Attention all businesses and professionals!
Are you looking to enhance your cybersecurity knowledge while also securing funding for your organization? Look no further than our Cybersecurity Awareness Training and Government Funding and Manufacturing Readiness Level Knowledge Base.
Our comprehensive dataset contains 1521 prioritized requirements, solutions, benefits, results, and example case studies/use cases that will equip you with the most important questions to ask in order to get results by urgency and scope.
Our dataset is carefully curated to cover all aspects of cybersecurity awareness training, government funding, and manufacturing readiness level, providing you with a one-stop-shop for all your needs.
But what sets us apart from our competitors and alternatives? Our Cybersecurity Awareness Training and Government Funding and Manufacturing Readiness Level dataset is specifically designed for professionals, making it the go-to resource for any business or individual seeking to gain valuable knowledge in this field.
Our product is easy to use, allowing you to quickly navigate through the information and find exactly what you need.
Not only that, but our dataset is also a DIY/affordable product alternative, perfect for those who do not have the budget for expensive cybersecurity training programs.
With our product, you can access all the necessary information at a fraction of the cost.
Let′s dive into the specifics of our dataset.
It provides a detailed overview of the product type and its specifications, as well as how it compares to semi-related product types.
Our dataset also outlines the numerous benefits of utilizing our Cybersecurity Awareness Training and Government Funding and Manufacturing Readiness Level Knowledge Base, such as increased security, improved compliance, and access to potential funding opportunities.
Our team has conducted extensive research on cybersecurity awareness training and government funding to ensure that our dataset is up-to-date with the latest industry trends and regulations.
We understand the importance of staying ahead of the curve when it comes to cybersecurity, and our product allows you to do just that.
For businesses, our Cybersecurity Awareness Training and Government Funding and Manufacturing Readiness Level Knowledge Base is a game-changer.
Not only does it provide employees with vital knowledge on cybersecurity best practices, but it also helps organizations secure funding and improve their manufacturing readiness level.
And all of this at a fraction of the cost of traditional training programs.
In terms of cost, our product is a cost-effective solution for any business or professional looking to enhance their cybersecurity knowledge.
No need to spend thousands of dollars on training programs or consultants when you have access to our comprehensive and affordable dataset.
We understand that every product has its pros and cons, and we want to be transparent with our customers.
Our Cybersecurity Awareness Training and Government Funding and Manufacturing Readiness Level Knowledge Base does have its own set of drawbacks; however, we believe that the numerous benefits and value it provides far outweigh any potential cons.
So what are you waiting for? With our Cybersecurity Awareness Training and Government Funding and Manufacturing Readiness Level Knowledge Base, you can take your cybersecurity knowledge and funding opportunities to the next level.
Don′t miss out on this valuable resource – start using our dataset today!
Should researchers and departmental managers have access to all funding information? Have your organizations personnel and partners been provided cybersecurity awareness training? Should research services department have access to research results and data in progress?
Cybersecurity Awareness Training
Researchers and departmental managers should have access to relevant funding information, but not all, to maintain project-specific confidentiality.
Here are the solutions and their benefits:
**Solution 1: Restricted Access to Funding Information**
Benefits: Prevents unauthorized access, reduces risk of data breaches, and protects sensitive budget information.
**Solution 2: Role-Based Access Control (RBAC)**
Benefits: Ensures only authorized personnel access funding information, reducing the attack surface and promoting accountability.
**Solution 3: Cybersecurity Awareness Training for Researchers and Managers**
Benefits: Educates personnel on funding information security best practices, reducing the risk of human error and data breaches.
**Solution 4: Two-Factor Authentication (2FA) for Funding Information Access**
Benefits: Adds an extra layer of security, making it harder for unauthorized access and ensuring funding information remains confidential.
**Solution 5: Regular Security Audits and Compliance**
Benefits: Identifies vulnerabilities, ensures compliance with regulations, and maintains the trust of stakeholders in funding information management.
CONTROL QUESTION: Should researchers and departmental managers have access to all funding information?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now: What a fascinating question!
Here′s a Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now for Cybersecurity Awareness Training:
**BHAG:** Cybersecurity Awareness Training for All: Unlocked Funding, Empowered Researchers, and Secure Innovation
**Vision Statement:** By 2033, 90% of researchers and departmental managers worldwide will have seamless access to all relevant funding information, catalyzing unprecedented collaboration, innovation, and cybersecurity awareness, thereby protecting sensitive research data and intellectual property.
**Key Goals:**
1. **Transparency and Accessibility:** Ensure that all funding information is readily available to researchers and departmental managers, promoting accountability, trust, and efficient resource allocation.
2. **Cybersecurity Awareness and Training:** Provide mandatory, engaging, and regularly updated cybersecurity awareness training for all researchers and departmental managers, focusing on threat awareness, best practices, and incident response.
3. **Innovative Research and Collaboration:** Foster a culture of collaboration, encouraging interdisciplinary research, and facilitating the development of novel cybersecurity solutions, such as AI-powered threat detection and incident response systems.
4. **Secure Research Environments:** Implement robust, AI-driven cybersecurity measures to protect research data, intellectual property, and sensitive information, ensuring the integrity of research outcomes.
5. **Global Standards and Governance:** Establish and maintain globally recognized standards, policies, and governance frameworks for cybersecurity in research environments, ensuring consistency and interoperability across institutions and nations.
**Strategies to Achieve the BHAG:**
1. Develop and implement a secure, decentralized, and transparent funding information platform.
2. Create engaging, gamified, and regularly updated cybersecurity awareness training programs, incorporating AI-driven threats and scenarios.
3. Establish interdisciplinary research clusters, focusing on cybersecurity, AI, and data science, to develop innovative solutions and best practices.
4. Collaborate with industry partners to develop and integrate cutting-edge cybersecurity solutions, ensuring seamless integration with existing research infrastructure.
5. Foster global partnerships to establish and update standards, policies, and governance frameworks, ensuring consistency and compliance.
** Metrics for Success:**
1. Increase in funding transparency and accessibility (95% by 2030, 100% by 2033).
2. Reduction in cybersecurity breaches and incidents (80% decrease by 2030, 95% by 2033).
3. Increase in interdisciplinary research collaborations (50% increase by 2030, 100% by 2033).
4. Improvement in cybersecurity awareness and skills among researchers and departmental managers (85% proficiency by 2030, 95% by 2033).
5. Global adoption of standardized governance frameworks and policies (80% by 2030, 95% by 2033).
By achieving this BHAG, we will unlock the full potential of research and innovation, while safeguarding sensitive information and protecting the integrity of research outcomes.
"The personalized recommendations have helped me attract more qualified leads and improve my engagement rates. My content is now resonating with my audience like never before."
**Synopsis of the Client Situation**
XYZ University, a prominent research institution, faces a dilemma regarding access to funding information for its researchers and departmental managers. The university′s administration is unsure whether to grant access to sensitive financial data to these stakeholders, balancing the need for transparency with the risk of data breaches and financial mismanagement.
**Consulting Methodology**
Our consulting team employed a comprehensive approach to address this question, involving:
1. **Stakeholder interviews**: In-depth discussions with researchers, departmental managers, and finance personnel to understand their information needs and concerns.
2. **Risk assessment**: Analysis of potential risks associated with granting access to funding information, including data breaches, financial mismanagement, and reputational damage.
3. **Review of existing policies**: Examination of XYZ University′s current policies and procedures governing access to financial information.
4. **Benchmarking**: Research into best practices at peer institutions and industry standards for accessing financial information.
**Deliverables**
Our team provided a comprehensive report outlining the following recommendations:
1. **Role-based access control**: Implement a role-based access control system, restricting access to funding information to those with a legitimate need-to-know.
2. **Need-to-know principle**: Ensure that researchers and departmental managers only have access to funding information necessary for their specific roles and responsibilities.
3. **Data anonymization**: Anonymize sensitive financial data to protect confidentiality and integrity.
4. **Regular audits and monitoring**: Conduct regular audits and monitoring to detect and respond to potential data breaches or financial irregularities.
**Implementation Challenges**
1. **Cultural resistance**: Researchers and departmental managers may resist changes to their access to funding information, citing concerns about transparency and accountability.
2. **Technical hurdles**: Implementing a role-based access control system may require significant investments in IT infrastructure and resources.
3. **Balancing transparency and confidentiality**: Finding a balance between providing necessary information to stakeholders while protecting sensitive financial data.
**KPIs (Key Performance Indicators)**
1. **Access control effectiveness**: Monitor the number of unauthorized access attempts to funding information.
2. **Data breach frequency**: Track the number of data breaches resulting from unauthorized access to funding information.
3. **Stakeholder satisfaction**: Conduct regular surveys to measure the satisfaction of researchers, departmental managers, and finance personnel with the new access control system.
**Management Considerations**
1. **Communication plan**: Develop a comprehensive communication plan to educate stakeholders about the new access control system and its benefits.
2. **Training and support**: Provide ongoing training and support to ensure stakeholders understand the new system and its requirements.
3. **Continuous monitoring and evaluation**: Regularly review and refine the access control system to address emerging risks and concerns.
**Citations**
* Cybersecurity and Information Assurance by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) [1]
* The need-to-know principle in access control by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) [2]
* A Role-Based Access Control Model for Financial Information Systems by the Journal of Information Systems [3]
* Data Anonymization: A Survey by the International Journal of Information Security [4]
**Market Research Reports**
* Cybersecurity in Education by MarketsandMarkets [5]
* Global Access Control Market by ResearchAndMarkets.com [6]
By adopting a comprehensive approach to access control, XYZ University can balance the need for transparency with the need to protect sensitive financial information, minimizing the risk of data breaches and financial mismanagement.
References:
[1] National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2017). Cybersecurity and Information Assurance.
[2] International Organization for Standardization. (2013). The need-to-know principle in access control.
[3] Journal of Information Systems. (2015). A Role-Based Access Control Model for Financial Information Systems.
[4] International Journal of Information Security. (2018). Data Anonymization: A Survey.
[5] MarketsandMarkets. (2020). Cybersecurity in Education.
[6] ResearchAndMarkets.com. (2022). Global Access Control Market.
Are you looking to enhance your cybersecurity knowledge while also securing funding for your organization? Look no further than our Cybersecurity Awareness Training and Government Funding and Manufacturing Readiness Level Knowledge Base.
Our comprehensive dataset contains 1521 prioritized requirements, solutions, benefits, results, and example case studies/use cases that will equip you with the most important questions to ask in order to get results by urgency and scope.
Our dataset is carefully curated to cover all aspects of cybersecurity awareness training, government funding, and manufacturing readiness level, providing you with a one-stop-shop for all your needs.
But what sets us apart from our competitors and alternatives? Our Cybersecurity Awareness Training and Government Funding and Manufacturing Readiness Level dataset is specifically designed for professionals, making it the go-to resource for any business or individual seeking to gain valuable knowledge in this field.
Our product is easy to use, allowing you to quickly navigate through the information and find exactly what you need.
Not only that, but our dataset is also a DIY/affordable product alternative, perfect for those who do not have the budget for expensive cybersecurity training programs.
With our product, you can access all the necessary information at a fraction of the cost.
Let′s dive into the specifics of our dataset.
It provides a detailed overview of the product type and its specifications, as well as how it compares to semi-related product types.
Our dataset also outlines the numerous benefits of utilizing our Cybersecurity Awareness Training and Government Funding and Manufacturing Readiness Level Knowledge Base, such as increased security, improved compliance, and access to potential funding opportunities.
Our team has conducted extensive research on cybersecurity awareness training and government funding to ensure that our dataset is up-to-date with the latest industry trends and regulations.
We understand the importance of staying ahead of the curve when it comes to cybersecurity, and our product allows you to do just that.
For businesses, our Cybersecurity Awareness Training and Government Funding and Manufacturing Readiness Level Knowledge Base is a game-changer.
Not only does it provide employees with vital knowledge on cybersecurity best practices, but it also helps organizations secure funding and improve their manufacturing readiness level.
And all of this at a fraction of the cost of traditional training programs.
In terms of cost, our product is a cost-effective solution for any business or professional looking to enhance their cybersecurity knowledge.
No need to spend thousands of dollars on training programs or consultants when you have access to our comprehensive and affordable dataset.
We understand that every product has its pros and cons, and we want to be transparent with our customers.
Our Cybersecurity Awareness Training and Government Funding and Manufacturing Readiness Level Knowledge Base does have its own set of drawbacks; however, we believe that the numerous benefits and value it provides far outweigh any potential cons.
So what are you waiting for? With our Cybersecurity Awareness Training and Government Funding and Manufacturing Readiness Level Knowledge Base, you can take your cybersecurity knowledge and funding opportunities to the next level.
Don′t miss out on this valuable resource – start using our dataset today!
Discover Insights, Make Informed Decisions, and Stay Ahead of the Curve:
Key Features:
Comprehensive set of 1521 prioritized Cybersecurity Awareness Training requirements. - Extensive coverage of 56 Cybersecurity Awareness Training topic scopes.
- In-depth analysis of 56 Cybersecurity Awareness Training step-by-step solutions, benefits, BHAGs.
- Detailed examination of 56 Cybersecurity Awareness Training case studies and use cases.
- Digital download upon purchase.
- Enjoy lifetime document updates included with your purchase.
- Benefit from a fully editable and customizable Excel format.
- Trusted and utilized by over 10,000 organizations.
- Covering: Robotics And Manufacturing, Additive Manufacturing Technology, Additive Manufacturing Application, Cyber Physical Systems, Cybersecurity Information Sharing, Manufacturing Readiness Level, Energy Storage Initiative, Critical Infrastructure Protection, Cybersecurity Standards, Cybersecurity Awareness, Advanced Materials Application, Manufacturing Innovation Fund, DoE Research Collaboration, Cybersecurity Training Initiative, Energy Efficiency Initiative, Cybersecurity Research Infrastructure, Cybersecurity Risk Management Framework, , Cybersecurity Risk Management, Cybersecurity Simulation, DoE Research Funding, Cybersecurity Information System Protection, Manufacturing Readiness Assessment, Robotics And Automation Application, Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Manufacturing Readiness Model, Robotics And Automation, Additive Manufacturing Research, Manufacturing Innovation Platform, Cybersecurity Awareness Training, Manufacturing Readiness Tool, Electronics Manufacturing Process, DoE Funding Opportunities, Energy Efficiency Technology, Energy Storage Research, Manufacturing USA Network, Advanced Materials Initiative, Cybersecurity Infrastructure Protection, Electronics Manufacturing Technology, Medical Device Manufacturing, Cybersecurity Manufacturing, Electronics Manufacturing Initiative, Industrial Base Analysis, Cybersecurity Risk Assessment, Cybersecurity Infrastructure, Cybersecurity Information System, DoE Grant Funding, High Performance Computing, Advanced Materials Development, Energy Storage Technology, Energy Efficiency Strategy, Cybersecurity Innovation, Research Funding Opportunities, Small Business Grant, Materials Science Research, Additive Manufacturing Process
Cybersecurity Awareness Training Assessment Dataset - Utilization, Solutions, Advantages, BHAG (Big Hairy Audacious Goal):
Cybersecurity Awareness Training
Researchers and departmental managers should have access to relevant funding information, but not all, to maintain project-specific confidentiality.
Here are the solutions and their benefits:
**Solution 1: Restricted Access to Funding Information**
Benefits: Prevents unauthorized access, reduces risk of data breaches, and protects sensitive budget information.
**Solution 2: Role-Based Access Control (RBAC)**
Benefits: Ensures only authorized personnel access funding information, reducing the attack surface and promoting accountability.
**Solution 3: Cybersecurity Awareness Training for Researchers and Managers**
Benefits: Educates personnel on funding information security best practices, reducing the risk of human error and data breaches.
**Solution 4: Two-Factor Authentication (2FA) for Funding Information Access**
Benefits: Adds an extra layer of security, making it harder for unauthorized access and ensuring funding information remains confidential.
**Solution 5: Regular Security Audits and Compliance**
Benefits: Identifies vulnerabilities, ensures compliance with regulations, and maintains the trust of stakeholders in funding information management.
CONTROL QUESTION: Should researchers and departmental managers have access to all funding information?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now: What a fascinating question!
Here′s a Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now for Cybersecurity Awareness Training:
**BHAG:** Cybersecurity Awareness Training for All: Unlocked Funding, Empowered Researchers, and Secure Innovation
**Vision Statement:** By 2033, 90% of researchers and departmental managers worldwide will have seamless access to all relevant funding information, catalyzing unprecedented collaboration, innovation, and cybersecurity awareness, thereby protecting sensitive research data and intellectual property.
**Key Goals:**
1. **Transparency and Accessibility:** Ensure that all funding information is readily available to researchers and departmental managers, promoting accountability, trust, and efficient resource allocation.
2. **Cybersecurity Awareness and Training:** Provide mandatory, engaging, and regularly updated cybersecurity awareness training for all researchers and departmental managers, focusing on threat awareness, best practices, and incident response.
3. **Innovative Research and Collaboration:** Foster a culture of collaboration, encouraging interdisciplinary research, and facilitating the development of novel cybersecurity solutions, such as AI-powered threat detection and incident response systems.
4. **Secure Research Environments:** Implement robust, AI-driven cybersecurity measures to protect research data, intellectual property, and sensitive information, ensuring the integrity of research outcomes.
5. **Global Standards and Governance:** Establish and maintain globally recognized standards, policies, and governance frameworks for cybersecurity in research environments, ensuring consistency and interoperability across institutions and nations.
**Strategies to Achieve the BHAG:**
1. Develop and implement a secure, decentralized, and transparent funding information platform.
2. Create engaging, gamified, and regularly updated cybersecurity awareness training programs, incorporating AI-driven threats and scenarios.
3. Establish interdisciplinary research clusters, focusing on cybersecurity, AI, and data science, to develop innovative solutions and best practices.
4. Collaborate with industry partners to develop and integrate cutting-edge cybersecurity solutions, ensuring seamless integration with existing research infrastructure.
5. Foster global partnerships to establish and update standards, policies, and governance frameworks, ensuring consistency and compliance.
** Metrics for Success:**
1. Increase in funding transparency and accessibility (95% by 2030, 100% by 2033).
2. Reduction in cybersecurity breaches and incidents (80% decrease by 2030, 95% by 2033).
3. Increase in interdisciplinary research collaborations (50% increase by 2030, 100% by 2033).
4. Improvement in cybersecurity awareness and skills among researchers and departmental managers (85% proficiency by 2030, 95% by 2033).
5. Global adoption of standardized governance frameworks and policies (80% by 2030, 95% by 2033).
By achieving this BHAG, we will unlock the full potential of research and innovation, while safeguarding sensitive information and protecting the integrity of research outcomes.
Customer Testimonials:
"The personalized recommendations have helped me attract more qualified leads and improve my engagement rates. My content is now resonating with my audience like never before."
"This downloadable dataset of prioritized recommendations is a game-changer! It`s incredibly well-organized and has saved me so much time in decision-making. Highly recommend!"
"The quality of the prioritized recommendations in this dataset is exceptional. It`s evident that a lot of thought and expertise went into curating it. A must-have for anyone looking to optimize their processes!"
Cybersecurity Awareness Training Case Study/Use Case example - How to use:
**Case Study: Access to Funding Information for Researchers and Departmental Managers****Synopsis of the Client Situation**
XYZ University, a prominent research institution, faces a dilemma regarding access to funding information for its researchers and departmental managers. The university′s administration is unsure whether to grant access to sensitive financial data to these stakeholders, balancing the need for transparency with the risk of data breaches and financial mismanagement.
**Consulting Methodology**
Our consulting team employed a comprehensive approach to address this question, involving:
1. **Stakeholder interviews**: In-depth discussions with researchers, departmental managers, and finance personnel to understand their information needs and concerns.
2. **Risk assessment**: Analysis of potential risks associated with granting access to funding information, including data breaches, financial mismanagement, and reputational damage.
3. **Review of existing policies**: Examination of XYZ University′s current policies and procedures governing access to financial information.
4. **Benchmarking**: Research into best practices at peer institutions and industry standards for accessing financial information.
**Deliverables**
Our team provided a comprehensive report outlining the following recommendations:
1. **Role-based access control**: Implement a role-based access control system, restricting access to funding information to those with a legitimate need-to-know.
2. **Need-to-know principle**: Ensure that researchers and departmental managers only have access to funding information necessary for their specific roles and responsibilities.
3. **Data anonymization**: Anonymize sensitive financial data to protect confidentiality and integrity.
4. **Regular audits and monitoring**: Conduct regular audits and monitoring to detect and respond to potential data breaches or financial irregularities.
**Implementation Challenges**
1. **Cultural resistance**: Researchers and departmental managers may resist changes to their access to funding information, citing concerns about transparency and accountability.
2. **Technical hurdles**: Implementing a role-based access control system may require significant investments in IT infrastructure and resources.
3. **Balancing transparency and confidentiality**: Finding a balance between providing necessary information to stakeholders while protecting sensitive financial data.
**KPIs (Key Performance Indicators)**
1. **Access control effectiveness**: Monitor the number of unauthorized access attempts to funding information.
2. **Data breach frequency**: Track the number of data breaches resulting from unauthorized access to funding information.
3. **Stakeholder satisfaction**: Conduct regular surveys to measure the satisfaction of researchers, departmental managers, and finance personnel with the new access control system.
**Management Considerations**
1. **Communication plan**: Develop a comprehensive communication plan to educate stakeholders about the new access control system and its benefits.
2. **Training and support**: Provide ongoing training and support to ensure stakeholders understand the new system and its requirements.
3. **Continuous monitoring and evaluation**: Regularly review and refine the access control system to address emerging risks and concerns.
**Citations**
* Cybersecurity and Information Assurance by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) [1]
* The need-to-know principle in access control by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) [2]
* A Role-Based Access Control Model for Financial Information Systems by the Journal of Information Systems [3]
* Data Anonymization: A Survey by the International Journal of Information Security [4]
**Market Research Reports**
* Cybersecurity in Education by MarketsandMarkets [5]
* Global Access Control Market by ResearchAndMarkets.com [6]
By adopting a comprehensive approach to access control, XYZ University can balance the need for transparency with the need to protect sensitive financial information, minimizing the risk of data breaches and financial mismanagement.
References:
[1] National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2017). Cybersecurity and Information Assurance.
[2] International Organization for Standardization. (2013). The need-to-know principle in access control.
[3] Journal of Information Systems. (2015). A Role-Based Access Control Model for Financial Information Systems.
[4] International Journal of Information Security. (2018). Data Anonymization: A Survey.
[5] MarketsandMarkets. (2020). Cybersecurity in Education.
[6] ResearchAndMarkets.com. (2022). Global Access Control Market.
Security and Trust:
- Secure checkout with SSL encryption Visa, Mastercard, Apple Pay, Google Pay, Stripe, Paypal
- Money-back guarantee for 30 days
- Our team is available 24/7 to assist you - support@theartofservice.com
About the Authors: Unleashing Excellence: The Mastery of Service Accredited by the Scientific Community
Immerse yourself in the pinnacle of operational wisdom through The Art of Service`s Excellence, now distinguished with esteemed accreditation from the scientific community. With an impressive 1000+ citations, The Art of Service stands as a beacon of reliability and authority in the field.Our dedication to excellence is highlighted by meticulous scrutiny and validation from the scientific community, evidenced by the 1000+ citations spanning various disciplines. Each citation attests to the profound impact and scholarly recognition of The Art of Service`s contributions.
Embark on a journey of unparalleled expertise, fortified by a wealth of research and acknowledgment from scholars globally. Join the community that not only recognizes but endorses the brilliance encapsulated in The Art of Service`s Excellence. Enhance your understanding, strategy, and implementation with a resource acknowledged and embraced by the scientific community.
Embrace excellence. Embrace The Art of Service.
Your trust in us aligns you with prestigious company; boasting over 1000 academic citations, our work ranks in the top 1% of the most cited globally. Explore our scholarly contributions at: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=blokdyk
About The Art of Service:
Our clients seek confidence in making risk management and compliance decisions based on accurate data. However, navigating compliance can be complex, and sometimes, the unknowns are even more challenging.
We empathize with the frustrations of senior executives and business owners after decades in the industry. That`s why The Art of Service has developed Self-Assessment and implementation tools, trusted by over 100,000 professionals worldwide, empowering you to take control of your compliance assessments. With over 1000 academic citations, our work stands in the top 1% of the most cited globally, reflecting our commitment to helping businesses thrive.
Founders:
Gerard Blokdyk
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gerardblokdijk/
Ivanka Menken
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ivankamenken/
