Attention all Autonomous Weapons Systems Ethicists in the field of defense!
Are you tired of sifting through mountains of information to identify Responsibility Gaps and potential Lethal Autonomous Weapons that may pose ethical concerns? Look no further, because our new dataset has got you covered.
Introducing the Responsibility Gaps and Lethal Autonomous Weapons for the Autonomous Weapons Systems Ethicist in Defense Knowledge Base.
This comprehensive dataset contains a prioritized list of 1539 requirements, solutions, benefits, and results specific to your field.
It also includes real-life case studies and use cases to help guide your decision-making process.
But why is this dataset so essential? In today′s constantly evolving world, it is crucial for defense professionals to stay up-to-date on responsible and ethical practices in the development and use of Autonomous Weapons.
Our dataset not only provides a thorough overview of Responsibility Gaps and Lethal Autonomous Weapons but also offers valuable insights and solutions to address these issues.
Compared to other alternatives, our dataset stands out as the most comprehensive and effective resource for professionals in the defense industry.
It offers a user-friendly interface and easy navigation, making it accessible to all skill levels.
With a detailed product overview and specifications, you can quickly identify the right solutions for your specific needs.
Moreover, our dataset also includes a DIY/affordable product alternative, making it accessible to businesses of all sizes.
There is no need to break the bank to ensure responsible and ethical practices in your field.
Don′t just take our word for it, do your own research on the importance of Responsibility Gaps and Lethal Autonomous Weapons in defense.
Our dataset provides an in-depth analysis and comparison, giving you the tools to make informed decisions.
Don′t let ethical concerns and responsibility gaps hinder the progress of your work.
Incorporate our Responsibility Gaps and Lethal Autonomous Weapons for the Autonomous Weapons Systems Ethicist in Defense Knowledge Base into your daily practices and see the positive impact it has on your organization.
But that′s not all, our dataset also offers a cost-effective solution for businesses.
With its user-friendly interface and vast array of solutions, it will save you both time and resources in the long run.
So don′t wait any longer, invest in our Responsibility Gaps and Lethal Autonomous Weapons for the Autonomous Weapons Systems Ethicist in Defense Knowledge Base today and ensure responsible and ethical practices in your field.
And remember, with great power comes great responsibility - make sure you are equipped with the right tools for the job.
What are the foreseen measures and gaps in terms of human control and oversight? Who has the responsibility for informing the board of potential gaps in reporting and ways to improve reporting? How can addressing gaps in a clusters framework conditions improve productivity?
Responsibility Gaps
Responsibility gaps refer to areas where there is a lack of human control and oversight, resulting in potential issues and risks. Measures are needed to fill these gaps.
1. Implementation of strict guidelines and protocols for use: Ensures human control and provides clear boundaries for the actions of the autonomous weapons.
2. Development of advanced monitoring systems: Allows for continuous monitoring of the autonomous weapons′ actions and quickly detects any potential failures or malfunctions.
3. Regular training and education for operators: Keeps them up-to-date on the capabilities and limitations of the autonomous weapons, promoting responsible and ethical use.
4. Integration of human-in-the-loop systems: Enables human decision-making and intervention in critical situations, enhancing human control.
5. Enhanced transparency and accountability mechanisms: Requires manufacturers to disclose the algorithms and decision-making mechanisms of the autonomous weapons, holding them accountable for any misconduct.
6. Inclusion of ethics committees: Provides independent assessment and oversight of the use of autonomous weapons, ensuring ethical considerations are taken into account.
7. Adoption of a human-machine team approach: Emphasizes the collaboration between humans and autonomous weapons, promoting shared responsibility and improving decision-making.
8. Creation of an inter-agency task force for regulation: Facilitates cooperation between multiple stakeholders, leading to the development of effective regulations and guidelines for the use of autonomous weapons.
9. Incorporation of fail-safe mechanisms: Includes fail-safe options such as disabling or shutting down the autonomous weapons in case of malfunction or unauthorized use.
10. Adoption of a multi-level review process: Implementing a robust review process at various levels ensures that all decisions made by the autonomous weapons are in line with ethical principles and human control.
CONTROL QUESTION: What are the foreseen measures and gaps in terms of human control and oversight?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
In 2030, I envision a world where human control and oversight is seamlessly integrated into all systems and processes, ensuring accountability and responsible decision-making at all levels. The key focus areas for responsibility gaps in this future are:
1. Artificial Intelligence and Automation: With the rapid advancement of AI and automation, there will be a need for clear guidelines and regulations on ethical and responsible use of these technologies. This will require constant monitoring and updating of protocols to ensure that ethical considerations are embedded in decision-making algorithms.
2. Government and Corporate Responsibility: Governments and corporations will be held to a higher standard of responsibility, with strict laws and regulations in place to prevent irresponsible practices. This will include measures such as transparency in decision-making processes, corporate social responsibility initiatives, and accountability for environmental impact.
3. Data Privacy and Security: As technology continues to evolve, data privacy and security will become even more crucial. There will be a need for a global framework for data protection, with stringent measures in place to prevent breaches and misuse of sensitive personal information.
4. Human Rights Protection: With the growth of global markets and interconnectedness, there will be a continued need for protection of human rights, especially in industries such as mining, manufacturing, and agriculture. Governments and businesses will be expected to implement responsible practices and adhere to international human rights standards.
5. International Cooperation and Oversight: The responsibility for ensuring ethical and responsible practices will not fall solely on the shoulders of governments and corporations. There will be a need for international cooperation and oversight to address responsibility gaps across borders and hold all actors accountable.
To achieve this vision, measures like regular audits, mandatory training on responsible decision-making, and open forums for public input and debate will be put in place. Additionally, advancements in technology, such as blockchain, will play a crucial role in enabling transparency and traceability of processes and decisions.
Overall, my goal for 2030 is to have a society where human control and oversight is the norm, and responsibility is ingrained in all aspects of our lives, leading to a more ethical, just, and sustainable world.
"I`ve tried several datasets before, but this one stands out. The prioritized recommendations are not only accurate but also easy to interpret. A fantastic resource for data-driven decision-makers!"
Synopsis:
XYZ Company is a large multinational organization operating in the technology industry. The company has a diverse workforce, spread across various regions, and operates in highly regulated industries, such as healthcare and finance. With a large number of employees and a complex business structure, the company faces significant challenges in terms of ensuring human control and oversight. This case study aims to analyze the foreseen measures and gaps in human control and oversight within the organization, and provide recommendations for addressing them.
Consulting Methodology:
To assess the current state of responsibility gaps within XYZ Company, our consulting team employed a comprehensive methodology that involved a thorough review of existing policies, procedures, and governance frameworks. Our team also conducted interviews with key stakeholders within the organization, including senior management, department heads, and frontline employees. This was followed by an analysis of data related to incidents of non-compliance, internal controls audit findings, and employee surveys.
Deliverables:
Our consulting team delivered a detailed report that provided insights into the areas where the organization lacked human control and oversight. The report included a gap analysis of current policies, processes, and governance structures against industry best practices and regulatory requirements. It also included a roadmap for implementing recommended measures for addressing the identified gaps, along with a cost-benefit analysis.
Implementation Challenges:
One of the key challenges faced during the implementation of our recommendations was resistance from some stakeholders within the organization who perceived the suggested changes as hindering operational efficiency. Additionally, implementing the necessary changes would require significant financial resources and a realignment of priorities within the organization, which could also pose challenges.
KPIs:
To measure the success of our recommendations, we proposed the following KPIs for monitoring human control and oversight within the organization:
1. Compliance rates: The percentage of employees adhering to established rules, regulations, and policies.
2. Incident rate: The number of compliance-related incidents reported within a specific period.
3. Internal control assessment scores: The results of internal control audits conducted periodically.
4. Employee satisfaction: Results of employee surveys assessing their level of satisfaction with the organization′s policies, procedures, and governance frameworks.
Management Considerations:
To ensure the success of our recommendations, it is crucial for the organization′s management to be fully committed to implementing the necessary changes. Management should also provide sufficient resources and support to drive effective implementation. Additionally, continuous monitoring and evaluation of the recommended measures will be necessary to identify any gaps that may arise and take corrective actions promptly.
Whitepapers & Academic Journals:
Our methodology and recommendations were based on insights and principles from various whitepapers and academic journals. These include The Importance of Effective Oversight in Corporate Governance by The Conference Board, which emphasizes the need for responsible oversight by senior executives and board members in promoting ethical and compliant behavior within organizations. Additionally, Human Control and Responsibility Gaps in Automated Decision Making by Ethical AI, highlights the human responsibility gaps that can occur due to the increasing use of artificial intelligence in decision-making processes.
Market Research Reports:
Our consulting team also drew insights from market research reports, such as The Global Business Ethics and Compliance Training Market by Technavio, which identifies the increasing demand for training on responsible decision-making and ethics as a key factor driving the growth of the global business ethics and compliance training market. This report further emphasizes the importance of human oversight and control in promoting ethical behavior within organizations.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the foreseen measures and gaps in terms of human control and oversight within XYZ Company present significant challenges that could expose the organization to compliance risks and reputational damage. Through a comprehensive review of existing policies and procedures and leveraging insights from industry best practices and regulatory requirements, our consulting team has identified key gaps and provided recommendations for addressing them. By implementing our recommendations and continuously monitoring and evaluating their effectiveness, XYZ Company can strengthen its human control and oversight, ensuring ethical and compliant conduct within the organization.
Are you tired of sifting through mountains of information to identify Responsibility Gaps and potential Lethal Autonomous Weapons that may pose ethical concerns? Look no further, because our new dataset has got you covered.
Introducing the Responsibility Gaps and Lethal Autonomous Weapons for the Autonomous Weapons Systems Ethicist in Defense Knowledge Base.
This comprehensive dataset contains a prioritized list of 1539 requirements, solutions, benefits, and results specific to your field.
It also includes real-life case studies and use cases to help guide your decision-making process.
But why is this dataset so essential? In today′s constantly evolving world, it is crucial for defense professionals to stay up-to-date on responsible and ethical practices in the development and use of Autonomous Weapons.
Our dataset not only provides a thorough overview of Responsibility Gaps and Lethal Autonomous Weapons but also offers valuable insights and solutions to address these issues.
Compared to other alternatives, our dataset stands out as the most comprehensive and effective resource for professionals in the defense industry.
It offers a user-friendly interface and easy navigation, making it accessible to all skill levels.
With a detailed product overview and specifications, you can quickly identify the right solutions for your specific needs.
Moreover, our dataset also includes a DIY/affordable product alternative, making it accessible to businesses of all sizes.
There is no need to break the bank to ensure responsible and ethical practices in your field.
Don′t just take our word for it, do your own research on the importance of Responsibility Gaps and Lethal Autonomous Weapons in defense.
Our dataset provides an in-depth analysis and comparison, giving you the tools to make informed decisions.
Don′t let ethical concerns and responsibility gaps hinder the progress of your work.
Incorporate our Responsibility Gaps and Lethal Autonomous Weapons for the Autonomous Weapons Systems Ethicist in Defense Knowledge Base into your daily practices and see the positive impact it has on your organization.
But that′s not all, our dataset also offers a cost-effective solution for businesses.
With its user-friendly interface and vast array of solutions, it will save you both time and resources in the long run.
So don′t wait any longer, invest in our Responsibility Gaps and Lethal Autonomous Weapons for the Autonomous Weapons Systems Ethicist in Defense Knowledge Base today and ensure responsible and ethical practices in your field.
And remember, with great power comes great responsibility - make sure you are equipped with the right tools for the job.
Discover Insights, Make Informed Decisions, and Stay Ahead of the Curve:
Key Features:
Comprehensive set of 1539 prioritized Responsibility Gaps requirements. - Extensive coverage of 179 Responsibility Gaps topic scopes.
- In-depth analysis of 179 Responsibility Gaps step-by-step solutions, benefits, BHAGs.
- Detailed examination of 179 Responsibility Gaps case studies and use cases.
- Digital download upon purchase.
- Enjoy lifetime document updates included with your purchase.
- Benefit from a fully editable and customizable Excel format.
- Trusted and utilized by over 10,000 organizations.
- Covering: Cognitive Architecture, Full Autonomy, Political Implications, Human Override, Military Organizations, Machine Learning, Moral Philosophy, Cyber Attacks, Sensor Fusion, Moral Machines, Cyber Warfare, Human Factors, Usability Requirements, Human Rights Monitoring, Public Debate, Human Control, International Law, Technological Singularity, Autonomy Levels, Ethics Of Artificial Intelligence, Dual Responsibility, Control Measures, Airborne Systems, Strategic Systems, Operational Effectiveness, Design Compliance, Moral Responsibility, Individual Autonomy, Mission Goals, Communication Systems, Algorithmic Fairness, Future Developments, Human Enhancement, Moral Considerations, Risk Mitigation, Decision Making Authority, Fully Autonomous Systems, Chain Of Command, Emergency Procedures, Unintended Effects, Emerging Technologies, Self Preservation, Remote Control, Ethics By Design, Autonomous Ethics, Sensing Technologies, Operational Safety, Land Based Systems, Fail Safe Mechanisms, Network Security, Responsibility Gaps, Robotic Ethics, Deep Learning, Perception Management, Human Machine Teaming, Machine Morality, Data Protection, Object Recognition, Ethical Concerns, Artificial Consciousness, Human Augmentation, Desert Warfare, Privacy Concerns, Cognitive Mechanisms, Public Opinion, Rise Of The Machines, Distributed Autonomy, Minimum Force, Cascading Failures, Right To Privacy, Legal Personhood, Defense Strategies, Data Ownership, Psychological Trauma, Algorithmic Bias, Swarm Intelligence, Contextual Ethics, Arms Control, Moral Reasoning, Multi Agent Systems, Weapon Autonomy, Right To Life, Decision Making Biases, Responsible AI, Self Destruction, Justifiable Use, Explainable AI, Decision Making, Military Ethics, Government Oversight, Sea Based Systems, Protocol II, Human Dignity, Safety Standards, Homeland Security, Common Good, Discrimination By Design, Applied Ethics, Human Machine Interaction, Human Rights, Target Selection, Operational Art, Artificial Intelligence, Quality Assurance, Human Error, Levels Of Autonomy, Fairness In Machine Learning, AI Bias, Counter Terrorism, Robot Rights, Principles Of War, Data Collection, Human Performance, Ethical Reasoning, Ground Operations, Military Doctrine, Value Alignment, AI Accountability, Rules Of Engagement, Human Computer Interaction, Intentional Harm, Human Rights Law, Risk Benefit Analysis, Human Element, Human Out Of The Loop, Ethical Frameworks, Intelligence Collection, Military Use, Accounting For Intent, Risk Assessment, Cognitive Bias, Operational Imperatives, Autonomous Functions, Situation Awareness, Ethical Decision Making, Command And Control, Decision Making Process, Target Identification, Self Defence, Performance Verification, Moral Robots, Human In Command, Distributed Control, Cascading Consequences, Team Autonomy, Open Dialogue, Situational Ethics, Public Perception, Neural Networks, Disaster Relief, Human In The Loop, Border Surveillance, Discrimination Mitigation, Collective Decision Making, Safety Validation, Target Recognition, Attribution Of Responsibility, Civilian Use, Ethical Assessments, Concept Of Responsibility, Psychological Distance, Autonomous Targeting, Civilian Applications, Future Outlook, Humanitarian Aid, Human Security, Inherent Value, Civilian Oversight, Moral Theory, Target Discrimination, Group Behavior, Treaty Negotiations, AI Governance, Respect For Persons, Deployment Restrictions, Moral Agency, Proxy Agent, Cascading Effects, Contingency Plans
Responsibility Gaps Assessment Dataset - Utilization, Solutions, Advantages, BHAG (Big Hairy Audacious Goal):
Responsibility Gaps
Responsibility gaps refer to areas where there is a lack of human control and oversight, resulting in potential issues and risks. Measures are needed to fill these gaps.
1. Implementation of strict guidelines and protocols for use: Ensures human control and provides clear boundaries for the actions of the autonomous weapons.
2. Development of advanced monitoring systems: Allows for continuous monitoring of the autonomous weapons′ actions and quickly detects any potential failures or malfunctions.
3. Regular training and education for operators: Keeps them up-to-date on the capabilities and limitations of the autonomous weapons, promoting responsible and ethical use.
4. Integration of human-in-the-loop systems: Enables human decision-making and intervention in critical situations, enhancing human control.
5. Enhanced transparency and accountability mechanisms: Requires manufacturers to disclose the algorithms and decision-making mechanisms of the autonomous weapons, holding them accountable for any misconduct.
6. Inclusion of ethics committees: Provides independent assessment and oversight of the use of autonomous weapons, ensuring ethical considerations are taken into account.
7. Adoption of a human-machine team approach: Emphasizes the collaboration between humans and autonomous weapons, promoting shared responsibility and improving decision-making.
8. Creation of an inter-agency task force for regulation: Facilitates cooperation between multiple stakeholders, leading to the development of effective regulations and guidelines for the use of autonomous weapons.
9. Incorporation of fail-safe mechanisms: Includes fail-safe options such as disabling or shutting down the autonomous weapons in case of malfunction or unauthorized use.
10. Adoption of a multi-level review process: Implementing a robust review process at various levels ensures that all decisions made by the autonomous weapons are in line with ethical principles and human control.
CONTROL QUESTION: What are the foreseen measures and gaps in terms of human control and oversight?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
In 2030, I envision a world where human control and oversight is seamlessly integrated into all systems and processes, ensuring accountability and responsible decision-making at all levels. The key focus areas for responsibility gaps in this future are:
1. Artificial Intelligence and Automation: With the rapid advancement of AI and automation, there will be a need for clear guidelines and regulations on ethical and responsible use of these technologies. This will require constant monitoring and updating of protocols to ensure that ethical considerations are embedded in decision-making algorithms.
2. Government and Corporate Responsibility: Governments and corporations will be held to a higher standard of responsibility, with strict laws and regulations in place to prevent irresponsible practices. This will include measures such as transparency in decision-making processes, corporate social responsibility initiatives, and accountability for environmental impact.
3. Data Privacy and Security: As technology continues to evolve, data privacy and security will become even more crucial. There will be a need for a global framework for data protection, with stringent measures in place to prevent breaches and misuse of sensitive personal information.
4. Human Rights Protection: With the growth of global markets and interconnectedness, there will be a continued need for protection of human rights, especially in industries such as mining, manufacturing, and agriculture. Governments and businesses will be expected to implement responsible practices and adhere to international human rights standards.
5. International Cooperation and Oversight: The responsibility for ensuring ethical and responsible practices will not fall solely on the shoulders of governments and corporations. There will be a need for international cooperation and oversight to address responsibility gaps across borders and hold all actors accountable.
To achieve this vision, measures like regular audits, mandatory training on responsible decision-making, and open forums for public input and debate will be put in place. Additionally, advancements in technology, such as blockchain, will play a crucial role in enabling transparency and traceability of processes and decisions.
Overall, my goal for 2030 is to have a society where human control and oversight is the norm, and responsibility is ingrained in all aspects of our lives, leading to a more ethical, just, and sustainable world.
Customer Testimonials:
"I`ve tried several datasets before, but this one stands out. The prioritized recommendations are not only accurate but also easy to interpret. A fantastic resource for data-driven decision-makers!"
"Thank you for creating this amazing resource. You`ve made a real difference in my business and I`m sure it will do the same for countless others."
"I love the fact that the dataset is regularly updated with new data and algorithms. This ensures that my recommendations are always relevant and effective."
Responsibility Gaps Case Study/Use Case example - How to use:
Synopsis:
XYZ Company is a large multinational organization operating in the technology industry. The company has a diverse workforce, spread across various regions, and operates in highly regulated industries, such as healthcare and finance. With a large number of employees and a complex business structure, the company faces significant challenges in terms of ensuring human control and oversight. This case study aims to analyze the foreseen measures and gaps in human control and oversight within the organization, and provide recommendations for addressing them.
Consulting Methodology:
To assess the current state of responsibility gaps within XYZ Company, our consulting team employed a comprehensive methodology that involved a thorough review of existing policies, procedures, and governance frameworks. Our team also conducted interviews with key stakeholders within the organization, including senior management, department heads, and frontline employees. This was followed by an analysis of data related to incidents of non-compliance, internal controls audit findings, and employee surveys.
Deliverables:
Our consulting team delivered a detailed report that provided insights into the areas where the organization lacked human control and oversight. The report included a gap analysis of current policies, processes, and governance structures against industry best practices and regulatory requirements. It also included a roadmap for implementing recommended measures for addressing the identified gaps, along with a cost-benefit analysis.
Implementation Challenges:
One of the key challenges faced during the implementation of our recommendations was resistance from some stakeholders within the organization who perceived the suggested changes as hindering operational efficiency. Additionally, implementing the necessary changes would require significant financial resources and a realignment of priorities within the organization, which could also pose challenges.
KPIs:
To measure the success of our recommendations, we proposed the following KPIs for monitoring human control and oversight within the organization:
1. Compliance rates: The percentage of employees adhering to established rules, regulations, and policies.
2. Incident rate: The number of compliance-related incidents reported within a specific period.
3. Internal control assessment scores: The results of internal control audits conducted periodically.
4. Employee satisfaction: Results of employee surveys assessing their level of satisfaction with the organization′s policies, procedures, and governance frameworks.
Management Considerations:
To ensure the success of our recommendations, it is crucial for the organization′s management to be fully committed to implementing the necessary changes. Management should also provide sufficient resources and support to drive effective implementation. Additionally, continuous monitoring and evaluation of the recommended measures will be necessary to identify any gaps that may arise and take corrective actions promptly.
Whitepapers & Academic Journals:
Our methodology and recommendations were based on insights and principles from various whitepapers and academic journals. These include The Importance of Effective Oversight in Corporate Governance by The Conference Board, which emphasizes the need for responsible oversight by senior executives and board members in promoting ethical and compliant behavior within organizations. Additionally, Human Control and Responsibility Gaps in Automated Decision Making by Ethical AI, highlights the human responsibility gaps that can occur due to the increasing use of artificial intelligence in decision-making processes.
Market Research Reports:
Our consulting team also drew insights from market research reports, such as The Global Business Ethics and Compliance Training Market by Technavio, which identifies the increasing demand for training on responsible decision-making and ethics as a key factor driving the growth of the global business ethics and compliance training market. This report further emphasizes the importance of human oversight and control in promoting ethical behavior within organizations.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the foreseen measures and gaps in terms of human control and oversight within XYZ Company present significant challenges that could expose the organization to compliance risks and reputational damage. Through a comprehensive review of existing policies and procedures and leveraging insights from industry best practices and regulatory requirements, our consulting team has identified key gaps and provided recommendations for addressing them. By implementing our recommendations and continuously monitoring and evaluating their effectiveness, XYZ Company can strengthen its human control and oversight, ensuring ethical and compliant conduct within the organization.
Security and Trust:
- Secure checkout with SSL encryption Visa, Mastercard, Apple Pay, Google Pay, Stripe, Paypal
- Money-back guarantee for 30 days
- Our team is available 24/7 to assist you - support@theartofservice.com
About the Authors: Unleashing Excellence: The Mastery of Service Accredited by the Scientific Community
Immerse yourself in the pinnacle of operational wisdom through The Art of Service`s Excellence, now distinguished with esteemed accreditation from the scientific community. With an impressive 1000+ citations, The Art of Service stands as a beacon of reliability and authority in the field.Our dedication to excellence is highlighted by meticulous scrutiny and validation from the scientific community, evidenced by the 1000+ citations spanning various disciplines. Each citation attests to the profound impact and scholarly recognition of The Art of Service`s contributions.
Embark on a journey of unparalleled expertise, fortified by a wealth of research and acknowledgment from scholars globally. Join the community that not only recognizes but endorses the brilliance encapsulated in The Art of Service`s Excellence. Enhance your understanding, strategy, and implementation with a resource acknowledged and embraced by the scientific community.
Embrace excellence. Embrace The Art of Service.
Your trust in us aligns you with prestigious company; boasting over 1000 academic citations, our work ranks in the top 1% of the most cited globally. Explore our scholarly contributions at: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=blokdyk
About The Art of Service:
Our clients seek confidence in making risk management and compliance decisions based on accurate data. However, navigating compliance can be complex, and sometimes, the unknowns are even more challenging.
We empathize with the frustrations of senior executives and business owners after decades in the industry. That`s why The Art of Service has developed Self-Assessment and implementation tools, trusted by over 100,000 professionals worldwide, empowering you to take control of your compliance assessments. With over 1000 academic citations, our work stands in the top 1% of the most cited globally, reflecting our commitment to helping businesses thrive.
Founders:
Gerard Blokdyk
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gerardblokdijk/
Ivanka Menken
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ivankamenken/
