Are you tired of spending endless hours trying to understand Joint Costs and Cost Allocation and feeling overwhelmed by the complexities of the process? Look no further!
Our Joint Costs and Cost Allocation Knowledge Base is here to simplify your journey by providing you with the most important questions to ask in order to get results quickly and accurately.
With 1542 prioritized requirements, solutions, benefits, and example case studies/use cases, our Knowledge Base has everything you need to master Joint Costs and Cost Allocation.
What sets us apart from our competitors and alternatives is our extensive dataset curated specifically for professionals.
This product offers a more comprehensive and user-friendly approach compared to semi-related products, making it the top choice for individuals and businesses.
You may be wondering how to best utilize our Knowledge Base.
It′s simple!
With its detailed and organized format, you can easily navigate through the dataset to find the information you need.
No more wasting time on complex and expensive solutions - ours is affordable and easy to use for anyone, regardless of their level of expertise.
Our product provides an in-depth overview of the specifications and details of Joint Costs and Cost Allocation, allowing you to understand the process inside out.
It also offers a comparative analysis of various product types, highlighting the unique benefits of our Knowledge Base.
By using our Knowledge Base, you can save valuable time and resources while achieving accurate and efficient results.
But don′t just take our word for it, our research on Joint Costs and Cost Allocation speaks for itself.
Furthermore, our product is not just limited to individuals - it′s also a valuable tool for businesses looking to streamline their Joint Costs and Cost Allocation processes.
With its cost-effective and user-friendly features, our Knowledge Base is a must-have for any business.
In summary, our Joint Costs and Cost Allocation Knowledge Base is the ultimate solution to your needs.
With its detailed dataset, user-friendly interface, and affordable pricing, it is the perfect DIY alternative for anyone looking to master Joint Costs and Cost Allocation.
Say goodbye to complex and costly solutions, and hello to efficient and accurate results.
Give it a try today and see the difference it can make in your business!
What methods can be used to allocate joint costs to individual products? Do you jointly work with your service suppliers to reduce total lifecycle costs? Is there evidence based awareness about potential healthcare IT costs and benefits?
Joint Costs
Joint costs are expenses incurred in the production of multiple products. Methods such as relative sales value, physical units, and net realizable value can be used to allocate these costs.
1. Sales Value Method: Allocates costs based on the relative sales value of each product. Benefits: Simple and easy to use.
2. Physical Units Method: Allocates costs based on the number of units produced for each product. Benefits: Good for products with similar physical characteristics.
3. Net Realizable Value Method: Allocates costs based on the net realizable value of each product. Benefits: Reflects market demand and potential profit.
4. Weighted Average Method: Allocates costs based on the ratio of production costs to total production. Benefits: Considers both volume and cost differences across products.
5. Relative Market Value Method: Allocates costs based on the relative market value of each product. Benefits: Reflects market conditions and competition.
6. Contribution Margin Method: Allocates costs based on the contribution margin of each product. Benefits: Focuses on profitability and can aid in pricing decisions.
7. Opportunity Cost Method: Allocates costs based on the opportunity cost of producing each product. Benefits: Takes into account the value of alternative uses for resources.
8. Direct Labor Hours Method: Allocates costs based on the direct labor hours required to produce each product. Benefits: Suitable for industries with high labor costs.
9. Direct Materials Cost Method: Allocates costs based on the direct materials cost for each product. Benefits: Useful for products with high material costs.
10. Fixed and Variable Cost Method: Allocates costs based on the fixed and variable costs for each product. Benefits: Differentiates between costs that vary based on activity levels.
CONTROL QUESTION: What methods can be used to allocate joint costs to individual products?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
To be the leading and most innovative company in the market, with a diversified product portfolio under Joint Costs. This will be achieved through consistent growth and expansion strategies, cutting-edge technology and a customer-centric approach.
To achieve this goal within 10 years, we will implement the following methods for allocating joint costs to individual products:
1. Contribution Margin Method: This method allocates joint costs to each product based on its contribution margin, which is the difference between the selling price and variable costs. Products with higher contribution margins will bear a larger share of joint costs.
2. Physical Unit Method: Under this method, joint costs are allocated based on the physical units produced by each product. This can be further refined by considering factors such as complexity, size, and weight of each product.
3. Sales Proportion Method: This method allocates joint costs based on the proportion of sales revenue generated by each product. Higher revenue-generating products will bear a larger share of joint costs.
4. Profit Margin Method: Similar to the contribution margin method, this method allocates joint costs based on the profit margin of each product. Products with higher profit margins will bear a larger share of joint costs.
5. Time and Effort Allocation Method: This method allocates joint costs based on the time and effort spent on each product. It takes into consideration the resources utilized and the level of complexity involved in producing each product.
In addition to these methods, we will also regularly review and assess the effectiveness of each method and make necessary adjustments to ensure fair and accurate allocation of joint costs to individual products. By implementing these methods and continuously improving our processes, we are confident in achieving our BHAG for Joint Costs in the next 10 years.
"The prioritized recommendations in this dataset are a game-changer for project planning. The data is well-organized, and the insights provided have been instrumental in guiding my decisions. Impressive!"
Introduction
Joint costs refer to the costs incurred during the production process of two or more products that cannot be feasibly separated from each other. These costs are jointly shared among the different products and are usually a significant portion of the overall production costs. Accurately allocating joint costs is essential for management decisions such as product pricing, determining profitability, budgeting, and resource allocation. This case study will examine the client situation of a manufacturing company that produces several dairy products and the methods used to allocate joint costs to each product.
Client Situation
ABC Dairy Company is a leading manufacturer of dairy products, including milk, cheese, butter, and yogurt. The company has been in operation for over 30 years and has a widespread market presence. The production process of dairy products involves several stages, including sourcing raw milk, pasteurization, fermentation, and packaging. During this process, joint costs are incurred, making it challenging to determine the individual costs of each product.
The management team at ABC Dairy Company is facing challenges in accurately allocating joint costs to their product lines. They have realized that some products seem to have higher costs than others, which impacts their profitability analysis and decision-making. The company has also noticed a steady increase in production costs over the years, which they believe may be due to incorrect allocation of joint costs. The management has identified the need to review their current joint cost allocation methods and come up with a more accurate and effective approach.
Consulting Methodology
As a consulting firm, our first step was to gather data and information about the client′s current joint cost allocation methods. We interviewed the production team, reviewed financial records, and observed the production process to understand how joint costs were incurred. Our team also conducted research on best practices for allocating joint costs in the dairy industry, including consulting whitepapers, academic business journals, and market research reports.
Based on our findings, we proposed the following methodology to assist ABC Dairy Company in allocating joint costs accurately:
1. Identify the Cost Object: The first step was to identify the cost object, which is the end product of the production process. In this case, the cost object is the different dairy products produced by the company.
2. Identify the Direct Costs: Direct costs are those that can be easily traced to a specific product. In the dairy industry, direct costs may include raw milk, packaging materials, and production labor costs.
3. Determine the Joint Costs: Joint costs are those that cannot be directly attributed to any particular product. These costs are incurred during the common stages of the production process, including milk processing, pasteurization, and packaging. Our team proposed the use of the following methods to allocate joint costs to individual products:
- Physical Units Method: This method involves dividing joint costs among the products based on the number of units produced. For instance, if 1,000 liters of milk are used to produce cheese, and 10,000 liters of milk are used to produce yogurt, then 9% of the joint costs will be allocated to cheese (1,000/11,000 x 100) and 91% to yogurt (10,000/11,000 x 100).
- Sales Value at Split-off Point Method: This approach allocates joint costs based on the sales value of each product at the point where they can be separated from each other. For example, if cheese and butter have a sales value of $200 and $800, respectively, at the point of separation, then 20% of joint costs will be allocated to cheese ($200/$1,000 x 100) and 80% to butter ($800/$1,000 x 100).
- Net Realizable Value Method: This method considers the final selling price of the product as well as any additional costs incurred after the split-off point. It takes into account any spoilage or processing costs that may occur after the separation of products.
4. Calculate the Joint Costs for Each Product: Once the joint costs have been allocated, they are added to the direct costs to obtain the total cost of production for each product.
5. Evaluate Results and Make Adjustments: The final step is to compare the allocated joint costs with the actual costs incurred by each product. If there are significant differences, adjustments may need to be made to the allocation methods to ensure accuracy.
Deliverables and Implementation Challenges
The deliverables of our consulting engagement with ABC Dairy Company included a report outlining the proposed methodology for allocating joint costs, a detailed cost allocation table for each product, and a presentation to the management team on how to implement the new approach.
One of the main challenges of implementing a new joint cost allocation method was resistance from employees who were used to the old system. Our team organized training sessions to explain the new approach and its benefits to all employees involved in the production process. We also worked closely with the company′s IT team to develop a system for tracking and recording data that would facilitate the calculation of joint costs.
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
To measure the success of our consulting project, we proposed the following KPIs for ABC Dairy Company:
1. Variance between allocated and actual joint costs: This KPI will measure the accuracy of the new approach to allocate joint costs. A lower variance indicates a more accurate allocation method, while a higher variance may require further adjustments.
2. Profitability of each product: With a more accurate allocation of joint costs, the company can determine the profitability of each individual product. This KPI will help the management team make informed decisions about product pricing and resource allocation.
3. Production costs: By comparing production costs before and after implementing the new method, the company can track the effectiveness of the new approach in reducing overall production costs.
Management Considerations
It is essential for ABC Dairy Company′s management team to regularly review and monitor the allocation of joint costs to ensure its accuracy. They should also consider incorporating new technologies, such as a cost accounting system, to help streamline the process and improve efficiency.
Conclusion
Accurate allocation of joint costs is critical for the success of any manufacturing company. By using a combination of methods, such as physical units, sales value at split-off point, and net realizable value, ABC Dairy Company can allocate joint costs more accurately and make informed decisions about product profitability and pricing. Our consulting approach has helped the company overcome the challenges of inaccurate cost allocation and has provided them with a more effective method for managing joint costs.
Our Joint Costs and Cost Allocation Knowledge Base is here to simplify your journey by providing you with the most important questions to ask in order to get results quickly and accurately.
With 1542 prioritized requirements, solutions, benefits, and example case studies/use cases, our Knowledge Base has everything you need to master Joint Costs and Cost Allocation.
What sets us apart from our competitors and alternatives is our extensive dataset curated specifically for professionals.
This product offers a more comprehensive and user-friendly approach compared to semi-related products, making it the top choice for individuals and businesses.
You may be wondering how to best utilize our Knowledge Base.
It′s simple!
With its detailed and organized format, you can easily navigate through the dataset to find the information you need.
No more wasting time on complex and expensive solutions - ours is affordable and easy to use for anyone, regardless of their level of expertise.
Our product provides an in-depth overview of the specifications and details of Joint Costs and Cost Allocation, allowing you to understand the process inside out.
It also offers a comparative analysis of various product types, highlighting the unique benefits of our Knowledge Base.
By using our Knowledge Base, you can save valuable time and resources while achieving accurate and efficient results.
But don′t just take our word for it, our research on Joint Costs and Cost Allocation speaks for itself.
Furthermore, our product is not just limited to individuals - it′s also a valuable tool for businesses looking to streamline their Joint Costs and Cost Allocation processes.
With its cost-effective and user-friendly features, our Knowledge Base is a must-have for any business.
In summary, our Joint Costs and Cost Allocation Knowledge Base is the ultimate solution to your needs.
With its detailed dataset, user-friendly interface, and affordable pricing, it is the perfect DIY alternative for anyone looking to master Joint Costs and Cost Allocation.
Say goodbye to complex and costly solutions, and hello to efficient and accurate results.
Give it a try today and see the difference it can make in your business!
Discover Insights, Make Informed Decisions, and Stay Ahead of the Curve:
Key Features:
Comprehensive set of 1542 prioritized Joint Costs requirements. - Extensive coverage of 130 Joint Costs topic scopes.
- In-depth analysis of 130 Joint Costs step-by-step solutions, benefits, BHAGs.
- Detailed examination of 130 Joint Costs case studies and use cases.
- Digital download upon purchase.
- Enjoy lifetime document updates included with your purchase.
- Benefit from a fully editable and customizable Excel format.
- Trusted and utilized by over 10,000 organizations.
- Covering: Salaries And Benefits, Fixed Costs, Expense Allocation, Segment Costs, Cost Based Pricing, Administrative Overhead, Cost Overhead Allocation, Service Competition, Operating Costs, Resource Based Allocation, Cost Center Allocation, Indirect Costs, Heat Integration, Sunk Cost, Portfolio Allocation, Capital Allocation, Subcontracting, Full Cost Allocation, Manufacturing Costs, Project management industry standards, Allocation Methodology, Service Department Costs, Premium Allocation, Cost Pools, Contribution Margin Ratio, Budgeted Costing, Production Volume, Service Costing, Profit And Loss Allocation, Direct Costs, Depreciation Expenses, Advertising And Marketing, Cost Recovery, Departmental Costs, Parts Allocation, Inventory Costs, Freight And Delivery, Historical Costing, High Quality Products, Standard Costing, Time Based Allocation, Business Process Redesign, Cost Allocation Strategies, Fixed Expenses, Mixed Expenses, Shared Services, Overhead Rate, Contribution Margin Analysis, Rent And Utilities, Focusing Resources, Contribution Margin, Customer Profitability, Budget Variance, Distribution Costs, Inventory Allocation, Single Rate Method, Asset Allocation, Legal And Professional Fees, IT Staffing, Supplies And Materials, Equitable Allocation, Controllable Costs, Opportunity Cost, Period Cost, Product Costing, Project Budget Allocation, Product Cost, Variable Costs, Actual Costing, Job Order Costing, Flexibility Policies, Janitorial Services, Costs Of Goods Sold, Fringe Benefits, Payment Allocation, Team Scheduling, Partial Cost Allocation, Cost Of Sales, Transaction Costs, Project Charter, Step Down Allocation, Cost Sharing Allocation, Dual Rate Method, Revenue Allocation, Cost Control, Cost Allocation, Direct Material Costs, Cost Centers, Shared Purpose, Marginal Cost Of Funds, Flexible Budgeting, HRIS Cost, Uncontrollable Costs, Break Even Point, Predetermined Overhead Rate, Infrastructure Capex, Under Over Applied Overhead, Incremental Revenue, Routing Efficiency, Resource Allocation, Absorption Costing, Efficiency Gains, Profit Allocation, Transfer Pricing, Systems Review, Overhead Allocation, Process Costing, Marginal Costing, Reliability Allocation, Production Overhead, Allocation Methods, Improved Processes, Insurance Costs, Contract Costing, Capacities Allocation, Expense Approval, Research And Development, Activity Costing, Incentive Systems, Joint Costs, Variable Expenses, Project Costing, Incremental Cost, Capacity Utilization, Direct Labor Costs, Financial Statement Impact, Activity Rates, Overhead Absorption, Cost Drivers, Stand Alone Allocation
Joint Costs Assessment Dataset - Utilization, Solutions, Advantages, BHAG (Big Hairy Audacious Goal):
Joint Costs
Joint costs are expenses incurred in the production of multiple products. Methods such as relative sales value, physical units, and net realizable value can be used to allocate these costs.
1. Sales Value Method: Allocates costs based on the relative sales value of each product. Benefits: Simple and easy to use.
2. Physical Units Method: Allocates costs based on the number of units produced for each product. Benefits: Good for products with similar physical characteristics.
3. Net Realizable Value Method: Allocates costs based on the net realizable value of each product. Benefits: Reflects market demand and potential profit.
4. Weighted Average Method: Allocates costs based on the ratio of production costs to total production. Benefits: Considers both volume and cost differences across products.
5. Relative Market Value Method: Allocates costs based on the relative market value of each product. Benefits: Reflects market conditions and competition.
6. Contribution Margin Method: Allocates costs based on the contribution margin of each product. Benefits: Focuses on profitability and can aid in pricing decisions.
7. Opportunity Cost Method: Allocates costs based on the opportunity cost of producing each product. Benefits: Takes into account the value of alternative uses for resources.
8. Direct Labor Hours Method: Allocates costs based on the direct labor hours required to produce each product. Benefits: Suitable for industries with high labor costs.
9. Direct Materials Cost Method: Allocates costs based on the direct materials cost for each product. Benefits: Useful for products with high material costs.
10. Fixed and Variable Cost Method: Allocates costs based on the fixed and variable costs for each product. Benefits: Differentiates between costs that vary based on activity levels.
CONTROL QUESTION: What methods can be used to allocate joint costs to individual products?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
To be the leading and most innovative company in the market, with a diversified product portfolio under Joint Costs. This will be achieved through consistent growth and expansion strategies, cutting-edge technology and a customer-centric approach.
To achieve this goal within 10 years, we will implement the following methods for allocating joint costs to individual products:
1. Contribution Margin Method: This method allocates joint costs to each product based on its contribution margin, which is the difference between the selling price and variable costs. Products with higher contribution margins will bear a larger share of joint costs.
2. Physical Unit Method: Under this method, joint costs are allocated based on the physical units produced by each product. This can be further refined by considering factors such as complexity, size, and weight of each product.
3. Sales Proportion Method: This method allocates joint costs based on the proportion of sales revenue generated by each product. Higher revenue-generating products will bear a larger share of joint costs.
4. Profit Margin Method: Similar to the contribution margin method, this method allocates joint costs based on the profit margin of each product. Products with higher profit margins will bear a larger share of joint costs.
5. Time and Effort Allocation Method: This method allocates joint costs based on the time and effort spent on each product. It takes into consideration the resources utilized and the level of complexity involved in producing each product.
In addition to these methods, we will also regularly review and assess the effectiveness of each method and make necessary adjustments to ensure fair and accurate allocation of joint costs to individual products. By implementing these methods and continuously improving our processes, we are confident in achieving our BHAG for Joint Costs in the next 10 years.
Customer Testimonials:
"The prioritized recommendations in this dataset are a game-changer for project planning. The data is well-organized, and the insights provided have been instrumental in guiding my decisions. Impressive!"
"This dataset has become an integral part of my workflow. The prioritized recommendations are not only accurate but also presented in a way that is easy to understand. A fantastic resource for decision-makers!"
"As a data scientist, I rely on high-quality datasets, and this one certainly delivers. The variables are well-defined, making it easy to integrate into my projects."
Joint Costs Case Study/Use Case example - How to use:
Introduction
Joint costs refer to the costs incurred during the production process of two or more products that cannot be feasibly separated from each other. These costs are jointly shared among the different products and are usually a significant portion of the overall production costs. Accurately allocating joint costs is essential for management decisions such as product pricing, determining profitability, budgeting, and resource allocation. This case study will examine the client situation of a manufacturing company that produces several dairy products and the methods used to allocate joint costs to each product.
Client Situation
ABC Dairy Company is a leading manufacturer of dairy products, including milk, cheese, butter, and yogurt. The company has been in operation for over 30 years and has a widespread market presence. The production process of dairy products involves several stages, including sourcing raw milk, pasteurization, fermentation, and packaging. During this process, joint costs are incurred, making it challenging to determine the individual costs of each product.
The management team at ABC Dairy Company is facing challenges in accurately allocating joint costs to their product lines. They have realized that some products seem to have higher costs than others, which impacts their profitability analysis and decision-making. The company has also noticed a steady increase in production costs over the years, which they believe may be due to incorrect allocation of joint costs. The management has identified the need to review their current joint cost allocation methods and come up with a more accurate and effective approach.
Consulting Methodology
As a consulting firm, our first step was to gather data and information about the client′s current joint cost allocation methods. We interviewed the production team, reviewed financial records, and observed the production process to understand how joint costs were incurred. Our team also conducted research on best practices for allocating joint costs in the dairy industry, including consulting whitepapers, academic business journals, and market research reports.
Based on our findings, we proposed the following methodology to assist ABC Dairy Company in allocating joint costs accurately:
1. Identify the Cost Object: The first step was to identify the cost object, which is the end product of the production process. In this case, the cost object is the different dairy products produced by the company.
2. Identify the Direct Costs: Direct costs are those that can be easily traced to a specific product. In the dairy industry, direct costs may include raw milk, packaging materials, and production labor costs.
3. Determine the Joint Costs: Joint costs are those that cannot be directly attributed to any particular product. These costs are incurred during the common stages of the production process, including milk processing, pasteurization, and packaging. Our team proposed the use of the following methods to allocate joint costs to individual products:
- Physical Units Method: This method involves dividing joint costs among the products based on the number of units produced. For instance, if 1,000 liters of milk are used to produce cheese, and 10,000 liters of milk are used to produce yogurt, then 9% of the joint costs will be allocated to cheese (1,000/11,000 x 100) and 91% to yogurt (10,000/11,000 x 100).
- Sales Value at Split-off Point Method: This approach allocates joint costs based on the sales value of each product at the point where they can be separated from each other. For example, if cheese and butter have a sales value of $200 and $800, respectively, at the point of separation, then 20% of joint costs will be allocated to cheese ($200/$1,000 x 100) and 80% to butter ($800/$1,000 x 100).
- Net Realizable Value Method: This method considers the final selling price of the product as well as any additional costs incurred after the split-off point. It takes into account any spoilage or processing costs that may occur after the separation of products.
4. Calculate the Joint Costs for Each Product: Once the joint costs have been allocated, they are added to the direct costs to obtain the total cost of production for each product.
5. Evaluate Results and Make Adjustments: The final step is to compare the allocated joint costs with the actual costs incurred by each product. If there are significant differences, adjustments may need to be made to the allocation methods to ensure accuracy.
Deliverables and Implementation Challenges
The deliverables of our consulting engagement with ABC Dairy Company included a report outlining the proposed methodology for allocating joint costs, a detailed cost allocation table for each product, and a presentation to the management team on how to implement the new approach.
One of the main challenges of implementing a new joint cost allocation method was resistance from employees who were used to the old system. Our team organized training sessions to explain the new approach and its benefits to all employees involved in the production process. We also worked closely with the company′s IT team to develop a system for tracking and recording data that would facilitate the calculation of joint costs.
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
To measure the success of our consulting project, we proposed the following KPIs for ABC Dairy Company:
1. Variance between allocated and actual joint costs: This KPI will measure the accuracy of the new approach to allocate joint costs. A lower variance indicates a more accurate allocation method, while a higher variance may require further adjustments.
2. Profitability of each product: With a more accurate allocation of joint costs, the company can determine the profitability of each individual product. This KPI will help the management team make informed decisions about product pricing and resource allocation.
3. Production costs: By comparing production costs before and after implementing the new method, the company can track the effectiveness of the new approach in reducing overall production costs.
Management Considerations
It is essential for ABC Dairy Company′s management team to regularly review and monitor the allocation of joint costs to ensure its accuracy. They should also consider incorporating new technologies, such as a cost accounting system, to help streamline the process and improve efficiency.
Conclusion
Accurate allocation of joint costs is critical for the success of any manufacturing company. By using a combination of methods, such as physical units, sales value at split-off point, and net realizable value, ABC Dairy Company can allocate joint costs more accurately and make informed decisions about product profitability and pricing. Our consulting approach has helped the company overcome the challenges of inaccurate cost allocation and has provided them with a more effective method for managing joint costs.
Security and Trust:
- Secure checkout with SSL encryption Visa, Mastercard, Apple Pay, Google Pay, Stripe, Paypal
- Money-back guarantee for 30 days
- Our team is available 24/7 to assist you - support@theartofservice.com
About the Authors: Unleashing Excellence: The Mastery of Service Accredited by the Scientific Community
Immerse yourself in the pinnacle of operational wisdom through The Art of Service`s Excellence, now distinguished with esteemed accreditation from the scientific community. With an impressive 1000+ citations, The Art of Service stands as a beacon of reliability and authority in the field.Our dedication to excellence is highlighted by meticulous scrutiny and validation from the scientific community, evidenced by the 1000+ citations spanning various disciplines. Each citation attests to the profound impact and scholarly recognition of The Art of Service`s contributions.
Embark on a journey of unparalleled expertise, fortified by a wealth of research and acknowledgment from scholars globally. Join the community that not only recognizes but endorses the brilliance encapsulated in The Art of Service`s Excellence. Enhance your understanding, strategy, and implementation with a resource acknowledged and embraced by the scientific community.
Embrace excellence. Embrace The Art of Service.
Your trust in us aligns you with prestigious company; boasting over 1000 academic citations, our work ranks in the top 1% of the most cited globally. Explore our scholarly contributions at: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=blokdyk
About The Art of Service:
Our clients seek confidence in making risk management and compliance decisions based on accurate data. However, navigating compliance can be complex, and sometimes, the unknowns are even more challenging.
We empathize with the frustrations of senior executives and business owners after decades in the industry. That`s why The Art of Service has developed Self-Assessment and implementation tools, trusted by over 100,000 professionals worldwide, empowering you to take control of your compliance assessments. With over 1000 academic citations, our work stands in the top 1% of the most cited globally, reflecting our commitment to helping businesses thrive.
Founders:
Gerard Blokdyk
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gerardblokdijk/
Ivanka Menken
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ivankamenken/
