Attention all professionals and businesses looking to improve their cost allocation methods!
Are you tired of wasting time and resources on inaccurate cost allocations? Are you looking for a solution that can provide accurate and timely results to help you make informed decisions?Introducing our Cost Allocation Bases in Activity Based Costing Knowledge Base – the ultimate tool for cost allocation success.
This comprehensive dataset contains 1510 prioritized requirements, solutions, benefits, results, and real-life case studies/use cases to guide you through the process.
Unlike other cost allocation products, our database offers a wide range of critical questions to ask in order to determine the urgency and scope of your cost allocation needs.
This will save you valuable time and ensure that you are addressing the most important areas first.
Not only does our dataset cover all the essential aspects of activity-based costing, but it also provides detailed product specifications and easy-to-follow instructions for use.
Our product is designed for professionals, but also offers a DIY/affordable alternative for those on a budget.
But why choose our Cost Allocation Bases in Activity Based Costing Knowledge Base over competitors and alternatives? The answer is simple – our dataset offers unparalleled accuracy, efficiency, and effectiveness.
It is the result of years of research and experience, making it the go-to resource for businesses worldwide.
By using our product, you will experience numerous benefits, including improved accuracy, cost savings, and better decision-making.
You will have access to all the latest insights and techniques in activity-based costing, empowering you to stay ahead of the competition.
But don′t just take our word for it – our satisfied customers have seen significant improvements in their cost allocation processes and have rave reviews for our product′s simplicity and effectiveness.
Still not convinced? Our Cost Allocation Bases in Activity Based Costing Knowledge Base is available at an affordable cost, making it a smart investment for any business looking to streamline their expenses and increase profitability.
Say goodbye to guesswork and inefficiency in cost allocation – give our product a try and see the results for yourself.
Experience the power of accurate and timely cost allocation with our Cost Allocation Bases in Activity Based Costing Knowledge Base.
Don′t miss out – get your hands on it today and stay ahead of the competition.
What would be some useful bases upon which to develop standards for your immediate work group? What typical types of distribution bases are available to calculate the indirect cost rate?
Cost Allocation Bases
Cost allocation bases are factors used to assign expenses to different departments or products. Useful bases for standards include labor hours, material usage, and machine usage.
-Some useful bases for cost allocation in Activity Based Costing include:
1. Number of transactions: This can be a good allocation base for departmental costs such as IT and human resources, as the number of transactions processed by each department can vary significantly.
2. Labor hours: Allocating costs based on the amount of time employees spend on specific activities can provide a fair and accurate representation of the resources used.
3. Machine hours: This method is best suited for companies that have high production volume or use specialized equipment, as it takes into account the wear and tear on machinery and the associated costs.
4. Square footage: Ideal for allocating facility-related expenses such as rent, insurance, and maintenance, as larger departments or spaces will consume more resources.
5. Number of customers: This can be an effective cost allocation base for service-based businesses, as the number of customers served can directly impact the resources needed to support those customers.
Benefits:
1. Fairness: Using appropriate cost allocation bases helps ensure that costs are assigned accurately and fairly to different departments or activities.
2. Cost control: By understanding the resources used by different activities, managers can identify areas where costs can be reduced or eliminated.
3. Performance evaluation: Standards based on cost allocation bases can be used for performance evaluation and reward systems, making it clear which departments or activities are performing well.
4. Accurate product costing: By allocating costs based on different activities, ABC provides a more precise understanding of the true cost of producing a product, leading to more accurate pricing decisions.
5. Better decision-making: With more accurate cost information, managers can make informed decisions about resource allocation, efficiency, and profitability.
CONTROL QUESTION: What would be some useful bases upon which to develop standards for the immediate work group?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
Big Hairy Audacious Goal for 2031:
To implement a cost allocation system within our organization that maximizes efficiency, transparency, and fairness in resource allocation, resulting in a significant increase in overall profitability and sustainable long-term growth.
Some potential useful bases for developing standards for the immediate work group could include:
1. Activity-based costing: This method allocates costs based on the specific activities that consume resources, providing a more accurate and fair representation of the costs incurred by each department or team.
2. Cost driver analysis: By identifying and measuring the key drivers of costs within the organization, we can allocate costs based on their actual impact and contribution to the bottom line.
3. Departmental usage: Allocating costs based on the actual usage of resources by each department or work group can help ensure equitable distribution of expenses.
4. Revenue contribution: Incorporating revenue as a factor in cost allocation can align incentives and drive better decision-making within the work group.
5. Historical data: Using historical trends and data to forecast future resource needs and allocate costs accordingly can aid in planning and budgeting for the work group′s growth and development.
6. Performance measures: Including performance metrics such as productivity, quality, and efficiency in the cost allocation system can incentivize continuous improvement and drive better results.
7. Industry benchmarks: Comparing our cost allocation practices to industry benchmarks and best practices can provide insights and opportunities for optimization and cost savings.
8. Strategic goals: Aligning cost allocation with the organization′s strategic goals and priorities can ensure that resources are allocated to support the most critical objectives.
9. Employee involvement: Involving employees in the development and review of cost allocation standards can improve buy-in and accountability, leading to more effective implementation and utilization.
10. Technology integration: Leveraging technology, such as automated cost allocation software, can streamline processes, reduce errors, and provide real-time visibility into costs and resource usage.
"I am thoroughly impressed with this dataset. The prioritized recommendations are backed by solid data, and the download process was quick and hassle-free. A must-have for anyone serious about data analysis!"
Client Situation:
Company A is a mid-sized manufacturing company that produces industrial machinery for various industries. The company has several departments, each responsible for a specific stage in the production process. The immediate work group in focus comprises of the production department, including the assembly and testing units. The company is facing challenges in cost allocation and performance evaluation within this work group. As a result, the top management has decided to develop standards for the immediate work group based on appropriate cost allocation bases. The objective is to improve cost control, benchmark performance, and enhance decision-making within the work group.
Consulting Methodology:
The consulting team has selected a comprehensive methodology to address the client′s situation. This methodology includes the following steps:
1. Current Assessment: The first step is to understand the current cost allocation practices and performance evaluation methods within the production department. The team will review the current allocation bases used and assess their effectiveness in achieving the company′s objectives.
2. Identification of Relevant Cost Allocation Bases: Based on the assessment, the team will identify relevant cost allocation bases that align with the company′s strategic goals and objectives. This will involve a thorough understanding of the production processes, resource utilization, and cost drivers.
3. Consultation with Stakeholders: The team will engage with key stakeholders, including managers and employees from the production department, to gather insights and feedback on the proposed cost allocation bases. This will ensure buy-in and acceptance of the new standards by those who will be directly impacted by them.
4. Development of Standards: Using the identified cost allocation bases, the team will develop standards that clearly define the expected costs and performance for the immediate work group. These standards will be developed in alignment with the company′s overall goals and objectives.
5. Pilot Testing: Before full implementation, the team will conduct a pilot test of the new standards within a section of the production department. This will allow for any necessary adjustments to be made before implementation across the entire work group.
6. Implementation: The team will work with the production department to ensure a smooth and successful implementation of the new cost allocation standards. This will involve training employees on the use and interpretation of the standards and addressing any concerns or issues that may arise during the process.
Deliverables:
1. Current Assessment Report: This report will provide an overview of the current cost allocation practices and performance evaluation methods within the production department, along with recommendations for improvement.
2. List of Relevant Cost Allocation Bases: Based on the assessment, a list of relevant cost allocation bases will be provided, along with a rationale for their selection.
3. Proposed Standards Report: This report will outline the new standards developed for the immediate work group, including the cost allocation bases used, expected costs, and performance targets.
4. Training Materials: The team will develop training materials to educate employees on the new standards and how to use them effectively.
5. Implementation Plan: A detailed implementation plan will be provided to guide the company in successfully adopting the new cost allocation standards.
Implementation Challenges:
The implementation of new cost allocation standards may face some challenges, such as resistance from employees and potential disruptions in the production process. To mitigate these challenges, the consulting team will involve employees in the development process and provide adequate training and support during implementation. The pilot test will also allow for any necessary adjustments to be made before full implementation.
KPIs:
1. Cost Reduction: One of the main objectives of implementing new cost allocation standards is to reduce costs within the production department. Therefore, the percentage decrease in costs will be a critical KPI to measure the success of the project.
2. Performance Improvement: The new standards aim to improve performance within the work group. KPIs such as productivity, quality, and efficiency will be used to evaluate the performance of each section of the production department before and after the implementation of the new standards.
3. Employee Satisfaction: The satisfaction of employees within the production department will be measured through surveys and feedback to ensure that the new standards are acceptable and fair.
Management Considerations:
1. Continuous Monitoring: The success of the project will depend on continuous monitoring of the new standards, their effectiveness, and any necessary adjustments.
2. Communication and Transparency: Transparent communication is crucial to ensure the understanding and acceptance of the new standards by all employees. Regular updates on the progress and success of the project should be communicated to all stakeholders.
3. Incorporating Feedback: It is essential to listen to and incorporate feedback from employees and stakeholders throughout the process to ensure the relevance and effectiveness of the new standards.
Citations:
1. Boucher, L., & Sergeeva, E. (2017). Cost allocation methods under information asymmetry. International Journal of Production Economics, 184, 1-12.
2. Lavely, D., & Wise, R. (2019). Implementing improved cost allocation practices in manufacturing firms. Management Accounting Quarterly, 20(3), 29-39.
3. Thomas, D., & Ross, J. (2018). Implementing performance standards in manufacturing: A case study of best practices. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 19, 259-269.
4. Gopal, P., & Vrat, P. (2016). Cost optimization in manufacturing through activity-based costing: A case study. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 11(6), 3934-3940.
5. Nafisi, H., Afshar Kazemi, M., & Mozaffari, S. (2015). Developing a cost control model for manufacturing companies. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 26(6), 794-814.
Are you tired of wasting time and resources on inaccurate cost allocations? Are you looking for a solution that can provide accurate and timely results to help you make informed decisions?Introducing our Cost Allocation Bases in Activity Based Costing Knowledge Base – the ultimate tool for cost allocation success.
This comprehensive dataset contains 1510 prioritized requirements, solutions, benefits, results, and real-life case studies/use cases to guide you through the process.
Unlike other cost allocation products, our database offers a wide range of critical questions to ask in order to determine the urgency and scope of your cost allocation needs.
This will save you valuable time and ensure that you are addressing the most important areas first.
Not only does our dataset cover all the essential aspects of activity-based costing, but it also provides detailed product specifications and easy-to-follow instructions for use.
Our product is designed for professionals, but also offers a DIY/affordable alternative for those on a budget.
But why choose our Cost Allocation Bases in Activity Based Costing Knowledge Base over competitors and alternatives? The answer is simple – our dataset offers unparalleled accuracy, efficiency, and effectiveness.
It is the result of years of research and experience, making it the go-to resource for businesses worldwide.
By using our product, you will experience numerous benefits, including improved accuracy, cost savings, and better decision-making.
You will have access to all the latest insights and techniques in activity-based costing, empowering you to stay ahead of the competition.
But don′t just take our word for it – our satisfied customers have seen significant improvements in their cost allocation processes and have rave reviews for our product′s simplicity and effectiveness.
Still not convinced? Our Cost Allocation Bases in Activity Based Costing Knowledge Base is available at an affordable cost, making it a smart investment for any business looking to streamline their expenses and increase profitability.
Say goodbye to guesswork and inefficiency in cost allocation – give our product a try and see the results for yourself.
Experience the power of accurate and timely cost allocation with our Cost Allocation Bases in Activity Based Costing Knowledge Base.
Don′t miss out – get your hands on it today and stay ahead of the competition.
Discover Insights, Make Informed Decisions, and Stay Ahead of the Curve:
Key Features:
Comprehensive set of 1510 prioritized Cost Allocation Bases requirements. - Extensive coverage of 132 Cost Allocation Bases topic scopes.
- In-depth analysis of 132 Cost Allocation Bases step-by-step solutions, benefits, BHAGs.
- Detailed examination of 132 Cost Allocation Bases case studies and use cases.
- Digital download upon purchase.
- Enjoy lifetime document updates included with your purchase.
- Benefit from a fully editable and customizable Excel format.
- Trusted and utilized by over 10,000 organizations.
- Covering: Set Budget, Cost Equation, Cost Object, Budgeted Cost, Activity Output, Cost Comparison, Cost Analysis Report, Overhead Costs, Capacity Levels, Fixed Overhead, Cost Effectiveness, Cost Drivers, Direct Material, Cost Evaluation, Cost Estimation Accuracy, Cost Structure, Indirect Labor, Joint Cost, Actual Cost, Time Driver, Budget Performance, Variable Budget, Budget Deviation, Balanced Scorecard, Flexible Variance, Indirect Expense, Basis Of Allocation, Lean Management, Six Sigma, Continuous improvement Introduction, Non Manufacturing Costs, Spending Variance, Sales Volume, Allocation Base, Process Costing, Volume Performance, Limit Budget, Cost Efficiency, Volume Levels, Cost Monitoring, Quality Inspection, Cost Tracking, ABC System, Value Added Activity, Support Departments, Activity Rate, Cost Flow, Marginal Cost, Cost Performance, Unit Cost, Indirect Material, Cost Allocation Bases, Cost Variance, Service Department, Research Activities, Cost Distortion, Cost Classification, Physical Activity, Cost Management, Direct Costs, Associated Facts, Volume Variance, Factory Overhead, Actual Efficiency, Cost Optimization, Overhead Rate, Sunk Cost, Activity Based Management, Ethical Evaluation, Capacity Cost, Maintenance Cost, Cost Estimation, Cost System, Continuous Improvement, Driver Base, Cost Benefit Analysis, Direct Labor, Total Cost, Variable Costing, Incremental Costing, Flexible Budgeting, Cost Planning, Allocation Method, Cost Shifting, Product Costing, Final Costing, Efficiency Factor, Production Costs, Cost Control Measures, Fixed Budget, Supplier Quality, Service Organization, Indirect Costs, Cost Savings, Variances Analysis, Reverse Auctions, Service Based Costing, Differential Cost, Efficiency Variance, Standard Costing, Cost Behavior, Absorption Costing, Obsolete Software, Cost Model, Cost Hierarchy, Cost Reduction, Cost Complexity, Work Efficiency, Activity Cost, Support Costs, Underwriting Compliance, Product Mix, Business Process Redesign, Cost Control, Cost Pools, Resource Consumption, Activity Based Costing, Transaction Driver, Cost Analysis, Systems Review, Job Order Costing, Theory of Constraints, Cost Formula, Resource Driver, Activity Ratios, Costing Methods, Activity Levels, Cost Minimization, Opportunity Cost, Direct Expense, Job Costing, Activity Analysis, Cost Allocation, Spending Performance
Cost Allocation Bases Assessment Dataset - Utilization, Solutions, Advantages, BHAG (Big Hairy Audacious Goal):
Cost Allocation Bases
Cost allocation bases are factors used to assign expenses to different departments or products. Useful bases for standards include labor hours, material usage, and machine usage.
-Some useful bases for cost allocation in Activity Based Costing include:
1. Number of transactions: This can be a good allocation base for departmental costs such as IT and human resources, as the number of transactions processed by each department can vary significantly.
2. Labor hours: Allocating costs based on the amount of time employees spend on specific activities can provide a fair and accurate representation of the resources used.
3. Machine hours: This method is best suited for companies that have high production volume or use specialized equipment, as it takes into account the wear and tear on machinery and the associated costs.
4. Square footage: Ideal for allocating facility-related expenses such as rent, insurance, and maintenance, as larger departments or spaces will consume more resources.
5. Number of customers: This can be an effective cost allocation base for service-based businesses, as the number of customers served can directly impact the resources needed to support those customers.
Benefits:
1. Fairness: Using appropriate cost allocation bases helps ensure that costs are assigned accurately and fairly to different departments or activities.
2. Cost control: By understanding the resources used by different activities, managers can identify areas where costs can be reduced or eliminated.
3. Performance evaluation: Standards based on cost allocation bases can be used for performance evaluation and reward systems, making it clear which departments or activities are performing well.
4. Accurate product costing: By allocating costs based on different activities, ABC provides a more precise understanding of the true cost of producing a product, leading to more accurate pricing decisions.
5. Better decision-making: With more accurate cost information, managers can make informed decisions about resource allocation, efficiency, and profitability.
CONTROL QUESTION: What would be some useful bases upon which to develop standards for the immediate work group?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
Big Hairy Audacious Goal for 2031:
To implement a cost allocation system within our organization that maximizes efficiency, transparency, and fairness in resource allocation, resulting in a significant increase in overall profitability and sustainable long-term growth.
Some potential useful bases for developing standards for the immediate work group could include:
1. Activity-based costing: This method allocates costs based on the specific activities that consume resources, providing a more accurate and fair representation of the costs incurred by each department or team.
2. Cost driver analysis: By identifying and measuring the key drivers of costs within the organization, we can allocate costs based on their actual impact and contribution to the bottom line.
3. Departmental usage: Allocating costs based on the actual usage of resources by each department or work group can help ensure equitable distribution of expenses.
4. Revenue contribution: Incorporating revenue as a factor in cost allocation can align incentives and drive better decision-making within the work group.
5. Historical data: Using historical trends and data to forecast future resource needs and allocate costs accordingly can aid in planning and budgeting for the work group′s growth and development.
6. Performance measures: Including performance metrics such as productivity, quality, and efficiency in the cost allocation system can incentivize continuous improvement and drive better results.
7. Industry benchmarks: Comparing our cost allocation practices to industry benchmarks and best practices can provide insights and opportunities for optimization and cost savings.
8. Strategic goals: Aligning cost allocation with the organization′s strategic goals and priorities can ensure that resources are allocated to support the most critical objectives.
9. Employee involvement: Involving employees in the development and review of cost allocation standards can improve buy-in and accountability, leading to more effective implementation and utilization.
10. Technology integration: Leveraging technology, such as automated cost allocation software, can streamline processes, reduce errors, and provide real-time visibility into costs and resource usage.
Customer Testimonials:
"I am thoroughly impressed with this dataset. The prioritized recommendations are backed by solid data, and the download process was quick and hassle-free. A must-have for anyone serious about data analysis!"
"The ability to customize the prioritization criteria was a huge plus. I was able to tailor the recommendations to my specific needs and goals, making them even more effective."
"This dataset is a goldmine for anyone seeking actionable insights. The prioritized recommendations are clear, concise, and supported by robust data. Couldn`t be happier with my purchase."
Cost Allocation Bases Case Study/Use Case example - How to use:
Client Situation:
Company A is a mid-sized manufacturing company that produces industrial machinery for various industries. The company has several departments, each responsible for a specific stage in the production process. The immediate work group in focus comprises of the production department, including the assembly and testing units. The company is facing challenges in cost allocation and performance evaluation within this work group. As a result, the top management has decided to develop standards for the immediate work group based on appropriate cost allocation bases. The objective is to improve cost control, benchmark performance, and enhance decision-making within the work group.
Consulting Methodology:
The consulting team has selected a comprehensive methodology to address the client′s situation. This methodology includes the following steps:
1. Current Assessment: The first step is to understand the current cost allocation practices and performance evaluation methods within the production department. The team will review the current allocation bases used and assess their effectiveness in achieving the company′s objectives.
2. Identification of Relevant Cost Allocation Bases: Based on the assessment, the team will identify relevant cost allocation bases that align with the company′s strategic goals and objectives. This will involve a thorough understanding of the production processes, resource utilization, and cost drivers.
3. Consultation with Stakeholders: The team will engage with key stakeholders, including managers and employees from the production department, to gather insights and feedback on the proposed cost allocation bases. This will ensure buy-in and acceptance of the new standards by those who will be directly impacted by them.
4. Development of Standards: Using the identified cost allocation bases, the team will develop standards that clearly define the expected costs and performance for the immediate work group. These standards will be developed in alignment with the company′s overall goals and objectives.
5. Pilot Testing: Before full implementation, the team will conduct a pilot test of the new standards within a section of the production department. This will allow for any necessary adjustments to be made before implementation across the entire work group.
6. Implementation: The team will work with the production department to ensure a smooth and successful implementation of the new cost allocation standards. This will involve training employees on the use and interpretation of the standards and addressing any concerns or issues that may arise during the process.
Deliverables:
1. Current Assessment Report: This report will provide an overview of the current cost allocation practices and performance evaluation methods within the production department, along with recommendations for improvement.
2. List of Relevant Cost Allocation Bases: Based on the assessment, a list of relevant cost allocation bases will be provided, along with a rationale for their selection.
3. Proposed Standards Report: This report will outline the new standards developed for the immediate work group, including the cost allocation bases used, expected costs, and performance targets.
4. Training Materials: The team will develop training materials to educate employees on the new standards and how to use them effectively.
5. Implementation Plan: A detailed implementation plan will be provided to guide the company in successfully adopting the new cost allocation standards.
Implementation Challenges:
The implementation of new cost allocation standards may face some challenges, such as resistance from employees and potential disruptions in the production process. To mitigate these challenges, the consulting team will involve employees in the development process and provide adequate training and support during implementation. The pilot test will also allow for any necessary adjustments to be made before full implementation.
KPIs:
1. Cost Reduction: One of the main objectives of implementing new cost allocation standards is to reduce costs within the production department. Therefore, the percentage decrease in costs will be a critical KPI to measure the success of the project.
2. Performance Improvement: The new standards aim to improve performance within the work group. KPIs such as productivity, quality, and efficiency will be used to evaluate the performance of each section of the production department before and after the implementation of the new standards.
3. Employee Satisfaction: The satisfaction of employees within the production department will be measured through surveys and feedback to ensure that the new standards are acceptable and fair.
Management Considerations:
1. Continuous Monitoring: The success of the project will depend on continuous monitoring of the new standards, their effectiveness, and any necessary adjustments.
2. Communication and Transparency: Transparent communication is crucial to ensure the understanding and acceptance of the new standards by all employees. Regular updates on the progress and success of the project should be communicated to all stakeholders.
3. Incorporating Feedback: It is essential to listen to and incorporate feedback from employees and stakeholders throughout the process to ensure the relevance and effectiveness of the new standards.
Citations:
1. Boucher, L., & Sergeeva, E. (2017). Cost allocation methods under information asymmetry. International Journal of Production Economics, 184, 1-12.
2. Lavely, D., & Wise, R. (2019). Implementing improved cost allocation practices in manufacturing firms. Management Accounting Quarterly, 20(3), 29-39.
3. Thomas, D., & Ross, J. (2018). Implementing performance standards in manufacturing: A case study of best practices. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 19, 259-269.
4. Gopal, P., & Vrat, P. (2016). Cost optimization in manufacturing through activity-based costing: A case study. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 11(6), 3934-3940.
5. Nafisi, H., Afshar Kazemi, M., & Mozaffari, S. (2015). Developing a cost control model for manufacturing companies. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 26(6), 794-814.
Security and Trust:
- Secure checkout with SSL encryption Visa, Mastercard, Apple Pay, Google Pay, Stripe, Paypal
- Money-back guarantee for 30 days
- Our team is available 24/7 to assist you - support@theartofservice.com
About the Authors: Unleashing Excellence: The Mastery of Service Accredited by the Scientific Community
Immerse yourself in the pinnacle of operational wisdom through The Art of Service`s Excellence, now distinguished with esteemed accreditation from the scientific community. With an impressive 1000+ citations, The Art of Service stands as a beacon of reliability and authority in the field.Our dedication to excellence is highlighted by meticulous scrutiny and validation from the scientific community, evidenced by the 1000+ citations spanning various disciplines. Each citation attests to the profound impact and scholarly recognition of The Art of Service`s contributions.
Embark on a journey of unparalleled expertise, fortified by a wealth of research and acknowledgment from scholars globally. Join the community that not only recognizes but endorses the brilliance encapsulated in The Art of Service`s Excellence. Enhance your understanding, strategy, and implementation with a resource acknowledged and embraced by the scientific community.
Embrace excellence. Embrace The Art of Service.
Your trust in us aligns you with prestigious company; boasting over 1000 academic citations, our work ranks in the top 1% of the most cited globally. Explore our scholarly contributions at: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=blokdyk
About The Art of Service:
Our clients seek confidence in making risk management and compliance decisions based on accurate data. However, navigating compliance can be complex, and sometimes, the unknowns are even more challenging.
We empathize with the frustrations of senior executives and business owners after decades in the industry. That`s why The Art of Service has developed Self-Assessment and implementation tools, trusted by over 100,000 professionals worldwide, empowering you to take control of your compliance assessments. With over 1000 academic citations, our work stands in the top 1% of the most cited globally, reflecting our commitment to helping businesses thrive.
Founders:
Gerard Blokdyk
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gerardblokdijk/
Ivanka Menken
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ivankamenken/
