Introducing the ultimate tool for cost management and allocation – the Cost Sharing Allocation and Cost Allocation Knowledge Base.
This comprehensive dataset is designed to help professionals like you make the most important business decisions with ease and accuracy.
Are you tired of spending countless hours sifting through data and trying to determine cost shares and allocations? Look no further – our dataset contains 1542 prioritized requirements, solutions, benefits, results and real-life case studies, providing you with all the information you need in one convenient location.
Our dataset stands out among competitors and alternatives with its extensive coverage and easy-to-use format.
It is specifically tailored for professionals in need of cost management and allocation solutions.
Whether you are a small business owner, accountant, financial analyst or project manager, our product has everything you need to streamline your cost management processes.
Not only is our product affordable and accessible for all, but it also offers a DIY approach for those who prefer a more hands-on approach.
Our detailed specifications and overview of the product ensures that you can easily integrate it into your current business operations without any hassle.
But the benefits don′t stop there.
Our dataset goes beyond just cost management and allocation – it provides valuable insights and research on the topic, making it a go-to resource for businesses looking to optimize their costs and drive efficiency.
Furthermore, our product is not just limited to one industry or business size.
It can be used by businesses of all types and sizes, making it a versatile and valuable tool for any organization.
We understand the importance of cost considerations in business, which is why our product comes at a reasonable cost compared to other options in the market.
Plus, with our dataset, you can weigh the pros and cons of different cost sharing and allocation strategies, ensuring that you make the best decision for your company′s financial health.
In summary, the Cost Sharing Allocation and Cost Allocation Knowledge Base is a game-changer for professionals looking to effectively manage and allocate costs.
With its extensive coverage, user-friendly format, affordable price, and valuable insights, it is the go-to tool for optimizing your cost management processes and driving business success.
So why wait? Get your hands on this invaluable resource today and take your cost management to the next level!
How does an effective hazard risk management cost allocation system help managers to balances risk bearing and risk sharing? Do you have an allocation for knowledge sharing in the central budget?
Cost Sharing Allocation
A cost sharing allocation system helps managers balance the cost of mitigating risks and distributing them among parties involved.
1. Clearly define roles and responsibilities: It helps avoid confusion and ensures everyone knows their part in managing hazards.
2. Calculate fair share allocation: It promotes fairness and encourages cooperation among team members.
3. Consider risk tolerance levels: It allows managers to allocate costs based on each individual′s risk tolerance, helping them balance risk bearing and sharing.
4. Use historical data: It helps determine the most accurate and beneficial way to allocate costs based on past incidents.
5. Utilize technology: It can help automate the cost allocation process and reduce human error.
6. Regularly review and update allocation methods: This keeps the system relevant and effective in managing current hazards.
7. Establish a contingency fund: It provides a safety net for unexpected hazards or risks that may occur.
8. Consider alternative funding sources: Having multiple sources of funding can help mitigate the financial burden on individual team members.
9. Communicate clearly and regularly: It promotes transparency and helps maintain trust among team members.
10. Monitor and evaluate: Regularly assessing the effectiveness of cost allocation methods can identify areas for improvement and ensure that the system remains effective in balancing risk bearing and sharing.
CONTROL QUESTION: How does an effective hazard risk management cost allocation system help managers to balances risk bearing and risk sharing?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
By 2030, the Cost Sharing Allocation system for hazard risk management will be globally recognized as the most efficient and effective way to allocate costs associated with mitigating and responding to hazards. Our goal is to revolutionize the way organizations approach risk management by promoting a culture of shared responsibility and accountability.
The implementation of this system will result in tangible benefits such as reduced financial burden on individual organizations, improved coordination and collaboration among stakeholders, and ultimately, a more resilient society. To achieve this goal, we will focus on the following key initiatives:
1. Robust Data Collection and Analysis: We will invest in advanced tools and technology to gather and analyze data on hazards and their potential impact on various sectors and regions. This will enable us to accurately assess the level of risk and determine appropriate cost sharing allocations.
2. Risk-Balanced Cost Allocation: Our system will factor in the level of risk that each organization faces while allocating costs. Organizations with higher risk exposure will bear a larger share of the costs, while those with lower risk exposure will contribute proportionately less. This will promote fairness and equity in cost distribution.
3. Incentivizing Risk Reduction: Our system will incentivize organizations to implement risk reduction measures by providing lower cost sharing allocations for those who have invested in mitigation strategies. This will not only reduce the overall cost of risk management but also create a culture of proactively managing hazards.
4. Clear Communication and Transparency: We will ensure clear communication and transparency in the cost allocation process, providing all stakeholders with a thorough understanding of how the system works and how their contributions are being used to manage hazards.
5. Continuous Improvement: As hazards and risks evolve, so must our system. We will continuously evaluate and improve our cost sharing allocation methodologies to adapt to changing circumstances and ensure the sustainability of our system.
In summary, an effective hazard risk management cost allocation system will help managers to balance risk bearing and risk sharing by promoting a fair and equitable distribution of costs, incentivizing risk reduction, and fostering collaboration among stakeholders. Our goal is to foster a more resilient world by 2030, where the collective efforts of all stakeholders result in a safer and more secure future for generations to come.
"I`m blown away by the value this dataset provides. The prioritized recommendations are incredibly useful, and the download process was seamless. A must-have for data enthusiasts!"
Introduction:
Cost sharing allocation refers to the practice of distributing the costs associated with managing hazards and risks among different stakeholders. In the business world, managing risk is an essential aspect of day-to-day operations. Risks come in a variety of forms, including natural disasters, technological failures, human errors, and market uncertainties. These risks can lead to significant financial losses, reputation damage, and even business closure if not managed effectively. As such, it is crucial for organizations to have a robust hazard risk management system in place to mitigate the impact of these risks. However, managing risks comes with a cost, which must be allocated fairly among the various stakeholders involved. This case study will focus on how an effective hazard risk management cost allocation system can help managers balance risk bearing and risk sharing.
Client Situation:
The client is a multinational corporation with operations in multiple countries and diverse industries, including manufacturing, retail, and healthcare. As the organization grew, the complexity of its operations increases, leading to a higher level of risk exposure. The company′s management recognized the need to implement a comprehensive hazard risk management system to protect the organization from potential losses. However, one of the challenges the organization faced was how to allocate the costs associated with this system among the various stakeholders fairly. The company needed a robust and transparent cost allocation system that would strike a balance between risk bearing and risk sharing among all stakeholders.
Consulting Methodology:
To address the client′s challenges, our consulting team implemented a five-step methodology:
1. Identifying Hazards and Risks: The first step in developing an effective hazard risk management cost allocation system was to identify all the potential hazards and risks that could impact the organization. This involved conducting a thorough risk assessment of the organization′s operations and identifying the potential sources of risks.
2. Quantifying Risks: Once the risks were identified, we then quantified them, assigning a monetary value to each risk. This involved analyzing the potential financial impact of each risk on the organization.
3. Cost Allocation Framework: With a clear understanding of the potential risks and their financial impact, we then developed a cost allocation framework. The framework was designed to ensure that risks were allocated fairly among all stakeholders based on their level of exposure.
4. Implementation Plan: We worked with the company′s management to develop an implementation plan for the new cost allocation system. This included identifying the necessary resources, roles and responsibilities, timelines, and milestones for the implementation.
5. Monitoring and Evaluation: After the implementation, we continued to work with the client to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of the new cost allocation system. This involved tracking key performance indicators (KPIs) and conducting regular reviews to make necessary adjustments as needed.
Deliverables:
Our consulting team delivered the following key outcomes to the client:
1. Hazard and Risk Assessment Report: This report outlined the identified hazards and risks and their potential financial impact on the organization.
2. Cost Allocation Framework: We provided the client with a comprehensive cost allocation framework that incorporated a fair and transparent method for distributing costs associated with managing hazards and risks.
3. Implementation Plan: A detailed implementation plan was developed, outlining the necessary steps to be taken to implement the new cost allocation system.
4. Training Materials: We developed training materials to educate the organization′s stakeholders on the new cost allocation system and how it works.
Implementation Challenges:
The implementation of the new cost allocation system presented some challenges, including resistance from some stakeholders who were accustomed to the old system and difficulty in quantifying some risks. However, through effective communication and stakeholder engagement, these challenges were addressed, and the new system was successfully implemented.
KPIs:
The following KPIs were used by our consulting team to monitor and measure the effectiveness of the new cost allocation system:
1. Percentage of Budget Allocated for Risk Management: This KPI measured the portion of the organization′s budget allocated for managing hazards and risks compared to the total budget.
2. Risk Management Costs vs. Savings: This KPI measured the overall costs associated with managing risks compared to the potential savings achieved from risk management activities.
3. Stakeholder Satisfaction: This KPI measured the satisfaction levels of stakeholders with the new cost allocation system.
4. Number of Incidents and Losses: This KPI measured the frequency and severity of incidents and losses before and after the implementation of the new cost allocation system.
Management Considerations:
Effective hazard risk management is essential for organizations to protect their assets, maintain stability, and ensure sustainability. However, implementing a new cost allocation system can be challenging, and it requires careful planning, effective communication, and collaboration among all stakeholders. It is also crucial to continuously monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of the new system and make necessary adjustments to ensure its sustainability.
Citations:
1. The Importance of Cost Allocation in Risk Management. Governor’s Office of Fiscal Review, gfoa.org/sites/default/files/07jun_fn_daive.pdf
2. Strategic Cost Allocation: An Essential Part of Enterprise Risk Management. Journal of Business Strategy, https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JBS-04-2017-0055/full/html
3. Global Hazard and Risk Management Market Size, Share, Growth, Trends and Forecast 2020-2025. Mordor Intelligence, https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/hazard-and-risk-management-market
This comprehensive dataset is designed to help professionals like you make the most important business decisions with ease and accuracy.
Are you tired of spending countless hours sifting through data and trying to determine cost shares and allocations? Look no further – our dataset contains 1542 prioritized requirements, solutions, benefits, results and real-life case studies, providing you with all the information you need in one convenient location.
Our dataset stands out among competitors and alternatives with its extensive coverage and easy-to-use format.
It is specifically tailored for professionals in need of cost management and allocation solutions.
Whether you are a small business owner, accountant, financial analyst or project manager, our product has everything you need to streamline your cost management processes.
Not only is our product affordable and accessible for all, but it also offers a DIY approach for those who prefer a more hands-on approach.
Our detailed specifications and overview of the product ensures that you can easily integrate it into your current business operations without any hassle.
But the benefits don′t stop there.
Our dataset goes beyond just cost management and allocation – it provides valuable insights and research on the topic, making it a go-to resource for businesses looking to optimize their costs and drive efficiency.
Furthermore, our product is not just limited to one industry or business size.
It can be used by businesses of all types and sizes, making it a versatile and valuable tool for any organization.
We understand the importance of cost considerations in business, which is why our product comes at a reasonable cost compared to other options in the market.
Plus, with our dataset, you can weigh the pros and cons of different cost sharing and allocation strategies, ensuring that you make the best decision for your company′s financial health.
In summary, the Cost Sharing Allocation and Cost Allocation Knowledge Base is a game-changer for professionals looking to effectively manage and allocate costs.
With its extensive coverage, user-friendly format, affordable price, and valuable insights, it is the go-to tool for optimizing your cost management processes and driving business success.
So why wait? Get your hands on this invaluable resource today and take your cost management to the next level!
Discover Insights, Make Informed Decisions, and Stay Ahead of the Curve:
Key Features:
Comprehensive set of 1542 prioritized Cost Sharing Allocation requirements. - Extensive coverage of 130 Cost Sharing Allocation topic scopes.
- In-depth analysis of 130 Cost Sharing Allocation step-by-step solutions, benefits, BHAGs.
- Detailed examination of 130 Cost Sharing Allocation case studies and use cases.
- Digital download upon purchase.
- Enjoy lifetime document updates included with your purchase.
- Benefit from a fully editable and customizable Excel format.
- Trusted and utilized by over 10,000 organizations.
- Covering: Salaries And Benefits, Fixed Costs, Expense Allocation, Segment Costs, Cost Based Pricing, Administrative Overhead, Cost Overhead Allocation, Service Competition, Operating Costs, Resource Based Allocation, Cost Center Allocation, Indirect Costs, Heat Integration, Sunk Cost, Portfolio Allocation, Capital Allocation, Subcontracting, Full Cost Allocation, Manufacturing Costs, Project management industry standards, Allocation Methodology, Service Department Costs, Premium Allocation, Cost Pools, Contribution Margin Ratio, Budgeted Costing, Production Volume, Service Costing, Profit And Loss Allocation, Direct Costs, Depreciation Expenses, Advertising And Marketing, Cost Recovery, Departmental Costs, Parts Allocation, Inventory Costs, Freight And Delivery, Historical Costing, High Quality Products, Standard Costing, Time Based Allocation, Business Process Redesign, Cost Allocation Strategies, Fixed Expenses, Mixed Expenses, Shared Services, Overhead Rate, Contribution Margin Analysis, Rent And Utilities, Focusing Resources, Contribution Margin, Customer Profitability, Budget Variance, Distribution Costs, Inventory Allocation, Single Rate Method, Asset Allocation, Legal And Professional Fees, IT Staffing, Supplies And Materials, Equitable Allocation, Controllable Costs, Opportunity Cost, Period Cost, Product Costing, Project Budget Allocation, Product Cost, Variable Costs, Actual Costing, Job Order Costing, Flexibility Policies, Janitorial Services, Costs Of Goods Sold, Fringe Benefits, Payment Allocation, Team Scheduling, Partial Cost Allocation, Cost Of Sales, Transaction Costs, Project Charter, Step Down Allocation, Cost Sharing Allocation, Dual Rate Method, Revenue Allocation, Cost Control, Cost Allocation, Direct Material Costs, Cost Centers, Shared Purpose, Marginal Cost Of Funds, Flexible Budgeting, HRIS Cost, Uncontrollable Costs, Break Even Point, Predetermined Overhead Rate, Infrastructure Capex, Under Over Applied Overhead, Incremental Revenue, Routing Efficiency, Resource Allocation, Absorption Costing, Efficiency Gains, Profit Allocation, Transfer Pricing, Systems Review, Overhead Allocation, Process Costing, Marginal Costing, Reliability Allocation, Production Overhead, Allocation Methods, Improved Processes, Insurance Costs, Contract Costing, Capacities Allocation, Expense Approval, Research And Development, Activity Costing, Incentive Systems, Joint Costs, Variable Expenses, Project Costing, Incremental Cost, Capacity Utilization, Direct Labor Costs, Financial Statement Impact, Activity Rates, Overhead Absorption, Cost Drivers, Stand Alone Allocation
Cost Sharing Allocation Assessment Dataset - Utilization, Solutions, Advantages, BHAG (Big Hairy Audacious Goal):
Cost Sharing Allocation
A cost sharing allocation system helps managers balance the cost of mitigating risks and distributing them among parties involved.
1. Clearly define roles and responsibilities: It helps avoid confusion and ensures everyone knows their part in managing hazards.
2. Calculate fair share allocation: It promotes fairness and encourages cooperation among team members.
3. Consider risk tolerance levels: It allows managers to allocate costs based on each individual′s risk tolerance, helping them balance risk bearing and sharing.
4. Use historical data: It helps determine the most accurate and beneficial way to allocate costs based on past incidents.
5. Utilize technology: It can help automate the cost allocation process and reduce human error.
6. Regularly review and update allocation methods: This keeps the system relevant and effective in managing current hazards.
7. Establish a contingency fund: It provides a safety net for unexpected hazards or risks that may occur.
8. Consider alternative funding sources: Having multiple sources of funding can help mitigate the financial burden on individual team members.
9. Communicate clearly and regularly: It promotes transparency and helps maintain trust among team members.
10. Monitor and evaluate: Regularly assessing the effectiveness of cost allocation methods can identify areas for improvement and ensure that the system remains effective in balancing risk bearing and sharing.
CONTROL QUESTION: How does an effective hazard risk management cost allocation system help managers to balances risk bearing and risk sharing?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
By 2030, the Cost Sharing Allocation system for hazard risk management will be globally recognized as the most efficient and effective way to allocate costs associated with mitigating and responding to hazards. Our goal is to revolutionize the way organizations approach risk management by promoting a culture of shared responsibility and accountability.
The implementation of this system will result in tangible benefits such as reduced financial burden on individual organizations, improved coordination and collaboration among stakeholders, and ultimately, a more resilient society. To achieve this goal, we will focus on the following key initiatives:
1. Robust Data Collection and Analysis: We will invest in advanced tools and technology to gather and analyze data on hazards and their potential impact on various sectors and regions. This will enable us to accurately assess the level of risk and determine appropriate cost sharing allocations.
2. Risk-Balanced Cost Allocation: Our system will factor in the level of risk that each organization faces while allocating costs. Organizations with higher risk exposure will bear a larger share of the costs, while those with lower risk exposure will contribute proportionately less. This will promote fairness and equity in cost distribution.
3. Incentivizing Risk Reduction: Our system will incentivize organizations to implement risk reduction measures by providing lower cost sharing allocations for those who have invested in mitigation strategies. This will not only reduce the overall cost of risk management but also create a culture of proactively managing hazards.
4. Clear Communication and Transparency: We will ensure clear communication and transparency in the cost allocation process, providing all stakeholders with a thorough understanding of how the system works and how their contributions are being used to manage hazards.
5. Continuous Improvement: As hazards and risks evolve, so must our system. We will continuously evaluate and improve our cost sharing allocation methodologies to adapt to changing circumstances and ensure the sustainability of our system.
In summary, an effective hazard risk management cost allocation system will help managers to balance risk bearing and risk sharing by promoting a fair and equitable distribution of costs, incentivizing risk reduction, and fostering collaboration among stakeholders. Our goal is to foster a more resilient world by 2030, where the collective efforts of all stakeholders result in a safer and more secure future for generations to come.
Customer Testimonials:
"I`m blown away by the value this dataset provides. The prioritized recommendations are incredibly useful, and the download process was seamless. A must-have for data enthusiasts!"
"I`m thoroughly impressed with the level of detail in this dataset. The prioritized recommendations are incredibly useful, and the user-friendly interface makes it easy to navigate. A solid investment!"
"Impressed with the quality and diversity of this dataset It exceeded my expectations and provided valuable insights for my research."
Cost Sharing Allocation Case Study/Use Case example - How to use:
Introduction:
Cost sharing allocation refers to the practice of distributing the costs associated with managing hazards and risks among different stakeholders. In the business world, managing risk is an essential aspect of day-to-day operations. Risks come in a variety of forms, including natural disasters, technological failures, human errors, and market uncertainties. These risks can lead to significant financial losses, reputation damage, and even business closure if not managed effectively. As such, it is crucial for organizations to have a robust hazard risk management system in place to mitigate the impact of these risks. However, managing risks comes with a cost, which must be allocated fairly among the various stakeholders involved. This case study will focus on how an effective hazard risk management cost allocation system can help managers balance risk bearing and risk sharing.
Client Situation:
The client is a multinational corporation with operations in multiple countries and diverse industries, including manufacturing, retail, and healthcare. As the organization grew, the complexity of its operations increases, leading to a higher level of risk exposure. The company′s management recognized the need to implement a comprehensive hazard risk management system to protect the organization from potential losses. However, one of the challenges the organization faced was how to allocate the costs associated with this system among the various stakeholders fairly. The company needed a robust and transparent cost allocation system that would strike a balance between risk bearing and risk sharing among all stakeholders.
Consulting Methodology:
To address the client′s challenges, our consulting team implemented a five-step methodology:
1. Identifying Hazards and Risks: The first step in developing an effective hazard risk management cost allocation system was to identify all the potential hazards and risks that could impact the organization. This involved conducting a thorough risk assessment of the organization′s operations and identifying the potential sources of risks.
2. Quantifying Risks: Once the risks were identified, we then quantified them, assigning a monetary value to each risk. This involved analyzing the potential financial impact of each risk on the organization.
3. Cost Allocation Framework: With a clear understanding of the potential risks and their financial impact, we then developed a cost allocation framework. The framework was designed to ensure that risks were allocated fairly among all stakeholders based on their level of exposure.
4. Implementation Plan: We worked with the company′s management to develop an implementation plan for the new cost allocation system. This included identifying the necessary resources, roles and responsibilities, timelines, and milestones for the implementation.
5. Monitoring and Evaluation: After the implementation, we continued to work with the client to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of the new cost allocation system. This involved tracking key performance indicators (KPIs) and conducting regular reviews to make necessary adjustments as needed.
Deliverables:
Our consulting team delivered the following key outcomes to the client:
1. Hazard and Risk Assessment Report: This report outlined the identified hazards and risks and their potential financial impact on the organization.
2. Cost Allocation Framework: We provided the client with a comprehensive cost allocation framework that incorporated a fair and transparent method for distributing costs associated with managing hazards and risks.
3. Implementation Plan: A detailed implementation plan was developed, outlining the necessary steps to be taken to implement the new cost allocation system.
4. Training Materials: We developed training materials to educate the organization′s stakeholders on the new cost allocation system and how it works.
Implementation Challenges:
The implementation of the new cost allocation system presented some challenges, including resistance from some stakeholders who were accustomed to the old system and difficulty in quantifying some risks. However, through effective communication and stakeholder engagement, these challenges were addressed, and the new system was successfully implemented.
KPIs:
The following KPIs were used by our consulting team to monitor and measure the effectiveness of the new cost allocation system:
1. Percentage of Budget Allocated for Risk Management: This KPI measured the portion of the organization′s budget allocated for managing hazards and risks compared to the total budget.
2. Risk Management Costs vs. Savings: This KPI measured the overall costs associated with managing risks compared to the potential savings achieved from risk management activities.
3. Stakeholder Satisfaction: This KPI measured the satisfaction levels of stakeholders with the new cost allocation system.
4. Number of Incidents and Losses: This KPI measured the frequency and severity of incidents and losses before and after the implementation of the new cost allocation system.
Management Considerations:
Effective hazard risk management is essential for organizations to protect their assets, maintain stability, and ensure sustainability. However, implementing a new cost allocation system can be challenging, and it requires careful planning, effective communication, and collaboration among all stakeholders. It is also crucial to continuously monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of the new system and make necessary adjustments to ensure its sustainability.
Citations:
1. The Importance of Cost Allocation in Risk Management. Governor’s Office of Fiscal Review, gfoa.org/sites/default/files/07jun_fn_daive.pdf
2. Strategic Cost Allocation: An Essential Part of Enterprise Risk Management. Journal of Business Strategy, https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JBS-04-2017-0055/full/html
3. Global Hazard and Risk Management Market Size, Share, Growth, Trends and Forecast 2020-2025. Mordor Intelligence, https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/hazard-and-risk-management-market
Security and Trust:
- Secure checkout with SSL encryption Visa, Mastercard, Apple Pay, Google Pay, Stripe, Paypal
- Money-back guarantee for 30 days
- Our team is available 24/7 to assist you - support@theartofservice.com
About the Authors: Unleashing Excellence: The Mastery of Service Accredited by the Scientific Community
Immerse yourself in the pinnacle of operational wisdom through The Art of Service`s Excellence, now distinguished with esteemed accreditation from the scientific community. With an impressive 1000+ citations, The Art of Service stands as a beacon of reliability and authority in the field.Our dedication to excellence is highlighted by meticulous scrutiny and validation from the scientific community, evidenced by the 1000+ citations spanning various disciplines. Each citation attests to the profound impact and scholarly recognition of The Art of Service`s contributions.
Embark on a journey of unparalleled expertise, fortified by a wealth of research and acknowledgment from scholars globally. Join the community that not only recognizes but endorses the brilliance encapsulated in The Art of Service`s Excellence. Enhance your understanding, strategy, and implementation with a resource acknowledged and embraced by the scientific community.
Embrace excellence. Embrace The Art of Service.
Your trust in us aligns you with prestigious company; boasting over 1000 academic citations, our work ranks in the top 1% of the most cited globally. Explore our scholarly contributions at: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=blokdyk
About The Art of Service:
Our clients seek confidence in making risk management and compliance decisions based on accurate data. However, navigating compliance can be complex, and sometimes, the unknowns are even more challenging.
We empathize with the frustrations of senior executives and business owners after decades in the industry. That`s why The Art of Service has developed Self-Assessment and implementation tools, trusted by over 100,000 professionals worldwide, empowering you to take control of your compliance assessments. With over 1000 academic citations, our work stands in the top 1% of the most cited globally, reflecting our commitment to helping businesses thrive.
Founders:
Gerard Blokdyk
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gerardblokdijk/
Ivanka Menken
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ivankamenken/
