Are you tired of struggling to manage your brand’s reputation and mitigate third-party risk? Look no further – our Brand Reputation Damage and Third Party Risk Management Knowledge Base has got you covered.
Our comprehensive dataset consists of 1526 carefully curated questions that will guide you towards effective results in a timely manner.
Prioritizing urgency and scope, our knowledge base provides you with the most important questions to ask, giving you a strategic advantage.
But it doesn’t stop there.
Our dataset also includes solutions, benefits, and results for both brand reputation damage and third party risk management.
With real-life examples and case studies, you can see the tangible impact our knowledge base can have on your business.
What sets us apart from competitors and alternatives? Our dataset is specifically designed for professionals, making it the go-to resource for businesses looking to improve their brand reputation and minimize risk.
It’s easy to use and affordable, making it a DIY alternative to expensive consulting services.
Don’t just take our word for it – our product is backed by thorough research on brand reputation damage and third party risk management.
Our knowledge base is tailored to fit the specific needs of businesses, providing targeted solutions and benefits.
And the best part? Our knowledge base is not limited to one industry or sector – it can benefit businesses of all sizes and types.
No matter the cost, our knowledge base offers a high return on investment by saving you time and resources in managing your brand’s reputation and mitigating third-party risk.
So why wait? Say goodbye to the stress and uncertainty of managing brand reputation and third-party risk – our knowledge base is here to simplify and streamline the process for you.
Don’t miss out on this game-changing tool – try it now and see the difference it can make for your business.
What kinds of compliance failures would create significant brand risk or reputational damage?
Brand Reputation Damage
Compliance failures related to ethical, legal, or social responsibility issues that go against a company′s values and beliefs can significantly damage its brand reputation.
1) Implementing strict compliance protocols to prevent any potential ethical or legal violations. - Benefit: Maintains a positive brand image and prevents negative publicity.
2) Conducting regular audits and assessments of third-party partners to identify any potential red flags. - Benefit: Helps to proactively address and rectify any potential compliance issues before they cause damage to the brand′s reputation.
3) Establishing clear communication channels with third-party partners to ensure transparency and open dialogue on any compliance matters. - Benefit: Promotes trust and accountability between the brand and its third-party partners.
4) Developing a third-party risk management program that includes ongoing monitoring and remediation processes. - Benefit: Helps to continuously assess and mitigate any compliance risks that could harm the brand′s reputation.
5) Providing comprehensive training and education to third-party partners on compliance policies and procedures. - Benefit: Ensures all parties are well-informed and aligned with the brand′s compliance standards, reducing the likelihood of any potential breaches.
6) Collaborating with reputable and trustworthy third-party partners who have proven track records of compliance. - Benefit: Mitigates the risk of working with unreliable or non-compliant partners that could damage the brand′s reputation.
7) Creating a crisis management plan in case of any compliance failures, including a clear communication strategy and steps for remediation. - Benefit: Allows for a quick and effective response to any potential compliance issues, minimizing the impact on the brand′s reputation.
CONTROL QUESTION: What kinds of compliance failures would create significant brand risk or reputational damage?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
In 10 years, Brand Reputation Damage aims to be the leading global authority on corporate compliance failures and their impact on brand image and reputation.
Our goal is to have a strong presence in the media, with regular appearances on major news outlets and highly respected speaking engagements at prestigious events around the world.
We will have a team of experts who are constantly monitoring and analyzing data on compliance breaches and their effects on brands. We will use cutting-edge technology and data analytics to identify trends and patterns, providing insights and predictions on potential threats to companies′ reputations.
Through our research and thought leadership, we will influence legislative and regulatory changes to strengthen compliance laws and hold corporations accountable for their actions. We will also collaborate with industry leaders and experts to develop best practices and guidelines for companies to follow in order to avoid compliance failures and protect their brand reputation.
In terms of our impact, we strive to have a proactive approach and prevent compliance failures before they occur, rather than simply reacting to them after the damage has been done. Our goal is to significantly reduce the occurrence of major compliance breaches and their negative impact on companies′ brand image and reputation.
Ultimately, our 10-year goal is to be at the forefront of shaping a business environment where ethical and responsible practices are the norm, and companies prioritize compliance to protect their valuable brand reputation.
"This dataset was the perfect training ground for my recommendation engine. The high-quality data and clear prioritization helped me achieve exceptional accuracy and user satisfaction."
Case Study: Brand Reputation Damage Due to Compliance Failures
Synopsis of the Client Situation:
The case study revolves around a multinational retail company with operations in various countries. The company has been in business for over three decades and has established itself as a market leader. However, in recent years, the company′s brand reputation has taken a hit due to several compliance failures. These compliance failures have not only resulted in fines and penalties but have also had a significant impact on the company′s reputation and financial performance.
Consulting Methodology:
To analyze the client′s situation and provide recommendations, our consulting team followed a structured methodology, which involved the following steps:
1. Identifying Compliance Failures - The first step was to identify the specific compliance failures that had occurred within the company. This involved conducting interviews with key stakeholders and reviewing relevant documents and reports.
2. Assessing Risks - Once the compliance failures were identified, the next step was to assess the risks associated with each failure. This involved analyzing the potential impact on the company′s reputation and financial performance.
3. Conducting Root Cause Analysis - Our team then conducted a root cause analysis to determine the underlying reasons behind the compliance failures. This involved interviewing employees at various levels and reviewing internal processes and procedures.
4. Formulating Recommendations - Based on the findings from the previous steps, our team formulated a set of recommendations aimed at addressing the compliance failures and mitigating any potential risks to the company′s reputation.
5. Developing an Implementation Plan - To ensure the successful implementation of the recommendations, our team developed a detailed implementation plan that included timelines, responsibilities, and resources required.
Deliverables:
1. Compliance Failure Identification Report - This report outlines the specific compliance failures that have occurred within the company.
2. Risk Assessment Report - This report highlights the potential risks associated with each compliance failure.
3. Root Cause Analysis Report - This report provides insights into the underlying causes of the compliance failures.
4. Recommendations Report - This report outlines the recommendations formulated by our team to address the compliance failures and mitigate risks.
5. Implementation Plan - This plan provides a roadmap for the successful implementation of the recommendations.
Implementation Challenges:
The implementation of the recommendations was not without its challenges. Some of the key challenges faced during the implementation process include:
1. Resistance from Employees - The recommended changes required employees to adopt new processes and procedures, which met with resistance from some employees who were comfortable with the old ways of doing things.
2. Lack of Resources - The implementation process required the allocation of significant resources, which posed a challenge for the company′s management, who were already facing financial constraints.
3. Resistance from Stakeholders - The recommended changes also required the buy-in and cooperation of external stakeholders, such as suppliers and distributors, who were not willing to make the necessary changes.
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs):
To measure the success of the implementation of the recommendations, the following KPIs were identified:
1. Reduction in Compliance Failures – The number of compliance failures should decrease after the implementation of the recommendations.
2. Increase in Compliance – The company should see an overall increase in compliance levels across all areas.
3. Improvement in Reputation Score – The company′s reputation score should improve as measured by surveys and market research.
4. Increase in Revenue – The implementation of the recommendations should result in increased revenue due to better operational efficiency and improved reputation.
Management Considerations:
The management of the company needs to consider the following factors to ensure the successful implementation of the recommendations and prevent future compliance failures:
1. Employee Engagement - It is essential to involve and engage employees at all levels in the implementation process to minimize resistance and increase adoption of the recommended changes.
2. Resource Allocation - The management needs to allocate necessary resources to support the implementation process, including funds, personnel, and technology.
3. Stakeholder Management - The company should work closely with external stakeholders, such as suppliers and distributors, to ensure their cooperation and support in the implementation process.
Conclusion:
Compliance failures can significantly damage a company′s brand reputation and lead to financial losses. It is imperative for companies to identify and address compliance failures promptly to mitigate risks and maintain their brand image. A robust consulting methodology, coupled with careful implementation and management considerations, can help companies overcome compliance failures and prevent them from recurring in the future.
Citations:
1. Harvard Business Review. (2016). A Short Guide to Reputation Risk. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2015/04/a-short-guide-to-reputation-risk
2. PwC. (2020). Compliance Failures: The High Cost of Poor Risk Management. Retrieved from https://www.pwc.com/us/en/services/ risk-assurance/compliance-failure-cost-risks.html
3. Deloitte. (2019). Managing Reputational Risk. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/pages/risk/articles/managing-reputational-risk.html
4. Market Research Future. (2020). Reputation Management Market Research Report – Global Forecast till 2025. Retrieved from https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/reputation-management-market-7975
Our comprehensive dataset consists of 1526 carefully curated questions that will guide you towards effective results in a timely manner.
Prioritizing urgency and scope, our knowledge base provides you with the most important questions to ask, giving you a strategic advantage.
But it doesn’t stop there.
Our dataset also includes solutions, benefits, and results for both brand reputation damage and third party risk management.
With real-life examples and case studies, you can see the tangible impact our knowledge base can have on your business.
What sets us apart from competitors and alternatives? Our dataset is specifically designed for professionals, making it the go-to resource for businesses looking to improve their brand reputation and minimize risk.
It’s easy to use and affordable, making it a DIY alternative to expensive consulting services.
Don’t just take our word for it – our product is backed by thorough research on brand reputation damage and third party risk management.
Our knowledge base is tailored to fit the specific needs of businesses, providing targeted solutions and benefits.
And the best part? Our knowledge base is not limited to one industry or sector – it can benefit businesses of all sizes and types.
No matter the cost, our knowledge base offers a high return on investment by saving you time and resources in managing your brand’s reputation and mitigating third-party risk.
So why wait? Say goodbye to the stress and uncertainty of managing brand reputation and third-party risk – our knowledge base is here to simplify and streamline the process for you.
Don’t miss out on this game-changing tool – try it now and see the difference it can make for your business.
Discover Insights, Make Informed Decisions, and Stay Ahead of the Curve:
Key Features:
Comprehensive set of 1526 prioritized Brand Reputation Damage requirements. - Extensive coverage of 225 Brand Reputation Damage topic scopes.
- In-depth analysis of 225 Brand Reputation Damage step-by-step solutions, benefits, BHAGs.
- Detailed examination of 225 Brand Reputation Damage case studies and use cases.
- Digital download upon purchase.
- Enjoy lifetime document updates included with your purchase.
- Benefit from a fully editable and customizable Excel format.
- Trusted and utilized by over 10,000 organizations.
- Covering: Information Sharing, Activity Level, Incentive Structure, Recorded Outcome, Performance Scorecards, Fraud Reporting, Patch Management, Vendor Selection Process, Complaint Management, Third Party Dependencies, Third-party claims, End Of Life Support, Regulatory Impact, Annual Contracts, Alerts And Notifications, Third-Party Risk Management, Vendor Stability, Financial Reporting, Termination Procedures, Store Inventory, Risk management policies and procedures, Eliminating Waste, Risk Appetite, Security Controls, Supplier Monitoring, Fraud Prevention, Vendor Compliance, Cybersecurity Incidents, Risk measurement practices, Decision Consistency, Vendor Selection, Critical Vendor Program, Business Resilience, Business Impact Assessments, ISO 22361, Oversight Activities, Claims Management, Data Classification, Risk Systems, Data Governance Data Retention Policies, Vendor Relationship Management, Vendor Relationships, Vendor Due Diligence Process, Parts Compliance, Home Automation, Future Applications, Being Proactive, Data Protection Regulations, Business Continuity Planning, Contract Negotiation, Risk Assessment, Business Impact Analysis, Systems Review, Payment Terms, Operational Risk Management, Employee Misconduct, Diversity And Inclusion, Supplier Diversity, Conflicts Of Interest, Ethical Compliance Monitoring, Contractual Agreements, AI Risk Management, Risk Mitigation, Privacy Policies, Quality Assurance, Data Privacy, Monitoring Procedures, Secure Access Management, Insurance Coverage, Contract Renewal, Remote Customer Service, Sourcing Strategies, Third Party Vetting, Project management roles and responsibilities, Crisis Team, Operational disruption, Third Party Agreements, Personal Data Handling, Vendor Inventory, Contracts Database, Auditing And Monitoring, Effectiveness Metrics, Dependency Risks, Brand Reputation Damage, Supply Challenges, Contractual Obligations, Risk Appetite Statement, Timelines and Milestones, KPI Monitoring, Litigation Management, Employee Fraud, Project Management Systems, Environmental Impact, Cybersecurity Standards, Auditing Capabilities, Third-party vendor assessments, Risk Management Frameworks, Leadership Resilience, Data Access, Third Party Agreements Audit, Penetration Testing, Third Party Audits, Vendor Screening, Penalty Clauses, Effective Risk Management, Contract Standardization, Risk Education, Risk Control Activities, Financial Risk, Breach Notification, Data Protection Oversight, Risk Identification, Data Governance, Outsourcing Arrangements, Business Associate Agreements, Data Transparency, Business Associates, Onboarding Process, Governance risk policies and procedures, Security audit program management, Performance Improvement, Risk Management, Financial Due Diligence, Regulatory Requirements, Third Party Risks, Vendor Due Diligence, Vendor Due Diligence Checklist, Data Breach Incident Incident Risk Management, Enterprise Architecture Risk Management, Regulatory Policies, Continuous Monitoring, Finding Solutions, Governance risk management practices, Outsourcing Oversight, Vendor Exit Plan, Performance Metrics, Dependency Management, Quality Audits Assessments, Due Diligence Checklists, Assess Vulnerabilities, Entity-Level Controls, Performance Reviews, Disciplinary Actions, Vendor Risk Profile, Regulatory Oversight, Board Risk Tolerance, Compliance Frameworks, Vendor Risk Rating, Compliance Management, Spreadsheet Controls, Third Party Vendor Risk, Risk Awareness, SLA Monitoring, Ongoing Monitoring, Third Party Penetration Testing, Volunteer Management, Vendor Trust, Internet Access Policies, Information Technology, Service Level Objectives, Supply Chain Disruptions, Coverage assessment, Refusal Management, Risk Reporting, Implemented Solutions, Supplier Risk, Cost Management Solutions, Vendor Selection Criteria, Skills Assessment, Third-Party Vendors, Contract Management, Risk Management Policies, Third Party Risk Assessment, Continuous Auditing, Confidentiality Agreements, IT Risk Management, Privacy Regulations, Secure Vendor Management, Master Data Management, Access Controls, Information Security Risk Assessments, Vendor Risk Analytics, Data Ownership, Cybersecurity Controls, Testing And Validation, Data Security, Company Policies And Procedures, Cybersecurity Assessments, Third Party Management, Master Plan, Financial Compliance, Cybersecurity Risks, Software Releases, Disaster Recovery, Scope Of Services, Control Systems, Regulatory Compliance, Security Enhancement, Incentive Structures, Third Party Risk Management, Service Providers, Agile Methodologies, Risk Governance, Bribery Policies, FISMA, Cybersecurity Research, Risk Auditing Standards, Security Assessments, Risk Management Cycle, Shipping And Transportation, Vendor Contract Review, Customer Complaints Management, Supply Chain Risks, Subcontractor Assessment, App Store Policies, Contract Negotiation Strategies, Data Breaches, Third Party Inspections, Third Party Logistics 3PL, Vendor Performance, Termination Rights, Vendor Access, Audit Trails, Legal Framework, Continuous Improvement
Brand Reputation Damage Assessment Dataset - Utilization, Solutions, Advantages, BHAG (Big Hairy Audacious Goal):
Brand Reputation Damage
Compliance failures related to ethical, legal, or social responsibility issues that go against a company′s values and beliefs can significantly damage its brand reputation.
1) Implementing strict compliance protocols to prevent any potential ethical or legal violations. - Benefit: Maintains a positive brand image and prevents negative publicity.
2) Conducting regular audits and assessments of third-party partners to identify any potential red flags. - Benefit: Helps to proactively address and rectify any potential compliance issues before they cause damage to the brand′s reputation.
3) Establishing clear communication channels with third-party partners to ensure transparency and open dialogue on any compliance matters. - Benefit: Promotes trust and accountability between the brand and its third-party partners.
4) Developing a third-party risk management program that includes ongoing monitoring and remediation processes. - Benefit: Helps to continuously assess and mitigate any compliance risks that could harm the brand′s reputation.
5) Providing comprehensive training and education to third-party partners on compliance policies and procedures. - Benefit: Ensures all parties are well-informed and aligned with the brand′s compliance standards, reducing the likelihood of any potential breaches.
6) Collaborating with reputable and trustworthy third-party partners who have proven track records of compliance. - Benefit: Mitigates the risk of working with unreliable or non-compliant partners that could damage the brand′s reputation.
7) Creating a crisis management plan in case of any compliance failures, including a clear communication strategy and steps for remediation. - Benefit: Allows for a quick and effective response to any potential compliance issues, minimizing the impact on the brand′s reputation.
CONTROL QUESTION: What kinds of compliance failures would create significant brand risk or reputational damage?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
In 10 years, Brand Reputation Damage aims to be the leading global authority on corporate compliance failures and their impact on brand image and reputation.
Our goal is to have a strong presence in the media, with regular appearances on major news outlets and highly respected speaking engagements at prestigious events around the world.
We will have a team of experts who are constantly monitoring and analyzing data on compliance breaches and their effects on brands. We will use cutting-edge technology and data analytics to identify trends and patterns, providing insights and predictions on potential threats to companies′ reputations.
Through our research and thought leadership, we will influence legislative and regulatory changes to strengthen compliance laws and hold corporations accountable for their actions. We will also collaborate with industry leaders and experts to develop best practices and guidelines for companies to follow in order to avoid compliance failures and protect their brand reputation.
In terms of our impact, we strive to have a proactive approach and prevent compliance failures before they occur, rather than simply reacting to them after the damage has been done. Our goal is to significantly reduce the occurrence of major compliance breaches and their negative impact on companies′ brand image and reputation.
Ultimately, our 10-year goal is to be at the forefront of shaping a business environment where ethical and responsible practices are the norm, and companies prioritize compliance to protect their valuable brand reputation.
Customer Testimonials:
"This dataset was the perfect training ground for my recommendation engine. The high-quality data and clear prioritization helped me achieve exceptional accuracy and user satisfaction."
"I`ve used several datasets in the past, but this one stands out for its completeness. It`s a valuable asset for anyone working with data analytics or machine learning."
"This dataset is more than just data; it`s a partner in my success. It`s a constant source of inspiration and guidance."
Brand Reputation Damage Case Study/Use Case example - How to use:
Case Study: Brand Reputation Damage Due to Compliance Failures
Synopsis of the Client Situation:
The case study revolves around a multinational retail company with operations in various countries. The company has been in business for over three decades and has established itself as a market leader. However, in recent years, the company′s brand reputation has taken a hit due to several compliance failures. These compliance failures have not only resulted in fines and penalties but have also had a significant impact on the company′s reputation and financial performance.
Consulting Methodology:
To analyze the client′s situation and provide recommendations, our consulting team followed a structured methodology, which involved the following steps:
1. Identifying Compliance Failures - The first step was to identify the specific compliance failures that had occurred within the company. This involved conducting interviews with key stakeholders and reviewing relevant documents and reports.
2. Assessing Risks - Once the compliance failures were identified, the next step was to assess the risks associated with each failure. This involved analyzing the potential impact on the company′s reputation and financial performance.
3. Conducting Root Cause Analysis - Our team then conducted a root cause analysis to determine the underlying reasons behind the compliance failures. This involved interviewing employees at various levels and reviewing internal processes and procedures.
4. Formulating Recommendations - Based on the findings from the previous steps, our team formulated a set of recommendations aimed at addressing the compliance failures and mitigating any potential risks to the company′s reputation.
5. Developing an Implementation Plan - To ensure the successful implementation of the recommendations, our team developed a detailed implementation plan that included timelines, responsibilities, and resources required.
Deliverables:
1. Compliance Failure Identification Report - This report outlines the specific compliance failures that have occurred within the company.
2. Risk Assessment Report - This report highlights the potential risks associated with each compliance failure.
3. Root Cause Analysis Report - This report provides insights into the underlying causes of the compliance failures.
4. Recommendations Report - This report outlines the recommendations formulated by our team to address the compliance failures and mitigate risks.
5. Implementation Plan - This plan provides a roadmap for the successful implementation of the recommendations.
Implementation Challenges:
The implementation of the recommendations was not without its challenges. Some of the key challenges faced during the implementation process include:
1. Resistance from Employees - The recommended changes required employees to adopt new processes and procedures, which met with resistance from some employees who were comfortable with the old ways of doing things.
2. Lack of Resources - The implementation process required the allocation of significant resources, which posed a challenge for the company′s management, who were already facing financial constraints.
3. Resistance from Stakeholders - The recommended changes also required the buy-in and cooperation of external stakeholders, such as suppliers and distributors, who were not willing to make the necessary changes.
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs):
To measure the success of the implementation of the recommendations, the following KPIs were identified:
1. Reduction in Compliance Failures – The number of compliance failures should decrease after the implementation of the recommendations.
2. Increase in Compliance – The company should see an overall increase in compliance levels across all areas.
3. Improvement in Reputation Score – The company′s reputation score should improve as measured by surveys and market research.
4. Increase in Revenue – The implementation of the recommendations should result in increased revenue due to better operational efficiency and improved reputation.
Management Considerations:
The management of the company needs to consider the following factors to ensure the successful implementation of the recommendations and prevent future compliance failures:
1. Employee Engagement - It is essential to involve and engage employees at all levels in the implementation process to minimize resistance and increase adoption of the recommended changes.
2. Resource Allocation - The management needs to allocate necessary resources to support the implementation process, including funds, personnel, and technology.
3. Stakeholder Management - The company should work closely with external stakeholders, such as suppliers and distributors, to ensure their cooperation and support in the implementation process.
Conclusion:
Compliance failures can significantly damage a company′s brand reputation and lead to financial losses. It is imperative for companies to identify and address compliance failures promptly to mitigate risks and maintain their brand image. A robust consulting methodology, coupled with careful implementation and management considerations, can help companies overcome compliance failures and prevent them from recurring in the future.
Citations:
1. Harvard Business Review. (2016). A Short Guide to Reputation Risk. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2015/04/a-short-guide-to-reputation-risk
2. PwC. (2020). Compliance Failures: The High Cost of Poor Risk Management. Retrieved from https://www.pwc.com/us/en/services/ risk-assurance/compliance-failure-cost-risks.html
3. Deloitte. (2019). Managing Reputational Risk. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/pages/risk/articles/managing-reputational-risk.html
4. Market Research Future. (2020). Reputation Management Market Research Report – Global Forecast till 2025. Retrieved from https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/reputation-management-market-7975
Security and Trust:
- Secure checkout with SSL encryption Visa, Mastercard, Apple Pay, Google Pay, Stripe, Paypal
- Money-back guarantee for 30 days
- Our team is available 24/7 to assist you - support@theartofservice.com
About the Authors: Unleashing Excellence: The Mastery of Service Accredited by the Scientific Community
Immerse yourself in the pinnacle of operational wisdom through The Art of Service`s Excellence, now distinguished with esteemed accreditation from the scientific community. With an impressive 1000+ citations, The Art of Service stands as a beacon of reliability and authority in the field.Our dedication to excellence is highlighted by meticulous scrutiny and validation from the scientific community, evidenced by the 1000+ citations spanning various disciplines. Each citation attests to the profound impact and scholarly recognition of The Art of Service`s contributions.
Embark on a journey of unparalleled expertise, fortified by a wealth of research and acknowledgment from scholars globally. Join the community that not only recognizes but endorses the brilliance encapsulated in The Art of Service`s Excellence. Enhance your understanding, strategy, and implementation with a resource acknowledged and embraced by the scientific community.
Embrace excellence. Embrace The Art of Service.
Your trust in us aligns you with prestigious company; boasting over 1000 academic citations, our work ranks in the top 1% of the most cited globally. Explore our scholarly contributions at: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=blokdyk
About The Art of Service:
Our clients seek confidence in making risk management and compliance decisions based on accurate data. However, navigating compliance can be complex, and sometimes, the unknowns are even more challenging.
We empathize with the frustrations of senior executives and business owners after decades in the industry. That`s why The Art of Service has developed Self-Assessment and implementation tools, trusted by over 100,000 professionals worldwide, empowering you to take control of your compliance assessments. With over 1000 academic citations, our work stands in the top 1% of the most cited globally, reflecting our commitment to helping businesses thrive.
Founders:
Gerard Blokdyk
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gerardblokdijk/
Ivanka Menken
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ivankamenken/
