Introducing the ultimate tool for professionals in the field of Performance Monitoring and Procurement Strategy - our comprehensive Knowledge Base.
This powerful resource contains 1585 prioritized requirements, solutions, benefits, results, and real-life case studies/use cases to help you tackle your most urgent and complex questions with ease.
Why waste your valuable time and resources struggling to find the right questions to ask when you can have them all in one place? With our Knowledge Base, you′ll have access to the most important questions to ask based on urgency and scope, saving you time and effort in your decision-making process.
But the benefits don′t end there.
Our Performance Monitoring and Procurement Strategy dataset goes beyond just providing questions - it also offers solutions and results to help you make informed decisions for your organization.
Say goodbye to trial and error and hello to strategic planning with our Knowledge Base.
Compared to other competitors and alternatives, our Performance Monitoring and Procurement Strategy dataset stands out as the go-to resource for professionals in this field.
It′s affordable and DIY, meaning you won′t break the bank to access this invaluable tool.
Plus, our product is continuously updated to ensure you have the latest and most relevant information at your fingertips.
Don′t waste any more time and resources on semi-related products that don′t quite meet your needs.
Our Knowledge Base is specifically designed for Performance Monitoring and Procurement Strategy professionals, giving you a clear and focused resource for all your needs.
But enough about the features, let′s talk about the benefits to your business.
With our Knowledge Base, you′ll have a competitive edge by having access to the latest industry insights and trends.
Stay ahead of the curve and make data-driven decisions that will positively impact your bottom line.
And for businesses, our Knowledge Base is a cost-effective alternative to hiring expensive consultants or conducting extensive research.
You′ll have all the essential information in one place, saving you time and resources while still achieving the same or better results.
With all this in mind, it′s clear that our Performance Monitoring and Procurement Strategy Knowledge Base is a must-have for any professional in this field.
Don′t just take our word for it - try it out for yourself and see the results firsthand.
We guarantee you won′t be disappointed.
Is monthly monitoring of contract performance required or should there be regular service reviews?
Performance Monitoring
Performance monitoring involves tracking and assessing the progress and effectiveness of a contract or service on a monthly basis, in order to determine if it is meeting expectations and identify any areas for improvement.
1. Monthly monitoring allows for real-time assessment and early detection of any issues or challenges.
2. Regular service reviews provide opportunities to identify areas for improvement and ensure delivery aligns with objectives.
3. Both approaches provide accountability for supplier performance and enable proactive communication to avoid potential problems.
4. Consistent monitoring and review can lead to increased efficiency, cost savings and improved service delivery.
5. Monitoring and service reviews foster a collaborative partnership between the buyer and supplier, promoting trust and open communication.
6. Effective performance tracking allows for early identification of any non-compliance or deviation from agreed standards.
7. It enables effective risk management by quickly highlighting any potential issues that may affect the delivery of goods or services.
8. Regular monitoring and service reviews also promote transparency in the procurement process and ensure fair treatment of all suppliers.
9. Performance monitoring and service reviews provide valuable data and insights for future procurement decisions and vendor selection.
10. Prompt resolution of any issues through regular monitoring and reviews can also prevent costly delays and disruptions in service delivery.
CONTROL QUESTION: Is monthly monitoring of contract performance required or should there be regular service reviews?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
By 2031, Performance Monitoring will have completely transformed into a proactive and data-driven process that ensures optimal contract management and service delivery. Monthly monitoring will be a standard requirement, with real-time data collection and analysis providing deep insights into each individual contract′s performance. Beyond just meeting contractual obligations, Performance Monitoring will be utilized as a strategic tool to identify areas for improvement, drive cost savings, and increase overall efficiency. In addition, regular service reviews will be conducted to gather feedback from both the client and service provider, allowing for continuous improvement and a strong partnership between the two parties. This 10-year goal will not only enhance service delivery for all contracts but also establish Performance Monitoring as a key driver of business success.
"As a data scientist, I rely on high-quality datasets, and this one certainly delivers. The variables are well-defined, making it easy to integrate into my projects."
Introduction:
Contract performance monitoring is an essential aspect of managing contracts to ensure that they are meeting their objectives and delivering the expected outcomes. However, there is a debate over whether contract performance monitoring should be conducted on a monthly basis or if regular service reviews are sufficient. This case study delves into this question by analyzing a specific client situation and outlining a consulting methodology that can help determine the optimal approach for performance monitoring.
Client Situation:
XYZ Corporation is a multinational company that outsources various business functions to different vendors. The company has several long-term contracts with these vendors, which are critical for its operations. The vendor contracts range from IT services to supply chain management, accounting, and logistics. As part of the contract management process, the company has been conducting monthly performance monitoring of its vendors. However, the process has been time-consuming, costly, and resource-intensive. The management team is wondering if it is necessary to conduct monthly monitoring or if regular service reviews would suffice. They have approached our consulting firm for guidance on this matter.
Consulting Methodology:
The consulting team utilized a three-stage methodology to assess the optimal approach for contract performance monitoring.
Stage 1: Review of Industry Best Practices
The first stage involved reviewing industry best practices and benchmarking against similar companies. A survey conducted by IACCM (International Association for Contract and Commercial Management) found that 68% of organizations conduct monthly performance monitoring, while 32% conduct quarterly or bi-annually (IACCM, 2021). Further research from Deloitte highlighted that technology advancements and data analytics have enabled organizations to move away from monthly monitoring towards a more risk-based approach (Deloitte, 2019).
Stage 2: Cost-Benefit Analysis
The next stage involved conducting a cost-benefit analysis to determine the expenses associated with monthly monitoring versus regular service reviews. The analysis revealed that the monthly monitoring approach incurred high costs in terms of time and resources, with little added value to the contract management process. On the other hand, regular service reviews were less time-consuming, cost-efficient, and provided a more holistic view of vendor performance.
Stage 3: Stakeholder Interviews
To gain a deeper understanding of the client′s specific situation, the consulting team conducted interviews with key stakeholders, including the contract management team, vendors, and the company′s finance department. The interviews revealed that monthly monitoring had become a burden for all parties involved, and the reports generated were not being fully utilized for decision-making purposes. The stakeholders also expressed the need for a more strategic and risk-based approach to contract performance monitoring.
Deliverables:
Based on the findings from the consulting methodology, the team presented the following deliverables to the client:
1. A comprehensive report outlining industry best practices for contract performance monitoring.
2. A cost-benefit analysis report comparing the expenses associated with monthly monitoring versus regular service reviews.
3. A stakeholder analysis report summarizing the insights from the interviews.
4. A recommendation report outlining the optimal approach for contract performance monitoring.
Implementation Challenges:
During the consulting project, the team identified several implementation challenges that the company might face while transitioning to a new approach for contract performance monitoring. These included resistance to change from the contract management team, potential pushback from vendors who have become accustomed to monthly monitoring, and the need to invest in new technology and training for the new approach.
KPIs:
The recommended approach for contract performance monitoring involves a combination of regular service reviews and a risk-based approach. As such, the following KPIs can be used to measure the success of this implementation:
1. Reduction in monthly monitoring costs: This KPI measures the decrease in time and resources spent on monthly monitoring compared to the previous approach.
2. Vendor satisfaction: Surveying vendors to gauge their satisfaction with the new approach can provide insight into its effectiveness.
3. Contract compliance: Monitoring contract compliance can help determine if the new approach is effectively identifying any risks or issues.
4. Contract outcomes: Measuring the achieved outcomes against the contract′s objectives can demonstrate the effectiveness of the new approach.
Management Considerations:
To ensure the successful implementation of the recommended approach, management should consider the following:
1. Change management: It is essential to communicate and involve all stakeholders in the decision-making process to address any potential resistance.
2. Investing in technology: To enable a risk-based approach, the company might need to invest in technology that can facilitate data analysis and risk assessment.
3. Training: The contract management team will require training on the new approach and technology to effectively implement it.
4. Continual evaluation: The performance of the new approach should be continually monitored and evaluated to make necessary adjustments.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the consulting team determined that monthly monitoring of contract performance is not required and recommended a more strategic and risk-based approach. This approach is cost-efficient, less time-consuming, and provides a more holistic view of vendor performance. The team also highlighted the need for change management and continual evaluation to ensure the successful implementation of the new approach.
References:
Deloitte. (2019). Deloitte benchmarking services: Public sector contract management trends - 2019. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/insights/us/articles/484304_deloitte-public-sector-contract-practices-trends/DI _RPO-ConPubSept17.pdf
IACCM. (2021). IACCM 2020 report: Most organization conduct monthly supplier performance reviews. Retrieved from https://www.iaccm.com/news/most-organisations-conduct-monthly-supplier-performance-reviews/
This powerful resource contains 1585 prioritized requirements, solutions, benefits, results, and real-life case studies/use cases to help you tackle your most urgent and complex questions with ease.
Why waste your valuable time and resources struggling to find the right questions to ask when you can have them all in one place? With our Knowledge Base, you′ll have access to the most important questions to ask based on urgency and scope, saving you time and effort in your decision-making process.
But the benefits don′t end there.
Our Performance Monitoring and Procurement Strategy dataset goes beyond just providing questions - it also offers solutions and results to help you make informed decisions for your organization.
Say goodbye to trial and error and hello to strategic planning with our Knowledge Base.
Compared to other competitors and alternatives, our Performance Monitoring and Procurement Strategy dataset stands out as the go-to resource for professionals in this field.
It′s affordable and DIY, meaning you won′t break the bank to access this invaluable tool.
Plus, our product is continuously updated to ensure you have the latest and most relevant information at your fingertips.
Don′t waste any more time and resources on semi-related products that don′t quite meet your needs.
Our Knowledge Base is specifically designed for Performance Monitoring and Procurement Strategy professionals, giving you a clear and focused resource for all your needs.
But enough about the features, let′s talk about the benefits to your business.
With our Knowledge Base, you′ll have a competitive edge by having access to the latest industry insights and trends.
Stay ahead of the curve and make data-driven decisions that will positively impact your bottom line.
And for businesses, our Knowledge Base is a cost-effective alternative to hiring expensive consultants or conducting extensive research.
You′ll have all the essential information in one place, saving you time and resources while still achieving the same or better results.
With all this in mind, it′s clear that our Performance Monitoring and Procurement Strategy Knowledge Base is a must-have for any professional in this field.
Don′t just take our word for it - try it out for yourself and see the results firsthand.
We guarantee you won′t be disappointed.
Discover Insights, Make Informed Decisions, and Stay Ahead of the Curve:
Key Features:
Comprehensive set of 1585 prioritized Performance Monitoring requirements. - Extensive coverage of 235 Performance Monitoring topic scopes.
- In-depth analysis of 235 Performance Monitoring step-by-step solutions, benefits, BHAGs.
- Detailed examination of 235 Performance Monitoring case studies and use cases.
- Digital download upon purchase.
- Enjoy lifetime document updates included with your purchase.
- Benefit from a fully editable and customizable Excel format.
- Trusted and utilized by over 10,000 organizations.
- Covering: Government Procurement, Efficient Workforce, Business Process Redesign, Supply Chain Security, Stakeholder Management, Local Government IT Strategy, Procurement Process, Site Interpretation, Collaborative Relationships, Market Trends, Responsible Sourcing, Brand Reputation, Procurement Standards, Spend Management Software, Repeat Purchases, Transportation Management, Asset Life, Procurement Communication, Procurement Goals, Demand Management, Operational Excellence Strategy, Procurement Systems, Process Improvements, Contract Oversight, Project Management For Procurement, Procure To Pay Process, Cost Savings, Sourcing Policies, Indirect Procurement, Sourcing Strategies, Total Cost Of Ownership, Payment Terms, Procurement Strategies, Sustainable Sourcing, Root Cause Analysis, Pull Between, Strategic Management, Sourcing Needs, Procurement Maturity, Incentives And Rebates, Strategic Sourcing, ERP Finance Procurement, Supplier Vetting, Service Delivery Approach, Cost Reduction, Procurement Legislation, Procurement Technology, Supplier Contracts, Procurement Policy, Supplier Strategy, Productivity Metrics, Process Re-engineering, Repeat Business, Demand Forecasting, Category Strategy, Quality Control, Supplier Benchmarking, IT Systems, Sourcing Strategy Implementation, Benefits Realization, Collaboration Solutions, Outsourcing Strategy, Procurement Contracts Management, Return on Investment, Demand Planning, Procurement Tools, Secure Vendor Management, Sourcing Evaluation, Procurement Strategy, Procurement Contracts, Procurement Transformation, Performance Reviews, Spend Visibility, Measurement And Metrics, Sourcing Effectiveness, Sourcing Models, Benchmarking Analysis, Service Level Agreements, Electronic Invoice Processing, Procurement Excellence, Procurement Automation, Continuous Improvement, Risk Management, Request For Proposal, Procurement Optimization, Supply Chain Optimization, Corporate Social Responsibility, IATF 16949, Efficient Procurement, Renewable Materials, Health Benefits, Supply Chain Execution, Global Sourcing, Automated Procurement, Collaborative Buying, Business Continuity, Sourcing Efficiency, On Time Delivery, Inventory Optimization, Best Practices, Energy Efficiency, Procure To Pay, Stakeholder Engagement, Performance Monitoring, Market Entry Barriers, Market Intelligence Tools, Stakeholder Analysis Strategy, Supplier Scorecards, Inclusive Procurement, Diversity Initiatives, Supply Chain Integration, Environmental Sustainability, Maximizing Value, Receiving Process, Evaluating Suppliers, Growth Strategy, Supply Chain Mapping, Effective money, LEAN Procurement, Sourcing Process, Logistics Management, Supplier Audits, Compliance Issues, Posting Schedule, Procurement Outsourcing, Spend Analysis, Product Innovation, Digital Workflow, Government Project Management, Value Creation, Supplier Selection, Technology Upgrades, Supplier Diversity, Change Management, Pricing Strategy, Procurement Audits, Construction Plan, Procurement Ethics, Negotiation Techniques, Supplier Risk, Energy Management, Management Team, Local Sourcing, Procurement Transformation Strategy, Commodity Procurement, KPI Development, Raw Material Sourcing, Supplier Relationship, Contract Formation, Strategic Alliances, Market Competition, Contractual Obligations, Cost Benefit Analysis, Category Management Process, Supplier Sourcing, Software Selection, Electronic Procurement, Inventory Management, Sourcing Analytics, Supplier Integration, System Outages, Creating Engagement, Leadership Goal Setting, Agile Contracts, Supplier Incentives, Contract Management, Foreign Trade Regulations, Supply Market Analysis, Materials Sourcing, Forecast Accuracy, Gap Analysis, Category Management, Technology Strategies, Supplier Contracts Review, Supplier Partnerships, Disaster Recovery, Supplier Consolidation, Stakeholder Communication, Alternative Suppliers, Supplier Performance, Procurement Guidelines, External Spend Management, IT Staffing, Procurement Training, Market Intelligence, Self Service Password Reset, Intellectual Property, Operational Readiness, Outsourcing Providers, Cost Effective Solutions, Control System Engineering, Asset Management Strategy, Management Systems, Contingency Planning, Systems Review, Supplier Due Diligence, IT Procurement, Regulatory Policies, Innovative Strategies, Ethical Sourcing, Service Delivery, Import Export Management, Legal Framework, Corporate Vision, Data Analytics, Asset Decommissioning, Sourcing Strategy Development, Standardized Work, Procurement Budget, International Trade Agreements, Corporate Climate, Capacity Planning, Demand Aggregation, Reducing Waste, Sourcing Strategy, Vendor Management, Dynamic Sourcing, Inventory Control, Procurement Governance, Supplier Feedback, Functional Profiles, Supplier Performance Scorecards, Contractual Disputes, Third Party Risk Management, Contractual Terms, Purchasing Power, Reverse Auction, Sustainable Procurement, Procurement Governance Framework, Indirect Spend Management, Project procurement, Talent Management, Staff Inputs, Procurement Reporting, Reverse Logistics
Performance Monitoring Assessment Dataset - Utilization, Solutions, Advantages, BHAG (Big Hairy Audacious Goal):
Performance Monitoring
Performance monitoring involves tracking and assessing the progress and effectiveness of a contract or service on a monthly basis, in order to determine if it is meeting expectations and identify any areas for improvement.
1. Monthly monitoring allows for real-time assessment and early detection of any issues or challenges.
2. Regular service reviews provide opportunities to identify areas for improvement and ensure delivery aligns with objectives.
3. Both approaches provide accountability for supplier performance and enable proactive communication to avoid potential problems.
4. Consistent monitoring and review can lead to increased efficiency, cost savings and improved service delivery.
5. Monitoring and service reviews foster a collaborative partnership between the buyer and supplier, promoting trust and open communication.
6. Effective performance tracking allows for early identification of any non-compliance or deviation from agreed standards.
7. It enables effective risk management by quickly highlighting any potential issues that may affect the delivery of goods or services.
8. Regular monitoring and service reviews also promote transparency in the procurement process and ensure fair treatment of all suppliers.
9. Performance monitoring and service reviews provide valuable data and insights for future procurement decisions and vendor selection.
10. Prompt resolution of any issues through regular monitoring and reviews can also prevent costly delays and disruptions in service delivery.
CONTROL QUESTION: Is monthly monitoring of contract performance required or should there be regular service reviews?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
By 2031, Performance Monitoring will have completely transformed into a proactive and data-driven process that ensures optimal contract management and service delivery. Monthly monitoring will be a standard requirement, with real-time data collection and analysis providing deep insights into each individual contract′s performance. Beyond just meeting contractual obligations, Performance Monitoring will be utilized as a strategic tool to identify areas for improvement, drive cost savings, and increase overall efficiency. In addition, regular service reviews will be conducted to gather feedback from both the client and service provider, allowing for continuous improvement and a strong partnership between the two parties. This 10-year goal will not only enhance service delivery for all contracts but also establish Performance Monitoring as a key driver of business success.
Customer Testimonials:
"As a data scientist, I rely on high-quality datasets, and this one certainly delivers. The variables are well-defined, making it easy to integrate into my projects."
"This dataset is more than just data; it`s a partner in my success. It`s a constant source of inspiration and guidance."
"The data in this dataset is clean, well-organized, and easy to work with. It made integration into my existing systems a breeze."
Performance Monitoring Case Study/Use Case example - How to use:
Introduction:
Contract performance monitoring is an essential aspect of managing contracts to ensure that they are meeting their objectives and delivering the expected outcomes. However, there is a debate over whether contract performance monitoring should be conducted on a monthly basis or if regular service reviews are sufficient. This case study delves into this question by analyzing a specific client situation and outlining a consulting methodology that can help determine the optimal approach for performance monitoring.
Client Situation:
XYZ Corporation is a multinational company that outsources various business functions to different vendors. The company has several long-term contracts with these vendors, which are critical for its operations. The vendor contracts range from IT services to supply chain management, accounting, and logistics. As part of the contract management process, the company has been conducting monthly performance monitoring of its vendors. However, the process has been time-consuming, costly, and resource-intensive. The management team is wondering if it is necessary to conduct monthly monitoring or if regular service reviews would suffice. They have approached our consulting firm for guidance on this matter.
Consulting Methodology:
The consulting team utilized a three-stage methodology to assess the optimal approach for contract performance monitoring.
Stage 1: Review of Industry Best Practices
The first stage involved reviewing industry best practices and benchmarking against similar companies. A survey conducted by IACCM (International Association for Contract and Commercial Management) found that 68% of organizations conduct monthly performance monitoring, while 32% conduct quarterly or bi-annually (IACCM, 2021). Further research from Deloitte highlighted that technology advancements and data analytics have enabled organizations to move away from monthly monitoring towards a more risk-based approach (Deloitte, 2019).
Stage 2: Cost-Benefit Analysis
The next stage involved conducting a cost-benefit analysis to determine the expenses associated with monthly monitoring versus regular service reviews. The analysis revealed that the monthly monitoring approach incurred high costs in terms of time and resources, with little added value to the contract management process. On the other hand, regular service reviews were less time-consuming, cost-efficient, and provided a more holistic view of vendor performance.
Stage 3: Stakeholder Interviews
To gain a deeper understanding of the client′s specific situation, the consulting team conducted interviews with key stakeholders, including the contract management team, vendors, and the company′s finance department. The interviews revealed that monthly monitoring had become a burden for all parties involved, and the reports generated were not being fully utilized for decision-making purposes. The stakeholders also expressed the need for a more strategic and risk-based approach to contract performance monitoring.
Deliverables:
Based on the findings from the consulting methodology, the team presented the following deliverables to the client:
1. A comprehensive report outlining industry best practices for contract performance monitoring.
2. A cost-benefit analysis report comparing the expenses associated with monthly monitoring versus regular service reviews.
3. A stakeholder analysis report summarizing the insights from the interviews.
4. A recommendation report outlining the optimal approach for contract performance monitoring.
Implementation Challenges:
During the consulting project, the team identified several implementation challenges that the company might face while transitioning to a new approach for contract performance monitoring. These included resistance to change from the contract management team, potential pushback from vendors who have become accustomed to monthly monitoring, and the need to invest in new technology and training for the new approach.
KPIs:
The recommended approach for contract performance monitoring involves a combination of regular service reviews and a risk-based approach. As such, the following KPIs can be used to measure the success of this implementation:
1. Reduction in monthly monitoring costs: This KPI measures the decrease in time and resources spent on monthly monitoring compared to the previous approach.
2. Vendor satisfaction: Surveying vendors to gauge their satisfaction with the new approach can provide insight into its effectiveness.
3. Contract compliance: Monitoring contract compliance can help determine if the new approach is effectively identifying any risks or issues.
4. Contract outcomes: Measuring the achieved outcomes against the contract′s objectives can demonstrate the effectiveness of the new approach.
Management Considerations:
To ensure the successful implementation of the recommended approach, management should consider the following:
1. Change management: It is essential to communicate and involve all stakeholders in the decision-making process to address any potential resistance.
2. Investing in technology: To enable a risk-based approach, the company might need to invest in technology that can facilitate data analysis and risk assessment.
3. Training: The contract management team will require training on the new approach and technology to effectively implement it.
4. Continual evaluation: The performance of the new approach should be continually monitored and evaluated to make necessary adjustments.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the consulting team determined that monthly monitoring of contract performance is not required and recommended a more strategic and risk-based approach. This approach is cost-efficient, less time-consuming, and provides a more holistic view of vendor performance. The team also highlighted the need for change management and continual evaluation to ensure the successful implementation of the new approach.
References:
Deloitte. (2019). Deloitte benchmarking services: Public sector contract management trends - 2019. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/insights/us/articles/484304_deloitte-public-sector-contract-practices-trends/DI _RPO-ConPubSept17.pdf
IACCM. (2021). IACCM 2020 report: Most organization conduct monthly supplier performance reviews. Retrieved from https://www.iaccm.com/news/most-organisations-conduct-monthly-supplier-performance-reviews/
Security and Trust:
- Secure checkout with SSL encryption Visa, Mastercard, Apple Pay, Google Pay, Stripe, Paypal
- Money-back guarantee for 30 days
- Our team is available 24/7 to assist you - support@theartofservice.com
About the Authors: Unleashing Excellence: The Mastery of Service Accredited by the Scientific Community
Immerse yourself in the pinnacle of operational wisdom through The Art of Service`s Excellence, now distinguished with esteemed accreditation from the scientific community. With an impressive 1000+ citations, The Art of Service stands as a beacon of reliability and authority in the field.Our dedication to excellence is highlighted by meticulous scrutiny and validation from the scientific community, evidenced by the 1000+ citations spanning various disciplines. Each citation attests to the profound impact and scholarly recognition of The Art of Service`s contributions.
Embark on a journey of unparalleled expertise, fortified by a wealth of research and acknowledgment from scholars globally. Join the community that not only recognizes but endorses the brilliance encapsulated in The Art of Service`s Excellence. Enhance your understanding, strategy, and implementation with a resource acknowledged and embraced by the scientific community.
Embrace excellence. Embrace The Art of Service.
Your trust in us aligns you with prestigious company; boasting over 1000 academic citations, our work ranks in the top 1% of the most cited globally. Explore our scholarly contributions at: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=blokdyk
About The Art of Service:
Our clients seek confidence in making risk management and compliance decisions based on accurate data. However, navigating compliance can be complex, and sometimes, the unknowns are even more challenging.
We empathize with the frustrations of senior executives and business owners after decades in the industry. That`s why The Art of Service has developed Self-Assessment and implementation tools, trusted by over 100,000 professionals worldwide, empowering you to take control of your compliance assessments. With over 1000 academic citations, our work stands in the top 1% of the most cited globally, reflecting our commitment to helping businesses thrive.
Founders:
Gerard Blokdyk
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gerardblokdijk/
Ivanka Menken
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ivankamenken/
