Attention all professionals seeking to make a significant impact in your industry!
Introducing the ultimate tool to achieve your goals - our Impact Evaluation and Collective Impact Knowledge Base.
This comprehensive dataset is specifically designed to help you identify the most crucial questions to ask in order to get results quickly and effectively, with consideration to both urgency and scope.
With 1524 prioritized requirements, this knowledge base has everything you need to successfully carry out an impact evaluation or collective impact project.
But what makes our Impact Evaluation and Collective Impact Knowledge Base stand out from competitors and alternatives? Let us break it down for you:- Our dataset is tailored for professionals like you, who are looking to make a difference.
We understand that your time is valuable and our product is designed to optimize your efforts.
- The Impact Evaluation and Collective Impact Knowledge Base covers a wide range of industries and use cases, making it a versatile and valuable resource for any project.
- It is user-friendly and easily accessible, so you can start using it right away without any hassle.
No need to spend extra on expensive consultants or courses - this DIY product is affordable and easy to use.
- Not only does our dataset provide the necessary information for impact evaluations and collective impact initiatives, but it also includes real-life case studies and examples to illustrate practical applications.
- Our product has been thoroughly researched and curated by experts in the field, ensuring accuracy and relevance.
- Whether you are a small business or a large corporation, our Impact Evaluation and Collective Impact Knowledge Base can be applied to any organization of any size.
- While other products on the market may come with a hefty price tag, our dataset is cost-effective and offers great value for your investment.
But what exactly does our Impact Evaluation and Collective Impact Knowledge Base offer? Here are just a few highlights:- Prioritized requirements: Our dataset includes a comprehensive list of 1524 prioritized requirements to guide your impact evaluation or collective impact project.
- Solutions: We not only provide the questions to ask but also offer solutions and strategies to address any issues that may arise in your project.
- Benefits: The Impact Evaluation and Collective Impact Knowledge Base outlines the potential benefits of carrying out such projects, such as increased efficiency, improved outcomes, and increased impact.
- Results: With our dataset, you will be able to measure and track the results of your project, making it easier to evaluate its success and effectiveness.
- Case studies/use cases: Our dataset includes real-life examples of successful impact evaluation and collective impact projects, giving you a better understanding of how to apply the knowledge to your own work.
Investing in our Impact Evaluation and Collective Impact Knowledge Base is an investment in your success and the betterment of your industry.
Don′t miss out on this opportunity to take your projects to the next level.
Get your hands on our knowledge base today and see the difference it can make for your business.
Order now and take the first step towards becoming a leader in implementing impactful changes in your organization.
How did all of this make you feel and what impact did your feelings have on your actions and observations? Has your organization conducted a third party impact evaluation of its programs? Has your organization conducted a privacy impact assessment on the information system?
Impact Evaluation
Impact evaluation involves assessing the effects of a program or intervention. Feelings experienced during the evaluation process can influence actions and observations; for example, if an evaluator feels positively about a program, they may be more likely to observe and report positive outcomes. Conversely, if an evaluator has negative feelings towards a program, they may be more likely to focus on and report negative outcomes. These feelings can also impact the actions of those being evaluated, as they may feel motivated or discouraged based on the evaluator′s feedback. It is important for evaluators to be aware of their own biases and take steps to minimize their impact on the evaluation process.
1. Data-driven Decisions: Collecting and analyzing data allows for informed decisions, leading to more effective strategies.
2. Continuous Improvement: Regular evaluations ensure that the initiative stays on track and adapts to changes.
3. Shared Understanding: Evaluation results foster transparency and alignment among stakeholders.
4. Accountability: Regular impact assessments ensure resources are used efficiently and effectively.
5. Emotional Connection: Acknowledging feelings can motivate stakeholders and strengthen commitment.
6. Informed Adjustments: Understanding the emotional impact guides adjustments for better outcomes.
7. Enhanced Collaboration: Emotional awareness promotes empathy and trust among stakeholders.
8. Improved Communication: Sharing impact evaluations fosters open dialogue and strengthens partnerships.
CONTROL QUESTION: How did all of this make you feel and what impact did the feelings have on the actions and observations?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now: A big hairy audacious goal for Impact Evaluation in 10 years could be to have a world where all decisions, policies, and programs are informed by rigorous, ethical, and culturally responsive impact evaluations. This means that impact evaluations would be an integral part of decision-making processes at all levels, from local communities to national governments and international organizations.
When I think about this goal, I feel excited, motivated, and hopeful. I believe that impact evaluations have the potential to significantly improve people′s lives by ensuring that resources are used effectively and equitably. This goal also makes me feel a sense of responsibility, as it requires a collective effort from all of us who work in this field to make it a reality.
The feelings of excitement, motivation, and hope inspire me to take action towards achieving this goal. For example, I am more likely to volunteer my time and expertise to support impact evaluations in underserved communities or to advocate for the use of impact evaluations in policy and program decisions. I am also more likely to seek out opportunities to collaborate and learn from others who share this goal.
On the other hand, the feeling of responsibility motivates me to hold myself and others accountable for the quality and ethical conduct of impact evaluations. This includes ensuring that evaluations are conducted with the full participation and consent of the communities being studied, and that the findings are disseminated in an accessible and actionable way.
Overall, the impact of these feelings on my actions and observations is positive and motivating. They drive me to be more intentional and purposeful in my work and to strive for excellence in all that I do. I believe that by working towards this big hairy audacious goal, we can make a significant and positive impact on the world.
"This dataset is more than just data; it`s a partner in my success. It`s a constant source of inspiration and guidance."
Synopsis of the Client Situation
A mid-sized technology company (referred to as TechCo) sought to expand its market share and product offerings through a strategic merger and acquisition. The target company, InnoTech, was a smaller but rapidly growing firm with a complementary product line and a strong reputation for innovation. The client engaged our consulting firm to conduct an impact evaluation of the proposed merger, with a specific focus on assessing the potential financial, operational, and cultural implications for TechCo.
Consulting Methodology
To conduct the impact evaluation, we employed a comprehensive consulting methodology that included the following steps:
1. Desk research: We conducted a thorough review of publicly available information on TechCo and InnoTech, including financial statements, annual reports, press releases, and industry analyses.
2. Interviews: We conducted in-depth interviews with key stakeholders from both companies, including members of the C-suite, managers, and employees at various levels. The interviews focused on understanding the motivations for the merger, the anticipated benefits, and the potential challenges.
3. Data analysis: We analyzed financial and operational data from both companies to assess the potential synergies and cost savings that could be achieved through the merger.
4. Cultural assessment: We conducted a cultural assessment of both organizations to understand the values, norms, and practices that shaped their work environments. We used a variety of tools, including surveys, focus groups, and interviews, to gather data on the cultural dimensions of both organizations.
5. Scenario analysis: We developed multiple scenarios to project the potential financial and operational impact of the merger, taking into account different assumptions about market conditions, integration challenges, and cultural compatibility.
Deliverables
The deliverables for this engagement included:
1. A comprehensive report outlining the findings of the impact evaluation, including an assessment of the potential financial, operational, and cultural implications of the merger.
2. A detailed roadmap for integration, including recommendations on how to manage cultural differences, mitigate risks, and capture synergies.
3. A dashboard of key performance indicators (KPIs) to monitor the progress of the integration and evaluate the success of the merger.
Implementation Challenges
The implementation of the merger and acquisition was not without challenges. One of the biggest challenges was managing the cultural integration of the two organizations. Despite the complementary product lines, there were significant differences in the values, norms, and practices of TechCo and InnoTech. These differences led to tensions and conflicts, particularly in the early stages of the integration.
To address these challenges, we recommended a phased approach to integration, starting with a period of coexistence and mutual learning, followed by a gradual alignment of processes, systems, and structures. We also emphasized the importance of communication and transparency during the integration process, and provided training and support to help employees navigate the changes.
KPIs and Management Considerations
To evaluate the success of the merger, we identified a set of KPIs that included both financial and non-financial measures. These included:
1. Revenue growth: We tracked the revenue growth of the combined entity, compared to a pre-merger baseline and to industry benchmarks.
2. Cost savings: We measured the cost savings achieved through the merger, including synergies in areas such as procurement, Ru0026D, and sales and marketing.
3. Employee engagement: We measured employee engagement and satisfaction, both before and after the merger, to assess the impact of the cultural integration.
4. Time to market: We tracked the time to market for new products and services, to assess the impact of the merger on innovation and competitiveness.
In addition to these KPIs, we provided ongoing support to TechCo′s leadership team, including regular check-ins and progress reports, to ensure that the merger remained on track and that any issues or challenges were addressed in a timely and effective manner.
Conclusion
The impact evaluation of TechCo′s merger and acquisition with InnoTech highlighted both the potential benefits and challenges of such transactions. While the merger offered significant opportunities for growth and innovation, it also presented significant cultural challenges that required careful management and attention. Through a comprehensive impact evaluation, we were able to provide TechCo with a clear roadmap for integration, including recommendations on how to manage cultural differences, mitigate risks, and capture synergies. The use of KPIs and ongoing support helped ensure that the merger remained on track and that its impact was evaluated and measured over time.
Citations
* Accenture. (2019). Mu0026A: A new era of transformation. Retrieved from u003chttps://www.accenture.com/us-en/insights/operations/ma-new-era-of-transformationu003e
* Deloitte. (2020). The state of the deal: Mu0026A trends 2020. Retrieved from u003chttps://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/pages/mergers-and-acquisitions/articles/ma-trends-2020.htmlu003e
* KPMG. (2021). Mu0026A outlook: Navigating uncertainty. Retrieved from u003chttps://home.kpmg/us/en/home/insights/2021/01/ma-outlook-navigating-uncertainty.htmlu003e
* PwC. (2020). 2020 PwC US pulse survey: Mu0026A in the new reality. Retrieved from u003chttps://www.pwc.com/us/en/services/advisory/deals/ma-pulse-survey.htmlu003e
Introducing the ultimate tool to achieve your goals - our Impact Evaluation and Collective Impact Knowledge Base.
This comprehensive dataset is specifically designed to help you identify the most crucial questions to ask in order to get results quickly and effectively, with consideration to both urgency and scope.
With 1524 prioritized requirements, this knowledge base has everything you need to successfully carry out an impact evaluation or collective impact project.
But what makes our Impact Evaluation and Collective Impact Knowledge Base stand out from competitors and alternatives? Let us break it down for you:- Our dataset is tailored for professionals like you, who are looking to make a difference.
We understand that your time is valuable and our product is designed to optimize your efforts.
- The Impact Evaluation and Collective Impact Knowledge Base covers a wide range of industries and use cases, making it a versatile and valuable resource for any project.
- It is user-friendly and easily accessible, so you can start using it right away without any hassle.
No need to spend extra on expensive consultants or courses - this DIY product is affordable and easy to use.
- Not only does our dataset provide the necessary information for impact evaluations and collective impact initiatives, but it also includes real-life case studies and examples to illustrate practical applications.
- Our product has been thoroughly researched and curated by experts in the field, ensuring accuracy and relevance.
- Whether you are a small business or a large corporation, our Impact Evaluation and Collective Impact Knowledge Base can be applied to any organization of any size.
- While other products on the market may come with a hefty price tag, our dataset is cost-effective and offers great value for your investment.
But what exactly does our Impact Evaluation and Collective Impact Knowledge Base offer? Here are just a few highlights:- Prioritized requirements: Our dataset includes a comprehensive list of 1524 prioritized requirements to guide your impact evaluation or collective impact project.
- Solutions: We not only provide the questions to ask but also offer solutions and strategies to address any issues that may arise in your project.
- Benefits: The Impact Evaluation and Collective Impact Knowledge Base outlines the potential benefits of carrying out such projects, such as increased efficiency, improved outcomes, and increased impact.
- Results: With our dataset, you will be able to measure and track the results of your project, making it easier to evaluate its success and effectiveness.
- Case studies/use cases: Our dataset includes real-life examples of successful impact evaluation and collective impact projects, giving you a better understanding of how to apply the knowledge to your own work.
Investing in our Impact Evaluation and Collective Impact Knowledge Base is an investment in your success and the betterment of your industry.
Don′t miss out on this opportunity to take your projects to the next level.
Get your hands on our knowledge base today and see the difference it can make for your business.
Order now and take the first step towards becoming a leader in implementing impactful changes in your organization.
Discover Insights, Make Informed Decisions, and Stay Ahead of the Curve:
Key Features:
Comprehensive set of 1524 prioritized Impact Evaluation requirements. - Extensive coverage of 124 Impact Evaluation topic scopes.
- In-depth analysis of 124 Impact Evaluation step-by-step solutions, benefits, BHAGs.
- Detailed examination of 124 Impact Evaluation case studies and use cases.
- Digital download upon purchase.
- Enjoy lifetime document updates included with your purchase.
- Benefit from a fully editable and customizable Excel format.
- Trusted and utilized by over 10,000 organizations.
- Covering: Cultural Competency, Community Well Being, Community Driven Solutions, Shared Learning, Collective Impact Evaluation, Multi Stakeholder Collaboration, Social Innovation, Continuous Improvement, Stakeholder Relationship, Collective Impact Infrastructure, Impact Evaluation, Sustainability Impact, Power Dynamics, Realistic Goals, Collaborative Problem Solving, Shared Vision, End-User Feedback, Collective Buy In, Community Impact, Community Resilience, Community Empowerment, Community Based Research, Collaborative Development, Evidence Based Strategies, Collaborative Processes, Community Centered Design, Goal Alignment, Diversity Impact, Resource Optimization, Online Collaboration, Accountability Mechanisms, Collective Impact Framework, Local Leadership, Social Entrepreneurship, Multi Disciplinary Approach, Social Capital, Effective Grantmaking, Collaboration Teams, Resource Development, Impact Investing, Structural Change, Problem Solving Approach, Collective Impact Implementation, Collective Impact Models, Community Mobilization, Sustainable Financing, Professional Development, Innovative Solutions, Resource Alignment, Mutual Understanding, Emotional Impact, Equity Focus, Coalition Building, Collective Insight, Performance Monitoring, Participatory Action Research, Civic Technology, Collective Impact Strategy, Relationship Management, Proactive Collaboration, Process Improvement, Upstream Thinking, Global Collaboration, Community Capacity Building, Collective Goals, Collective Impact Assessment, Collective Impact Network, Collective Leadership, Food Safety, Data Driven Decisions, Collective Impact Design, Capacity Sharing, Scaling Impact, Shared Ownership, Stakeholders Engagement, Holistic Approach, Collective Decision Making, Continuous Communication, Capacity Building Initiatives, Stakeholder Buy In, Participatory Decision Making, Integrated Services, Empowerment Evaluation, Corporate Social Responsibility, Transparent Reporting, Breaking Silos, Equitable Outcomes, Perceived Value, Collaboration Networks, Collective Impact, Fostering Collaboration, Collective Vision, Community Vision, Project Stakeholders, Policy Advocacy, Shared Measurement, Regional Collaboration, Civic Engagement, Adaptive Planning, Claim validation, Confidence Building, Continuous Improvement Cycles, Evaluation Metrics, Youth Leadership, Community Engagement, Conflict Resolution, Data Management, Cross Sector Collaboration, Stakeholder Engagement, Sustainable Development, Community Mapping, Community Based Initiatives, Shared Resources, Collective Impact Initiative, Long Term Commitment, Stakeholder Alignment, Adaptive Learning, Strategic Communication, Knowledge Exchange, Collective Action, Innovation Focus, Public Engagement, Strategic Partnerships, Youth Development
Impact Evaluation Assessment Dataset - Utilization, Solutions, Advantages, BHAG (Big Hairy Audacious Goal):
Impact Evaluation
Impact evaluation involves assessing the effects of a program or intervention. Feelings experienced during the evaluation process can influence actions and observations; for example, if an evaluator feels positively about a program, they may be more likely to observe and report positive outcomes. Conversely, if an evaluator has negative feelings towards a program, they may be more likely to focus on and report negative outcomes. These feelings can also impact the actions of those being evaluated, as they may feel motivated or discouraged based on the evaluator′s feedback. It is important for evaluators to be aware of their own biases and take steps to minimize their impact on the evaluation process.
1. Data-driven Decisions: Collecting and analyzing data allows for informed decisions, leading to more effective strategies.
2. Continuous Improvement: Regular evaluations ensure that the initiative stays on track and adapts to changes.
3. Shared Understanding: Evaluation results foster transparency and alignment among stakeholders.
4. Accountability: Regular impact assessments ensure resources are used efficiently and effectively.
5. Emotional Connection: Acknowledging feelings can motivate stakeholders and strengthen commitment.
6. Informed Adjustments: Understanding the emotional impact guides adjustments for better outcomes.
7. Enhanced Collaboration: Emotional awareness promotes empathy and trust among stakeholders.
8. Improved Communication: Sharing impact evaluations fosters open dialogue and strengthens partnerships.
CONTROL QUESTION: How did all of this make you feel and what impact did the feelings have on the actions and observations?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now: A big hairy audacious goal for Impact Evaluation in 10 years could be to have a world where all decisions, policies, and programs are informed by rigorous, ethical, and culturally responsive impact evaluations. This means that impact evaluations would be an integral part of decision-making processes at all levels, from local communities to national governments and international organizations.
When I think about this goal, I feel excited, motivated, and hopeful. I believe that impact evaluations have the potential to significantly improve people′s lives by ensuring that resources are used effectively and equitably. This goal also makes me feel a sense of responsibility, as it requires a collective effort from all of us who work in this field to make it a reality.
The feelings of excitement, motivation, and hope inspire me to take action towards achieving this goal. For example, I am more likely to volunteer my time and expertise to support impact evaluations in underserved communities or to advocate for the use of impact evaluations in policy and program decisions. I am also more likely to seek out opportunities to collaborate and learn from others who share this goal.
On the other hand, the feeling of responsibility motivates me to hold myself and others accountable for the quality and ethical conduct of impact evaluations. This includes ensuring that evaluations are conducted with the full participation and consent of the communities being studied, and that the findings are disseminated in an accessible and actionable way.
Overall, the impact of these feelings on my actions and observations is positive and motivating. They drive me to be more intentional and purposeful in my work and to strive for excellence in all that I do. I believe that by working towards this big hairy audacious goal, we can make a significant and positive impact on the world.
Customer Testimonials:
"This dataset is more than just data; it`s a partner in my success. It`s a constant source of inspiration and guidance."
"This dataset has significantly improved the efficiency of my workflow. The prioritized recommendations are clear and concise, making it easy to identify the most impactful actions. A must-have for analysts!"
"The range of variables in this dataset is fantastic. It allowed me to explore various aspects of my research, and the results were spot-on. Great resource!"
Impact Evaluation Case Study/Use Case example - How to use:
Case Study: Impact Evaluation of a Merger and AcquisitionSynopsis of the Client Situation
A mid-sized technology company (referred to as TechCo) sought to expand its market share and product offerings through a strategic merger and acquisition. The target company, InnoTech, was a smaller but rapidly growing firm with a complementary product line and a strong reputation for innovation. The client engaged our consulting firm to conduct an impact evaluation of the proposed merger, with a specific focus on assessing the potential financial, operational, and cultural implications for TechCo.
Consulting Methodology
To conduct the impact evaluation, we employed a comprehensive consulting methodology that included the following steps:
1. Desk research: We conducted a thorough review of publicly available information on TechCo and InnoTech, including financial statements, annual reports, press releases, and industry analyses.
2. Interviews: We conducted in-depth interviews with key stakeholders from both companies, including members of the C-suite, managers, and employees at various levels. The interviews focused on understanding the motivations for the merger, the anticipated benefits, and the potential challenges.
3. Data analysis: We analyzed financial and operational data from both companies to assess the potential synergies and cost savings that could be achieved through the merger.
4. Cultural assessment: We conducted a cultural assessment of both organizations to understand the values, norms, and practices that shaped their work environments. We used a variety of tools, including surveys, focus groups, and interviews, to gather data on the cultural dimensions of both organizations.
5. Scenario analysis: We developed multiple scenarios to project the potential financial and operational impact of the merger, taking into account different assumptions about market conditions, integration challenges, and cultural compatibility.
Deliverables
The deliverables for this engagement included:
1. A comprehensive report outlining the findings of the impact evaluation, including an assessment of the potential financial, operational, and cultural implications of the merger.
2. A detailed roadmap for integration, including recommendations on how to manage cultural differences, mitigate risks, and capture synergies.
3. A dashboard of key performance indicators (KPIs) to monitor the progress of the integration and evaluate the success of the merger.
Implementation Challenges
The implementation of the merger and acquisition was not without challenges. One of the biggest challenges was managing the cultural integration of the two organizations. Despite the complementary product lines, there were significant differences in the values, norms, and practices of TechCo and InnoTech. These differences led to tensions and conflicts, particularly in the early stages of the integration.
To address these challenges, we recommended a phased approach to integration, starting with a period of coexistence and mutual learning, followed by a gradual alignment of processes, systems, and structures. We also emphasized the importance of communication and transparency during the integration process, and provided training and support to help employees navigate the changes.
KPIs and Management Considerations
To evaluate the success of the merger, we identified a set of KPIs that included both financial and non-financial measures. These included:
1. Revenue growth: We tracked the revenue growth of the combined entity, compared to a pre-merger baseline and to industry benchmarks.
2. Cost savings: We measured the cost savings achieved through the merger, including synergies in areas such as procurement, Ru0026D, and sales and marketing.
3. Employee engagement: We measured employee engagement and satisfaction, both before and after the merger, to assess the impact of the cultural integration.
4. Time to market: We tracked the time to market for new products and services, to assess the impact of the merger on innovation and competitiveness.
In addition to these KPIs, we provided ongoing support to TechCo′s leadership team, including regular check-ins and progress reports, to ensure that the merger remained on track and that any issues or challenges were addressed in a timely and effective manner.
Conclusion
The impact evaluation of TechCo′s merger and acquisition with InnoTech highlighted both the potential benefits and challenges of such transactions. While the merger offered significant opportunities for growth and innovation, it also presented significant cultural challenges that required careful management and attention. Through a comprehensive impact evaluation, we were able to provide TechCo with a clear roadmap for integration, including recommendations on how to manage cultural differences, mitigate risks, and capture synergies. The use of KPIs and ongoing support helped ensure that the merger remained on track and that its impact was evaluated and measured over time.
Citations
* Accenture. (2019). Mu0026A: A new era of transformation. Retrieved from u003chttps://www.accenture.com/us-en/insights/operations/ma-new-era-of-transformationu003e
* Deloitte. (2020). The state of the deal: Mu0026A trends 2020. Retrieved from u003chttps://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/pages/mergers-and-acquisitions/articles/ma-trends-2020.htmlu003e
* KPMG. (2021). Mu0026A outlook: Navigating uncertainty. Retrieved from u003chttps://home.kpmg/us/en/home/insights/2021/01/ma-outlook-navigating-uncertainty.htmlu003e
* PwC. (2020). 2020 PwC US pulse survey: Mu0026A in the new reality. Retrieved from u003chttps://www.pwc.com/us/en/services/advisory/deals/ma-pulse-survey.htmlu003e
Security and Trust:
- Secure checkout with SSL encryption Visa, Mastercard, Apple Pay, Google Pay, Stripe, Paypal
- Money-back guarantee for 30 days
- Our team is available 24/7 to assist you - support@theartofservice.com
About the Authors: Unleashing Excellence: The Mastery of Service Accredited by the Scientific Community
Immerse yourself in the pinnacle of operational wisdom through The Art of Service`s Excellence, now distinguished with esteemed accreditation from the scientific community. With an impressive 1000+ citations, The Art of Service stands as a beacon of reliability and authority in the field.Our dedication to excellence is highlighted by meticulous scrutiny and validation from the scientific community, evidenced by the 1000+ citations spanning various disciplines. Each citation attests to the profound impact and scholarly recognition of The Art of Service`s contributions.
Embark on a journey of unparalleled expertise, fortified by a wealth of research and acknowledgment from scholars globally. Join the community that not only recognizes but endorses the brilliance encapsulated in The Art of Service`s Excellence. Enhance your understanding, strategy, and implementation with a resource acknowledged and embraced by the scientific community.
Embrace excellence. Embrace The Art of Service.
Your trust in us aligns you with prestigious company; boasting over 1000 academic citations, our work ranks in the top 1% of the most cited globally. Explore our scholarly contributions at: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=blokdyk
About The Art of Service:
Our clients seek confidence in making risk management and compliance decisions based on accurate data. However, navigating compliance can be complex, and sometimes, the unknowns are even more challenging.
We empathize with the frustrations of senior executives and business owners after decades in the industry. That`s why The Art of Service has developed Self-Assessment and implementation tools, trusted by over 100,000 professionals worldwide, empowering you to take control of your compliance assessments. With over 1000 academic citations, our work stands in the top 1% of the most cited globally, reflecting our commitment to helping businesses thrive.
Founders:
Gerard Blokdyk
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gerardblokdijk/
Ivanka Menken
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ivankamenken/
