Attention all professionals and businesses seeking to improve efficiency and reduce downtime in your production processes!
Have you heard of Single Minute Exchange Of Die (SMED) in Theory Of Constraints? If not, you′re missing out on a game-changing solution that can revolutionize your operations.
Are you tired of long changeover times, high production costs, and wasted resources? Look no further than SMED in Theory Of Constraints.
This powerful methodology allows you to quickly and seamlessly switch between different production processes, ultimately leading to reduced downtime and increased productivity.
Wondering how this can work for you? Here are some important questions to consider: Is reducing changeover time a priority for your business? Are you looking for a cost-effective and efficient solution? Are you in need of a tool that can be easily implemented into your current processes? If you answered yes to any of these, then SMED in Theory Of Constraints is the answer you′ve been searching for.
By utilizing the insights provided by our dataset of 1560 prioritized requirements, solutions, benefits, results, and case studies, you can gain a comprehensive understanding of SMED and its potential impact on your operations.
Our dataset also includes a detailed breakdown of the product′s specifications, giving you a clear idea of what our product entails and how it compares to competitors and alternatives.
One of the greatest benefits of SMED in Theory Of Constraints is its versatility.
It can be used by professionals in various industries and is suitable for any type of product or process.
Whether you′re a small business owner or a large corporation, this methodology can benefit you in significant ways.
By reducing changeover time, you can increase efficiency, save costs, and enhance the overall performance of your business.
But don′t just take our word for it.
Our dataset contains extensive research on SMED in Theory Of Constraints, showcasing numerous real-life examples of businesses that have successfully implemented this solution and reaped its rewards.
From improved production flow to reduced lead time, the results speak for themselves.
And the best part? SMED in Theory Of Constraints is a cost-effective and DIY/affordable alternative to other complex and expensive solutions on the market.
It is designed to be user-friendly and easily integrated into your current processes, saving you time and resources.
However, like any product, there are pros and cons to consider.
While SMED in Theory Of Constraints can greatly benefit your business, it does require some initial investment and a strong commitment to change.
But rest assured, our product description outlines every step of the process and explains how this solution can be tailored to meet your specific needs.
In a nutshell, SMED in Theory Of Constraints provides professionals and businesses with a comprehensive and effective solution to reduce changeover times and increase productivity.
It′s a must-have tool for any organization looking to stay ahead of the competition and improve their bottom line.
Don′t waste any more time with inefficient production processes.
Invest in SMED in Theory Of Constraints today and experience the difference it can make for your business!
How can a manufacturing organization optimize the performance of the existing equipment? What are the human resources management practices within communfst and formerly communist companies? Is the combination going to enhance the process awareness or it will contribute to the opposite?
Single Minute Exchange Of Die SMED
SMED is a methodology that helps manufacturing organizations decrease the time it takes to changeover equipment, improving efficiency and reducing downtime.
1. Implement Single Minute Exchange of Die (SMED) techniques to reduce changeover time.
- Benefit: Increases equipment uptime and reduces production lead times.
2. Identify and eliminate non-essential changeover steps.
- Benefit: Streamlines the changeover process and reduces the risk of errors or delays.
3. Use standardized work instructions and train employees on efficient changeover procedures.
- Benefit: Ensures consistency and reduces changeover time by eliminating unnecessary variations.
4. Utilize quick-change parts or tools to reduce the need for manual adjustments.
- Benefit: Saves time and reduces the risk of errors or damage to equipment during changeovers.
5. Consider investing in dedicated or specialized equipment for specific products.
- Benefit: Reduces changeover time and increases equipment efficiency for frequently produced items.
6. Apply continuous improvement principles to continually streamline and improve the changeover process.
- Benefit: Ensures optimal performance and reduces changeover time even further over time.
7. Allocate resources effectively and plan changeovers in advance to minimize disruptions to production.
- Benefit: Maximizes equipment utilization and minimizes downtime for changeovers.
CONTROL QUESTION: How can a manufacturing organization optimize the performance of the existing equipment?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
By 2030, our manufacturing organization will achieve a 90% reduction in changeover time through the implementation of advanced Single Minute Exchange of Die (SMED) techniques. We will become the industry leader in optimizing equipment performance through quick and efficient changeovers, leading to decreased production downtime and increased overall productivity.
Through constant analysis and improvement of our changeover processes, we will minimize non-value added activities, such as transportation, waiting, and set-up, and streamline our operations to achieve seamless equipment changeovers within minutes. Our goal is to eliminate unnecessary steps and implement innovative methods to reduce changeover times significantly.
To achieve this ambitious goal, we will invest in state-of-the-art technology and equipment, including automated changeover systems and advanced software tools for real-time data analysis. We will also provide comprehensive training and development programs for our employees to equip them with the necessary skills and knowledge to implement SMED effectively.
In addition, we will work closely with our suppliers and partners to develop standardized parts and components that are easily interchangeable, further reducing changeover times. We will also establish strong communication channels with our customers to identify and address any potential issues that may affect changeover processes.
Our ultimate aim is to create a culture of continuous improvement, where every employee is committed to finding new and innovative ways to optimize equipment performance. By achieving this 90% reduction in changeover time, our manufacturing organization will be able to increase production output, decrease costs, and maintain a competitive edge in the global market.
"I can`t believe I didn`t discover this dataset sooner. The prioritized recommendations are a game-changer for project planning. The level of detail and accuracy is unmatched. Highly recommended!"
Introduction
The concept of Single Minute Exchange of Die (SMED) is a methodology developed by Shigeo Shingo in the 1950s to minimize the changeover or setup time in a manufacturing process. It involves analyzing and streamlining the steps involved in changing over one production process to another, with the ultimate goal of reducing this time to single digit minutes. This method is particularly beneficial for high-volume manufacturing plants where even small reductions in setup time can significantly impact productivity and profitability.
Client Situation
XYZ Manufacturing Company is a leading producer of automotive components and operates multiple facilities across the United States. The company had been experiencing significant downtime due to lengthy changeovers, especially in its assembly line processes. This resulted in lost production time, increased costs, and lower overall efficiency. The management team determined that streamlining changeovers was critical to improving overall performance and approached our consulting firm to assist with implementing the SMED methodology.
Consulting Methodology
To optimize the performance of the existing equipment at XYZ Manufacturing, our consulting team utilized the following approach:
1. Initial Assessment – The first step was to conduct a thorough assessment of the current changeover process. This involved observing the production floor, interviewing employees, and reviewing documentation on the changeover procedures.
2. Identify Internal and External Steps – We then identified the necessary tasks for the changeover from start to finish. This included both internal (performed while the equipment is not running) and external (performed while the equipment is running) steps.
3. Classify Internal and External Steps – Based on their nature, we classified the internal and external steps as essential or
on-essential. Essential steps are necessary for the quality and safety of the product, while non-essential steps contribute to organizational inefficiency and can be eliminated or streamlined.
4. Convert Internal to External Steps – The next step was to reduce the duration of internal steps to as close to zero as possible by converting them into external steps. This was achieved by automating or prepping these tasks before the equipment stopped running.
5. Standardize – We then standardized the remaining internal and external steps to reduce variability and improve efficiency.
6. Train Employees – To ensure successful implementation, we conducted training sessions with employees to familiarize them with the simplified and standardized changeover procedures.
Deliverables
1. Detailed report on the current changeover process, including identified bottlenecks, inefficiencies, and potential areas for improvement.
2. A streamlined changeover procedure document, including a step-by-step guide for both internal and external tasks.
3. Training material for employees on the optimized changeover process.
4. Implementation plan with specific timelines and responsibilities.
5. KPIs for measuring the effectiveness of the SMED methodology and tracking performance improvements over time.
Implementation Challenges
Implementing the SMED methodology at XYZ Manufacturing was not without its challenges. These included resistance from employees to change, lack of buy-in from management, and limited resources to carry out the necessary changes. Additionally, the company was in the midst of a busy production season, making it difficult to allocate sufficient time for implementing the new changeover process.
KPIs and Management Considerations
To measure the effectiveness of the SMED methodology, we proposed the following KPIs:
1. Changeover Time – This was the primary KPI to measure the success of the SMED methodology. We aimed to reduce the changeover time from its original duration of over 60 minutes to under 10 minutes.
2. Production Downtime – The implementation of the SMED methodology was expected to reduce production downtime, resulting in increased productivity.
3. Employee Efficiency – By streamlining the changeover process, employees would have more time to focus on production tasks, resulting in improved efficiency.
The management team at XYZ Manufacturing was advised to continue monitoring these KPIs regularly to identify any areas for further improvement and ensure that the benefits of the SMED methodology were sustained.
Conclusion
The implementation of the SMED methodology at XYZ Manufacturing resulted in significant improvements in the changeover process. The changeover time was reduced from 60 minutes to just 8 minutes, resulting in a 86% reduction in overall downtime. This translated to increased productivity and cost savings for the company, as well as improved employee satisfaction due to easier and standardized procedures. The success of this project also prompted the management team to consider implementing the SMED methodology in other areas of the production process, demonstrating the value of continuous improvement to optimize equipment performance. As stated by Shigeo Shingo himself, The most dangerous kind of waste is the waste we do not recognize. Our consulting services helped XYZ Manufacturing identify and eliminate this waste, leading to a more efficient and profitable operation.
Have you heard of Single Minute Exchange Of Die (SMED) in Theory Of Constraints? If not, you′re missing out on a game-changing solution that can revolutionize your operations.
Are you tired of long changeover times, high production costs, and wasted resources? Look no further than SMED in Theory Of Constraints.
This powerful methodology allows you to quickly and seamlessly switch between different production processes, ultimately leading to reduced downtime and increased productivity.
Wondering how this can work for you? Here are some important questions to consider: Is reducing changeover time a priority for your business? Are you looking for a cost-effective and efficient solution? Are you in need of a tool that can be easily implemented into your current processes? If you answered yes to any of these, then SMED in Theory Of Constraints is the answer you′ve been searching for.
By utilizing the insights provided by our dataset of 1560 prioritized requirements, solutions, benefits, results, and case studies, you can gain a comprehensive understanding of SMED and its potential impact on your operations.
Our dataset also includes a detailed breakdown of the product′s specifications, giving you a clear idea of what our product entails and how it compares to competitors and alternatives.
One of the greatest benefits of SMED in Theory Of Constraints is its versatility.
It can be used by professionals in various industries and is suitable for any type of product or process.
Whether you′re a small business owner or a large corporation, this methodology can benefit you in significant ways.
By reducing changeover time, you can increase efficiency, save costs, and enhance the overall performance of your business.
But don′t just take our word for it.
Our dataset contains extensive research on SMED in Theory Of Constraints, showcasing numerous real-life examples of businesses that have successfully implemented this solution and reaped its rewards.
From improved production flow to reduced lead time, the results speak for themselves.
And the best part? SMED in Theory Of Constraints is a cost-effective and DIY/affordable alternative to other complex and expensive solutions on the market.
It is designed to be user-friendly and easily integrated into your current processes, saving you time and resources.
However, like any product, there are pros and cons to consider.
While SMED in Theory Of Constraints can greatly benefit your business, it does require some initial investment and a strong commitment to change.
But rest assured, our product description outlines every step of the process and explains how this solution can be tailored to meet your specific needs.
In a nutshell, SMED in Theory Of Constraints provides professionals and businesses with a comprehensive and effective solution to reduce changeover times and increase productivity.
It′s a must-have tool for any organization looking to stay ahead of the competition and improve their bottom line.
Don′t waste any more time with inefficient production processes.
Invest in SMED in Theory Of Constraints today and experience the difference it can make for your business!
Discover Insights, Make Informed Decisions, and Stay Ahead of the Curve:
Key Features:
Comprehensive set of 1560 prioritized Single Minute Exchange Of Die SMED requirements. - Extensive coverage of 171 Single Minute Exchange Of Die SMED topic scopes.
- In-depth analysis of 171 Single Minute Exchange Of Die SMED step-by-step solutions, benefits, BHAGs.
- Detailed examination of 171 Single Minute Exchange Of Die SMED case studies and use cases.
- Digital download upon purchase.
- Enjoy lifetime document updates included with your purchase.
- Benefit from a fully editable and customizable Excel format.
- Trusted and utilized by over 10,000 organizations.
- Covering: Effective money, Daily Planning, Innovative Blame, Policy Deployment, Constraint Identification, Practical Plan, Innovative money, Focused money, Resourceful Strategy, Root Cause Analysis, Cutting-edge Strategy, Cutting-edge Info, Waste Reduction, Cost Benefit Analysis, Process Design, Effective Blame, Risk Management, Practical Strategy, Statistical Tolerance, Buffer Sizing, Cutting-edge Tech, Optimized Technology, Operational Expenses, Managing Complexity, Market Demand, System Constraints, Efficient Strategy, Theory Of Constraints Implementation, More money, Resource Utilization, Less Data, Effective Plan, Data Analysis, Creative money, Focused Strategy, Effective Technology, Cash Flow Management, More training & Communication, Buffer Management, Resourceful Data, Total Productive Maintenance, Organizational Culture, Modern Strategy, Delivery Time, Efficient Data, More Data, More Strategy, Quality Control, Less reorganization, Resource Allocation, Inventory Control, Strategic Technology, Effective Training, Creative Technology, Practical Info, Modern training & Communication, Defect Reduction, Order Fulfillment, Process Flow, Creative Data, Systematic Thinking, Practical money, Information Technology, Innovative Funds, Modern money, Continuous Improvement, Design For Manufacturability, Theory Of Constraints Thinking, Effective Data, Service Industry, Process Variability, Set Up Times, Solution Focus, Project Management, Streamlined Strategy, More Technology, Efficient money, Product Mix, Modern Data, Process Reliability, Work In Progress WIP, Effective Org, Effective training & Communication, Practical training & Communication, Performance Measurement, Critical Chain, Effective Strategy, Strategic Planning, Pull System, Variability Reduction, Strategic Strategy, Creative Strategy, Practical Technology, Smart Org, Smart Tech, Streamlined Data, Smart Info, Dependent Events, Cycle Time, Constraint Management Technique, Less Strategy, Process Control System, Resourceful money, Less money, Problem Solving, Effective reorganization, Innovative Data, Streamlined Technology, Decision Making, Streamlined money, Modern Technology, Practical Blame, Optimized Strategy, Optimized money, Cutting-edge Data, Lead Time, Strategic reorganization, Supply Chain, Safety Stock, Total System Performance, 1. give me a list of 100 subtopics for "Stop Decorating the Fish highlights common and ineffective tactics organizations often use when responding to problems. We refer to these actions as the Seductive 7. We deliberately chose the word seductive. The things that often seduce us away from focusing on the core problem are shiny, alluring, and ubiquitous. They often promise an easy fix or immediate gratification while the real problem isn’t quite as obvious. They are as follows:
More Technology
More Data
More Strategy
More training & Communication
More training and Communication
More reorganization
More accountability & assigning blame
More money" in two words per subtopic.
2. Each subtopic enclosed in quotes. Place the output in comma delimited format. Remove duplicates. Remove Line breaks. Do not number the list. When the list is ready remove line breaks from the list., Change Management, Effective Tech, Cutting-edge Org, Design Theory, Practical Funds, Systems Review, Cause And Effect, Focused Technology, Time Estimates, Project Buffer, Practical Tech, Innovative Strategy, Innovative Info, The Goal, Less training & Communication, Focused Data, Theory of Constraints, Theory Of Constraints Tools, Conflict Resolution, Single Minute Exchange Of Die SMED, Material Flow, Strategic training & Communication, Capacity Planning, Workload Balancing, Lean Thinking, Performance Measures, Statistical Process Control, Optimized Data, Supplier Relationships, Business Performance, Multiple Project Environment, Information Management, Efficient Technology, Smart Funds, Effective Info, Innovative Plan, Chain of Ownership, Control Charts, Practical Data, Practical Training, Effective Funds, Goal Conflict, Strategic money, Performance Targets, Smart Plan, Customer Needs, Impact Analysis, Practical Org, Innovative Org, Innovative Training
Single Minute Exchange Of Die SMED Assessment Dataset - Utilization, Solutions, Advantages, BHAG (Big Hairy Audacious Goal):
Single Minute Exchange Of Die SMED
SMED is a methodology that helps manufacturing organizations decrease the time it takes to changeover equipment, improving efficiency and reducing downtime.
1. Implement Single Minute Exchange of Die (SMED) techniques to reduce changeover time.
- Benefit: Increases equipment uptime and reduces production lead times.
2. Identify and eliminate non-essential changeover steps.
- Benefit: Streamlines the changeover process and reduces the risk of errors or delays.
3. Use standardized work instructions and train employees on efficient changeover procedures.
- Benefit: Ensures consistency and reduces changeover time by eliminating unnecessary variations.
4. Utilize quick-change parts or tools to reduce the need for manual adjustments.
- Benefit: Saves time and reduces the risk of errors or damage to equipment during changeovers.
5. Consider investing in dedicated or specialized equipment for specific products.
- Benefit: Reduces changeover time and increases equipment efficiency for frequently produced items.
6. Apply continuous improvement principles to continually streamline and improve the changeover process.
- Benefit: Ensures optimal performance and reduces changeover time even further over time.
7. Allocate resources effectively and plan changeovers in advance to minimize disruptions to production.
- Benefit: Maximizes equipment utilization and minimizes downtime for changeovers.
CONTROL QUESTION: How can a manufacturing organization optimize the performance of the existing equipment?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
By 2030, our manufacturing organization will achieve a 90% reduction in changeover time through the implementation of advanced Single Minute Exchange of Die (SMED) techniques. We will become the industry leader in optimizing equipment performance through quick and efficient changeovers, leading to decreased production downtime and increased overall productivity.
Through constant analysis and improvement of our changeover processes, we will minimize non-value added activities, such as transportation, waiting, and set-up, and streamline our operations to achieve seamless equipment changeovers within minutes. Our goal is to eliminate unnecessary steps and implement innovative methods to reduce changeover times significantly.
To achieve this ambitious goal, we will invest in state-of-the-art technology and equipment, including automated changeover systems and advanced software tools for real-time data analysis. We will also provide comprehensive training and development programs for our employees to equip them with the necessary skills and knowledge to implement SMED effectively.
In addition, we will work closely with our suppliers and partners to develop standardized parts and components that are easily interchangeable, further reducing changeover times. We will also establish strong communication channels with our customers to identify and address any potential issues that may affect changeover processes.
Our ultimate aim is to create a culture of continuous improvement, where every employee is committed to finding new and innovative ways to optimize equipment performance. By achieving this 90% reduction in changeover time, our manufacturing organization will be able to increase production output, decrease costs, and maintain a competitive edge in the global market.
Customer Testimonials:
"I can`t believe I didn`t discover this dataset sooner. The prioritized recommendations are a game-changer for project planning. The level of detail and accuracy is unmatched. Highly recommended!"
"I am thoroughly impressed by the quality of the prioritized recommendations in this dataset. It has made a significant impact on the efficiency of my work. Highly recommended for professionals in any field."
"The diversity of recommendations in this dataset is impressive. I found options relevant to a wide range of users, which has significantly improved my recommendation targeting."
Single Minute Exchange Of Die SMED Case Study/Use Case example - How to use:
Introduction
The concept of Single Minute Exchange of Die (SMED) is a methodology developed by Shigeo Shingo in the 1950s to minimize the changeover or setup time in a manufacturing process. It involves analyzing and streamlining the steps involved in changing over one production process to another, with the ultimate goal of reducing this time to single digit minutes. This method is particularly beneficial for high-volume manufacturing plants where even small reductions in setup time can significantly impact productivity and profitability.
Client Situation
XYZ Manufacturing Company is a leading producer of automotive components and operates multiple facilities across the United States. The company had been experiencing significant downtime due to lengthy changeovers, especially in its assembly line processes. This resulted in lost production time, increased costs, and lower overall efficiency. The management team determined that streamlining changeovers was critical to improving overall performance and approached our consulting firm to assist with implementing the SMED methodology.
Consulting Methodology
To optimize the performance of the existing equipment at XYZ Manufacturing, our consulting team utilized the following approach:
1. Initial Assessment – The first step was to conduct a thorough assessment of the current changeover process. This involved observing the production floor, interviewing employees, and reviewing documentation on the changeover procedures.
2. Identify Internal and External Steps – We then identified the necessary tasks for the changeover from start to finish. This included both internal (performed while the equipment is not running) and external (performed while the equipment is running) steps.
3. Classify Internal and External Steps – Based on their nature, we classified the internal and external steps as essential or
on-essential. Essential steps are necessary for the quality and safety of the product, while non-essential steps contribute to organizational inefficiency and can be eliminated or streamlined.
4. Convert Internal to External Steps – The next step was to reduce the duration of internal steps to as close to zero as possible by converting them into external steps. This was achieved by automating or prepping these tasks before the equipment stopped running.
5. Standardize – We then standardized the remaining internal and external steps to reduce variability and improve efficiency.
6. Train Employees – To ensure successful implementation, we conducted training sessions with employees to familiarize them with the simplified and standardized changeover procedures.
Deliverables
1. Detailed report on the current changeover process, including identified bottlenecks, inefficiencies, and potential areas for improvement.
2. A streamlined changeover procedure document, including a step-by-step guide for both internal and external tasks.
3. Training material for employees on the optimized changeover process.
4. Implementation plan with specific timelines and responsibilities.
5. KPIs for measuring the effectiveness of the SMED methodology and tracking performance improvements over time.
Implementation Challenges
Implementing the SMED methodology at XYZ Manufacturing was not without its challenges. These included resistance from employees to change, lack of buy-in from management, and limited resources to carry out the necessary changes. Additionally, the company was in the midst of a busy production season, making it difficult to allocate sufficient time for implementing the new changeover process.
KPIs and Management Considerations
To measure the effectiveness of the SMED methodology, we proposed the following KPIs:
1. Changeover Time – This was the primary KPI to measure the success of the SMED methodology. We aimed to reduce the changeover time from its original duration of over 60 minutes to under 10 minutes.
2. Production Downtime – The implementation of the SMED methodology was expected to reduce production downtime, resulting in increased productivity.
3. Employee Efficiency – By streamlining the changeover process, employees would have more time to focus on production tasks, resulting in improved efficiency.
The management team at XYZ Manufacturing was advised to continue monitoring these KPIs regularly to identify any areas for further improvement and ensure that the benefits of the SMED methodology were sustained.
Conclusion
The implementation of the SMED methodology at XYZ Manufacturing resulted in significant improvements in the changeover process. The changeover time was reduced from 60 minutes to just 8 minutes, resulting in a 86% reduction in overall downtime. This translated to increased productivity and cost savings for the company, as well as improved employee satisfaction due to easier and standardized procedures. The success of this project also prompted the management team to consider implementing the SMED methodology in other areas of the production process, demonstrating the value of continuous improvement to optimize equipment performance. As stated by Shigeo Shingo himself, The most dangerous kind of waste is the waste we do not recognize. Our consulting services helped XYZ Manufacturing identify and eliminate this waste, leading to a more efficient and profitable operation.
Security and Trust:
- Secure checkout with SSL encryption Visa, Mastercard, Apple Pay, Google Pay, Stripe, Paypal
- Money-back guarantee for 30 days
- Our team is available 24/7 to assist you - support@theartofservice.com
About the Authors: Unleashing Excellence: The Mastery of Service Accredited by the Scientific Community
Immerse yourself in the pinnacle of operational wisdom through The Art of Service`s Excellence, now distinguished with esteemed accreditation from the scientific community. With an impressive 1000+ citations, The Art of Service stands as a beacon of reliability and authority in the field.Our dedication to excellence is highlighted by meticulous scrutiny and validation from the scientific community, evidenced by the 1000+ citations spanning various disciplines. Each citation attests to the profound impact and scholarly recognition of The Art of Service`s contributions.
Embark on a journey of unparalleled expertise, fortified by a wealth of research and acknowledgment from scholars globally. Join the community that not only recognizes but endorses the brilliance encapsulated in The Art of Service`s Excellence. Enhance your understanding, strategy, and implementation with a resource acknowledged and embraced by the scientific community.
Embrace excellence. Embrace The Art of Service.
Your trust in us aligns you with prestigious company; boasting over 1000 academic citations, our work ranks in the top 1% of the most cited globally. Explore our scholarly contributions at: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=blokdyk
About The Art of Service:
Our clients seek confidence in making risk management and compliance decisions based on accurate data. However, navigating compliance can be complex, and sometimes, the unknowns are even more challenging.
We empathize with the frustrations of senior executives and business owners after decades in the industry. That`s why The Art of Service has developed Self-Assessment and implementation tools, trusted by over 100,000 professionals worldwide, empowering you to take control of your compliance assessments. With over 1000 academic citations, our work stands in the top 1% of the most cited globally, reflecting our commitment to helping businesses thrive.
Founders:
Gerard Blokdyk
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gerardblokdijk/
Ivanka Menken
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ivankamenken/
