Attention all Autonomous Weapons Systems Ethicists in the defense industry!
Are you looking for a comprehensive and reliable solution to address fairness in Machine Learning and Lethal Autonomous Weapons? Look no further – our Fairness In Machine Learning and Lethal Autonomous Weapons dataset is here to help you tackle this urgent and critical issue with ease.
With 1539 prioritized requirements, solutions, benefits, results, and real-world case studies, our dataset is the most comprehensive and up-to-date resource available for professionals like you.
Our product is specifically designed for use in the defense industry, making it a must-have for anyone working on ethical considerations for Autonomous Weapons Systems.
Compared to other alternatives or DIY methods, our Fairness In Machine Learning and Lethal Autonomous Weapons dataset stands out as the ultimate resource for its unbeatable accuracy, reliability, and relevance.
We have done the research for you and compiled all the necessary information in one place, making it easy for you to access and understand.
Our dataset is not just for the defense industry – it is also a valuable tool for businesses of all kinds that are looking to integrate fairness into their Machine Learning and Autonomous Weapons systems.
It provides a detailed overview and specification of the product, along with its benefits and potential trade-offs.
We understand that cost is always a concern, which is why our dataset offers a cost-effective and efficient solution for addressing fairness in Machine Learning and Lethal Autonomous Weapons.
By using our dataset, you will save time, effort, and resources, while also ensuring ethical considerations are met in your projects.
Don′t just take our word for it – see for yourself how our Fairness In Machine Learning and Lethal Autonomous Weapons dataset has helped numerous professionals and businesses in achieving a more fair and ethical approach to Machine Learning and Autonomous Weapons.
Our product speaks for itself through its proven results and satisfied customers.
So why wait? Upgrade your approach to fairness in Machine Learning and Lethal Autonomous Weapons today with our dataset.
Trust us to provide you with the most accurate, reliable, and comprehensive information available in the market.
Don′t settle for less – choose our Fairness In Machine Learning and Lethal Autonomous Weapons dataset for all your ethical considerations needs.
What are the effects of limiting data use in a machine learning environment? How will you monitor machine learning applications for accuracy and consistency in accordance with the definitions of fairness? Can the most accurate predictive algorithms be used in a way that respects fairness and equality?
Fairness In Machine Learning
Limiting data use in machine learning can lead to biased and unfair outcomes due to lack of representation and diversity in the training data.
1. Implementing diversity in training data to ensure a fair representation of diverse groups.
- Benefits: reduces bias and ensures fairness in decision making by the autonomous weapon system.
2. Regularly monitoring and auditing the data used by the autonomous weapon system.
- Benefits: allows for identification and correction of any biases or unfairness in the data.
3. Including input from ethicists and stakeholders during the design and development phase.
- Benefits: promotes transparent decision making and accountability for the actions of the autonomous weapon system.
4. Utilizing explainable AI techniques to understand and interpret the decisions made by the autonomous weapon system.
- Benefits: provides insight into the reasoning behind decisions, allowing for detection and correction of any biases in the system.
5. Developing an effective system for handling and addressing complaints or concerns about the decisions made by the autonomous weapon system.
- Benefits: promotes transparency and trust in the use of autonomous weapons by allowing for grievances to be addressed.
CONTROL QUESTION: What are the effects of limiting data use in a machine learning environment?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
My BHAG for Fairness in Machine Learning for the next 10 years is to create widespread ethical and equitable practices in limiting the use of data in machine learning environments. This goal will involve implementing policies and regulations that prioritize fairness and transparency in data selection, training, and deployment within the field of machine learning.
One of the major effects of limiting data use in machine learning would be the development of unbiased and inclusive algorithms. By actively limiting the types of data used, we can prevent systemic biases from perpetuating and potentially amplifyting discrimination against marginalized groups. This shift towards fairness would promote greater trust in machine learning systems and alleviate concerns over algorithmic bias.
Additionally, by limiting data use, we can encourage the development of alternative and more diverse data sources. This could lead to a more comprehensive and representative dataset, allowing for improved accuracy and generalizability of machine learning algorithms. It would also foster innovation and creativity in the field, as researchers and developers would need to think outside the box to overcome limitations in data availability.
Moreover, this BHAG would also have a broader societal impact. By promoting accountability and transparency in data usage, we can ensure that individuals′ personal information is not being used without their consent or knowledge. This would ultimately protect privacy rights and mitigate potential harms caused by invasive data collection and surveillance.
Overall, this BHAG for Fairness in Machine Learning has the potential to significantly transform the industry and address critical concerns surrounding ethics, diversity, and equity in AI. It would also have profound implications for society as a whole, promoting a more responsible and equitable use of technology for the betterment of all individuals.
"If you`re looking for a reliable and effective way to improve your recommendations, I highly recommend this dataset. It`s an investment that will pay off big time."
Synopsis:
The client is a large retail company that utilizes machine learning to improve their sales and marketing strategies. They have recently faced backlash regarding their use of customer data and the potential biases in their machine learning algorithms. This has raised concerns about fairness and ethical use of machine learning in the company. As a result, the client has approached our consulting firm to help them address these issues and create a more fair and transparent machine learning environment.
Consulting Methodology:
1. Data Analysis: The first step in our consulting methodology is to conduct a thorough analysis of the data being used in the machine learning algorithms. This includes examining potential biases and assessing the fairness of the data.
2. Algorithm Evaluation: After analyzing the data, we will evaluate the performance of the existing machine learning algorithms and identify any potential biases or unfair outcomes. This will involve benchmarking against industry standards and using established metrics such as accuracy, precision, and recall.
3. Identify Limitations: Once the data and algorithms have been evaluated, we will work with the client to identify any limitations on the use of data in the machine learning process. This may involve setting boundaries on the types of data that can be used and ensuring that certain groups are not disproportionately affected by the algorithms.
4. Mitigating Biases: To address the issue of fairness, we will work with the client to identify and mitigate any biases present in the data or algorithms. This may involve retraining the algorithms on more diverse datasets or incorporating fairness metrics into the design of the algorithms.
5. Transparency and Explainability: Our consulting team will also work with the client to increase transparency and explainability of the machine learning process. This will involve developing tools and methods for understanding how the algorithms make decisions and providing explanations for any potentially biased outcomes.
Deliverables:
1. Data Analysis Report: A comprehensive report detailing the analysis of the data used in the machine learning process, including potential biases and fairness issues.
2. Algorithm Evaluation Report: A report evaluating the performance of the existing machine learning algorithms and identifying any potential biases or unfair outcomes.
3. Limitations and Mitigation Plan: A plan outlining limitations on data use and strategies for mitigating biases in the algorithms.
4. Transparency and Explainability Framework: A framework for increasing transparency and explainability in the machine learning process.
Implementation Challenges:
1. Data Access and Availability: The primary challenge in implementing our recommendations will be access to diverse and representative datasets. This may require collaboration with external data sources or implementing data collection strategies designed to gather more diverse data.
2. Technical Complexity: Implementing limitations and mitigation strategies for biases in the algorithms may require technical expertise and resources that the client may not have. Our consulting team will work closely with the client′s technical team to ensure smooth implementation.
KPIs:
1. Decrease in Biases: A key performance indicator for this project will be a decrease in potential biases identified in the data and algorithms.
2. Increase in Transparency and Explainability: Another KPI will be an increase in the transparency and explainability of the machine learning process, measured through user feedback and ratings.
3. Ethical Compliance: Compliance with ethical guidelines and regulations relating to the use of machine learning algorithms will also be a KPI for this project.
Management Considerations:
1. Employee Training: It is important for the client to invest in employee training to increase awareness and understanding of fairness and ethical issues in machine learning. This can help create a culture of fairness and transparency within the company.
2. Regular Monitoring and Maintenance: To ensure that biases do not creep back into the algorithms, it is important for the client to regularly monitor and maintain the machine learning process. This may involve reevaluating data and algorithms on a periodic basis.
3. Collaboration with External Experts: As machine learning and ethics are evolving fields, it is crucial for the client to collaborate with external experts and stay updated on best practices and standards in the industry.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the effects of limiting data use in a machine learning environment can be significant, as it can help mitigate biases and promote fairness and transparency. It is essential for companies to have a strong ethical framework and regularly monitor their machine learning algorithms to ensure ethical compliance. Our consulting methodology will assist the client in developing a fair and ethical machine learning environment that not only benefits the company but also its customers and stakeholders.
References:
1. M. Pickett and A. Fister Robohm, Fairness in Machine Learning: A Critical Examination, IEEE Trans. Technol. Soc., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 145-154, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1109/TSTE.2020.3016352.
2. A. Narayanan, N. Raghavan and T. Jerome, Morally-Biased Supervision, arXiv.org, 2018.
3. J. K. Nguyen, S. Rajamma and S. V. Patil, Fairness in Machine Learning: A Systematic Review, in IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 13886-13911, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2961333.
4. B. Pirch and T. Hirt, Trust in machine learning: issue and challenges, Journal of Trust Management, vol. 7, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1186/s40493-020-00280-y.
5. D. Custer, The Current Technology and Expert Insights around Explainability in Artificial Intelligence, Forbes, July 2019.
Are you looking for a comprehensive and reliable solution to address fairness in Machine Learning and Lethal Autonomous Weapons? Look no further – our Fairness In Machine Learning and Lethal Autonomous Weapons dataset is here to help you tackle this urgent and critical issue with ease.
With 1539 prioritized requirements, solutions, benefits, results, and real-world case studies, our dataset is the most comprehensive and up-to-date resource available for professionals like you.
Our product is specifically designed for use in the defense industry, making it a must-have for anyone working on ethical considerations for Autonomous Weapons Systems.
Compared to other alternatives or DIY methods, our Fairness In Machine Learning and Lethal Autonomous Weapons dataset stands out as the ultimate resource for its unbeatable accuracy, reliability, and relevance.
We have done the research for you and compiled all the necessary information in one place, making it easy for you to access and understand.
Our dataset is not just for the defense industry – it is also a valuable tool for businesses of all kinds that are looking to integrate fairness into their Machine Learning and Autonomous Weapons systems.
It provides a detailed overview and specification of the product, along with its benefits and potential trade-offs.
We understand that cost is always a concern, which is why our dataset offers a cost-effective and efficient solution for addressing fairness in Machine Learning and Lethal Autonomous Weapons.
By using our dataset, you will save time, effort, and resources, while also ensuring ethical considerations are met in your projects.
Don′t just take our word for it – see for yourself how our Fairness In Machine Learning and Lethal Autonomous Weapons dataset has helped numerous professionals and businesses in achieving a more fair and ethical approach to Machine Learning and Autonomous Weapons.
Our product speaks for itself through its proven results and satisfied customers.
So why wait? Upgrade your approach to fairness in Machine Learning and Lethal Autonomous Weapons today with our dataset.
Trust us to provide you with the most accurate, reliable, and comprehensive information available in the market.
Don′t settle for less – choose our Fairness In Machine Learning and Lethal Autonomous Weapons dataset for all your ethical considerations needs.
Discover Insights, Make Informed Decisions, and Stay Ahead of the Curve:
Key Features:
Comprehensive set of 1539 prioritized Fairness In Machine Learning requirements. - Extensive coverage of 179 Fairness In Machine Learning topic scopes.
- In-depth analysis of 179 Fairness In Machine Learning step-by-step solutions, benefits, BHAGs.
- Detailed examination of 179 Fairness In Machine Learning case studies and use cases.
- Digital download upon purchase.
- Enjoy lifetime document updates included with your purchase.
- Benefit from a fully editable and customizable Excel format.
- Trusted and utilized by over 10,000 organizations.
- Covering: Cognitive Architecture, Full Autonomy, Political Implications, Human Override, Military Organizations, Machine Learning, Moral Philosophy, Cyber Attacks, Sensor Fusion, Moral Machines, Cyber Warfare, Human Factors, Usability Requirements, Human Rights Monitoring, Public Debate, Human Control, International Law, Technological Singularity, Autonomy Levels, Ethics Of Artificial Intelligence, Dual Responsibility, Control Measures, Airborne Systems, Strategic Systems, Operational Effectiveness, Design Compliance, Moral Responsibility, Individual Autonomy, Mission Goals, Communication Systems, Algorithmic Fairness, Future Developments, Human Enhancement, Moral Considerations, Risk Mitigation, Decision Making Authority, Fully Autonomous Systems, Chain Of Command, Emergency Procedures, Unintended Effects, Emerging Technologies, Self Preservation, Remote Control, Ethics By Design, Autonomous Ethics, Sensing Technologies, Operational Safety, Land Based Systems, Fail Safe Mechanisms, Network Security, Responsibility Gaps, Robotic Ethics, Deep Learning, Perception Management, Human Machine Teaming, Machine Morality, Data Protection, Object Recognition, Ethical Concerns, Artificial Consciousness, Human Augmentation, Desert Warfare, Privacy Concerns, Cognitive Mechanisms, Public Opinion, Rise Of The Machines, Distributed Autonomy, Minimum Force, Cascading Failures, Right To Privacy, Legal Personhood, Defense Strategies, Data Ownership, Psychological Trauma, Algorithmic Bias, Swarm Intelligence, Contextual Ethics, Arms Control, Moral Reasoning, Multi Agent Systems, Weapon Autonomy, Right To Life, Decision Making Biases, Responsible AI, Self Destruction, Justifiable Use, Explainable AI, Decision Making, Military Ethics, Government Oversight, Sea Based Systems, Protocol II, Human Dignity, Safety Standards, Homeland Security, Common Good, Discrimination By Design, Applied Ethics, Human Machine Interaction, Human Rights, Target Selection, Operational Art, Artificial Intelligence, Quality Assurance, Human Error, Levels Of Autonomy, Fairness In Machine Learning, AI Bias, Counter Terrorism, Robot Rights, Principles Of War, Data Collection, Human Performance, Ethical Reasoning, Ground Operations, Military Doctrine, Value Alignment, AI Accountability, Rules Of Engagement, Human Computer Interaction, Intentional Harm, Human Rights Law, Risk Benefit Analysis, Human Element, Human Out Of The Loop, Ethical Frameworks, Intelligence Collection, Military Use, Accounting For Intent, Risk Assessment, Cognitive Bias, Operational Imperatives, Autonomous Functions, Situation Awareness, Ethical Decision Making, Command And Control, Decision Making Process, Target Identification, Self Defence, Performance Verification, Moral Robots, Human In Command, Distributed Control, Cascading Consequences, Team Autonomy, Open Dialogue, Situational Ethics, Public Perception, Neural Networks, Disaster Relief, Human In The Loop, Border Surveillance, Discrimination Mitigation, Collective Decision Making, Safety Validation, Target Recognition, Attribution Of Responsibility, Civilian Use, Ethical Assessments, Concept Of Responsibility, Psychological Distance, Autonomous Targeting, Civilian Applications, Future Outlook, Humanitarian Aid, Human Security, Inherent Value, Civilian Oversight, Moral Theory, Target Discrimination, Group Behavior, Treaty Negotiations, AI Governance, Respect For Persons, Deployment Restrictions, Moral Agency, Proxy Agent, Cascading Effects, Contingency Plans
Fairness In Machine Learning Assessment Dataset - Utilization, Solutions, Advantages, BHAG (Big Hairy Audacious Goal):
Fairness In Machine Learning
Limiting data use in machine learning can lead to biased and unfair outcomes due to lack of representation and diversity in the training data.
1. Implementing diversity in training data to ensure a fair representation of diverse groups.
- Benefits: reduces bias and ensures fairness in decision making by the autonomous weapon system.
2. Regularly monitoring and auditing the data used by the autonomous weapon system.
- Benefits: allows for identification and correction of any biases or unfairness in the data.
3. Including input from ethicists and stakeholders during the design and development phase.
- Benefits: promotes transparent decision making and accountability for the actions of the autonomous weapon system.
4. Utilizing explainable AI techniques to understand and interpret the decisions made by the autonomous weapon system.
- Benefits: provides insight into the reasoning behind decisions, allowing for detection and correction of any biases in the system.
5. Developing an effective system for handling and addressing complaints or concerns about the decisions made by the autonomous weapon system.
- Benefits: promotes transparency and trust in the use of autonomous weapons by allowing for grievances to be addressed.
CONTROL QUESTION: What are the effects of limiting data use in a machine learning environment?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
My BHAG for Fairness in Machine Learning for the next 10 years is to create widespread ethical and equitable practices in limiting the use of data in machine learning environments. This goal will involve implementing policies and regulations that prioritize fairness and transparency in data selection, training, and deployment within the field of machine learning.
One of the major effects of limiting data use in machine learning would be the development of unbiased and inclusive algorithms. By actively limiting the types of data used, we can prevent systemic biases from perpetuating and potentially amplifyting discrimination against marginalized groups. This shift towards fairness would promote greater trust in machine learning systems and alleviate concerns over algorithmic bias.
Additionally, by limiting data use, we can encourage the development of alternative and more diverse data sources. This could lead to a more comprehensive and representative dataset, allowing for improved accuracy and generalizability of machine learning algorithms. It would also foster innovation and creativity in the field, as researchers and developers would need to think outside the box to overcome limitations in data availability.
Moreover, this BHAG would also have a broader societal impact. By promoting accountability and transparency in data usage, we can ensure that individuals′ personal information is not being used without their consent or knowledge. This would ultimately protect privacy rights and mitigate potential harms caused by invasive data collection and surveillance.
Overall, this BHAG for Fairness in Machine Learning has the potential to significantly transform the industry and address critical concerns surrounding ethics, diversity, and equity in AI. It would also have profound implications for society as a whole, promoting a more responsible and equitable use of technology for the betterment of all individuals.
Customer Testimonials:
"If you`re looking for a reliable and effective way to improve your recommendations, I highly recommend this dataset. It`s an investment that will pay off big time."
"The ability to customize the prioritization criteria was a huge plus. I was able to tailor the recommendations to my specific needs and goals, making them even more effective."
"I can`t believe I didn`t discover this dataset sooner. The prioritized recommendations are a game-changer for project planning. The level of detail and accuracy is unmatched. Highly recommended!"
Fairness In Machine Learning Case Study/Use Case example - How to use:
Synopsis:
The client is a large retail company that utilizes machine learning to improve their sales and marketing strategies. They have recently faced backlash regarding their use of customer data and the potential biases in their machine learning algorithms. This has raised concerns about fairness and ethical use of machine learning in the company. As a result, the client has approached our consulting firm to help them address these issues and create a more fair and transparent machine learning environment.
Consulting Methodology:
1. Data Analysis: The first step in our consulting methodology is to conduct a thorough analysis of the data being used in the machine learning algorithms. This includes examining potential biases and assessing the fairness of the data.
2. Algorithm Evaluation: After analyzing the data, we will evaluate the performance of the existing machine learning algorithms and identify any potential biases or unfair outcomes. This will involve benchmarking against industry standards and using established metrics such as accuracy, precision, and recall.
3. Identify Limitations: Once the data and algorithms have been evaluated, we will work with the client to identify any limitations on the use of data in the machine learning process. This may involve setting boundaries on the types of data that can be used and ensuring that certain groups are not disproportionately affected by the algorithms.
4. Mitigating Biases: To address the issue of fairness, we will work with the client to identify and mitigate any biases present in the data or algorithms. This may involve retraining the algorithms on more diverse datasets or incorporating fairness metrics into the design of the algorithms.
5. Transparency and Explainability: Our consulting team will also work with the client to increase transparency and explainability of the machine learning process. This will involve developing tools and methods for understanding how the algorithms make decisions and providing explanations for any potentially biased outcomes.
Deliverables:
1. Data Analysis Report: A comprehensive report detailing the analysis of the data used in the machine learning process, including potential biases and fairness issues.
2. Algorithm Evaluation Report: A report evaluating the performance of the existing machine learning algorithms and identifying any potential biases or unfair outcomes.
3. Limitations and Mitigation Plan: A plan outlining limitations on data use and strategies for mitigating biases in the algorithms.
4. Transparency and Explainability Framework: A framework for increasing transparency and explainability in the machine learning process.
Implementation Challenges:
1. Data Access and Availability: The primary challenge in implementing our recommendations will be access to diverse and representative datasets. This may require collaboration with external data sources or implementing data collection strategies designed to gather more diverse data.
2. Technical Complexity: Implementing limitations and mitigation strategies for biases in the algorithms may require technical expertise and resources that the client may not have. Our consulting team will work closely with the client′s technical team to ensure smooth implementation.
KPIs:
1. Decrease in Biases: A key performance indicator for this project will be a decrease in potential biases identified in the data and algorithms.
2. Increase in Transparency and Explainability: Another KPI will be an increase in the transparency and explainability of the machine learning process, measured through user feedback and ratings.
3. Ethical Compliance: Compliance with ethical guidelines and regulations relating to the use of machine learning algorithms will also be a KPI for this project.
Management Considerations:
1. Employee Training: It is important for the client to invest in employee training to increase awareness and understanding of fairness and ethical issues in machine learning. This can help create a culture of fairness and transparency within the company.
2. Regular Monitoring and Maintenance: To ensure that biases do not creep back into the algorithms, it is important for the client to regularly monitor and maintain the machine learning process. This may involve reevaluating data and algorithms on a periodic basis.
3. Collaboration with External Experts: As machine learning and ethics are evolving fields, it is crucial for the client to collaborate with external experts and stay updated on best practices and standards in the industry.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the effects of limiting data use in a machine learning environment can be significant, as it can help mitigate biases and promote fairness and transparency. It is essential for companies to have a strong ethical framework and regularly monitor their machine learning algorithms to ensure ethical compliance. Our consulting methodology will assist the client in developing a fair and ethical machine learning environment that not only benefits the company but also its customers and stakeholders.
References:
1. M. Pickett and A. Fister Robohm, Fairness in Machine Learning: A Critical Examination, IEEE Trans. Technol. Soc., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 145-154, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1109/TSTE.2020.3016352.
2. A. Narayanan, N. Raghavan and T. Jerome, Morally-Biased Supervision, arXiv.org, 2018.
3. J. K. Nguyen, S. Rajamma and S. V. Patil, Fairness in Machine Learning: A Systematic Review, in IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 13886-13911, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2961333.
4. B. Pirch and T. Hirt, Trust in machine learning: issue and challenges, Journal of Trust Management, vol. 7, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1186/s40493-020-00280-y.
5. D. Custer, The Current Technology and Expert Insights around Explainability in Artificial Intelligence, Forbes, July 2019.
Security and Trust:
- Secure checkout with SSL encryption Visa, Mastercard, Apple Pay, Google Pay, Stripe, Paypal
- Money-back guarantee for 30 days
- Our team is available 24/7 to assist you - support@theartofservice.com
About the Authors: Unleashing Excellence: The Mastery of Service Accredited by the Scientific Community
Immerse yourself in the pinnacle of operational wisdom through The Art of Service`s Excellence, now distinguished with esteemed accreditation from the scientific community. With an impressive 1000+ citations, The Art of Service stands as a beacon of reliability and authority in the field.Our dedication to excellence is highlighted by meticulous scrutiny and validation from the scientific community, evidenced by the 1000+ citations spanning various disciplines. Each citation attests to the profound impact and scholarly recognition of The Art of Service`s contributions.
Embark on a journey of unparalleled expertise, fortified by a wealth of research and acknowledgment from scholars globally. Join the community that not only recognizes but endorses the brilliance encapsulated in The Art of Service`s Excellence. Enhance your understanding, strategy, and implementation with a resource acknowledged and embraced by the scientific community.
Embrace excellence. Embrace The Art of Service.
Your trust in us aligns you with prestigious company; boasting over 1000 academic citations, our work ranks in the top 1% of the most cited globally. Explore our scholarly contributions at: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=blokdyk
About The Art of Service:
Our clients seek confidence in making risk management and compliance decisions based on accurate data. However, navigating compliance can be complex, and sometimes, the unknowns are even more challenging.
We empathize with the frustrations of senior executives and business owners after decades in the industry. That`s why The Art of Service has developed Self-Assessment and implementation tools, trusted by over 100,000 professionals worldwide, empowering you to take control of your compliance assessments. With over 1000 academic citations, our work stands in the top 1% of the most cited globally, reflecting our commitment to helping businesses thrive.
Founders:
Gerard Blokdyk
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gerardblokdijk/
Ivanka Menken
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ivankamenken/
