Are you worried about the security of your network? Do you want to ensure that your business is protected from cyber threats and unauthorized access? Look no further, the ultimate solution is here - our Network Access Control and Cyber Security Audit Knowledge Base.
This comprehensive database consists of over 1500 prioritized requirements, solutions, and benefits for Network Access Control and Cyber Security Audits.
It is designed to provide professionals like you with the most important questions to ask in order to get accurate and timely results, based on urgency and scope.
What sets our knowledge base apart from competitors and alternatives is its unmatched depth and breadth.
We have spent countless hours researching and compiling the most relevant and up-to-date information to help you protect your business from cyber attacks.
With our database, you no longer have to waste time scouring the internet for reliable information.
Our Network Access Control and Cyber Security Audit Knowledge Base is not just for IT experts, it is user-friendly and suitable for anyone looking to safeguard their network.
The product is easy to use, with a detailed overview of specifications and a breakdown of different product types and their advantages.
We understand that budget constraints can limit the ability to hire costly cybersecurity services.
That′s why we offer an affordable DIY alternative with our knowledge base.
You can now have access to the same level of expertise and guidance without breaking the bank.
The benefits of using our Network Access Control and Cyber Security Audit Knowledge Base are endless.
By utilizing the prioritized requirements and solutions, you can identify and address any potential vulnerabilities in your network.
This not only protects your business from data breaches and downtime, but also helps to maintain compliance with industry regulations.
Our knowledge base not only provides extensive research on Network Access Control and Cyber Security Audits, but also includes detailed case studies and use cases.
This allows you to see real-life examples of how our product has helped businesses like yours enhance their cybersecurity measures.
Don′t wait until it′s too late, secure your network now with our Network Access Control and Cyber Security Audit Knowledge Base.
Invest in the future success of your business for a fraction of the cost of traditional cybersecurity services.
With our product, you can have peace of mind knowing that your network is protected.
Try it out for yourself and see the results.
Our knowledge base is a must-have for businesses of all sizes.
Don′t risk your data and reputation, choose our Network Access Control and Cyber Security Audit Knowledge Base today.
What methodologies or frameworks does threat modeling employ to identify and prioritize potential lateral movement vectors, such as vulnerabilities in network protocols, weak authentication mechanisms, or misconfigured access controls, in order to develop targeted countermeasures?
Network Access Control
Threat modeling employs STRIDE, DREAD, and PASTA frameworks to identify and prioritize potential lateral movement vectors.
Here are the solutions and benefits for Network Access Control in the context of Cyber Security Audit:
**Solutions:**
1. **STRIDE**: Identify threats using Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Denial of Service, Elevation of Privilege.
2. **DREAD**: Prioritize threats based on Damage, Reproducibility, Exploitability, Affected Users, Discoverability.
3. **PASTA**: Analyze threats using Process for Attack Simulation and Threat Analysis.
**Benefits:**
1. **Improved threat visibility**: Identify potential lateral movement vectors and prioritize remediation efforts.
2. **Targeted countermeasures**: Develop effective security controls to mitigate identified threats.
3. **Reduced risk**: Minimize the attack surface by addressing vulnerabilities in network protocols, authentication, and access controls.
CONTROL QUESTION: What methodologies or frameworks does threat modeling employ to identify and prioritize potential lateral movement vectors, such as vulnerabilities in network protocols, weak authentication mechanisms, or misconfigured access controls, in order to develop targeted countermeasures?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now: Here′s a Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now for Network Access Control (NAC):
**BHAG:** By 2033, develop an Autonomous Lateral Movement Protection System (ALMPS) that utilizes Artificial Intelligence (AI), Machine Learning (ML), and advanced threat modeling frameworks to proactively identify and prioritize potential lateral movement vectors in real-time, and automatically deploy targeted countermeasures to prevent 99. 99% of lateral movement attacks in enterprise networks.
To achieve this BHAG, the following methodologies and frameworks can be employed to identify and prioritize potential lateral movement vectors:
1. ** Threat Modeling Frameworks:**
t* NIST 800-30: Guide for Conducting Risk Assessments
t* OWASP Threat Modeling Methodology
t* Microsoft Threat Modeling Tool
2. **Lateral Movement Attack Simulation:**
t* Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) tools, such as AttackIQ or SafeBreach
t* Adversarial simulation platforms, like MITRE ATTu0026CK
3. **Vulnerability Management:**
t* Continuous Vulnerability Management (CVM) processes
t* Vulnerability scanners, such as Nessus or OpenVAS
4. **Authentication and Authorization Analysis:**
t* Authentication protocol analysis tools, like Authtool or PyAuth
t* Authorization policy analysis frameworks, such as OPA (Open Policy Agent)
5. **Network Protocol Analysis:**
t* Protocol analysis tools, like Wireshark or Tcpdump
t* Network traffic analysis frameworks, such as Bro or Suricata
6. **Misconfiguration Detection:**
t* Configuration Compliance Scanning tools, like Nessus or OpenVAS
t* Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) tools, such as AWS Config or Google Cloud Security Command Center
7. **Real-time Analytics and Feedback Loops:**
t* Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) systems
t* Analytics platforms, such as Splunk or ELK Stack
8. **AI and ML-based Countermeasure Development:**
t* Machine Learning-based intrusion detection systems, like Apache Spot or Anomaly Detection
t* AI-powered security orchestration, automation, and response (SOAR) platforms
By integrating these methodologies and frameworks, the Autonomous Lateral Movement Protection System (ALMPS) can continuously analyze and prioritize potential lateral movement vectors, and automatically deploy targeted countermeasures to prevent lateral movement attacks in enterprise networks.
This BHAG requires significant advancements in AI, ML, and threat modeling, as well as the integration of various security technologies and frameworks. Achieving this goal will enable organizations to confidently protect their networks from lateral movement attacks, reducing the risk of data breaches and reputational damage.
"I can`t imagine working on my projects without this dataset. The prioritized recommendations are spot-on, and the ease of integration into existing systems is a huge plus. Highly satisfied with my purchase!"
**Client Situation:**
Acme Corporation, a multinational financial services company, operates a complex network infrastructure with multiple layers of defense. However, following a series of high-profile security breaches, the company′s security team realized that they lacked a comprehensive understanding of potential lateral movement vectors within their network. They sought to engage a consulting firm to conduct a threat modeling exercise to identify and prioritize potential vulnerabilities, weak authentication mechanisms, and misconfigured access controls, and develop targeted countermeasures to mitigate these risks.
**Consulting Methodology:**
The consulting firm employed a structured threat modeling approach, based on industry-recognized frameworks such as NIST 800-30 and FAIR (Factor Analysis of Information Risk). The methodology consisted of the following phases:
1. **Threat Identification**: Conducted workshops with key stakeholders to identify potential threats, including insider threats, advanced persistent threats (APTs), and common vulnerabilities and exposures (CVEs).
2. **Asset Identification**: Identified critical assets, including data storage systems, network infrastructure, and authentication mechanisms.
3. **Attack Path Analysis**: Utilized attack trees and kill chains to model potential attack paths, highlighting lateral movement vectors, including vulnerabilities in network protocols, weak authentication mechanisms, and misconfigured access controls.
4. **Risk Assessment**: Evaluated the likelihood and potential impact of each identified threat, prioritizing them based on risk scores.
5. **Countermeasure Development**: Designed and recommended targeted countermeasures to mitigate the identified risks, including network segmentation, multi-factor authentication, and access control list (ACL) hardening.
**Deliverables:**
The consulting firm delivered a comprehensive report outlining the identified threats, attack paths, and risk assessment results, as well as a roadmap for implementing recommended countermeasures. The report included:
1. **Threat Model Report**: Detailed documentation of the threat modeling exercise, including identified threats, assets, and attack paths.
2. **Risk Assessment Matrix**: A prioritized list of risks, including likelihood and potential impact scores.
3. **Countermeasure Roadmap**: A detailed plan for implementing recommended countermeasures, including timelines, resource allocation, and budget estimates.
**Implementation Challenges:**
1. **Complexity of Network Infrastructure**: Acme Corporation′s network infrastructure was complex, making it challenging to identify and prioritize all potential lateral movement vectors.
2. ** Stakeholder Buy-In**: Gaining buy-in from various stakeholders, including network administrators and security teams, required significant effort and communication.
**KPIs:**
To measure the effectiveness of the threat modeling exercise and the implementation of recommended countermeasures, the following KPIs were established:
1. **Mean Time to Detect (MTTD)**: Average time taken to detect a security incident.
2. **Mean Time to Respond (MTTR)**: Average time taken to respond to a security incident.
3. **Risk Reduction**: Percentage reduction in risk score for identified threats.
**Management Considerations:**
1. **Continuous Monitoring**: Threat modeling should be an ongoing process, with regular updates to reflect changes in the threat landscape and network infrastructure.
2. **Training and Awareness**: Educate network administrators and security teams on the importance of threat modeling and the implementation of countermeasures.
3. **Budget Allocation**: Allocate sufficient budget for implementing recommended countermeasures and ongoing threat modeling exercises.
**Citations:**
1. NIST. (2012). Managing Information Security Risk: Organization, Mission, and Information System View. Special Publication 800-30.
2. FAIR Institute. (n.d.). The FAIR Risk Management Framework. Retrieved from u003chttps://www.fairinstitute.org/the-fair-risk-management-frameworku003e
3. SANS Institute. (2019). Threat Modeling for Security Professionals. Retrieved from u003chttps://www.sans.org/white-papers/threat-modeling-security-professionals-38274u003e
4. Gartner. (2020). Market Guide for Network Access Control. Retrieved from u003chttps://www.gartner.com/en/documents/3999018/market-guide-for-network-access-controlu003e
5. Verizon. (2020). 2020 Data Breach Investigations Report. Retrieved from u003chttps://www.verizon.com/business/resources/reports/dbir/2020-data-breach-investigations-report.pdfu003e
By employing a structured threat modeling approach, Acme Corporation was able to identify and prioritize potential lateral movement vectors, develop targeted countermeasures, and implement a roadmap for mitigating these risks. The consulting firm′s methodology and deliverables enabled the company to improve its overall security posture, reduce risk, and enhance its ability to detect and respond to security incidents.
This comprehensive database consists of over 1500 prioritized requirements, solutions, and benefits for Network Access Control and Cyber Security Audits.
It is designed to provide professionals like you with the most important questions to ask in order to get accurate and timely results, based on urgency and scope.
What sets our knowledge base apart from competitors and alternatives is its unmatched depth and breadth.
We have spent countless hours researching and compiling the most relevant and up-to-date information to help you protect your business from cyber attacks.
With our database, you no longer have to waste time scouring the internet for reliable information.
Our Network Access Control and Cyber Security Audit Knowledge Base is not just for IT experts, it is user-friendly and suitable for anyone looking to safeguard their network.
The product is easy to use, with a detailed overview of specifications and a breakdown of different product types and their advantages.
We understand that budget constraints can limit the ability to hire costly cybersecurity services.
That′s why we offer an affordable DIY alternative with our knowledge base.
You can now have access to the same level of expertise and guidance without breaking the bank.
The benefits of using our Network Access Control and Cyber Security Audit Knowledge Base are endless.
By utilizing the prioritized requirements and solutions, you can identify and address any potential vulnerabilities in your network.
This not only protects your business from data breaches and downtime, but also helps to maintain compliance with industry regulations.
Our knowledge base not only provides extensive research on Network Access Control and Cyber Security Audits, but also includes detailed case studies and use cases.
This allows you to see real-life examples of how our product has helped businesses like yours enhance their cybersecurity measures.
Don′t wait until it′s too late, secure your network now with our Network Access Control and Cyber Security Audit Knowledge Base.
Invest in the future success of your business for a fraction of the cost of traditional cybersecurity services.
With our product, you can have peace of mind knowing that your network is protected.
Try it out for yourself and see the results.
Our knowledge base is a must-have for businesses of all sizes.
Don′t risk your data and reputation, choose our Network Access Control and Cyber Security Audit Knowledge Base today.
Discover Insights, Make Informed Decisions, and Stay Ahead of the Curve:
Key Features:
Comprehensive set of 1521 prioritized Network Access Control requirements. - Extensive coverage of 99 Network Access Control topic scopes.
- In-depth analysis of 99 Network Access Control step-by-step solutions, benefits, BHAGs.
- Detailed examination of 99 Network Access Control case studies and use cases.
- Digital download upon purchase.
- Enjoy lifetime document updates included with your purchase.
- Benefit from a fully editable and customizable Excel format.
- Trusted and utilized by over 10,000 organizations.
- Covering: Network Architecture, Compliance Report, Network Segmentation, Security Operation Model, Secure Communication Protocol, Stakeholder Management, Identity And Access Management, Anomaly Detection, Security Standards, Cloud Security, Data Loss Prevention, Vulnerability Scanning, Incident Response, Transport Layer Security, Resource Allocation, Threat Intelligence, Penetration Testing, Continuous Monitoring, Denial Service, Public Key Infrastructure, Cybersecurity Regulations, Compliance Management, Security Orchestration, NIST Framework, Security Awareness Training, Key Management, Cloud Security Gateway, Audit Logs, Endpoint Security, Data Backup Recovery, NIST Cybersecurity Framework, Response Automation, Cybersecurity Framework, Anomaly Detection System, Security Training Program, Threat Modeling, Security Metrics, Incident Response Team, Compliance Requirements, Security Architecture Model, Security Information, Incident Response Plan, Security Information And Event Management, PCI Compliance, Security Analytics, Compliance Assessment, Data Analysis, Third Party Risks, Security Awareness Program, Data Security Model, Data Encryption, Security Governance Framework, Risk Analysis, Cloud Security Model, Secure Communication, ISO 27001, Privilege Access Management, Application Security Model, Business Continuity Plan, Business Insight, Security Procedure Management, Incident Response Platform, Log Management, Application Security, Industry Best Practices, Secure Communication Network, Audit Report, Social Engineering, Vulnerability Assessment, Network Access Control, Security Standards Management, Return On Investment, Cloud Security Architecture, Security Governance Model, Cloud Workload Protection, HIPAA Compliance, Data Protection Regulations, Compliance Regulations, GDPR Compliance, Privacy Regulations, Security Policies, Risk Assessment Methodology, Intrusion Detection System, Disaster Recovery Plan, Secure Protocols, Business Continuity, Organization Design, Risk Management, Security Controls Assessment, Risk Based Approach, Cloud Storage Security, Risk Management Framework, Cyber Security Audit, Phishing Attacks, Security ROI, Security Analytics Platform, Phishing Awareness Program, Cybersecurity Maturity Model, Service Level Agreement
Network Access Control Assessment Dataset - Utilization, Solutions, Advantages, BHAG (Big Hairy Audacious Goal):
Network Access Control
Threat modeling employs STRIDE, DREAD, and PASTA frameworks to identify and prioritize potential lateral movement vectors.
Here are the solutions and benefits for Network Access Control in the context of Cyber Security Audit:
**Solutions:**
1. **STRIDE**: Identify threats using Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Denial of Service, Elevation of Privilege.
2. **DREAD**: Prioritize threats based on Damage, Reproducibility, Exploitability, Affected Users, Discoverability.
3. **PASTA**: Analyze threats using Process for Attack Simulation and Threat Analysis.
**Benefits:**
1. **Improved threat visibility**: Identify potential lateral movement vectors and prioritize remediation efforts.
2. **Targeted countermeasures**: Develop effective security controls to mitigate identified threats.
3. **Reduced risk**: Minimize the attack surface by addressing vulnerabilities in network protocols, authentication, and access controls.
CONTROL QUESTION: What methodologies or frameworks does threat modeling employ to identify and prioritize potential lateral movement vectors, such as vulnerabilities in network protocols, weak authentication mechanisms, or misconfigured access controls, in order to develop targeted countermeasures?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now: Here′s a Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now for Network Access Control (NAC):
**BHAG:** By 2033, develop an Autonomous Lateral Movement Protection System (ALMPS) that utilizes Artificial Intelligence (AI), Machine Learning (ML), and advanced threat modeling frameworks to proactively identify and prioritize potential lateral movement vectors in real-time, and automatically deploy targeted countermeasures to prevent 99. 99% of lateral movement attacks in enterprise networks.
To achieve this BHAG, the following methodologies and frameworks can be employed to identify and prioritize potential lateral movement vectors:
1. ** Threat Modeling Frameworks:**
t* NIST 800-30: Guide for Conducting Risk Assessments
t* OWASP Threat Modeling Methodology
t* Microsoft Threat Modeling Tool
2. **Lateral Movement Attack Simulation:**
t* Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) tools, such as AttackIQ or SafeBreach
t* Adversarial simulation platforms, like MITRE ATTu0026CK
3. **Vulnerability Management:**
t* Continuous Vulnerability Management (CVM) processes
t* Vulnerability scanners, such as Nessus or OpenVAS
4. **Authentication and Authorization Analysis:**
t* Authentication protocol analysis tools, like Authtool or PyAuth
t* Authorization policy analysis frameworks, such as OPA (Open Policy Agent)
5. **Network Protocol Analysis:**
t* Protocol analysis tools, like Wireshark or Tcpdump
t* Network traffic analysis frameworks, such as Bro or Suricata
6. **Misconfiguration Detection:**
t* Configuration Compliance Scanning tools, like Nessus or OpenVAS
t* Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) tools, such as AWS Config or Google Cloud Security Command Center
7. **Real-time Analytics and Feedback Loops:**
t* Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) systems
t* Analytics platforms, such as Splunk or ELK Stack
8. **AI and ML-based Countermeasure Development:**
t* Machine Learning-based intrusion detection systems, like Apache Spot or Anomaly Detection
t* AI-powered security orchestration, automation, and response (SOAR) platforms
By integrating these methodologies and frameworks, the Autonomous Lateral Movement Protection System (ALMPS) can continuously analyze and prioritize potential lateral movement vectors, and automatically deploy targeted countermeasures to prevent lateral movement attacks in enterprise networks.
This BHAG requires significant advancements in AI, ML, and threat modeling, as well as the integration of various security technologies and frameworks. Achieving this goal will enable organizations to confidently protect their networks from lateral movement attacks, reducing the risk of data breaches and reputational damage.
Customer Testimonials:
"I can`t imagine working on my projects without this dataset. The prioritized recommendations are spot-on, and the ease of integration into existing systems is a huge plus. Highly satisfied with my purchase!"
"The ethical considerations built into the dataset give me peace of mind knowing that my recommendations are not biased or discriminatory."
"The customer support is top-notch. They were very helpful in answering my questions and setting me up for success."
Network Access Control Case Study/Use Case example - How to use:
**Case Study: Threat Modeling for Network Access Control****Client Situation:**
Acme Corporation, a multinational financial services company, operates a complex network infrastructure with multiple layers of defense. However, following a series of high-profile security breaches, the company′s security team realized that they lacked a comprehensive understanding of potential lateral movement vectors within their network. They sought to engage a consulting firm to conduct a threat modeling exercise to identify and prioritize potential vulnerabilities, weak authentication mechanisms, and misconfigured access controls, and develop targeted countermeasures to mitigate these risks.
**Consulting Methodology:**
The consulting firm employed a structured threat modeling approach, based on industry-recognized frameworks such as NIST 800-30 and FAIR (Factor Analysis of Information Risk). The methodology consisted of the following phases:
1. **Threat Identification**: Conducted workshops with key stakeholders to identify potential threats, including insider threats, advanced persistent threats (APTs), and common vulnerabilities and exposures (CVEs).
2. **Asset Identification**: Identified critical assets, including data storage systems, network infrastructure, and authentication mechanisms.
3. **Attack Path Analysis**: Utilized attack trees and kill chains to model potential attack paths, highlighting lateral movement vectors, including vulnerabilities in network protocols, weak authentication mechanisms, and misconfigured access controls.
4. **Risk Assessment**: Evaluated the likelihood and potential impact of each identified threat, prioritizing them based on risk scores.
5. **Countermeasure Development**: Designed and recommended targeted countermeasures to mitigate the identified risks, including network segmentation, multi-factor authentication, and access control list (ACL) hardening.
**Deliverables:**
The consulting firm delivered a comprehensive report outlining the identified threats, attack paths, and risk assessment results, as well as a roadmap for implementing recommended countermeasures. The report included:
1. **Threat Model Report**: Detailed documentation of the threat modeling exercise, including identified threats, assets, and attack paths.
2. **Risk Assessment Matrix**: A prioritized list of risks, including likelihood and potential impact scores.
3. **Countermeasure Roadmap**: A detailed plan for implementing recommended countermeasures, including timelines, resource allocation, and budget estimates.
**Implementation Challenges:**
1. **Complexity of Network Infrastructure**: Acme Corporation′s network infrastructure was complex, making it challenging to identify and prioritize all potential lateral movement vectors.
2. ** Stakeholder Buy-In**: Gaining buy-in from various stakeholders, including network administrators and security teams, required significant effort and communication.
**KPIs:**
To measure the effectiveness of the threat modeling exercise and the implementation of recommended countermeasures, the following KPIs were established:
1. **Mean Time to Detect (MTTD)**: Average time taken to detect a security incident.
2. **Mean Time to Respond (MTTR)**: Average time taken to respond to a security incident.
3. **Risk Reduction**: Percentage reduction in risk score for identified threats.
**Management Considerations:**
1. **Continuous Monitoring**: Threat modeling should be an ongoing process, with regular updates to reflect changes in the threat landscape and network infrastructure.
2. **Training and Awareness**: Educate network administrators and security teams on the importance of threat modeling and the implementation of countermeasures.
3. **Budget Allocation**: Allocate sufficient budget for implementing recommended countermeasures and ongoing threat modeling exercises.
**Citations:**
1. NIST. (2012). Managing Information Security Risk: Organization, Mission, and Information System View. Special Publication 800-30.
2. FAIR Institute. (n.d.). The FAIR Risk Management Framework. Retrieved from u003chttps://www.fairinstitute.org/the-fair-risk-management-frameworku003e
3. SANS Institute. (2019). Threat Modeling for Security Professionals. Retrieved from u003chttps://www.sans.org/white-papers/threat-modeling-security-professionals-38274u003e
4. Gartner. (2020). Market Guide for Network Access Control. Retrieved from u003chttps://www.gartner.com/en/documents/3999018/market-guide-for-network-access-controlu003e
5. Verizon. (2020). 2020 Data Breach Investigations Report. Retrieved from u003chttps://www.verizon.com/business/resources/reports/dbir/2020-data-breach-investigations-report.pdfu003e
By employing a structured threat modeling approach, Acme Corporation was able to identify and prioritize potential lateral movement vectors, develop targeted countermeasures, and implement a roadmap for mitigating these risks. The consulting firm′s methodology and deliverables enabled the company to improve its overall security posture, reduce risk, and enhance its ability to detect and respond to security incidents.
Security and Trust:
- Secure checkout with SSL encryption Visa, Mastercard, Apple Pay, Google Pay, Stripe, Paypal
- Money-back guarantee for 30 days
- Our team is available 24/7 to assist you - support@theartofservice.com
About the Authors: Unleashing Excellence: The Mastery of Service Accredited by the Scientific Community
Immerse yourself in the pinnacle of operational wisdom through The Art of Service`s Excellence, now distinguished with esteemed accreditation from the scientific community. With an impressive 1000+ citations, The Art of Service stands as a beacon of reliability and authority in the field.Our dedication to excellence is highlighted by meticulous scrutiny and validation from the scientific community, evidenced by the 1000+ citations spanning various disciplines. Each citation attests to the profound impact and scholarly recognition of The Art of Service`s contributions.
Embark on a journey of unparalleled expertise, fortified by a wealth of research and acknowledgment from scholars globally. Join the community that not only recognizes but endorses the brilliance encapsulated in The Art of Service`s Excellence. Enhance your understanding, strategy, and implementation with a resource acknowledged and embraced by the scientific community.
Embrace excellence. Embrace The Art of Service.
Your trust in us aligns you with prestigious company; boasting over 1000 academic citations, our work ranks in the top 1% of the most cited globally. Explore our scholarly contributions at: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=blokdyk
About The Art of Service:
Our clients seek confidence in making risk management and compliance decisions based on accurate data. However, navigating compliance can be complex, and sometimes, the unknowns are even more challenging.
We empathize with the frustrations of senior executives and business owners after decades in the industry. That`s why The Art of Service has developed Self-Assessment and implementation tools, trusted by over 100,000 professionals worldwide, empowering you to take control of your compliance assessments. With over 1000 academic citations, our work stands in the top 1% of the most cited globally, reflecting our commitment to helping businesses thrive.
Founders:
Gerard Blokdyk
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gerardblokdijk/
Ivanka Menken
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ivankamenken/
