions for key personnel within the organization on the new framework, emphasizing the importance of early identification and prevention of disputes, effective communication, and the use of alternative methods such as mediation and arbitration.
Implementation Challenges:
One of the primary challenges faced during the implementation of the new framework was resistance from some external suppliers. Many of them were used to the previous dispute resolution process and were hesitant to adapt to the new approach. To address this, the consulting team held one-on-one meetings with the suppliers, explaining the benefits of the new process and addressing any concerns they may have had.
Another challenge was ensuring all employees within the organization were aware of the new process and understood their roles and responsibilities in its implementation. To overcome this, the team worked closely with the HR department to integrate the new framework into the company′s training and onboarding processes.
KPIs and Management Considerations:
To measure the success of the new framework, KPIs were established, including the number of disputes resolved within a specific timeframe, the cost of dispute resolution, and the satisfaction of both parties with the outcome. These KPIs were regularly monitored and reported to senior management, highlighting any areas for improvement.
Management was also involved in the implementation process, providing support and guidance to employees, and ensuring all necessary resources were allocated for the smooth implementation of the new framework. Regular communication between management and the consulting team was maintained to address any challenges or concerns as they arose.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the new framework successfully transformed ABC Corporation′s contractual dispute resolution process. By emphasizing the importance of early identification and prevention of disputes and promoting alternative methods such as mediation, the company has been able to resolve conflicts more efficiently and effectively. This has not only reduced financial losses and improved relationships with external suppliers but has also strengthened the company′s overall reputation in the market.
References:
1. Watkins, M., & Rosegrant, S. (2018). Contract Dispute Resolution: Current Trends and Challenges. Whitepaper. Retrieved from https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/dispute_resolution/resources/2018_new_trends_and_challenges_in_contract_dispute_resolution.pdf.
2. Landler, M., & Tatum, J. R. (2015). A New Framework for Managing Contract Risk. McKinsey & Company. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/operations/our-insights/a-new-framework-for-managing-contract-risk.
3. Blackaby, N. (2019). Contractual Dispute Resolution: A Guide to Effective Tactics and Strategies. International Construction Law Review, 36(1), 39-58.
Security and Trust:
- Secure checkout with SSL encryption Visa, Mastercard, Apple Pay, Google Pay, Stripe, Paypal
- Money-back guarantee for 30 days
- Our team is available 24/7 to assist you - support@theartofservice.com
About the Authors: Unleashing Excellence: The Mastery of Service Accredited by the Scientific Community
Immerse yourself in the pinnacle of operational wisdom through The Art of Service`s Excellence, now distinguished with esteemed accreditation from the scientific community. With an impressive 1000+ citations, The Art of Service stands as a beacon of reliability and authority in the field.Our dedication to excellence is highlighted by meticulous scrutiny and validation from the scientific community, evidenced by the 1000+ citations spanning various disciplines. Each citation attests to the profound impact and scholarly recognition of The Art of Service`s contributions.
Embark on a journey of unparalleled expertise, fortified by a wealth of research and acknowledgment from scholars globally. Join the community that not only recognizes but endorses the brilliance encapsulated in The Art of Service`s Excellence. Enhance your understanding, strategy, and implementation with a resource acknowledged and embraced by the scientific community.
Embrace excellence. Embrace The Art of Service.
Your trust in us aligns you with prestigious company; boasting over 1000 academic citations, our work ranks in the top 1% of the most cited globally. Explore our scholarly contributions at: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=blokdyk
About The Art of Service:
Our clients seek confidence in making risk management and compliance decisions based on accurate data. However, navigating compliance can be complex, and sometimes, the unknowns are even more challenging.
We empathize with the frustrations of senior executives and business owners after decades in the industry. That`s why The Art of Service has developed Self-Assessment and implementation tools, trusted by over 100,000 professionals worldwide, empowering you to take control of your compliance assessments. With over 1000 academic citations, our work stands in the top 1% of the most cited globally, reflecting our commitment to helping businesses thrive.
Founders:
Gerard Blokdyk
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gerardblokdijk/
Ivanka Menken
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ivankamenken/
