Looking for a comprehensive and efficient solution to address the ever-changing landscape of business disruption and innovation? Look no further!
Our Thought Leadership and Disruption Dilemma, Embracing Innovation or Becoming Obsolete Knowledge Base is here to provide you with all the tools and information you need to stay ahead of the curve.
Our dataset contains 1519 prioritized requirements, proven solutions, and tangible benefits for businesses and professionals.
By utilizing this knowledge base, you will be equipped with the most important questions to ask in order to get results with urgency and scope.
Each piece of information has been carefully curated and organized to ensure maximum effectiveness for our users.
One of the key advantages of our Thought Leadership and Disruption Dilemma, Embracing Innovation or Becoming Obsolete Knowledge Base is its superiority compared to competitors and alternatives.
We have thoroughly researched and analyzed the market to develop a product that stands out in its breadth, depth, and accuracy of information.
This makes it the go-to choice for professionals and businesses looking for a reliable and trustworthy resource.
Our product is suitable for all types of users, whether you are a seasoned expert or just starting out in your field.
With easy-to-use navigation and a user-friendly interface, the knowledge base can be utilized by anyone.
You don′t have to break the bank to access this valuable information either, as our product offers DIY/affordable alternatives to expensive consulting services.
But what exactly does our Thought Leadership and Disruption Dilemma, Embracing Innovation or Becoming Obsolete Knowledge Base offer? It provides a detailed overview of the product type and its specifications, along with real-world case studies and use cases to showcase its effectiveness.
The benefits of using our product are endless, from understanding the latest trends and technologies to unlocking new growth opportunities for your business.
Our research on the Thought Leadership and Disruption Dilemma, Embracing Innovation or Becoming Obsolete also extends to its impact on businesses.
By utilizing this knowledge base, you will gain a deeper understanding of how disruption and innovation can affect your industry and how you can adapt to stay ahead of the game.
This invaluable information will help your business thrive in a constantly evolving market.
Our Thought Leadership and Disruption Dilemma, Embracing Innovation or Becoming Obsolete Knowledge Base is an all-in-one solution that saves you time, effort, and resources.
Say goodbye to endless research and guesswork, and let our product guide you towards success.
With a cost-effective price point and easy accessibility, it is a must-have for any business or professional looking to stay relevant and competitive in today′s fast-paced world.
Don′t let disruption and innovation become a dilemma for your business.
Invest in our Thought Leadership and Disruption Dilemma, Embracing Innovation or Becoming Obsolete Knowledge Base and see the results for yourself.
Stay informed, stay ahead, and stay successful with our comprehensive and reliable dataset.
Who can help you navigate through the complex thought process of bringing your desired change to life? Is there an identified knowledge thought leader in your organization at the present time? How does your thought leadership goals align with your larger organizational goals?
Thought Leadership
Thought leaders are experts who guide others through complex ideas, inspiring innovation and change. They provide valuable insights, clarify ambiguities and foster progress.
Solution 1: Hire a Chief Innovation Officer
- Brings expertise in managing innovation and disruption
- Provides a clear vision and strategy for innovation
Solution 2: Create a Culture of Innovation
- Encourages creative thinking and continuous learning
- Improves adaptability and resilience to change
Solution 3: Collaborate with Startups
- Provides access to new technologies and business models
- Allows for experimentation and risk-taking
Solution 4: Invest in Ru0026D
- Drives long-term growth and competitiveness
- Increases the ability to create and capitalize on new opportunities
Thought Leadership:
- Seek advice from industry experts and thought leaders
- Attend industry conferences and events to stay informed on the latest trends and best practices.
CONTROL QUESTION: Who can help you navigate through the complex thought process of bringing the desired change to life?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now: A big hairy audacious goal (BHAG) for thought leadership 10 years from now could be:
To be recognized as the leading authority on the intersection of Artificial Intelligence and Ethics, and to have successfully navigated the implementation of ethical AI systems in at least 50% of the world′s top companies.
To achieve this goal, you will need to establish yourself as a thought leader in both the AI and ethics fields. This will involve staying up-to-date with the latest research and developments, publishing influential papers, speaking at conferences, and building a strong network of connections in both industries.
To help you navigate the complex thought process of bringing this change to life, you may want to consider working with a team of experts, including AI researchers, ethicists, business strategists, and communication professionals. This team can help you develop a clear and comprehensive plan for achieving your BHAG, including specific milestones and metrics for success.
Additionally, it will be important to engage with stakeholders across a variety of sectors, including industry, government, and civil society. This will help to build a broad base of support for your vision and ensure that your ideas are grounded in the needs and perspectives of those who will be affected by them.
Overall, achieving this BHAG will require a long-term commitment to both learning and action, as well as a deep understanding of the complex and interrelated issues at play. But with the right team, strategy, and stakeholder engagement, it is certainly within reach.
"This dataset has saved me so much time and effort. No more manually combing through data to find the best recommendations. Now, it`s just a matter of choosing from the top picks."
Synopsis:
A mid-sized manufacturing company, ABC Inc., sought to implement a major organizational change to improve operational efficiency and competitiveness. Faced with a complex thought process and lacking internal expertise, they turned to XYZ Consulting for guidance. XYZ employed a comprehensive consulting methodology, delivered actionable insights, and supported the implementation process, ensuring that ABC Inc. successfully navigated the challenging transformation.
Consulting Methodology:
Utilizing a four-phased approach (Diagnose, Design, Deliver, and Drive), XYZ Consulting followed the recommended best practices from leading consulting whitepapers, academic business journals, and market research reports.
1. Diagnose: XYZ Consulting conducted a thorough analysis of ABC Inc.′s operations, utilizing quantitative and qualitative research methods. A PESTLE (Political, Economic, Sociocultural, Technological, Legal, Environmental) analysis and a SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) assessment were performed to identify external and internal factors impacting the company. Two critical research articles guided this phase:
* Diagnosing Organizational Problems: A Framework and Guidelines (Carlopio, T., Andrewartha, G., u0026 Armstrong, S., 2018)
* Best Practices in Problem Diagnosis and Related Decision Making in Organizations – A Literature Review (Lonkar, R., Borade, H., u0026 Phalke, P., 2018)
1. Design: In collaboration with ABC Inc., XYZ Consulting created a customized strategy and roadmap for the desired change, leveraging research-backed frameworks such as Kotter′s Eight-Step Change Model (Kotter, J. P., 1995) and McKinsey′s 7S Framework (Waterman, R. H., Peters, T. J., u0026 Phillips, J. R., 1980). The new operational processes and systems were designed to align with ABC Inc.′s strategic objectives and promote a culture of continuous improvement.
2. Deliver: XYZ Consulting provided ABC Inc. with a comprehensive report detailing the new operational structure, roles and responsibilities, and performance indicators. A series of training and development workshops were held for key stakeholders to equip them with the necessary skills and knowledge to implement and sustain the change.
3. Drive: Throughout the implementation stage, XYZ Consulting offered ongoing support and guidance, monitoring progress, identifying challenges, and adjusting the strategy when necessary. Drawing on a study by Appelbaum, S. H., Bailey, D. E., Berg, P. O., u0026 Kogut, B., (2008), [Implementing organizational change: An empirical study of the change process](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6348600_Implementing_Organizational_Change_An_Empirical_Study_of_the_Change_Process), XYZ Consulting remained vigilant and adaptive as they facilitated ABC Inc.′s transformation.
Deliverables:
In addition to the diagnostic report, strategy roadmap, and training materials, XYZ Consulting provided ABC Inc. with a Performance Dashboard, equipped with Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and progress metrics. These KPIs were chosen based on their relevance to ABC Inc.′s strategic objectives, aligning with recommendations from the academic literature (DeBusk, R. F., u0026 Gulley, J. D., 2016).
Implementation Challenges:
As with most organizational transformations, ABC Inc. faced hurdles during the implementation stage. Resistance to change, communication breakdowns, and resource constraints were the primary challenges. Drawing on the findings of Fugate, M., u0026 Grau, G. (2012), [Implementing Change: Strategies to Develop Organizational Change Capacity](https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15348423.2011.612189), XYZ Consulting actively worked with ABC Inc. to develop internal change management capabilities and foster a culture of adaptability.
Management Considerations:
To ensure long-term success, ABC Inc.′s management team received support and coaching from XYZ Consulting in the areas of sustainable change management and performance monitoring. This approach was recommended by Balogun, J., u0026 Hope-Hailey, V. (2013) in [Managing Change Through Complexity: The Role of Managerial Capabilities](https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1467-8551.12070). Additionally, ABC Inc. committed to regular, data-driven performance evaluations based on the established KPIs to maintain the organizational transformation.
References:
Appelbaum, S. H., Bailey, D. E., Berg, P. O., u0026 Kogut, B. (2008). Implementing organizational change: An empirical study of the change process. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 44(2), 223-252.
Balogun, J., u0026 Hope-Hailey, V. (2013). Managing Change Through Complexity: The Role of Managerial Capabilities. Journal of Change Management, 13(3), 373-393.
Carlopio, T., Andrewartha, G., u0026 Armstrong, S. (2018). Diagnosing Organizational Problems: A Framework and Guidelines. Journal of Business and Management, 14(2), 48-57.
DeBusk, R. F., u0026 Gulley, J. D. (2016). Choosing and using performance measurements: An adaptive strategy for small business leaders. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 29(4), 45-60.
Fugate, M., u0026 Grau, G. (2012). Implementing Change: Strategies to Develop Organizational Change Capacity. Business Process Management Journal, 18(4), 674-694.
Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading Change: Why Transformation Efforts Fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.
Lonkar, R., Borade, H., u0026 Phalke, P. (2018). Best Practices in Problem Diagnosis and Related Decision Making in Organizations – A Literature Review. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 7(1), 77-84.
Waterman, R. H., Peters, T. J., u0026 Phillips, J. R. (1980). Structure is Not Organization. McKinsey Quarterly, 1(3), 20-31.
Our Thought Leadership and Disruption Dilemma, Embracing Innovation or Becoming Obsolete Knowledge Base is here to provide you with all the tools and information you need to stay ahead of the curve.
Our dataset contains 1519 prioritized requirements, proven solutions, and tangible benefits for businesses and professionals.
By utilizing this knowledge base, you will be equipped with the most important questions to ask in order to get results with urgency and scope.
Each piece of information has been carefully curated and organized to ensure maximum effectiveness for our users.
One of the key advantages of our Thought Leadership and Disruption Dilemma, Embracing Innovation or Becoming Obsolete Knowledge Base is its superiority compared to competitors and alternatives.
We have thoroughly researched and analyzed the market to develop a product that stands out in its breadth, depth, and accuracy of information.
This makes it the go-to choice for professionals and businesses looking for a reliable and trustworthy resource.
Our product is suitable for all types of users, whether you are a seasoned expert or just starting out in your field.
With easy-to-use navigation and a user-friendly interface, the knowledge base can be utilized by anyone.
You don′t have to break the bank to access this valuable information either, as our product offers DIY/affordable alternatives to expensive consulting services.
But what exactly does our Thought Leadership and Disruption Dilemma, Embracing Innovation or Becoming Obsolete Knowledge Base offer? It provides a detailed overview of the product type and its specifications, along with real-world case studies and use cases to showcase its effectiveness.
The benefits of using our product are endless, from understanding the latest trends and technologies to unlocking new growth opportunities for your business.
Our research on the Thought Leadership and Disruption Dilemma, Embracing Innovation or Becoming Obsolete also extends to its impact on businesses.
By utilizing this knowledge base, you will gain a deeper understanding of how disruption and innovation can affect your industry and how you can adapt to stay ahead of the game.
This invaluable information will help your business thrive in a constantly evolving market.
Our Thought Leadership and Disruption Dilemma, Embracing Innovation or Becoming Obsolete Knowledge Base is an all-in-one solution that saves you time, effort, and resources.
Say goodbye to endless research and guesswork, and let our product guide you towards success.
With a cost-effective price point and easy accessibility, it is a must-have for any business or professional looking to stay relevant and competitive in today′s fast-paced world.
Don′t let disruption and innovation become a dilemma for your business.
Invest in our Thought Leadership and Disruption Dilemma, Embracing Innovation or Becoming Obsolete Knowledge Base and see the results for yourself.
Stay informed, stay ahead, and stay successful with our comprehensive and reliable dataset.
Discover Insights, Make Informed Decisions, and Stay Ahead of the Curve:
Key Features:
Comprehensive set of 1519 prioritized Thought Leadership requirements. - Extensive coverage of 82 Thought Leadership topic scopes.
- In-depth analysis of 82 Thought Leadership step-by-step solutions, benefits, BHAGs.
- Detailed examination of 82 Thought Leadership case studies and use cases.
- Digital download upon purchase.
- Enjoy lifetime document updates included with your purchase.
- Benefit from a fully editable and customizable Excel format.
- Trusted and utilized by over 10,000 organizations.
- Covering: Decentralized Networks, Disruptive Business Models, Overcoming Resistance, Operational Efficiency, Agile Methodologies, Embracing Innovation, Big Data Impacts, Lean Startup Methodology, Talent Acquisition, The On Demand Economy, Quantum Computing, The Sharing Economy, Exponential Technologies, Software As Service, Intellectual Property Protection, Regulatory Compliance, Security Breaches, Open Innovation, Sustainable Innovation, Emerging Business Models, Digital Transformation, Software Upgrades, Next Gen Computing, Outsourcing Vs Insourcing, Token Economy, Venture Building, Scaling Up, Technology Adoption, Machine Learning Algorithms, Blockchain Technology, Sensors And Wearables, Innovation Management, Training And Development, Thought Leadership, Robotic Process Automation, Venture Capital Funding, Technological Convergence, Product Development Lifecycle, Cybersecurity Threats, Smart Cities, Virtual Teams, Crowdfunding Platforms, Shared Economy, Adapting To Change, Future Of Work, Autonomous Vehicles, Regtech Solutions, Data Analysis Tools, Network Effects, Ethical AI Considerations, Commerce Strategies, Human Centered Design, Platform Economy, Emerging Technologies, Global Connectivity, Entrepreneurial Mindset, Network Security Protocols, Value Proposition Design, Investment Strategies, User Experience Design, Gig Economy, Technology Trends, Predictive Analytics, Social Media Strategies, Web3 Infrastructure, Digital Supply Chain, Technological Advancements, Disruptive Technologies, Artificial Intelligence, Robotics In Manufacturing, Virtual And Augmented Reality, Machine Learning Applications, Workforce Mobility, Mobility As Service, IoT Devices, Cloud Computing, Interoperability Standards, Design Thinking Methodology, Innovation Culture, The Fourth Industrial Revolution, Rapid Prototyping, New Market Opportunities
Thought Leadership Assessment Dataset - Utilization, Solutions, Advantages, BHAG (Big Hairy Audacious Goal):
Thought Leadership
Thought leaders are experts who guide others through complex ideas, inspiring innovation and change. They provide valuable insights, clarify ambiguities and foster progress.
Solution 1: Hire a Chief Innovation Officer
- Brings expertise in managing innovation and disruption
- Provides a clear vision and strategy for innovation
Solution 2: Create a Culture of Innovation
- Encourages creative thinking and continuous learning
- Improves adaptability and resilience to change
Solution 3: Collaborate with Startups
- Provides access to new technologies and business models
- Allows for experimentation and risk-taking
Solution 4: Invest in Ru0026D
- Drives long-term growth and competitiveness
- Increases the ability to create and capitalize on new opportunities
Thought Leadership:
- Seek advice from industry experts and thought leaders
- Attend industry conferences and events to stay informed on the latest trends and best practices.
CONTROL QUESTION: Who can help you navigate through the complex thought process of bringing the desired change to life?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now: A big hairy audacious goal (BHAG) for thought leadership 10 years from now could be:
To be recognized as the leading authority on the intersection of Artificial Intelligence and Ethics, and to have successfully navigated the implementation of ethical AI systems in at least 50% of the world′s top companies.
To achieve this goal, you will need to establish yourself as a thought leader in both the AI and ethics fields. This will involve staying up-to-date with the latest research and developments, publishing influential papers, speaking at conferences, and building a strong network of connections in both industries.
To help you navigate the complex thought process of bringing this change to life, you may want to consider working with a team of experts, including AI researchers, ethicists, business strategists, and communication professionals. This team can help you develop a clear and comprehensive plan for achieving your BHAG, including specific milestones and metrics for success.
Additionally, it will be important to engage with stakeholders across a variety of sectors, including industry, government, and civil society. This will help to build a broad base of support for your vision and ensure that your ideas are grounded in the needs and perspectives of those who will be affected by them.
Overall, achieving this BHAG will require a long-term commitment to both learning and action, as well as a deep understanding of the complex and interrelated issues at play. But with the right team, strategy, and stakeholder engagement, it is certainly within reach.
Customer Testimonials:
"This dataset has saved me so much time and effort. No more manually combing through data to find the best recommendations. Now, it`s just a matter of choosing from the top picks."
"I can`t speak highly enough of this dataset. The prioritized recommendations have transformed the way I approach projects, making it easier to identify key actions. A must-have for data enthusiasts!"
"The variety of prioritization methods offered is fantastic. I can tailor the recommendations to my specific needs and goals, which gives me a huge advantage."
Thought Leadership Case Study/Use Case example - How to use:
Title: Thought Leadership Case Study: Navigating Complex Change with Expert ConsultingSynopsis:
A mid-sized manufacturing company, ABC Inc., sought to implement a major organizational change to improve operational efficiency and competitiveness. Faced with a complex thought process and lacking internal expertise, they turned to XYZ Consulting for guidance. XYZ employed a comprehensive consulting methodology, delivered actionable insights, and supported the implementation process, ensuring that ABC Inc. successfully navigated the challenging transformation.
Consulting Methodology:
Utilizing a four-phased approach (Diagnose, Design, Deliver, and Drive), XYZ Consulting followed the recommended best practices from leading consulting whitepapers, academic business journals, and market research reports.
1. Diagnose: XYZ Consulting conducted a thorough analysis of ABC Inc.′s operations, utilizing quantitative and qualitative research methods. A PESTLE (Political, Economic, Sociocultural, Technological, Legal, Environmental) analysis and a SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) assessment were performed to identify external and internal factors impacting the company. Two critical research articles guided this phase:
* Diagnosing Organizational Problems: A Framework and Guidelines (Carlopio, T., Andrewartha, G., u0026 Armstrong, S., 2018)
* Best Practices in Problem Diagnosis and Related Decision Making in Organizations – A Literature Review (Lonkar, R., Borade, H., u0026 Phalke, P., 2018)
1. Design: In collaboration with ABC Inc., XYZ Consulting created a customized strategy and roadmap for the desired change, leveraging research-backed frameworks such as Kotter′s Eight-Step Change Model (Kotter, J. P., 1995) and McKinsey′s 7S Framework (Waterman, R. H., Peters, T. J., u0026 Phillips, J. R., 1980). The new operational processes and systems were designed to align with ABC Inc.′s strategic objectives and promote a culture of continuous improvement.
2. Deliver: XYZ Consulting provided ABC Inc. with a comprehensive report detailing the new operational structure, roles and responsibilities, and performance indicators. A series of training and development workshops were held for key stakeholders to equip them with the necessary skills and knowledge to implement and sustain the change.
3. Drive: Throughout the implementation stage, XYZ Consulting offered ongoing support and guidance, monitoring progress, identifying challenges, and adjusting the strategy when necessary. Drawing on a study by Appelbaum, S. H., Bailey, D. E., Berg, P. O., u0026 Kogut, B., (2008), [Implementing organizational change: An empirical study of the change process](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6348600_Implementing_Organizational_Change_An_Empirical_Study_of_the_Change_Process), XYZ Consulting remained vigilant and adaptive as they facilitated ABC Inc.′s transformation.
Deliverables:
In addition to the diagnostic report, strategy roadmap, and training materials, XYZ Consulting provided ABC Inc. with a Performance Dashboard, equipped with Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and progress metrics. These KPIs were chosen based on their relevance to ABC Inc.′s strategic objectives, aligning with recommendations from the academic literature (DeBusk, R. F., u0026 Gulley, J. D., 2016).
Implementation Challenges:
As with most organizational transformations, ABC Inc. faced hurdles during the implementation stage. Resistance to change, communication breakdowns, and resource constraints were the primary challenges. Drawing on the findings of Fugate, M., u0026 Grau, G. (2012), [Implementing Change: Strategies to Develop Organizational Change Capacity](https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15348423.2011.612189), XYZ Consulting actively worked with ABC Inc. to develop internal change management capabilities and foster a culture of adaptability.
Management Considerations:
To ensure long-term success, ABC Inc.′s management team received support and coaching from XYZ Consulting in the areas of sustainable change management and performance monitoring. This approach was recommended by Balogun, J., u0026 Hope-Hailey, V. (2013) in [Managing Change Through Complexity: The Role of Managerial Capabilities](https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1467-8551.12070). Additionally, ABC Inc. committed to regular, data-driven performance evaluations based on the established KPIs to maintain the organizational transformation.
References:
Appelbaum, S. H., Bailey, D. E., Berg, P. O., u0026 Kogut, B. (2008). Implementing organizational change: An empirical study of the change process. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 44(2), 223-252.
Balogun, J., u0026 Hope-Hailey, V. (2013). Managing Change Through Complexity: The Role of Managerial Capabilities. Journal of Change Management, 13(3), 373-393.
Carlopio, T., Andrewartha, G., u0026 Armstrong, S. (2018). Diagnosing Organizational Problems: A Framework and Guidelines. Journal of Business and Management, 14(2), 48-57.
DeBusk, R. F., u0026 Gulley, J. D. (2016). Choosing and using performance measurements: An adaptive strategy for small business leaders. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 29(4), 45-60.
Fugate, M., u0026 Grau, G. (2012). Implementing Change: Strategies to Develop Organizational Change Capacity. Business Process Management Journal, 18(4), 674-694.
Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading Change: Why Transformation Efforts Fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.
Lonkar, R., Borade, H., u0026 Phalke, P. (2018). Best Practices in Problem Diagnosis and Related Decision Making in Organizations – A Literature Review. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 7(1), 77-84.
Waterman, R. H., Peters, T. J., u0026 Phillips, J. R. (1980). Structure is Not Organization. McKinsey Quarterly, 1(3), 20-31.
Security and Trust:
- Secure checkout with SSL encryption Visa, Mastercard, Apple Pay, Google Pay, Stripe, Paypal
- Money-back guarantee for 30 days
- Our team is available 24/7 to assist you - support@theartofservice.com
About the Authors: Unleashing Excellence: The Mastery of Service Accredited by the Scientific Community
Immerse yourself in the pinnacle of operational wisdom through The Art of Service`s Excellence, now distinguished with esteemed accreditation from the scientific community. With an impressive 1000+ citations, The Art of Service stands as a beacon of reliability and authority in the field.Our dedication to excellence is highlighted by meticulous scrutiny and validation from the scientific community, evidenced by the 1000+ citations spanning various disciplines. Each citation attests to the profound impact and scholarly recognition of The Art of Service`s contributions.
Embark on a journey of unparalleled expertise, fortified by a wealth of research and acknowledgment from scholars globally. Join the community that not only recognizes but endorses the brilliance encapsulated in The Art of Service`s Excellence. Enhance your understanding, strategy, and implementation with a resource acknowledged and embraced by the scientific community.
Embrace excellence. Embrace The Art of Service.
Your trust in us aligns you with prestigious company; boasting over 1000 academic citations, our work ranks in the top 1% of the most cited globally. Explore our scholarly contributions at: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=blokdyk
About The Art of Service:
Our clients seek confidence in making risk management and compliance decisions based on accurate data. However, navigating compliance can be complex, and sometimes, the unknowns are even more challenging.
We empathize with the frustrations of senior executives and business owners after decades in the industry. That`s why The Art of Service has developed Self-Assessment and implementation tools, trusted by over 100,000 professionals worldwide, empowering you to take control of your compliance assessments. With over 1000 academic citations, our work stands in the top 1% of the most cited globally, reflecting our commitment to helping businesses thrive.
Founders:
Gerard Blokdyk
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gerardblokdijk/
Ivanka Menken
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ivankamenken/
