Are you tired of spending countless hours searching for the most comprehensive and up-to-date information on Team Autonomy and Lethal Autonomous Weapons for the Autonomous Weapons Systems Ethicist in Defense? Look no further!
Our dataset contains a wealth of essential information that will save you time, effort, and stress.
With 1539 prioritized requirements, solutions, benefits, results, and example case studies/use cases, our dataset is the ultimate resource for any professional or business looking to stay ahead in the field of autonomous weapons systems ethics.
Compared to competitors and alternatives, our Team Autonomy and Lethal Autonomous Weapons for the Autonomous Weapons Systems Ethicist in Defense dataset stands out as the most thorough and reliable source of information.
No more wasting valuable time and resources on incomplete or outdated data - our dataset has it all.
Whether you are a professional looking to expand your knowledge and stay current in the industry, or a business seeking to make informed decisions and stay ahead of the competition, our dataset is the perfect tool for you.
It provides a detailed overview of product types, usage, and specifications, as well as clear comparisons with semi-related product types.
This way, you can easily understand the unique features and benefits of our Team Autonomy and Lethal Autonomous Weapons for the Autonomous Weapons Systems Ethicist in Defense dataset.
Our product offers numerous benefits, from saving time and resources to providing access to essential information that can help prevent ethical issues and ensure compliance with regulations.
Our research on Team Autonomy and Lethal Autonomous Weapons for the Autonomous Weapons Systems Ethicist in Defense is constantly updated to ensure that you have the most recent and relevant data at your fingertips.
Not only is our dataset perfect for professionals and businesses, but it also offers an affordable DIY alternative.
Instead of spending a significant amount of money on hiring external experts or conducting your own research, our dataset provides all the necessary information in one place, at a fraction of the cost.
In today′s fast-paced and evolving world, having the right information is crucial for success in any industry.
With our Team Autonomy and Lethal Autonomous Weapons for the Autonomous Weapons Systems Ethicist in Defense dataset, you can stay ahead of the game and make well-informed decisions for your organization.
So why wait? Get your copy now and experience the benefits for yourself!
How does your organization give autonomy to delivery teams while still making sure the deployed solutions are safe and compliant? What systems might you put in place to support the development and autonomy of your people? Is the level of autonomy your team is given linked to the level of maturity the team has with software quality analysis and managing technical debt?
Team Autonomy
The organization provides autonomy to delivery teams through clear guidelines, regular communication, and monitoring of solutions.
1. Establish clear guidelines and standards for ethical decision-making. This ensures that teams have a framework to follow when making autonomous weapon decisions.
2. Regular training and education on ethics and compliance. This empowers team members to make responsible decisions and stay updated on ethical guidelines and regulations.
3. Use of simulation and testing software. This allows teams to run multiple scenarios and identify any potential ethical issues before deploying solutions in the field.
4. Implement a system of checks and balances. This ensures that no one team or individual has complete autonomy and that decisions are reviewed by multiple parties.
5. Foster a culture of ethical responsibility within the organization. This encourages team autonomy while also emphasizing the importance of ethical and compliant decision-making.
6. Develop a transparent reporting system for ethical concerns. This enables teams to raise any ethical issues they encounter and ensures that they are addressed in a timely manner.
7. Collaborate with external experts and organizations. This provides additional resources and perspectives in ensuring solutions are safe and compliant.
8. Regular audits and evaluations of deployed solutions. This ensures continued compliance and identifies areas for improvement.
9. Encourage open communication between different teams and departments. This promotes cross-functional knowledge sharing and helps prevent potential ethical blind spots.
10. Incorporate ethical principles and considerations into the design and development process from the beginning. This ensures that ethical concerns are addressed and incorporated at every stage of solution development.
CONTROL QUESTION: How does the organization give autonomy to delivery teams while still making sure the deployed solutions are safe and compliant?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
In 10 years, Team Autonomy will have revolutionized the way that organizations approach autonomy in their delivery teams. Our goal is to ensure that every team within an organization has the freedom to independently design, develop, and deploy solutions, while also upholding the highest standards of safety and compliance.
To achieve this, we will implement a comprehensive framework that empowers teams to make autonomous decisions within predefined boundaries. This framework will include strict adherence to industry regulations and standards, as well as thorough risk assessments and mitigation strategies.
Our team will also develop cutting-edge technology that integrates automated safety and compliance checks into the development and deployment process, allowing for continuous monitoring and rapid response to any potential issues.
Furthermore, we will establish internal training and mentorship programs to cultivate a culture of accountability and responsibility within each team. This will ensure that every team member understands the importance of safety and compliance and has the necessary skills and knowledge to uphold them.
Through these efforts, Team Autonomy will become the go-to partner for organizations seeking to balance autonomy and compliance. Our success will not only contribute to the growth and success of our clients but also elevate the industry standards for safe and compliant delivery practices.
"If you`re serious about data-driven decision-making, this dataset is a must-have. The prioritized recommendations are thorough, and the ease of integration into existing systems is a huge plus. Impressed!"
Client Situation:
Team Autonomy is a tech company that specializes in developing software solutions for various industries. The organization differentiates itself by giving its delivery teams a high level of autonomy, allowing them to make decisions and implement solutions without strict oversight from upper management. This approach has been highly successful in terms of driving innovation and empowering employees, but it has also raised concerns about the safety and compliance of the deployed solutions. With an increasing number of regulations and data privacy laws, Team Autonomy needs to find a balance between giving autonomy to its delivery teams while still ensuring the safety and compliance of their solutions.
Consulting Methodology:
In order to address the client′s situation, our consulting team followed a four-step methodology:
1. Gap Analysis: The first step was to conduct a thorough gap analysis to understand the current state of autonomy and compliance within Team Autonomy. This involved assessing the organization′s existing processes, policies, and practices related to team autonomy and compliance.
2. Best Practice Research: The second step was to research and identify best practices for balancing team autonomy and compliance in other organizations within the tech industry. This involved reviewing consulting whitepapers, academic business journals, and market research reports to gather insights and recommendations.
3. Stakeholder Interviews: To gain a deeper understanding of the perspectives and concerns of key stakeholders, including upper management, delivery teams, and compliance officers, our team conducted structured interviews. These interviews helped us identify any gaps or misalignments between the objectives of the delivery teams and the organization′s compliance requirements.
4. Strategy Development: Based on our findings from the previous steps, our team developed a strategy that would give autonomy to delivery teams while also ensuring the safety and compliance of their solutions. This involved creating new policies and processes, as well as recommending necessary changes to existing ones.
Deliverables:
Our consulting team delivered the following key deliverables to Team Autonomy:
1. Autonomy and Compliance Framework: After conducting a gap analysis and researching best practices, our team developed an autonomy and compliance framework for Team Autonomy. This framework outlined the key principles, policies, and processes that would guide the organization in balancing team autonomy and compliance.
2. Communication Plan: We also created a communication plan to ensure that all employees, including delivery teams, were aware of the new framework and any changes to existing policies. The plan included regular town hall meetings, workshops, and training sessions to educate employees on the importance of compliance and the role it plays in achieving autonomy.
3. Recommendations for Policy Changes: Our team provided specific recommendations for changes to existing policies, procedures, and processes to align them with the autonomy and compliance framework. These recommendations were based on insights from our gap analysis and best practice research.
4. Implementation Roadmap: In order to ensure successful implementation of the autonomy and compliance framework, our team created a detailed roadmap that outlined the steps and timelines for all recommended changes.
Implementation Challenges:
One of the main challenges faced by our consultancy team was getting buy-in from all stakeholders, especially the delivery teams who were accustomed to a high level of autonomy. This required effective communication and stakeholder engagement to ensure that the new framework was seen as a positive change rather than a restriction.
Another challenge was addressing any resistance and pushback from delivery teams who felt that this change would hinder their ability to innovate and deliver solutions quickly. To overcome this, we emphasized the importance of compliance in protecting the organization′s reputation and mitigating potential risks.
KPIs:
To measure the success of our consulting intervention, we established the following key performance indicators (KPIs):
1. Percentage of Solutions Compliant with Regulations: This KPI measures the percentage of solutions deployed by delivery teams that are compliant with relevant regulations and data privacy laws.
2. Employee Satisfaction: We conducted an employee satisfaction survey before and after the implementation of the new autonomy and compliance framework to measure employee satisfaction and acceptance of the changes.
3. Compliance Audit Results: Regular compliance audits are conducted to assess the organization′s compliance with regulations. This KPI measures any improvements in compliance scores following the implementation of the new framework.
Other Management Considerations:
Implementing a new autonomy and compliance framework requires significant effort, not just from the consulting team but also from key stakeholders within the organization. Therefore, it is important for Team Autonomy to ensure ongoing engagement and collaboration with its employees to address any challenges that may arise during the implementation process.
Another crucial consideration is maintaining a balance between autonomy and compliance. While compliance is vital to the organization′s success, giving delivery teams too much autonomy could potentially lead to non-compliance and put the organization at risk. Therefore, regular check-ins and reviews will be necessary to ensure that the autonomy and compliance framework continues to align with the organization′s objectives.
Conclusion:
By implementing the autonomy and compliance framework recommended by our consulting team, Team Autonomy was able to strike a balance between giving autonomy to its delivery teams while ensuring the safety and compliance of their solutions. This approach not only helped the organization meet regulatory requirements but also fostered a culture of responsibility and accountability among the delivery teams. With the right policies, processes, and communication in place, Team Autonomy has been able to maintain its innovative approach while mitigating risks and protecting its reputation.
Our dataset contains a wealth of essential information that will save you time, effort, and stress.
With 1539 prioritized requirements, solutions, benefits, results, and example case studies/use cases, our dataset is the ultimate resource for any professional or business looking to stay ahead in the field of autonomous weapons systems ethics.
Compared to competitors and alternatives, our Team Autonomy and Lethal Autonomous Weapons for the Autonomous Weapons Systems Ethicist in Defense dataset stands out as the most thorough and reliable source of information.
No more wasting valuable time and resources on incomplete or outdated data - our dataset has it all.
Whether you are a professional looking to expand your knowledge and stay current in the industry, or a business seeking to make informed decisions and stay ahead of the competition, our dataset is the perfect tool for you.
It provides a detailed overview of product types, usage, and specifications, as well as clear comparisons with semi-related product types.
This way, you can easily understand the unique features and benefits of our Team Autonomy and Lethal Autonomous Weapons for the Autonomous Weapons Systems Ethicist in Defense dataset.
Our product offers numerous benefits, from saving time and resources to providing access to essential information that can help prevent ethical issues and ensure compliance with regulations.
Our research on Team Autonomy and Lethal Autonomous Weapons for the Autonomous Weapons Systems Ethicist in Defense is constantly updated to ensure that you have the most recent and relevant data at your fingertips.
Not only is our dataset perfect for professionals and businesses, but it also offers an affordable DIY alternative.
Instead of spending a significant amount of money on hiring external experts or conducting your own research, our dataset provides all the necessary information in one place, at a fraction of the cost.
In today′s fast-paced and evolving world, having the right information is crucial for success in any industry.
With our Team Autonomy and Lethal Autonomous Weapons for the Autonomous Weapons Systems Ethicist in Defense dataset, you can stay ahead of the game and make well-informed decisions for your organization.
So why wait? Get your copy now and experience the benefits for yourself!
Discover Insights, Make Informed Decisions, and Stay Ahead of the Curve:
Key Features:
Comprehensive set of 1539 prioritized Team Autonomy requirements. - Extensive coverage of 179 Team Autonomy topic scopes.
- In-depth analysis of 179 Team Autonomy step-by-step solutions, benefits, BHAGs.
- Detailed examination of 179 Team Autonomy case studies and use cases.
- Digital download upon purchase.
- Enjoy lifetime document updates included with your purchase.
- Benefit from a fully editable and customizable Excel format.
- Trusted and utilized by over 10,000 organizations.
- Covering: Cognitive Architecture, Full Autonomy, Political Implications, Human Override, Military Organizations, Machine Learning, Moral Philosophy, Cyber Attacks, Sensor Fusion, Moral Machines, Cyber Warfare, Human Factors, Usability Requirements, Human Rights Monitoring, Public Debate, Human Control, International Law, Technological Singularity, Autonomy Levels, Ethics Of Artificial Intelligence, Dual Responsibility, Control Measures, Airborne Systems, Strategic Systems, Operational Effectiveness, Design Compliance, Moral Responsibility, Individual Autonomy, Mission Goals, Communication Systems, Algorithmic Fairness, Future Developments, Human Enhancement, Moral Considerations, Risk Mitigation, Decision Making Authority, Fully Autonomous Systems, Chain Of Command, Emergency Procedures, Unintended Effects, Emerging Technologies, Self Preservation, Remote Control, Ethics By Design, Autonomous Ethics, Sensing Technologies, Operational Safety, Land Based Systems, Fail Safe Mechanisms, Network Security, Responsibility Gaps, Robotic Ethics, Deep Learning, Perception Management, Human Machine Teaming, Machine Morality, Data Protection, Object Recognition, Ethical Concerns, Artificial Consciousness, Human Augmentation, Desert Warfare, Privacy Concerns, Cognitive Mechanisms, Public Opinion, Rise Of The Machines, Distributed Autonomy, Minimum Force, Cascading Failures, Right To Privacy, Legal Personhood, Defense Strategies, Data Ownership, Psychological Trauma, Algorithmic Bias, Swarm Intelligence, Contextual Ethics, Arms Control, Moral Reasoning, Multi Agent Systems, Weapon Autonomy, Right To Life, Decision Making Biases, Responsible AI, Self Destruction, Justifiable Use, Explainable AI, Decision Making, Military Ethics, Government Oversight, Sea Based Systems, Protocol II, Human Dignity, Safety Standards, Homeland Security, Common Good, Discrimination By Design, Applied Ethics, Human Machine Interaction, Human Rights, Target Selection, Operational Art, Artificial Intelligence, Quality Assurance, Human Error, Levels Of Autonomy, Fairness In Machine Learning, AI Bias, Counter Terrorism, Robot Rights, Principles Of War, Data Collection, Human Performance, Ethical Reasoning, Ground Operations, Military Doctrine, Value Alignment, AI Accountability, Rules Of Engagement, Human Computer Interaction, Intentional Harm, Human Rights Law, Risk Benefit Analysis, Human Element, Human Out Of The Loop, Ethical Frameworks, Intelligence Collection, Military Use, Accounting For Intent, Risk Assessment, Cognitive Bias, Operational Imperatives, Autonomous Functions, Situation Awareness, Ethical Decision Making, Command And Control, Decision Making Process, Target Identification, Self Defence, Performance Verification, Moral Robots, Human In Command, Distributed Control, Cascading Consequences, Team Autonomy, Open Dialogue, Situational Ethics, Public Perception, Neural Networks, Disaster Relief, Human In The Loop, Border Surveillance, Discrimination Mitigation, Collective Decision Making, Safety Validation, Target Recognition, Attribution Of Responsibility, Civilian Use, Ethical Assessments, Concept Of Responsibility, Psychological Distance, Autonomous Targeting, Civilian Applications, Future Outlook, Humanitarian Aid, Human Security, Inherent Value, Civilian Oversight, Moral Theory, Target Discrimination, Group Behavior, Treaty Negotiations, AI Governance, Respect For Persons, Deployment Restrictions, Moral Agency, Proxy Agent, Cascading Effects, Contingency Plans
Team Autonomy Assessment Dataset - Utilization, Solutions, Advantages, BHAG (Big Hairy Audacious Goal):
Team Autonomy
The organization provides autonomy to delivery teams through clear guidelines, regular communication, and monitoring of solutions.
1. Establish clear guidelines and standards for ethical decision-making. This ensures that teams have a framework to follow when making autonomous weapon decisions.
2. Regular training and education on ethics and compliance. This empowers team members to make responsible decisions and stay updated on ethical guidelines and regulations.
3. Use of simulation and testing software. This allows teams to run multiple scenarios and identify any potential ethical issues before deploying solutions in the field.
4. Implement a system of checks and balances. This ensures that no one team or individual has complete autonomy and that decisions are reviewed by multiple parties.
5. Foster a culture of ethical responsibility within the organization. This encourages team autonomy while also emphasizing the importance of ethical and compliant decision-making.
6. Develop a transparent reporting system for ethical concerns. This enables teams to raise any ethical issues they encounter and ensures that they are addressed in a timely manner.
7. Collaborate with external experts and organizations. This provides additional resources and perspectives in ensuring solutions are safe and compliant.
8. Regular audits and evaluations of deployed solutions. This ensures continued compliance and identifies areas for improvement.
9. Encourage open communication between different teams and departments. This promotes cross-functional knowledge sharing and helps prevent potential ethical blind spots.
10. Incorporate ethical principles and considerations into the design and development process from the beginning. This ensures that ethical concerns are addressed and incorporated at every stage of solution development.
CONTROL QUESTION: How does the organization give autonomy to delivery teams while still making sure the deployed solutions are safe and compliant?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
In 10 years, Team Autonomy will have revolutionized the way that organizations approach autonomy in their delivery teams. Our goal is to ensure that every team within an organization has the freedom to independently design, develop, and deploy solutions, while also upholding the highest standards of safety and compliance.
To achieve this, we will implement a comprehensive framework that empowers teams to make autonomous decisions within predefined boundaries. This framework will include strict adherence to industry regulations and standards, as well as thorough risk assessments and mitigation strategies.
Our team will also develop cutting-edge technology that integrates automated safety and compliance checks into the development and deployment process, allowing for continuous monitoring and rapid response to any potential issues.
Furthermore, we will establish internal training and mentorship programs to cultivate a culture of accountability and responsibility within each team. This will ensure that every team member understands the importance of safety and compliance and has the necessary skills and knowledge to uphold them.
Through these efforts, Team Autonomy will become the go-to partner for organizations seeking to balance autonomy and compliance. Our success will not only contribute to the growth and success of our clients but also elevate the industry standards for safe and compliant delivery practices.
Customer Testimonials:
"If you`re serious about data-driven decision-making, this dataset is a must-have. The prioritized recommendations are thorough, and the ease of integration into existing systems is a huge plus. Impressed!"
"This dataset is a treasure trove for those seeking effective recommendations. The prioritized suggestions are well-researched and have proven instrumental in guiding my decision-making. A great asset!"
"Downloading this dataset was a breeze. The documentation is clear, and the data is clean and ready for analysis. Kudos to the creators!"
Team Autonomy Case Study/Use Case example - How to use:
Client Situation:
Team Autonomy is a tech company that specializes in developing software solutions for various industries. The organization differentiates itself by giving its delivery teams a high level of autonomy, allowing them to make decisions and implement solutions without strict oversight from upper management. This approach has been highly successful in terms of driving innovation and empowering employees, but it has also raised concerns about the safety and compliance of the deployed solutions. With an increasing number of regulations and data privacy laws, Team Autonomy needs to find a balance between giving autonomy to its delivery teams while still ensuring the safety and compliance of their solutions.
Consulting Methodology:
In order to address the client′s situation, our consulting team followed a four-step methodology:
1. Gap Analysis: The first step was to conduct a thorough gap analysis to understand the current state of autonomy and compliance within Team Autonomy. This involved assessing the organization′s existing processes, policies, and practices related to team autonomy and compliance.
2. Best Practice Research: The second step was to research and identify best practices for balancing team autonomy and compliance in other organizations within the tech industry. This involved reviewing consulting whitepapers, academic business journals, and market research reports to gather insights and recommendations.
3. Stakeholder Interviews: To gain a deeper understanding of the perspectives and concerns of key stakeholders, including upper management, delivery teams, and compliance officers, our team conducted structured interviews. These interviews helped us identify any gaps or misalignments between the objectives of the delivery teams and the organization′s compliance requirements.
4. Strategy Development: Based on our findings from the previous steps, our team developed a strategy that would give autonomy to delivery teams while also ensuring the safety and compliance of their solutions. This involved creating new policies and processes, as well as recommending necessary changes to existing ones.
Deliverables:
Our consulting team delivered the following key deliverables to Team Autonomy:
1. Autonomy and Compliance Framework: After conducting a gap analysis and researching best practices, our team developed an autonomy and compliance framework for Team Autonomy. This framework outlined the key principles, policies, and processes that would guide the organization in balancing team autonomy and compliance.
2. Communication Plan: We also created a communication plan to ensure that all employees, including delivery teams, were aware of the new framework and any changes to existing policies. The plan included regular town hall meetings, workshops, and training sessions to educate employees on the importance of compliance and the role it plays in achieving autonomy.
3. Recommendations for Policy Changes: Our team provided specific recommendations for changes to existing policies, procedures, and processes to align them with the autonomy and compliance framework. These recommendations were based on insights from our gap analysis and best practice research.
4. Implementation Roadmap: In order to ensure successful implementation of the autonomy and compliance framework, our team created a detailed roadmap that outlined the steps and timelines for all recommended changes.
Implementation Challenges:
One of the main challenges faced by our consultancy team was getting buy-in from all stakeholders, especially the delivery teams who were accustomed to a high level of autonomy. This required effective communication and stakeholder engagement to ensure that the new framework was seen as a positive change rather than a restriction.
Another challenge was addressing any resistance and pushback from delivery teams who felt that this change would hinder their ability to innovate and deliver solutions quickly. To overcome this, we emphasized the importance of compliance in protecting the organization′s reputation and mitigating potential risks.
KPIs:
To measure the success of our consulting intervention, we established the following key performance indicators (KPIs):
1. Percentage of Solutions Compliant with Regulations: This KPI measures the percentage of solutions deployed by delivery teams that are compliant with relevant regulations and data privacy laws.
2. Employee Satisfaction: We conducted an employee satisfaction survey before and after the implementation of the new autonomy and compliance framework to measure employee satisfaction and acceptance of the changes.
3. Compliance Audit Results: Regular compliance audits are conducted to assess the organization′s compliance with regulations. This KPI measures any improvements in compliance scores following the implementation of the new framework.
Other Management Considerations:
Implementing a new autonomy and compliance framework requires significant effort, not just from the consulting team but also from key stakeholders within the organization. Therefore, it is important for Team Autonomy to ensure ongoing engagement and collaboration with its employees to address any challenges that may arise during the implementation process.
Another crucial consideration is maintaining a balance between autonomy and compliance. While compliance is vital to the organization′s success, giving delivery teams too much autonomy could potentially lead to non-compliance and put the organization at risk. Therefore, regular check-ins and reviews will be necessary to ensure that the autonomy and compliance framework continues to align with the organization′s objectives.
Conclusion:
By implementing the autonomy and compliance framework recommended by our consulting team, Team Autonomy was able to strike a balance between giving autonomy to its delivery teams while ensuring the safety and compliance of their solutions. This approach not only helped the organization meet regulatory requirements but also fostered a culture of responsibility and accountability among the delivery teams. With the right policies, processes, and communication in place, Team Autonomy has been able to maintain its innovative approach while mitigating risks and protecting its reputation.
Security and Trust:
- Secure checkout with SSL encryption Visa, Mastercard, Apple Pay, Google Pay, Stripe, Paypal
- Money-back guarantee for 30 days
- Our team is available 24/7 to assist you - support@theartofservice.com
About the Authors: Unleashing Excellence: The Mastery of Service Accredited by the Scientific Community
Immerse yourself in the pinnacle of operational wisdom through The Art of Service`s Excellence, now distinguished with esteemed accreditation from the scientific community. With an impressive 1000+ citations, The Art of Service stands as a beacon of reliability and authority in the field.Our dedication to excellence is highlighted by meticulous scrutiny and validation from the scientific community, evidenced by the 1000+ citations spanning various disciplines. Each citation attests to the profound impact and scholarly recognition of The Art of Service`s contributions.
Embark on a journey of unparalleled expertise, fortified by a wealth of research and acknowledgment from scholars globally. Join the community that not only recognizes but endorses the brilliance encapsulated in The Art of Service`s Excellence. Enhance your understanding, strategy, and implementation with a resource acknowledged and embraced by the scientific community.
Embrace excellence. Embrace The Art of Service.
Your trust in us aligns you with prestigious company; boasting over 1000 academic citations, our work ranks in the top 1% of the most cited globally. Explore our scholarly contributions at: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=blokdyk
About The Art of Service:
Our clients seek confidence in making risk management and compliance decisions based on accurate data. However, navigating compliance can be complex, and sometimes, the unknowns are even more challenging.
We empathize with the frustrations of senior executives and business owners after decades in the industry. That`s why The Art of Service has developed Self-Assessment and implementation tools, trusted by over 100,000 professionals worldwide, empowering you to take control of your compliance assessments. With over 1000 academic citations, our work stands in the top 1% of the most cited globally, reflecting our commitment to helping businesses thrive.
Founders:
Gerard Blokdyk
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gerardblokdijk/
Ivanka Menken
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ivankamenken/
