What can go wrong in Cloud Computing?
5th Oct 2016
What can go wrong in Cloud Computing?
A closer look at some potential unexpected (though uncommon) problems
Cloud computing has enjoyed what some might even call a 'meteoric rise' to popularity in recent years; to make a long story short, people are extremely interested and intrigued by it. But despite all the wondrous things that cloud computing is capable of, the fact remains that it is still subject to the same realities as any other technology. Even with its ability to essentially 'do more' with less energy, and provide nearly limitless resources to users, it still has its shortcomings. Most of these cloud computing issues are either warnings for potential risks, or something to do with integration and management.
Too often people try to politicize issues rather than looking at the problem(s) objectively, the world of cloud computing currently suffers in this regard. For many, cloud computing represents a continuation and evolvement of computing and networking. These individuals only want to promote the mind blowing potentials that cloud computing clearly offers. Still, others (some that might even hold cloud computing in high regard) see the security holes, potential legal scruples, lack of support, and steep learning curve attached to cloud computing and aren't as satisfied. In reality, both groups are right (and wrong);
Pro Group
- Cloud computing is an incredible achievement and one that might, or might not change the world. But does it really have to change the world to be great?
Con Group
- Cloud computing has its faults and widespread adoption of it without conducting the necessary preventative research could create a smorgasbord of loopholes for criminals to wreak havoc with. However, there are numerous clear benefits to cloud computing, and no one can argue that on paper, it is a clear advancement over the current model, as well as a nod to the future.
Focusing solely on either the positive or negative aspects of cloud computing is more than a little bit naïve, it's akin to a 'horse that has blinders on either side of its head'. Most individuals probably fall somewhere in between these two groups; which is in truth, the most sensible place with which to reside. Take into consideration the speed with which cloud computing is developing, and it's entirely logical to assume that it will continue on its path of current growth and development.
What's the Damage?
Specifically speaking, there are some usability issues that make cloud computing less than accommodating. A perfect illustration concerning this lack of cooperation is evident in the fact that applications can't be simply moved from service to service and/or provider to provider, for example. This is a problem because often times, a business can become partly or entirely dependent on the activities or analysis of a specific application. Hinging the entire success of your business on a few critical elements which, may or may not be transferable, is not exactly an intelligent move is it?
Additionally, some people have reported that it is quite difficult to control, integrate or manage certain types of cloud applications. One thing about cloud computing that is different from the grid model is the fact that ongoing maintenance and support may be needed to ensure that components (both hardware and software) continue 'doing what they're supposed to be doing'. An underlying trend in cloud computing seems to push toward leaving most or all of the technical modifications and management to expertly skilled individuals. For those that are used to engaging in a hands-on approach themselves, this is almost like a step backwards. However, all is not lost; once the rules and guidelines have been established, the overall level of user modification, interaction and manageability will undoubtedly sharply increase.
What cloud computing discussion covering potential pitfalls would be complete without covering any regulatory and / or legal aspects? The simple fact of the matter is that service license agreements for either apps or the packages offered by cloud computing providers are not comprehensive, and are not sanctioned or authorized by any oversight committee(s). In fact, there is no definite regulatory structure in place for cloud computing at all. This means that in the event of catastrophic loss of data or breach of security, there may be no one there to catch you. Currently, it is at the discretion of the providing company to consider these potentialities. The good news is that there are a number of companies that are facing these issues head on and offer comprehensive plans / structures for dealing with unknown or outside threats. By the same token, certain companies may need to be forced to reveal the location(s) of their hardware to their clientele. This is important because there may be different laws in place in foreign countries concerning digital or internet based data and exchanges that could affect your business.
Hey, nobody's perfect…
Like it or not, cloud computing isn't going away any time soon. The best course of action is to love the things about it that work and fix those that don't. Simple enough right? Accomplishing this task is going to require the participation from all involved groups and parties. Those that see potentials in cloud computing will push it toward greater ends, and those that see serious problems will either help fix them or keep on highlighting them until someone else does.