Introducing the ultimate tool for Patch Management and Third Party Risk Management professionals - our Knowledge Base.
This comprehensive dataset is packed with 1526 prioritized requirements, solutions, benefits, results, and real-life case studies/use cases to help you get the best results for your organization.
Our Patch Management and Third Party Risk Management Knowledge Base stands out from competitors and alternatives with its depth and effectiveness.
We have carefully curated the most important questions and considerations to ensure that you address issues by urgency and scope, providing you with a strategic advantage in managing patches and third party risks.
As a professional in this field, you know the critical role that patch management and third party risk management play in maintaining the security and stability of your systems.
Our dataset is designed to support you in your job, empowering you to make well-informed decisions and take timely actions.
With our Knowledge Base, you will have access to a variety of patch management and third party risk management solutions, along with their corresponding benefits and results, making it easier for you to determine the most effective approach for your specific needs.
Not only is our dataset comprehensive and user-friendly, but it is also affordable and easy to use.
Whether you are a beginner or an expert in Patch Management and Third Party Risk Management, our Knowledge Base caters to all levels of proficiency and can be used as a DIY guide for self-learning.
We have also included a detailed specification overview to ensure that you have a thorough understanding of our product and its capabilities.
One of the key advantages of our Patch Management and Third Party Risk Management Knowledge Base is its focus solely on this niche area.
While other products may cover related topics, our dataset hones in on the specific challenges and best practices for managing patches and third party risks, providing you with the most relevant and actionable information.
By investing in our Knowledge Base, you are investing in the success and stability of your business.
Timely and efficient patch management and third party risk management can save your organization from costly data breaches, downtime, and reputational damage.
Our dataset also allows you to conduct in-depth research on this topic, supporting you in implementing best practices and staying ahead of the curve in this ever-evolving landscape.
Many businesses struggle to balance the cost of patch management and third party risk management with their budget constraints.
This is where our product shines - it is a cost-effective solution that offers invaluable insights and resources to mitigate risks and avoid potential disasters.
In addition to its many benefits, we want to be transparent about the pros and cons of our product.
We acknowledge that our Knowledge Base may not cover every possible scenario, as the landscape of patch management and third party risk management is constantly evolving.
However, we are constantly updating and improving our dataset to provide the most up-to-date and relevant information.
Overall, our Patch Management and Third Party Risk Management Knowledge Base is an essential tool for any organization looking to stay on top of their patch management and third party risk management game.
It is a comprehensive, user-friendly, and affordable solution that offers valuable insights, solutions, and case studies to optimize your processes and protect your business.
Don′t hesitate to invest in the success of your organization by purchasing our Knowledge Base today!
How do you know if your organization has an effective or ineffective change management process? What cost savings has your organization achieved through its patch management processes? Where will erm have its best opportunity to flourish and best help your organization meet its mission?
Patch Management
An effective patch management process ensures timely updates to software and prevents cyber threats, while an ineffective one leads to delays and potential security risks.
1. Regular vulnerability assessments: helps identify vulnerable systems and prioritize patches accordingly.
2. Collaboration with vendors: ensures timely delivery and application of necessary patches.
3. Automated patching tools: streamlines the process and reduces human error.
4. Change control board: oversees the approval and implementation of patches to avoid system disruptions.
5. Patch testing environment: allows for testing and validation of patches before deployment.
6. Patch documentation: maintains a record of all patches applied for audit purposes.
7. Patch management software: helps track and monitor the status of patches in real-time.
8. Regular backups: mitigates risks of patch failures by having a backup system in place.
9. Employee training: educates employees on the importance of patch management and their role in the process.
10. Continuous monitoring: ensures all systems are up-to-date with the latest patches to avoid potential vulnerabilities.
CONTROL QUESTION: How do you know if the organization has an effective or ineffective change management process?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
Big Hairy Audacious Goal: By 2030, our Patch Management process will be fully automated and comprehensive, ensuring that all software and security patches are automatically deployed and updated on every device within our organization, effectively eliminating any potential vulnerabilities and reducing downtime significantly.
Effective or Ineffective Change Management Process Check:
1. Consistency and Timeliness: An effective change management process for patch management will have a consistent schedule for reviewing and deploying patches. This process should also ensure timely deployment of critical updates to minimize the risk of an exploit.
2. Accountability and Communication: An effective change management process will clearly define roles and responsibilities for patch management. It will also have a streamlined communication system in place to ensure that all stakeholders are informed of any changes or updates.
3. Testing and Rollback Procedures: An effective process will include thorough testing of patches before deployment to identify any potential conflicts or issues. It should also have a solid rollback plan in case a patch causes unexpected problems.
4. Automation and Tracking: A successful change management process should have automation tools in place to streamline patch deployment and tracking. This can include automated updates, inventory tracking, and patch history logs.
5. User Training and Education: An efficient change management process should include user training and education to ensure that employees understand the importance of patch management and their role in keeping the company′s systems secure.
If an organization has a consistent, timely, accountable, and automated patch management process with proper testing and rollback procedures and user education, it can be considered as having an effective change management process. On the other hand, if the process is disorganized, inconsistent, lacks accountability, and has no proper testing or communication plan in place, it can be deemed ineffective.
"I can`t express how impressed I am with this dataset. The prioritized recommendations are a lifesaver, and the attention to detail in the data is commendable. A fantastic investment for any professional."
Client Situation:
The client, a medium-sized financial institution with multiple branches across the United States, was struggling with a consistent and efficient patch management process. The organization had experienced several cyber attacks and system failures due to outdated software and vulnerabilities which resulted in financial losses and damage to their reputation. The IT department was overwhelmed with managing numerous software applications, hardware configurations, and update schedules, making it difficult to keep track of necessary patches and updates.
Furthermore, the lack of a systematic approach towards patch management caused delays in the deployment of critical security updates, resulting in a higher risk of cybersecurity threats and non-compliance with industry regulations. The management team recognized the need for a robust and effective change management process to ensure timely deployment of patches, minimize cybersecurity risks, and maintain compliance.
Consulting Methodology:
Our consulting team utilized a four-step methodology to assess the client′s current patch management process, identify gaps and areas for improvement, and develop an effective change management plan.
Step 1: Gap Analysis - Our team conducted a thorough analysis of the organization′s current patch management process, including documentation, procedures, tools, and resources. We compared the existing process with best practices and standards recommended by leading IT security and governance organizations, such as the Center for Internet Security (CIS) and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).
Step 2: Stakeholder Interviews - We conducted interviews with key stakeholders, including IT managers, system administrators, and end-users, to gain insights into their experiences and challenges with the current patch management process. This helped us understand the real impact of ineffective patch management on different departments and identify specific pain points.
Step 3: Risk Assessment - Our team performed a risk assessment to evaluate the potential cybersecurity threats and non-compliance risks associated with the organization′s existing patch management process. This involved identifying the critical systems and applications that require regular patching and assessing their current security posture.
Step 4: Development of Change Management Plan - Based on the findings from the previous steps, our team developed a customized change management plan to address the organization′s specific needs. This plan included recommendations for process improvements, tools and technologies to automate patch deployment, and a timeline for implementation.
Deliverables:
Our consulting team delivered a comprehensive report outlining the current state of the organization′s patch management process, key findings from the gap analysis, and a detailed change management plan. The report also included recommendations for tools and technologies to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of patch management, along with a cost-benefit analysis.
Implementation Challenges:
The implementation of the change management plan faced several challenges, including resistance to change from the IT team, budget constraints, and cultural barriers. Our team addressed these challenges by conducting training programs and workshops to educate the IT staff on the importance of effective change management, and how it can benefit the organization in terms of increased security and compliance. We also collaborated closely with the organization′s leadership team to secure budget approvals and create a culture that supports continuous improvement in patch management processes.
KPIs and Management Considerations:
To measure the success of the change management plan, our team identified the following key performance indicators (KPIs):
1. Time-to-deploy patches - The time taken to deploy critical security updates after release.
2. Patch compliance rate - The percentage of systems and applications that are up-to-date with the latest patches.
3. Number of cyber incidents - The overall number of cybersecurity incidents before and after implementing the change management plan.
4. Cost savings - The reduction in costs associated with system failures and cybersecurity incidents due to ineffective patch management.
Additionally, we recommended regular audits and reviews of the patch management process to ensure continuous improvement and adherence to established best practices.
Conclusion:
Based on our consulting services, the organization was able to implement an effective change management process for patch management, resulting in improved security posture, reduced cybersecurity risks, and better compliance with industry regulations. The implementation of automated tools and technologies also led to increased efficiency and cost savings for the organization. The management team now has a better understanding of the effectiveness of their patch management process through the key performance indicators identified, and they continue to monitor and review the process regularly to maintain its effectiveness.
This comprehensive dataset is packed with 1526 prioritized requirements, solutions, benefits, results, and real-life case studies/use cases to help you get the best results for your organization.
Our Patch Management and Third Party Risk Management Knowledge Base stands out from competitors and alternatives with its depth and effectiveness.
We have carefully curated the most important questions and considerations to ensure that you address issues by urgency and scope, providing you with a strategic advantage in managing patches and third party risks.
As a professional in this field, you know the critical role that patch management and third party risk management play in maintaining the security and stability of your systems.
Our dataset is designed to support you in your job, empowering you to make well-informed decisions and take timely actions.
With our Knowledge Base, you will have access to a variety of patch management and third party risk management solutions, along with their corresponding benefits and results, making it easier for you to determine the most effective approach for your specific needs.
Not only is our dataset comprehensive and user-friendly, but it is also affordable and easy to use.
Whether you are a beginner or an expert in Patch Management and Third Party Risk Management, our Knowledge Base caters to all levels of proficiency and can be used as a DIY guide for self-learning.
We have also included a detailed specification overview to ensure that you have a thorough understanding of our product and its capabilities.
One of the key advantages of our Patch Management and Third Party Risk Management Knowledge Base is its focus solely on this niche area.
While other products may cover related topics, our dataset hones in on the specific challenges and best practices for managing patches and third party risks, providing you with the most relevant and actionable information.
By investing in our Knowledge Base, you are investing in the success and stability of your business.
Timely and efficient patch management and third party risk management can save your organization from costly data breaches, downtime, and reputational damage.
Our dataset also allows you to conduct in-depth research on this topic, supporting you in implementing best practices and staying ahead of the curve in this ever-evolving landscape.
Many businesses struggle to balance the cost of patch management and third party risk management with their budget constraints.
This is where our product shines - it is a cost-effective solution that offers invaluable insights and resources to mitigate risks and avoid potential disasters.
In addition to its many benefits, we want to be transparent about the pros and cons of our product.
We acknowledge that our Knowledge Base may not cover every possible scenario, as the landscape of patch management and third party risk management is constantly evolving.
However, we are constantly updating and improving our dataset to provide the most up-to-date and relevant information.
Overall, our Patch Management and Third Party Risk Management Knowledge Base is an essential tool for any organization looking to stay on top of their patch management and third party risk management game.
It is a comprehensive, user-friendly, and affordable solution that offers valuable insights, solutions, and case studies to optimize your processes and protect your business.
Don′t hesitate to invest in the success of your organization by purchasing our Knowledge Base today!
Discover Insights, Make Informed Decisions, and Stay Ahead of the Curve:
Key Features:
Comprehensive set of 1526 prioritized Patch Management requirements. - Extensive coverage of 225 Patch Management topic scopes.
- In-depth analysis of 225 Patch Management step-by-step solutions, benefits, BHAGs.
- Detailed examination of 225 Patch Management case studies and use cases.
- Digital download upon purchase.
- Enjoy lifetime document updates included with your purchase.
- Benefit from a fully editable and customizable Excel format.
- Trusted and utilized by over 10,000 organizations.
- Covering: Information Sharing, Activity Level, Incentive Structure, Recorded Outcome, Performance Scorecards, Fraud Reporting, Patch Management, Vendor Selection Process, Complaint Management, Third Party Dependencies, Third-party claims, End Of Life Support, Regulatory Impact, Annual Contracts, Alerts And Notifications, Third-Party Risk Management, Vendor Stability, Financial Reporting, Termination Procedures, Store Inventory, Risk management policies and procedures, Eliminating Waste, Risk Appetite, Security Controls, Supplier Monitoring, Fraud Prevention, Vendor Compliance, Cybersecurity Incidents, Risk measurement practices, Decision Consistency, Vendor Selection, Critical Vendor Program, Business Resilience, Business Impact Assessments, ISO 22361, Oversight Activities, Claims Management, Data Classification, Risk Systems, Data Governance Data Retention Policies, Vendor Relationship Management, Vendor Relationships, Vendor Due Diligence Process, Parts Compliance, Home Automation, Future Applications, Being Proactive, Data Protection Regulations, Business Continuity Planning, Contract Negotiation, Risk Assessment, Business Impact Analysis, Systems Review, Payment Terms, Operational Risk Management, Employee Misconduct, Diversity And Inclusion, Supplier Diversity, Conflicts Of Interest, Ethical Compliance Monitoring, Contractual Agreements, AI Risk Management, Risk Mitigation, Privacy Policies, Quality Assurance, Data Privacy, Monitoring Procedures, Secure Access Management, Insurance Coverage, Contract Renewal, Remote Customer Service, Sourcing Strategies, Third Party Vetting, Project management roles and responsibilities, Crisis Team, Operational disruption, Third Party Agreements, Personal Data Handling, Vendor Inventory, Contracts Database, Auditing And Monitoring, Effectiveness Metrics, Dependency Risks, Brand Reputation Damage, Supply Challenges, Contractual Obligations, Risk Appetite Statement, Timelines and Milestones, KPI Monitoring, Litigation Management, Employee Fraud, Project Management Systems, Environmental Impact, Cybersecurity Standards, Auditing Capabilities, Third-party vendor assessments, Risk Management Frameworks, Leadership Resilience, Data Access, Third Party Agreements Audit, Penetration Testing, Third Party Audits, Vendor Screening, Penalty Clauses, Effective Risk Management, Contract Standardization, Risk Education, Risk Control Activities, Financial Risk, Breach Notification, Data Protection Oversight, Risk Identification, Data Governance, Outsourcing Arrangements, Business Associate Agreements, Data Transparency, Business Associates, Onboarding Process, Governance risk policies and procedures, Security audit program management, Performance Improvement, Risk Management, Financial Due Diligence, Regulatory Requirements, Third Party Risks, Vendor Due Diligence, Vendor Due Diligence Checklist, Data Breach Incident Incident Risk Management, Enterprise Architecture Risk Management, Regulatory Policies, Continuous Monitoring, Finding Solutions, Governance risk management practices, Outsourcing Oversight, Vendor Exit Plan, Performance Metrics, Dependency Management, Quality Audits Assessments, Due Diligence Checklists, Assess Vulnerabilities, Entity-Level Controls, Performance Reviews, Disciplinary Actions, Vendor Risk Profile, Regulatory Oversight, Board Risk Tolerance, Compliance Frameworks, Vendor Risk Rating, Compliance Management, Spreadsheet Controls, Third Party Vendor Risk, Risk Awareness, SLA Monitoring, Ongoing Monitoring, Third Party Penetration Testing, Volunteer Management, Vendor Trust, Internet Access Policies, Information Technology, Service Level Objectives, Supply Chain Disruptions, Coverage assessment, Refusal Management, Risk Reporting, Implemented Solutions, Supplier Risk, Cost Management Solutions, Vendor Selection Criteria, Skills Assessment, Third-Party Vendors, Contract Management, Risk Management Policies, Third Party Risk Assessment, Continuous Auditing, Confidentiality Agreements, IT Risk Management, Privacy Regulations, Secure Vendor Management, Master Data Management, Access Controls, Information Security Risk Assessments, Vendor Risk Analytics, Data Ownership, Cybersecurity Controls, Testing And Validation, Data Security, Company Policies And Procedures, Cybersecurity Assessments, Third Party Management, Master Plan, Financial Compliance, Cybersecurity Risks, Software Releases, Disaster Recovery, Scope Of Services, Control Systems, Regulatory Compliance, Security Enhancement, Incentive Structures, Third Party Risk Management, Service Providers, Agile Methodologies, Risk Governance, Bribery Policies, FISMA, Cybersecurity Research, Risk Auditing Standards, Security Assessments, Risk Management Cycle, Shipping And Transportation, Vendor Contract Review, Customer Complaints Management, Supply Chain Risks, Subcontractor Assessment, App Store Policies, Contract Negotiation Strategies, Data Breaches, Third Party Inspections, Third Party Logistics 3PL, Vendor Performance, Termination Rights, Vendor Access, Audit Trails, Legal Framework, Continuous Improvement
Patch Management Assessment Dataset - Utilization, Solutions, Advantages, BHAG (Big Hairy Audacious Goal):
Patch Management
An effective patch management process ensures timely updates to software and prevents cyber threats, while an ineffective one leads to delays and potential security risks.
1. Regular vulnerability assessments: helps identify vulnerable systems and prioritize patches accordingly.
2. Collaboration with vendors: ensures timely delivery and application of necessary patches.
3. Automated patching tools: streamlines the process and reduces human error.
4. Change control board: oversees the approval and implementation of patches to avoid system disruptions.
5. Patch testing environment: allows for testing and validation of patches before deployment.
6. Patch documentation: maintains a record of all patches applied for audit purposes.
7. Patch management software: helps track and monitor the status of patches in real-time.
8. Regular backups: mitigates risks of patch failures by having a backup system in place.
9. Employee training: educates employees on the importance of patch management and their role in the process.
10. Continuous monitoring: ensures all systems are up-to-date with the latest patches to avoid potential vulnerabilities.
CONTROL QUESTION: How do you know if the organization has an effective or ineffective change management process?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
Big Hairy Audacious Goal: By 2030, our Patch Management process will be fully automated and comprehensive, ensuring that all software and security patches are automatically deployed and updated on every device within our organization, effectively eliminating any potential vulnerabilities and reducing downtime significantly.
Effective or Ineffective Change Management Process Check:
1. Consistency and Timeliness: An effective change management process for patch management will have a consistent schedule for reviewing and deploying patches. This process should also ensure timely deployment of critical updates to minimize the risk of an exploit.
2. Accountability and Communication: An effective change management process will clearly define roles and responsibilities for patch management. It will also have a streamlined communication system in place to ensure that all stakeholders are informed of any changes or updates.
3. Testing and Rollback Procedures: An effective process will include thorough testing of patches before deployment to identify any potential conflicts or issues. It should also have a solid rollback plan in case a patch causes unexpected problems.
4. Automation and Tracking: A successful change management process should have automation tools in place to streamline patch deployment and tracking. This can include automated updates, inventory tracking, and patch history logs.
5. User Training and Education: An efficient change management process should include user training and education to ensure that employees understand the importance of patch management and their role in keeping the company′s systems secure.
If an organization has a consistent, timely, accountable, and automated patch management process with proper testing and rollback procedures and user education, it can be considered as having an effective change management process. On the other hand, if the process is disorganized, inconsistent, lacks accountability, and has no proper testing or communication plan in place, it can be deemed ineffective.
Customer Testimonials:
"I can`t express how impressed I am with this dataset. The prioritized recommendations are a lifesaver, and the attention to detail in the data is commendable. A fantastic investment for any professional."
"The variety of prioritization methods offered is fantastic. I can tailor the recommendations to my specific needs and goals, which gives me a huge advantage."
"I am thoroughly impressed by the quality of the prioritized recommendations in this dataset. It has made a significant impact on the efficiency of my work. Highly recommended for professionals in any field."
Patch Management Case Study/Use Case example - How to use:
Client Situation:
The client, a medium-sized financial institution with multiple branches across the United States, was struggling with a consistent and efficient patch management process. The organization had experienced several cyber attacks and system failures due to outdated software and vulnerabilities which resulted in financial losses and damage to their reputation. The IT department was overwhelmed with managing numerous software applications, hardware configurations, and update schedules, making it difficult to keep track of necessary patches and updates.
Furthermore, the lack of a systematic approach towards patch management caused delays in the deployment of critical security updates, resulting in a higher risk of cybersecurity threats and non-compliance with industry regulations. The management team recognized the need for a robust and effective change management process to ensure timely deployment of patches, minimize cybersecurity risks, and maintain compliance.
Consulting Methodology:
Our consulting team utilized a four-step methodology to assess the client′s current patch management process, identify gaps and areas for improvement, and develop an effective change management plan.
Step 1: Gap Analysis - Our team conducted a thorough analysis of the organization′s current patch management process, including documentation, procedures, tools, and resources. We compared the existing process with best practices and standards recommended by leading IT security and governance organizations, such as the Center for Internet Security (CIS) and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).
Step 2: Stakeholder Interviews - We conducted interviews with key stakeholders, including IT managers, system administrators, and end-users, to gain insights into their experiences and challenges with the current patch management process. This helped us understand the real impact of ineffective patch management on different departments and identify specific pain points.
Step 3: Risk Assessment - Our team performed a risk assessment to evaluate the potential cybersecurity threats and non-compliance risks associated with the organization′s existing patch management process. This involved identifying the critical systems and applications that require regular patching and assessing their current security posture.
Step 4: Development of Change Management Plan - Based on the findings from the previous steps, our team developed a customized change management plan to address the organization′s specific needs. This plan included recommendations for process improvements, tools and technologies to automate patch deployment, and a timeline for implementation.
Deliverables:
Our consulting team delivered a comprehensive report outlining the current state of the organization′s patch management process, key findings from the gap analysis, and a detailed change management plan. The report also included recommendations for tools and technologies to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of patch management, along with a cost-benefit analysis.
Implementation Challenges:
The implementation of the change management plan faced several challenges, including resistance to change from the IT team, budget constraints, and cultural barriers. Our team addressed these challenges by conducting training programs and workshops to educate the IT staff on the importance of effective change management, and how it can benefit the organization in terms of increased security and compliance. We also collaborated closely with the organization′s leadership team to secure budget approvals and create a culture that supports continuous improvement in patch management processes.
KPIs and Management Considerations:
To measure the success of the change management plan, our team identified the following key performance indicators (KPIs):
1. Time-to-deploy patches - The time taken to deploy critical security updates after release.
2. Patch compliance rate - The percentage of systems and applications that are up-to-date with the latest patches.
3. Number of cyber incidents - The overall number of cybersecurity incidents before and after implementing the change management plan.
4. Cost savings - The reduction in costs associated with system failures and cybersecurity incidents due to ineffective patch management.
Additionally, we recommended regular audits and reviews of the patch management process to ensure continuous improvement and adherence to established best practices.
Conclusion:
Based on our consulting services, the organization was able to implement an effective change management process for patch management, resulting in improved security posture, reduced cybersecurity risks, and better compliance with industry regulations. The implementation of automated tools and technologies also led to increased efficiency and cost savings for the organization. The management team now has a better understanding of the effectiveness of their patch management process through the key performance indicators identified, and they continue to monitor and review the process regularly to maintain its effectiveness.
Security and Trust:
- Secure checkout with SSL encryption Visa, Mastercard, Apple Pay, Google Pay, Stripe, Paypal
- Money-back guarantee for 30 days
- Our team is available 24/7 to assist you - support@theartofservice.com
About the Authors: Unleashing Excellence: The Mastery of Service Accredited by the Scientific Community
Immerse yourself in the pinnacle of operational wisdom through The Art of Service`s Excellence, now distinguished with esteemed accreditation from the scientific community. With an impressive 1000+ citations, The Art of Service stands as a beacon of reliability and authority in the field.Our dedication to excellence is highlighted by meticulous scrutiny and validation from the scientific community, evidenced by the 1000+ citations spanning various disciplines. Each citation attests to the profound impact and scholarly recognition of The Art of Service`s contributions.
Embark on a journey of unparalleled expertise, fortified by a wealth of research and acknowledgment from scholars globally. Join the community that not only recognizes but endorses the brilliance encapsulated in The Art of Service`s Excellence. Enhance your understanding, strategy, and implementation with a resource acknowledged and embraced by the scientific community.
Embrace excellence. Embrace The Art of Service.
Your trust in us aligns you with prestigious company; boasting over 1000 academic citations, our work ranks in the top 1% of the most cited globally. Explore our scholarly contributions at: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=blokdyk
About The Art of Service:
Our clients seek confidence in making risk management and compliance decisions based on accurate data. However, navigating compliance can be complex, and sometimes, the unknowns are even more challenging.
We empathize with the frustrations of senior executives and business owners after decades in the industry. That`s why The Art of Service has developed Self-Assessment and implementation tools, trusted by over 100,000 professionals worldwide, empowering you to take control of your compliance assessments. With over 1000 academic citations, our work stands in the top 1% of the most cited globally, reflecting our commitment to helping businesses thrive.
Founders:
Gerard Blokdyk
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gerardblokdijk/
Ivanka Menken
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ivankamenken/
