Attention all IT professionals and business leaders!
Are you tired of struggling to navigate through endless amounts of information when it comes to IT risk management? Look no further.
We have the solution for you: our Risk Metrics in IT Risk Management Knowledge Base.
Our comprehensive dataset includes 1587 prioritized requirements, solutions, benefits, results, and real-life case studies/use cases, making it the ultimate resource for anyone looking to effectively manage IT risk.
But what sets us apart from our competitors and alternatives?Firstly, our dataset is specifically designed for professionals, providing you with highly valuable and relevant information tailored to your needs.
Unlike other products, our Risk Metrics in IT Risk Management Knowledge Base is user-friendly and easy to navigate, saving you both time and frustration.
Our product not only offers a wide range of data in terms of risk metrics and solutions, but it also allows you to prioritize by urgency and scope.
This means you can quickly and efficiently identify the most critical risks and take immediate action, ultimately saving your business time and resources.
But that′s not all.
Our Risk Metrics in IT Risk Management Knowledge Base is an affordable DIY alternative to expensive consulting services.
With our easy-to-use product, you can take charge of managing IT risks on your own, without breaking the bank.
We understand that research is crucial when it comes to choosing the right IT risk management solution.
With our dataset, you can trust that you are receiving accurate and reliable information, backed by extensive research and data analysis.
For businesses, our Risk Metrics in IT Risk Management Knowledge Base is a game-changer.
Not only does it streamline and improve the risk management process, but it also helps prevent costly cybersecurity breaches that could significantly impact your bottom line.
Our product is easy to use, cost-effective, and delivers real results.
Don′t just take our word for it - try it out for yourself and experience the benefits firsthand.
But hurry, don′t let your business fall behind, get our Risk Metrics in IT Risk Management Knowledge Base today and stay ahead of the competition.
Let us help you mitigate risks and protect your business.
Order now!
Is responsibility for liquidity risk management assigned to a specific individual or department? How do you manage stakeholders with a high interest in your project and a high amount of power? What metrics should be used to measure whether the risk is within expected tolerance levels?
Risk Metrics
Risk metrics are used to measure and manage the level of risk in a particular area. This includes assigning responsibility for liquidity risk management to a designated person or department.
1. Assign a dedicated individual or team to oversee liquidity risk management - ensures accountability and focused attention.
2. Develop a clear framework for assessing and monitoring liquidity risk - allows for early detection and proactive measures.
3. Implement regular stress testing and scenario analysis to evaluate potential impacts - helps identify vulnerabilities and inform risk management strategies.
4. Utilize technology and automation tools for data collection and analysis - improves accuracy, efficiency, and speed of monitoring and reporting.
5. Establish defined limits and thresholds for liquidity risk exposure - promotes informed decision-making and risk controls.
6. Diversify funding sources and maintain adequate liquidity buffers - mitigates potential liquidity shortfalls and enhances financial stability.
7. Collaborate with other departments, such as finance and treasury, to align risk management strategies - promotes a holistic approach to managing liquidity risk.
8. Regularly review and update risk metrics and tolerance levels - ensures relevance and effectiveness in managing evolving risks.
9. Consider hedging and contingency plans to manage potential cash flow disruptions - provides additional safeguards against liquidity risks.
10. Continuously monitor and reassess the liquidity risk management process for improvements - promotes a culture of risk awareness and adaptation.
CONTROL QUESTION: Is responsibility for liquidity risk management assigned to a specific individual or department?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
By 2030, Risk Metrics will be the leading authority in liquidity risk management, with a dedicated team of experts and cutting-edge technology driving innovation in this field. Our goal is to have successfully integrated a comprehensive and holistic approach to liquidity risk management across all industries and countries, creating a global standard for best practices. We envision reducing the impact of liquidity risk on financial institutions and the economy as a whole, mitigating potential crises and promoting stability in the financial system. Our dedicated team will continue to push the boundaries and lead the way in cultivating a culture of responsible liquidity risk management throughout the business world.
"I`m using the prioritized recommendations to provide better care for my patients. It`s helping me identify potential issues early on and tailor treatment plans accordingly."
Case Study: Risk Metrics – Assignment of Responsibility for Liquidity Risk Management
Client Situation:
Risk Metrics is a leading financial firm that provides risk management solutions to clients across various industries. As the company continues to grow and expand its services, it has recognized the need to address and manage liquidity risk within its operations. Liquidity risk refers to the potential for a company to be unable to meet its financial obligations or have difficulty accessing cash when needed.
In light of recent economic events, the global financial crisis of 2008, and increasing regulatory scrutiny, Risk Metrics has identified the importance of assigning responsibility for liquidity risk management to ensure effective oversight and mitigation of potential risks. However, the company lacks a clear understanding of whether this responsibility should be allocated to a specific individual or department. To determine the most suitable approach, Risk Metrics has engaged the services of a consulting firm to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the organization′s structure, processes, and current risk management practices.
Consulting Methodology:
The consulting methodology chosen for this project is the Integrated Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) Approach developed by KPMG International. This approach is widely used in the financial industry and focuses on integrating all aspects of governance, risk management, and compliance into a holistic framework, providing a more comprehensive and efficient solution to addressing organizational risks.
The GRC approach incorporates three main stages, namely – identification of risks, assessment of risks, and management of risks. The first stage involves identifying potential risks to the organization, including liquidity risk. In this stage, the consulting team will gather information through document reviews, interviews with key stakeholders, and data analysis.
The second stage is the assessment of risks, which involves evaluating the likelihood and impact of identified risks on the organization. The consulting team will use scenario analysis, stress testing, and financial modeling techniques to assess the potential impact of liquidity risk on Risk Metrics.
Lastly, the third stage involves the development of risk management strategies and implementation plans. Here, the consulting team will recommend the most suitable approach for assigning responsibility for liquidity risk management, based on the findings from the first two stages. The final deliverable of the GRC approach is a comprehensive risk management plan that outlines specific actions to be taken, timelines, and key performance indicators (KPIs) for monitoring and measuring the effectiveness of the plan.
Deliverables:
1. An in-depth analysis of the organization′s structure: The consulting team will conduct a thorough analysis of Risk Metrics′ organizational structure to determine the current processes and decision-making structures related to liquidity risk management.
2. Identification and assessment of liquidity risk: Through data analysis and stress testing, the consulting team will identify and assess the potential impact of liquidity risk on the organization.
3. Recommendations for assigning responsibility for liquidity risk management: Based on the findings from the first two deliverables, the consulting team will provide recommendations on the most suitable approach for assigning responsibility for liquidity risk management.
4. Development of a risk management plan: The final deliverable will be a detailed risk management plan that outlines specific actions, responsibilities, timelines, and KPIs for effective management of liquidity risk.
Implementation Challenges:
The implementation of any new strategy or approach is often met with challenges, and this project is no exception. One of the main challenges that may arise during implementation is resistance to change from stakeholders, particularly if the recommended approach involves a significant shift in responsibility. To mitigate this, the consulting team will work closely with Risk Metrics′ leadership team to communicate the importance and benefits of the proposed changes.
Another challenge could be the lack of buy-in from different departments within the organization. In such cases, it is crucial to involve key stakeholders in the decision-making process and gather their feedback before finalizing the risk management plan.
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs):
To ensure the success of the recommended approach, the following KPIs will be used to measure the effectiveness of the risk management plan:
1. Liquidity ratio: This measures the company′s ability to meet its short-term financial obligations in case of a liquidity crisis.
2. Liquidity risk premium: This KPI reflects the additional cost of borrowing funds in case the company faces a liquidity shortage.
3. Time to obtain funding: Measures the time taken by the company to access funding or liquid assets in times of financial stress.
4. Compliance with regulatory requirements: Regular tracking of compliance with applicable regulations related to liquidity risk management.
Management Considerations:
Risk Metrics′ leadership team must consider the following factors when implementing the recommendations and risk management plan:
1. Embedding a risk culture: To effectively manage liquidity risk, the organization needs to cultivate a strong risk culture. This involves setting the tone at the top and promoting risk awareness and accountability throughout the organization.
2. Continuous monitoring and review: Liquidity risk is dynamic and requires regular monitoring and review to ensure that the risk management plan remains effective and relevant.
3. Adequate training and resources: The success of the recommended approach relies on the availability of trained personnel and resources to implement and monitor the risk management plan effectively.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, with the increasing importance of effectively managing liquidity risk in the current business landscape, it is vital for Risk Metrics to assign responsibility for this task. Through the use of the Integrated GRC Approach and the development of a comprehensive risk management plan, the consulting team aims to provide a suitable approach for assigning responsibility for liquidity risk management. By implementing the recommended changes and continuously monitoring and reviewing the plan′s effectiveness, Risk Metrics can mitigate potential risks and maintain financial stability in the long run.
Citations:
1. KPMG International. (2011). Integrated Governance, Risk and Compliance –The View Ahead: Insights on How Governance, Risks and Compliance Can Work Together to Drive Value. Retrieved from https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2011/integrated_grc.pdf
2. Dionne, G. (2008). The Rise and Fall of Global Financial Ashes: A Risk Management Perspective. British Journal of Management, 19(1), 110-124. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2007.00540.x
3. Deloitte. (2014). Governance, Risk & Compliance: Putting It All Together. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/deloitte-review/issue-15/governance-risk-compliance.html
Are you tired of struggling to navigate through endless amounts of information when it comes to IT risk management? Look no further.
We have the solution for you: our Risk Metrics in IT Risk Management Knowledge Base.
Our comprehensive dataset includes 1587 prioritized requirements, solutions, benefits, results, and real-life case studies/use cases, making it the ultimate resource for anyone looking to effectively manage IT risk.
But what sets us apart from our competitors and alternatives?Firstly, our dataset is specifically designed for professionals, providing you with highly valuable and relevant information tailored to your needs.
Unlike other products, our Risk Metrics in IT Risk Management Knowledge Base is user-friendly and easy to navigate, saving you both time and frustration.
Our product not only offers a wide range of data in terms of risk metrics and solutions, but it also allows you to prioritize by urgency and scope.
This means you can quickly and efficiently identify the most critical risks and take immediate action, ultimately saving your business time and resources.
But that′s not all.
Our Risk Metrics in IT Risk Management Knowledge Base is an affordable DIY alternative to expensive consulting services.
With our easy-to-use product, you can take charge of managing IT risks on your own, without breaking the bank.
We understand that research is crucial when it comes to choosing the right IT risk management solution.
With our dataset, you can trust that you are receiving accurate and reliable information, backed by extensive research and data analysis.
For businesses, our Risk Metrics in IT Risk Management Knowledge Base is a game-changer.
Not only does it streamline and improve the risk management process, but it also helps prevent costly cybersecurity breaches that could significantly impact your bottom line.
Our product is easy to use, cost-effective, and delivers real results.
Don′t just take our word for it - try it out for yourself and experience the benefits firsthand.
But hurry, don′t let your business fall behind, get our Risk Metrics in IT Risk Management Knowledge Base today and stay ahead of the competition.
Let us help you mitigate risks and protect your business.
Order now!
Discover Insights, Make Informed Decisions, and Stay Ahead of the Curve:
Key Features:
Comprehensive set of 1587 prioritized Risk Metrics requirements. - Extensive coverage of 151 Risk Metrics topic scopes.
- In-depth analysis of 151 Risk Metrics step-by-step solutions, benefits, BHAGs.
- Detailed examination of 151 Risk Metrics case studies and use cases.
- Digital download upon purchase.
- Enjoy lifetime document updates included with your purchase.
- Benefit from a fully editable and customizable Excel format.
- Trusted and utilized by over 10,000 organizations.
- Covering: Portfolio Performance, Third-Party Risk Management, Risk Metrics Tracking, Risk Assessment Methodology, Risk Management, Risk Monitoring Plan, Risk Communication System, Management Processes, Risk Management Process, Risk Mitigation Security Measures, User Authentication, Compliance Auditing, Cash Flow Management, Supplier Risk Assessment, Manufacturing Processes, Risk Appetite Statement, Transaction Automation, Risk Register, Automation In Finance, Project Budget Management, Secure Data Lifecycle, Risk Audit, Brand Reputation Management, Quality Control, Information Security, Cost Estimating, Financial portfolio management, Risk Management Skills, Database Security, Regulatory Impact, Compliance Cost, Integrated Processes, Risk Remediation, Risk Assessment Criteria, Risk Allocation, Risk Reporting Structure, Risk Intelligence, Risk Assessment, Real Time Security Monitoring, Risk Transfer, Risk Response Plan, Data Breach Response, Efficient Execution, Risk Avoidance, Inventory Automation, Risk Diversification, Auditing Capabilities, Risk Transfer Agreement, Identity Management, IT Systems, Risk Tolerance, Risk Review, IT Environment, IT Staffing, Risk management policies and procedures, Purpose Limitation, Risk Culture, Risk Performance Indicators, Risk Testing, Risk Management Framework, Coordinate Resources, IT Governance, Patch Management, Disaster Recovery Planning, Risk Severity, Risk Management Plan, Risk Assessment Framework, Supplier Risk, Risk Analysis Techniques, Regulatory Frameworks, Access Management, Management Systems, Achievable Goals, Risk Visualization, Resource Identification, Risk Communication Plan, Expected Cash Flows, Incident Response, Risk Treatment, Define Requirements, Risk Matrix, Risk Management Policy, IT Investment, Cloud Security Posture Management, Debt Collection, Supplier Quality, Third Party Risk, Risk Scoring, Risk Awareness Training, Vendor Compliance, Supplier Strategy, Legal Liability, IT Risk Management, Risk Governance Model, Disability Accommodation, IFRS 17, Innovation Cost, Business Continuity, It Like, Security Policies, Control Management, Innovative Actions, Risk Scorecard, AI Risk Management, internal processes, Authentication Process, Risk Reduction, Privacy Compliance, IT Infrastructure, Enterprise Architecture Risk Management, Risk Tracking, Risk Communication, Secure Data Processing, Future Technology, Governance risk audit processes, Security Controls, Supply Chain Security, Risk Monitoring, IT Strategy, Risk Insurance, Asset Inspection, Risk Identification, Firewall Protection, Risk Response Planning, Risk Criteria, Security Incident Handling Procedure, Threat Intelligence, Disaster Recovery, Security Controls Evaluation, Business Process Redesign, Risk Culture Assessment, Risk Minimization, Contract Milestones, Risk Reporting, Cyber Threats, Risk Sharing, Systems Review, Control System Engineering, Vulnerability Scanning, Risk Probability, Risk Data Analysis, Risk Management Software, Risk Metrics, Risk Financing, Endpoint Security, Threat Modeling, Risk Appetite, Information Technology, Risk Monitoring Tools, Scheduling Efficiency, Identified Risks
Risk Metrics Assessment Dataset - Utilization, Solutions, Advantages, BHAG (Big Hairy Audacious Goal):
Risk Metrics
Risk metrics are used to measure and manage the level of risk in a particular area. This includes assigning responsibility for liquidity risk management to a designated person or department.
1. Assign a dedicated individual or team to oversee liquidity risk management - ensures accountability and focused attention.
2. Develop a clear framework for assessing and monitoring liquidity risk - allows for early detection and proactive measures.
3. Implement regular stress testing and scenario analysis to evaluate potential impacts - helps identify vulnerabilities and inform risk management strategies.
4. Utilize technology and automation tools for data collection and analysis - improves accuracy, efficiency, and speed of monitoring and reporting.
5. Establish defined limits and thresholds for liquidity risk exposure - promotes informed decision-making and risk controls.
6. Diversify funding sources and maintain adequate liquidity buffers - mitigates potential liquidity shortfalls and enhances financial stability.
7. Collaborate with other departments, such as finance and treasury, to align risk management strategies - promotes a holistic approach to managing liquidity risk.
8. Regularly review and update risk metrics and tolerance levels - ensures relevance and effectiveness in managing evolving risks.
9. Consider hedging and contingency plans to manage potential cash flow disruptions - provides additional safeguards against liquidity risks.
10. Continuously monitor and reassess the liquidity risk management process for improvements - promotes a culture of risk awareness and adaptation.
CONTROL QUESTION: Is responsibility for liquidity risk management assigned to a specific individual or department?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
By 2030, Risk Metrics will be the leading authority in liquidity risk management, with a dedicated team of experts and cutting-edge technology driving innovation in this field. Our goal is to have successfully integrated a comprehensive and holistic approach to liquidity risk management across all industries and countries, creating a global standard for best practices. We envision reducing the impact of liquidity risk on financial institutions and the economy as a whole, mitigating potential crises and promoting stability in the financial system. Our dedicated team will continue to push the boundaries and lead the way in cultivating a culture of responsible liquidity risk management throughout the business world.
Customer Testimonials:
"I`m using the prioritized recommendations to provide better care for my patients. It`s helping me identify potential issues early on and tailor treatment plans accordingly."
"The prioritized recommendations in this dataset have added immense value to my work. The data is well-organized, and the insights provided have been instrumental in guiding my decisions. Impressive!"
"This dataset sparked my creativity and led me to develop new and innovative product recommendations that my customers love. It`s opened up a whole new revenue stream for my business."
Risk Metrics Case Study/Use Case example - How to use:
Case Study: Risk Metrics – Assignment of Responsibility for Liquidity Risk Management
Client Situation:
Risk Metrics is a leading financial firm that provides risk management solutions to clients across various industries. As the company continues to grow and expand its services, it has recognized the need to address and manage liquidity risk within its operations. Liquidity risk refers to the potential for a company to be unable to meet its financial obligations or have difficulty accessing cash when needed.
In light of recent economic events, the global financial crisis of 2008, and increasing regulatory scrutiny, Risk Metrics has identified the importance of assigning responsibility for liquidity risk management to ensure effective oversight and mitigation of potential risks. However, the company lacks a clear understanding of whether this responsibility should be allocated to a specific individual or department. To determine the most suitable approach, Risk Metrics has engaged the services of a consulting firm to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the organization′s structure, processes, and current risk management practices.
Consulting Methodology:
The consulting methodology chosen for this project is the Integrated Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) Approach developed by KPMG International. This approach is widely used in the financial industry and focuses on integrating all aspects of governance, risk management, and compliance into a holistic framework, providing a more comprehensive and efficient solution to addressing organizational risks.
The GRC approach incorporates three main stages, namely – identification of risks, assessment of risks, and management of risks. The first stage involves identifying potential risks to the organization, including liquidity risk. In this stage, the consulting team will gather information through document reviews, interviews with key stakeholders, and data analysis.
The second stage is the assessment of risks, which involves evaluating the likelihood and impact of identified risks on the organization. The consulting team will use scenario analysis, stress testing, and financial modeling techniques to assess the potential impact of liquidity risk on Risk Metrics.
Lastly, the third stage involves the development of risk management strategies and implementation plans. Here, the consulting team will recommend the most suitable approach for assigning responsibility for liquidity risk management, based on the findings from the first two stages. The final deliverable of the GRC approach is a comprehensive risk management plan that outlines specific actions to be taken, timelines, and key performance indicators (KPIs) for monitoring and measuring the effectiveness of the plan.
Deliverables:
1. An in-depth analysis of the organization′s structure: The consulting team will conduct a thorough analysis of Risk Metrics′ organizational structure to determine the current processes and decision-making structures related to liquidity risk management.
2. Identification and assessment of liquidity risk: Through data analysis and stress testing, the consulting team will identify and assess the potential impact of liquidity risk on the organization.
3. Recommendations for assigning responsibility for liquidity risk management: Based on the findings from the first two deliverables, the consulting team will provide recommendations on the most suitable approach for assigning responsibility for liquidity risk management.
4. Development of a risk management plan: The final deliverable will be a detailed risk management plan that outlines specific actions, responsibilities, timelines, and KPIs for effective management of liquidity risk.
Implementation Challenges:
The implementation of any new strategy or approach is often met with challenges, and this project is no exception. One of the main challenges that may arise during implementation is resistance to change from stakeholders, particularly if the recommended approach involves a significant shift in responsibility. To mitigate this, the consulting team will work closely with Risk Metrics′ leadership team to communicate the importance and benefits of the proposed changes.
Another challenge could be the lack of buy-in from different departments within the organization. In such cases, it is crucial to involve key stakeholders in the decision-making process and gather their feedback before finalizing the risk management plan.
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs):
To ensure the success of the recommended approach, the following KPIs will be used to measure the effectiveness of the risk management plan:
1. Liquidity ratio: This measures the company′s ability to meet its short-term financial obligations in case of a liquidity crisis.
2. Liquidity risk premium: This KPI reflects the additional cost of borrowing funds in case the company faces a liquidity shortage.
3. Time to obtain funding: Measures the time taken by the company to access funding or liquid assets in times of financial stress.
4. Compliance with regulatory requirements: Regular tracking of compliance with applicable regulations related to liquidity risk management.
Management Considerations:
Risk Metrics′ leadership team must consider the following factors when implementing the recommendations and risk management plan:
1. Embedding a risk culture: To effectively manage liquidity risk, the organization needs to cultivate a strong risk culture. This involves setting the tone at the top and promoting risk awareness and accountability throughout the organization.
2. Continuous monitoring and review: Liquidity risk is dynamic and requires regular monitoring and review to ensure that the risk management plan remains effective and relevant.
3. Adequate training and resources: The success of the recommended approach relies on the availability of trained personnel and resources to implement and monitor the risk management plan effectively.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, with the increasing importance of effectively managing liquidity risk in the current business landscape, it is vital for Risk Metrics to assign responsibility for this task. Through the use of the Integrated GRC Approach and the development of a comprehensive risk management plan, the consulting team aims to provide a suitable approach for assigning responsibility for liquidity risk management. By implementing the recommended changes and continuously monitoring and reviewing the plan′s effectiveness, Risk Metrics can mitigate potential risks and maintain financial stability in the long run.
Citations:
1. KPMG International. (2011). Integrated Governance, Risk and Compliance –The View Ahead: Insights on How Governance, Risks and Compliance Can Work Together to Drive Value. Retrieved from https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2011/integrated_grc.pdf
2. Dionne, G. (2008). The Rise and Fall of Global Financial Ashes: A Risk Management Perspective. British Journal of Management, 19(1), 110-124. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2007.00540.x
3. Deloitte. (2014). Governance, Risk & Compliance: Putting It All Together. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/deloitte-review/issue-15/governance-risk-compliance.html
Security and Trust:
- Secure checkout with SSL encryption Visa, Mastercard, Apple Pay, Google Pay, Stripe, Paypal
- Money-back guarantee for 30 days
- Our team is available 24/7 to assist you - support@theartofservice.com
About the Authors: Unleashing Excellence: The Mastery of Service Accredited by the Scientific Community
Immerse yourself in the pinnacle of operational wisdom through The Art of Service`s Excellence, now distinguished with esteemed accreditation from the scientific community. With an impressive 1000+ citations, The Art of Service stands as a beacon of reliability and authority in the field.Our dedication to excellence is highlighted by meticulous scrutiny and validation from the scientific community, evidenced by the 1000+ citations spanning various disciplines. Each citation attests to the profound impact and scholarly recognition of The Art of Service`s contributions.
Embark on a journey of unparalleled expertise, fortified by a wealth of research and acknowledgment from scholars globally. Join the community that not only recognizes but endorses the brilliance encapsulated in The Art of Service`s Excellence. Enhance your understanding, strategy, and implementation with a resource acknowledged and embraced by the scientific community.
Embrace excellence. Embrace The Art of Service.
Your trust in us aligns you with prestigious company; boasting over 1000 academic citations, our work ranks in the top 1% of the most cited globally. Explore our scholarly contributions at: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=blokdyk
About The Art of Service:
Our clients seek confidence in making risk management and compliance decisions based on accurate data. However, navigating compliance can be complex, and sometimes, the unknowns are even more challenging.
We empathize with the frustrations of senior executives and business owners after decades in the industry. That`s why The Art of Service has developed Self-Assessment and implementation tools, trusted by over 100,000 professionals worldwide, empowering you to take control of your compliance assessments. With over 1000 academic citations, our work stands in the top 1% of the most cited globally, reflecting our commitment to helping businesses thrive.
Founders:
Gerard Blokdyk
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gerardblokdijk/
Ivanka Menken
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ivankamenken/
