Attention insurance professionals!
Are you tired of sifting through endless amounts of data to evaluate insurance policies and assess key risks? Look no further, because our Insurance Evaluation and Key Risk Indicator Knowledge Base is here to make your job easier and more efficient.
Our dataset contains 1552 prioritized requirements specifically designed to help you get quick and accurate results.
With our knowledge base, you will have access to the most important questions to ask when evaluating insurance policies, categorized by urgency and scope.
This means you can prioritize and address critical issues first, saving you valuable time and effort.
But that’s not all – our Insurance Evaluation and Key Risk Indicator Knowledge Base also includes solutions, benefits, and real-life case studies and use cases, giving you a comprehensive understanding of how to effectively use the information in your day-to-day work.
Don’t waste any more time and resources on manually sifting through data or using less comprehensive alternatives.
Our product stands out above the competition with its extensive coverage of key risk indicators and prioritized requirements.
It is specifically designed for professionals like you who value efficiency and accuracy in their work.
Our product is easy to use and affordable, making it the perfect DIY alternative to expensive and complicated tools.
You don’t need to be an expert to benefit from our Insurance Evaluation and Key Risk Indicator Knowledge Base – anyone in the insurance industry can use it to streamline their evaluation process and make well-informed decisions.
Additionally, our product is constantly updated and backed by thorough research on insurance evaluation and key risk indicators, ensuring that you have the most up-to-date information at your fingertips.
It is your ultimate guide for evaluating insurance policies and mitigating risks effectively.
Whether you′re a small business owner or a large corporation, our Insurance Evaluation and Key Risk Indicator Knowledge Base is a valuable investment that will save you time, resources, and headaches in the long run.
And for a fraction of the cost of hiring a consultant or using other complex software.
Don’t just take our word for it – try our product for yourself and see the difference it can make in your insurance evaluation process.
With clear pros and cons laid out, you can make informed decisions and improve your overall effectiveness as an insurance professional.
Say goodbye to tedious data analysis and hello to a more efficient and accurate way of evaluating insurance policies.
Our Insurance Evaluation and Key Risk Indicator Knowledge Base is here to support and enhance your work.
Try it now and experience the benefits for yourself!
When will criteria be applied to insurance companies, and which insurers will be subject to ERM evaluations?
Insurance Evaluation
Insurance Evaluation is the process of assessing insurance companies based on specific criteria. The criteria will be applied to determine which insurers are subject to evaluations for their Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) practices.
1. Implement objective criteria for determining which insurers will undergo an ERM evaluation.
- Benefit: This will ensure that insurers with higher risks are identified and evaluated, reducing potential threats to stability.
2. Develop standardized risk evaluation criteria to assess insurance companies.
- Benefit: This will provide a consistent and transparent approach to evaluating risks across all insurance companies, promoting fairness and accuracy in the process.
3. Conduct regular evaluations of insurers based on established performance indicators.
- Benefit: This will help identify any changes or trends in the insurers′ risk profiles and allow for adjustments or interventions to be made as needed.
4. Utilize advanced data analytics and technology to enhance risk assessment capabilities.
- Benefit: This will increase the accuracy and efficiency of risk evaluations, allowing for timely identification of potential risks or vulnerabilities.
5. Strengthen communication and collaboration between insurance regulators and companies to share information and insights on emerging risks.
- Benefit: This will promote a more comprehensive understanding of risks and facilitate better decision making in managing risks.
6. Encourage insurance companies to implement risk management strategies and practices to minimize potential risks.
- Benefit: This will reduce the likelihood of risks materializing and help maintain stability within the insurance industry.
7. Provide incentives for insurance companies to improve their risk management processes and outcomes.
- Benefit: This will encourage insurers to continuously monitor and address risks, leading to a more resilient and stable insurance market.
8. Regularly review and update the Key Risk Indicators (KRIs) to reflect changing market conditions and emerging risks.
- Benefit: This will ensure that the KRIs remain relevant and effective in identifying potential risks for the insurance industry.
CONTROL QUESTION: When will criteria be applied to insurance companies, and which insurers will be subject to ERM evaluations?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
By 2030, all insurance companies globally will have a mandatory requirement to undergo regular enterprise risk management (ERM) evaluations. This will be enforced by regulatory bodies and will apply to both large and small insurers.
The criteria for these evaluations will not only assess financial risks but also take into account non-financial risks such as cybersecurity, climate change, and reputation risk. Insurers will be expected to have robust risk management strategies in place and demonstrate a clear understanding of their risk exposures.
This bold initiative aims to improve the stability and sustainability of the insurance industry and ensure better protection for policyholders. The results of these evaluations will be made public to increase transparency and accountability in the industry.
The implementation of ERM evaluations is expected to lead to fewer insurance company failures, stronger financial positions for insurers, and ultimately better protection and peace of mind for customers. This goal will revolutionize the insurance industry and elevate it to a higher level of risk management and accountability, setting a new standard for the entire financial sector.
"Since using this dataset, my customers are finding the products they need faster and are more likely to buy them. My average order value has increased significantly."
Introduction:
Insurance companies play a vital role in ensuring economic stability and protecting individuals and businesses from financial risks. However, the insurance industry is also susceptible to risks that can have a significant impact on their ability to fulfill their obligations. As such, there has been an increasing push for insurance companies to implement Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) practices to identify and manage potential risks.
ERM is a holistic framework that helps organizations identify, assess, and manage risks across all areas of their operations. It provides a standardized and integrated approach to risk assessment and management, allowing companies to proactively mitigate and respond to potential threats. In this case study, we will explore when criteria will be applied to insurance companies, and which insurers will be subject to ERM evaluations.
Client Situation:
Our client, Insurance Evaluation, is a leading consulting firm specializing in risk management and insurance advisory services. They have been working closely with insurance companies to help them adopt ERM practices, considering the ever-evolving regulatory environment. As the industry is becoming increasingly complex, Insurance Evaluation has identified the need for a standardized criteria and evaluation process to ensure that insurance companies are effectively managing their risks.
Consulting Methodology:
To address our client’s concerns, we employed a comprehensive and data-driven approach. We conducted extensive research by reviewing consulting whitepapers, academic business journals, and market research reports to identify the best practices that insurance companies should follow in their ERM processes. Our methodology consisted of the following steps:
1. Understanding Regulatory Environment: The first step was to gain an in-depth understanding of the current regulatory environment governing insurance companies. We analyzed the regulatory requirements at both national and international levels to identify the existing gaps and areas that require improvement.
2. Identifying Best Practices: We then researched the best practices in ERM adopted by leading insurance companies. This included conducting interviews with risk managers from various insurance companies to gain insights into their ERM processes and identifying key success factors.
3. Developing Criteria: Based on our research, we developed a set of criteria that insurance companies should follow to effectively implement ERM practices. These criteria were designed to cover all areas of risk, including financial, operational, strategic, and reputational risks.
4. Piloting and Validation: Before implementing the criteria on a wider scale, we conducted a pilot test with a select group of insurance companies. This helped us validate the effectiveness of the criteria and make any necessary adjustments.
5. Training and Education: To ensure that insurance companies understand the importance and benefits of ERM, we developed training materials and provided educational sessions for both executives and employees.
Deliverables:
Our consulting engagement resulted in the following deliverables:
1. Risk Criteria: A comprehensive set of criteria that insurance companies should follow to identify, assess, and manage risks in their operations.
2. Implementation Guidelines: Detailed guidelines on how to effectively implement ERM practices based on the identified criteria.
3. Training Materials: Educational materials and training sessions to increase awareness and understanding of ERM among insurance company executives and employees.
4. Monitoring Tools and Templates: Tools and templates to help insurance companies monitor and report their risks in a standardized manner.
Implementation Challenges:
During the consulting engagement, we faced several challenges, including resistance to change and lack of data. Many insurance companies were resistant to adopt ERM practices as they saw it as an additional burden and expense. We overcame this challenge by showcasing the benefits of ERM, such as improved risk management, cost savings, and increased stakeholder confidence.
KPIs and Other Management Considerations:
To measure the effectiveness of our recommendations, we established Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) to quantify the improvements in risk management processes and outcomes. These KPIs included:
1. Number of Risks Identified: This KPI measures the effectiveness of the criteria in identifying potential risks across all areas of an insurance company’s operations.
2. Risk Management Maturity Level: This KPI assesses how well insurance companies have integrated ERM into their operations, processes, and culture.
3. Cost Savings: By proactively managing risks, insurance companies can avoid potential losses, resulting in cost savings. This KPI measures the amount of savings achieved through effective ERM practices.
4. Stakeholder Confidence: This KPI measures the level of confidence that stakeholders have in an insurance company’s risk management processes.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, our research and analysis have revealed that criteria will be applied to insurance companies in the near future, and all insurers will be subject to ERM evaluations. As the regulatory environment becomes increasingly stringent, insurance companies must adopt ERM practices to effectively manage their risks and ensure long-term sustainability. Our consulting engagement has provided a standardized framework for insurance companies to follow, enabling them to proactively identify and manage potential risks and build resilience against uncertainties. We believe that by implementing these guidelines, insurance companies will not only comply with regulatory requirements but also strengthen their risk management practices and enhance stakeholder confidence.
Are you tired of sifting through endless amounts of data to evaluate insurance policies and assess key risks? Look no further, because our Insurance Evaluation and Key Risk Indicator Knowledge Base is here to make your job easier and more efficient.
Our dataset contains 1552 prioritized requirements specifically designed to help you get quick and accurate results.
With our knowledge base, you will have access to the most important questions to ask when evaluating insurance policies, categorized by urgency and scope.
This means you can prioritize and address critical issues first, saving you valuable time and effort.
But that’s not all – our Insurance Evaluation and Key Risk Indicator Knowledge Base also includes solutions, benefits, and real-life case studies and use cases, giving you a comprehensive understanding of how to effectively use the information in your day-to-day work.
Don’t waste any more time and resources on manually sifting through data or using less comprehensive alternatives.
Our product stands out above the competition with its extensive coverage of key risk indicators and prioritized requirements.
It is specifically designed for professionals like you who value efficiency and accuracy in their work.
Our product is easy to use and affordable, making it the perfect DIY alternative to expensive and complicated tools.
You don’t need to be an expert to benefit from our Insurance Evaluation and Key Risk Indicator Knowledge Base – anyone in the insurance industry can use it to streamline their evaluation process and make well-informed decisions.
Additionally, our product is constantly updated and backed by thorough research on insurance evaluation and key risk indicators, ensuring that you have the most up-to-date information at your fingertips.
It is your ultimate guide for evaluating insurance policies and mitigating risks effectively.
Whether you′re a small business owner or a large corporation, our Insurance Evaluation and Key Risk Indicator Knowledge Base is a valuable investment that will save you time, resources, and headaches in the long run.
And for a fraction of the cost of hiring a consultant or using other complex software.
Don’t just take our word for it – try our product for yourself and see the difference it can make in your insurance evaluation process.
With clear pros and cons laid out, you can make informed decisions and improve your overall effectiveness as an insurance professional.
Say goodbye to tedious data analysis and hello to a more efficient and accurate way of evaluating insurance policies.
Our Insurance Evaluation and Key Risk Indicator Knowledge Base is here to support and enhance your work.
Try it now and experience the benefits for yourself!
Discover Insights, Make Informed Decisions, and Stay Ahead of the Curve:
Key Features:
Comprehensive set of 1552 prioritized Insurance Evaluation requirements. - Extensive coverage of 183 Insurance Evaluation topic scopes.
- In-depth analysis of 183 Insurance Evaluation step-by-step solutions, benefits, BHAGs.
- Detailed examination of 183 Insurance Evaluation case studies and use cases.
- Digital download upon purchase.
- Enjoy lifetime document updates included with your purchase.
- Benefit from a fully editable and customizable Excel format.
- Trusted and utilized by over 10,000 organizations.
- Covering: Control Environment, Cost Control, Hub Network, Continual Improvement, Auditing Capabilities, Performance Analysis, Project Risk Management, Change Initiatives, Omnichannel Model, Regulatory Changes, Risk Intelligence, Operations Risk, Quality Control, Process KPIs, Inherent Risk, Digital Transformation, ESG Risks, Environmental Risks, Production Hubs, Process Improvement, Talent Management, Problem Solution Fit, Meaningful Innovation, Continuous Auditing, Compliance Deficiencies, Vendor Screening, Performance Measurement, Organizational Objectives, Product Development, Treat Brand, Business Process Redesign, Incident Response, Risk Registers, Operational Risk Management, Process Effectiveness, Crisis Communication, Asset Control, Market forecasting, Third Party Risk, Omnichannel System, Risk Profiling, Risk Assessment, Organic Revenue, Price Pack, Focus Strategy, Business Rules Rule Management, Pricing Actions, Risk Performance Indicators, Detailed Strategies, Credit Risk, Scorecard Indicator, Quality Inspection, Crisis Management, Regulatory Requirements, Information Systems, Mitigation Strategies, Resilience Planning, Channel Risks, Risk Governance, Supply Chain Risks, Compliance Risk, Risk Management Reporting, Operational Efficiency, Risk Repository, Data Backed, Risk Landscape, Price Realization, Risk Mitigation, Portfolio Risk, Data Quality, Cost Benefit Analysis, Innovation Center, Market Development, Team Members, COSO, Business Interruption, Grocery Stores, Risk Response Planning, Key Result Indicators, Risk Management, Marketing Risks, Supply Chain Resilience, Disaster Preparedness, Key Risk Indicator, Insurance Evaluation, Existing Hubs, Compliance Management, Performance Monitoring, Efficient Frontier, Strategic Planning, Risk Appetite, Emerging Risks, Risk Culture, Risk Information System, Cybersecurity Threats, Dashboards Reporting, Vendor Financing, Fraud Risks, Credit Ratings, Privacy Regulations, Economic Volatility, Market Volatility, Vendor Management, Sustainability Risks, Risk Dashboard, Internal Controls, Financial Risk, Continued Focus, Organic Structure, Financial Reporting, Price Increases, Fraud Risk Management, Cyber Risk, Macro Environment, Compliance failures, Human Error, Disaster Recovery, Monitoring Industry Trends, Discretionary Spending, Governance risk indicators, Strategy Delivered, Compliance Challenges, Reputation Management, Key Performance Indicator, Streaming Services, Board Composition, Organizational Structure, Consistency In Reporting, Loyalty Program, Credit Exposure, Enhanced Visibility, Audit Findings, Enterprise Risk Management, Business Continuity, Metrics Dashboard, Loss reserves, Manage Labor, Performance Targets, Technology Risk, Data Management, Technology Regulation, Job Board, Organizational Culture, Third Party Relationships, Omnichannel Delivered, Threat Intelligence, Business Strategy, Portfolio Performance, Inventory Forecasting, Vendor Risk Management, Leading With Impact, Investment Risk, Legal And Ethical Risks, Expected Cash Flows, Board Oversight, Non Compliance Risks, Quality Assurance, Business Forecasting, New Hubs, Internal Audits, Grow Points, Strategic Partnerships, Security Architecture, Emerging Technologies, Geopolitical Risks, Risk Communication, Compliance Programs, Fraud Prevention, Reputation Risk, Governance Structure, Change Approval Board, IT Staffing, Consumer Demand, Customer Loyalty, Omnichannel Strategy, Strategic Risk, Data Privacy, Different Channels, Business Continuity Planning, Competitive Landscape, DFD Model, Information Security, Optimization Program
Insurance Evaluation Assessment Dataset - Utilization, Solutions, Advantages, BHAG (Big Hairy Audacious Goal):
Insurance Evaluation
Insurance Evaluation is the process of assessing insurance companies based on specific criteria. The criteria will be applied to determine which insurers are subject to evaluations for their Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) practices.
1. Implement objective criteria for determining which insurers will undergo an ERM evaluation.
- Benefit: This will ensure that insurers with higher risks are identified and evaluated, reducing potential threats to stability.
2. Develop standardized risk evaluation criteria to assess insurance companies.
- Benefit: This will provide a consistent and transparent approach to evaluating risks across all insurance companies, promoting fairness and accuracy in the process.
3. Conduct regular evaluations of insurers based on established performance indicators.
- Benefit: This will help identify any changes or trends in the insurers′ risk profiles and allow for adjustments or interventions to be made as needed.
4. Utilize advanced data analytics and technology to enhance risk assessment capabilities.
- Benefit: This will increase the accuracy and efficiency of risk evaluations, allowing for timely identification of potential risks or vulnerabilities.
5. Strengthen communication and collaboration between insurance regulators and companies to share information and insights on emerging risks.
- Benefit: This will promote a more comprehensive understanding of risks and facilitate better decision making in managing risks.
6. Encourage insurance companies to implement risk management strategies and practices to minimize potential risks.
- Benefit: This will reduce the likelihood of risks materializing and help maintain stability within the insurance industry.
7. Provide incentives for insurance companies to improve their risk management processes and outcomes.
- Benefit: This will encourage insurers to continuously monitor and address risks, leading to a more resilient and stable insurance market.
8. Regularly review and update the Key Risk Indicators (KRIs) to reflect changing market conditions and emerging risks.
- Benefit: This will ensure that the KRIs remain relevant and effective in identifying potential risks for the insurance industry.
CONTROL QUESTION: When will criteria be applied to insurance companies, and which insurers will be subject to ERM evaluations?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
By 2030, all insurance companies globally will have a mandatory requirement to undergo regular enterprise risk management (ERM) evaluations. This will be enforced by regulatory bodies and will apply to both large and small insurers.
The criteria for these evaluations will not only assess financial risks but also take into account non-financial risks such as cybersecurity, climate change, and reputation risk. Insurers will be expected to have robust risk management strategies in place and demonstrate a clear understanding of their risk exposures.
This bold initiative aims to improve the stability and sustainability of the insurance industry and ensure better protection for policyholders. The results of these evaluations will be made public to increase transparency and accountability in the industry.
The implementation of ERM evaluations is expected to lead to fewer insurance company failures, stronger financial positions for insurers, and ultimately better protection and peace of mind for customers. This goal will revolutionize the insurance industry and elevate it to a higher level of risk management and accountability, setting a new standard for the entire financial sector.
Customer Testimonials:
"Since using this dataset, my customers are finding the products they need faster and are more likely to buy them. My average order value has increased significantly."
"This dataset has been a game-changer for my research. The pre-filtered recommendations saved me countless hours of analysis and helped me identify key trends I wouldn`t have found otherwise."
"This dataset has helped me break out of my rut and be more creative with my recommendations. I`m impressed with how much it has boosted my confidence."
Insurance Evaluation Case Study/Use Case example - How to use:
Introduction:
Insurance companies play a vital role in ensuring economic stability and protecting individuals and businesses from financial risks. However, the insurance industry is also susceptible to risks that can have a significant impact on their ability to fulfill their obligations. As such, there has been an increasing push for insurance companies to implement Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) practices to identify and manage potential risks.
ERM is a holistic framework that helps organizations identify, assess, and manage risks across all areas of their operations. It provides a standardized and integrated approach to risk assessment and management, allowing companies to proactively mitigate and respond to potential threats. In this case study, we will explore when criteria will be applied to insurance companies, and which insurers will be subject to ERM evaluations.
Client Situation:
Our client, Insurance Evaluation, is a leading consulting firm specializing in risk management and insurance advisory services. They have been working closely with insurance companies to help them adopt ERM practices, considering the ever-evolving regulatory environment. As the industry is becoming increasingly complex, Insurance Evaluation has identified the need for a standardized criteria and evaluation process to ensure that insurance companies are effectively managing their risks.
Consulting Methodology:
To address our client’s concerns, we employed a comprehensive and data-driven approach. We conducted extensive research by reviewing consulting whitepapers, academic business journals, and market research reports to identify the best practices that insurance companies should follow in their ERM processes. Our methodology consisted of the following steps:
1. Understanding Regulatory Environment: The first step was to gain an in-depth understanding of the current regulatory environment governing insurance companies. We analyzed the regulatory requirements at both national and international levels to identify the existing gaps and areas that require improvement.
2. Identifying Best Practices: We then researched the best practices in ERM adopted by leading insurance companies. This included conducting interviews with risk managers from various insurance companies to gain insights into their ERM processes and identifying key success factors.
3. Developing Criteria: Based on our research, we developed a set of criteria that insurance companies should follow to effectively implement ERM practices. These criteria were designed to cover all areas of risk, including financial, operational, strategic, and reputational risks.
4. Piloting and Validation: Before implementing the criteria on a wider scale, we conducted a pilot test with a select group of insurance companies. This helped us validate the effectiveness of the criteria and make any necessary adjustments.
5. Training and Education: To ensure that insurance companies understand the importance and benefits of ERM, we developed training materials and provided educational sessions for both executives and employees.
Deliverables:
Our consulting engagement resulted in the following deliverables:
1. Risk Criteria: A comprehensive set of criteria that insurance companies should follow to identify, assess, and manage risks in their operations.
2. Implementation Guidelines: Detailed guidelines on how to effectively implement ERM practices based on the identified criteria.
3. Training Materials: Educational materials and training sessions to increase awareness and understanding of ERM among insurance company executives and employees.
4. Monitoring Tools and Templates: Tools and templates to help insurance companies monitor and report their risks in a standardized manner.
Implementation Challenges:
During the consulting engagement, we faced several challenges, including resistance to change and lack of data. Many insurance companies were resistant to adopt ERM practices as they saw it as an additional burden and expense. We overcame this challenge by showcasing the benefits of ERM, such as improved risk management, cost savings, and increased stakeholder confidence.
KPIs and Other Management Considerations:
To measure the effectiveness of our recommendations, we established Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) to quantify the improvements in risk management processes and outcomes. These KPIs included:
1. Number of Risks Identified: This KPI measures the effectiveness of the criteria in identifying potential risks across all areas of an insurance company’s operations.
2. Risk Management Maturity Level: This KPI assesses how well insurance companies have integrated ERM into their operations, processes, and culture.
3. Cost Savings: By proactively managing risks, insurance companies can avoid potential losses, resulting in cost savings. This KPI measures the amount of savings achieved through effective ERM practices.
4. Stakeholder Confidence: This KPI measures the level of confidence that stakeholders have in an insurance company’s risk management processes.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, our research and analysis have revealed that criteria will be applied to insurance companies in the near future, and all insurers will be subject to ERM evaluations. As the regulatory environment becomes increasingly stringent, insurance companies must adopt ERM practices to effectively manage their risks and ensure long-term sustainability. Our consulting engagement has provided a standardized framework for insurance companies to follow, enabling them to proactively identify and manage potential risks and build resilience against uncertainties. We believe that by implementing these guidelines, insurance companies will not only comply with regulatory requirements but also strengthen their risk management practices and enhance stakeholder confidence.
Security and Trust:
- Secure checkout with SSL encryption Visa, Mastercard, Apple Pay, Google Pay, Stripe, Paypal
- Money-back guarantee for 30 days
- Our team is available 24/7 to assist you - support@theartofservice.com
About the Authors: Unleashing Excellence: The Mastery of Service Accredited by the Scientific Community
Immerse yourself in the pinnacle of operational wisdom through The Art of Service`s Excellence, now distinguished with esteemed accreditation from the scientific community. With an impressive 1000+ citations, The Art of Service stands as a beacon of reliability and authority in the field.Our dedication to excellence is highlighted by meticulous scrutiny and validation from the scientific community, evidenced by the 1000+ citations spanning various disciplines. Each citation attests to the profound impact and scholarly recognition of The Art of Service`s contributions.
Embark on a journey of unparalleled expertise, fortified by a wealth of research and acknowledgment from scholars globally. Join the community that not only recognizes but endorses the brilliance encapsulated in The Art of Service`s Excellence. Enhance your understanding, strategy, and implementation with a resource acknowledged and embraced by the scientific community.
Embrace excellence. Embrace The Art of Service.
Your trust in us aligns you with prestigious company; boasting over 1000 academic citations, our work ranks in the top 1% of the most cited globally. Explore our scholarly contributions at: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=blokdyk
About The Art of Service:
Our clients seek confidence in making risk management and compliance decisions based on accurate data. However, navigating compliance can be complex, and sometimes, the unknowns are even more challenging.
We empathize with the frustrations of senior executives and business owners after decades in the industry. That`s why The Art of Service has developed Self-Assessment and implementation tools, trusted by over 100,000 professionals worldwide, empowering you to take control of your compliance assessments. With over 1000 academic citations, our work stands in the top 1% of the most cited globally, reflecting our commitment to helping businesses thrive.
Founders:
Gerard Blokdyk
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gerardblokdijk/
Ivanka Menken
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ivankamenken/
