Attention all professionals looking to streamline their User Access Management and SOC 2 Type 2 processes!
Say goodbye to tedious searching and detailed organization of requirements, solutions, and case studies.
Our new user-friendly Knowledge Base has everything you need to efficiently and effectively manage your User Access Management and SOC 2 Type 2 compliance.
Our dataset consists of 1610 prioritized requirements, solutions, and benefits to help you get results based on urgency and scope.
We understand that time is of the essence when it comes to compliance, which is why our Knowledge Base is designed to provide you with the most important questions and information that you need to know to achieve and maintain compliance.
But what makes our User Access Management and SOC 2 Type 2 Knowledge Base stand out among competitors and alternatives? Our dataset offers extensive and comprehensive coverage, making it a valuable tool for professionals in the field.
It′s easy to navigate and understand, making it suitable for both beginners and experts.
Plus, our affordable DIY alternative allows for cost-effective compliance management without sacrificing quality.
You can trust in our product as it has been meticulously researched and developed to meet the highest standards of User Access Management and SOC 2 Type 2 compliance.
We also provide real-life case studies and use cases to give you a better understanding of how our product works in practice.
Our User Access Management and SOC 2 Type 2 Knowledge Base is not just for professionals, but also for businesses looking to stay ahead in their compliance efforts.
By using our product, you can save both time and money in achieving and maintaining your compliance.
The pros of our Knowledge Base are endless - easily accessible, user-friendly, comprehensive coverage, and cost-effective.
And just like any product, there are cons as well, but rest assured that we have streamlined our processes to make it as efficient and effective as possible.
So what does our product do exactly? It provides you with all the necessary information, requirements, solutions, and case studies in one convenient location.
Say goodbye to endless searching and tedious organization of compliance information - our Knowledge Base has got you covered.
Join the many satisfied professionals and businesses who have already benefited from our User Access Management and SOC 2 Type 2 Knowledge Base.
Don′t waste any more time or effort, invest in our product today and see the difference it can make in your compliance management.
Get your hands on the best User Access Management and SOC 2 Type 2 Knowledge Base on the market and stay ahead in compliance!
What is the difference between an Authorized Official for your organization and an Access Manager? Do you need to customize out of the box identity and access management tools to meet your needs? How does your solution leverage user behavior analytics to simplify access while enhancing security?
User Access Management
An Authorized Official oversees and approves access to resources, while an Access Manager is responsible for implementing and managing user access according to those approvals.
- Solution 1: Clearly define roles and responsibilities for both Authorized Officials and Access Managers.
Benefits: Reduces confusion and promotes accountability, ensuring proper user access management.
- Solution 2: Implement multi-factor authentication for high-risk or sensitive systems.
Benefits: Enhances security by requiring an additional form of verification for accessing critical systems.
- Solution 3: Conduct regular audits to review user access privileges and remove any unnecessary access.
Benefits: Reduces the risk of unauthorized access and ensures that users only have access to what they need to perform their job duties.
- Solution 4: Utilize a role-based access control system.
Benefits: Simplifies user access management by assigning permissions based on job roles, making it easier to maintain access levels.
- Solution 5: Implement a least privilege principle where users are only given the minimum access necessary to perform their duties.
Benefits: Minimizes the risk of data breaches or misuse of sensitive information by limiting access to only what is required for job responsibilities.
CONTROL QUESTION: What is the difference between an Authorized Official for the organization and an Access Manager?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
Big Hairy Audacious Goal: By 2030, User Access Management will have achieved a 100% success rate in preventing unauthorized access to critical organizational systems and data, becoming an industry leader in ensuring secure and seamless user access.
Difference between an Authorized Official and an Access Manager:
An Authorized Official (AO) is a designated individual within an organization who is responsible for managing the overall access to the organization′s systems and data. They have the authority to make decisions on granting or revoking access to specific users, departments, or applications based on their roles and responsibilities within the organization.
On the other hand, an Access Manager is a specific role within the User Access Management team. They are responsible for implementing and enforcing access control policies and procedures. They work closely with the AO to ensure that access is granted appropriately based on the organization′s policies and guidelines. They monitor access activity and detect any potential security breaches, taking prompt action to prevent unauthorized access.
While the AO has decision-making authority, the Access Manager is instrumental in implementing and maintaining a robust access management system as per the AO′s direction. Both roles are crucial in ensuring the security and integrity of the organization′s information assets while facilitating efficient and seamless user access.
"I can`t thank the creators of this dataset enough. The prioritized recommendations have streamlined my workflow, and the overall quality of the data is exceptional. A must-have resource for any analyst."
Case Study: User Access Management at XYZ Corporation
Introduction:
XYZ Corporation is a global technology company that provides software solutions for various industries. With a large workforce and operations in multiple countries, the company relies heavily on its IT infrastructure to carry out its day-to-day operations. As a result, managing user access to the company′s systems, networks, and data is crucial to maintaining data security and supporting business operations. In order to ensure a robust and efficient user access management process, the company decided to engage a consulting firm to provide expertise and guidance.
Client Situation:
The client, XYZ Corporation, faced several challenges in managing user access across their organization. Firstly, with its growing workforce and constantly evolving IT landscape, the company found it difficult to keep track of all user access permissions granted to employees and third-party vendors. This lack of visibility towards user access posed a significant risk to the security of sensitive data and critical systems. Additionally, as a global company, the client also had to comply with various industry regulations and international data privacy laws, making user access management even more complex and challenging.
Consulting Methodology:
To address the client′s concerns regarding user access management, the consulting firm employed a methodical approach that involved the following steps:
1. Assessment of current process: The first step was to gain a thorough understanding of the client′s current user access management process. This included identifying the various systems and applications used, the types of access granted to different user roles, and the policies and procedures in place.
2. Gap analysis: Once the current state was understood, the consulting firm conducted a gap analysis to identify the shortcomings in the existing process. This involved assessing the level of compliance with regulations, identifying potential risks, and evaluating the effectiveness of user access controls.
3. Design and implementation of a new system: Based on the findings from the gap analysis, the consulting firm designed a new user access management system tailored to the client′s specific needs. This involved implementing robust access controls, role-based access frameworks, and automated processes for user provisioning and de-provisioning.
4. Training and change management: To ensure a smooth transition to the new system, the consulting firm provided training to all relevant stakeholders and assisted in change management efforts.
5. Ongoing support: The consulting firm provided ongoing support to fine-tune the user access management process and address any issues that may arise.
Deliverables:
The consulting firm delivered the following key outcomes to the client:
1. A comprehensive user access management framework that aligned with industry best practices and complied with relevant regulations.
2. A centralized system for managing user access requests, approvals, and revocations.
3. Documentation of policies and procedures for user access management.
4. Training materials for employees on how to request and approve user access.
5. Ongoing support and guidance to continuously enhance the user access management process.
Implementation Challenges:
During the implementation of the new user access management system, the consulting firm faced several challenges, including resistance to change from employees and difficulty in integrating legacy systems into the new framework. To overcome these challenges, the consulting firm worked closely with the client′s IT and HR departments, providing training and support to ensure a smooth transition.
KPIs:
To measure the success of the user access management project, the consulting firm tracked the following key performance indicators (KPIs):
1. Number of user access requests processed per day/week/month.
2. Time taken to approve and provision new user access.
3. Number of unauthorized access attempts blocked.
4. Compliance with relevant regulations and industry best practices.
Management Considerations:
The successful implementation of a sound user access management process has several benefits for an organization like XYZ Corporation. Some of the key management considerations that the client should keep in mind are:
1. Regular audits and reviews of the user access management process to identify any gaps or issues that may arise.
2. Providing ongoing training and awareness to employees on the importance of following proper user access protocols.
3. Implementation of a robust user access review process to ensure that access permissions are regularly reviewed and updated as needed.
Difference between an Authorized Official and an Access Manager:
In the context of user access management, an Authorized Official (AO) and an Access Manager (AM) are two distinct roles with different responsibilities. An AO is typically a senior-level executive within an organization who has the authority to grant final approval for granting access to critical systems and data. They are responsible for ensuring that the organization adheres to relevant regulations and policies when granting user access permissions. On the other hand, an AM is responsible for day-to-day management of user access requests and approvals. They oversee the process of granting, modifying, and revoking user access based on their job role or responsibilities.
Conclusion:
A robust user access management process is vital to maintaining the security and integrity of an organization′s data and systems. With the help of a consulting firm, XYZ Corporation was able to successfully establish a centralized and automated user access management system that addressed their specific challenges and met compliance requirements. By understanding the differences between an Authorized Official and an Access Manager, the client can now effectively manage user access and mitigate the risk of unauthorized access.
Say goodbye to tedious searching and detailed organization of requirements, solutions, and case studies.
Our new user-friendly Knowledge Base has everything you need to efficiently and effectively manage your User Access Management and SOC 2 Type 2 compliance.
Our dataset consists of 1610 prioritized requirements, solutions, and benefits to help you get results based on urgency and scope.
We understand that time is of the essence when it comes to compliance, which is why our Knowledge Base is designed to provide you with the most important questions and information that you need to know to achieve and maintain compliance.
But what makes our User Access Management and SOC 2 Type 2 Knowledge Base stand out among competitors and alternatives? Our dataset offers extensive and comprehensive coverage, making it a valuable tool for professionals in the field.
It′s easy to navigate and understand, making it suitable for both beginners and experts.
Plus, our affordable DIY alternative allows for cost-effective compliance management without sacrificing quality.
You can trust in our product as it has been meticulously researched and developed to meet the highest standards of User Access Management and SOC 2 Type 2 compliance.
We also provide real-life case studies and use cases to give you a better understanding of how our product works in practice.
Our User Access Management and SOC 2 Type 2 Knowledge Base is not just for professionals, but also for businesses looking to stay ahead in their compliance efforts.
By using our product, you can save both time and money in achieving and maintaining your compliance.
The pros of our Knowledge Base are endless - easily accessible, user-friendly, comprehensive coverage, and cost-effective.
And just like any product, there are cons as well, but rest assured that we have streamlined our processes to make it as efficient and effective as possible.
So what does our product do exactly? It provides you with all the necessary information, requirements, solutions, and case studies in one convenient location.
Say goodbye to endless searching and tedious organization of compliance information - our Knowledge Base has got you covered.
Join the many satisfied professionals and businesses who have already benefited from our User Access Management and SOC 2 Type 2 Knowledge Base.
Don′t waste any more time or effort, invest in our product today and see the difference it can make in your compliance management.
Get your hands on the best User Access Management and SOC 2 Type 2 Knowledge Base on the market and stay ahead in compliance!
Discover Insights, Make Informed Decisions, and Stay Ahead of the Curve:
Key Features:
Comprehensive set of 1610 prioritized User Access Management requirements. - Extensive coverage of 256 User Access Management topic scopes.
- In-depth analysis of 256 User Access Management step-by-step solutions, benefits, BHAGs.
- Detailed examination of 256 User Access Management case studies and use cases.
- Digital download upon purchase.
- Enjoy lifetime document updates included with your purchase.
- Benefit from a fully editable and customizable Excel format.
- Trusted and utilized by over 10,000 organizations.
- Covering: Test Environment Security, Archival Locations, User Access Requests, Data Breaches, Personal Information Protection, Asset Management, Facility Access, User Activity Monitoring, Access Request Process, Maintenance Dashboard, Privacy Policy, Information Security Management System, Notification Procedures, Security Auditing, Vendor Management, Network Monitoring, Privacy Impact Assessment, Least Privilege Principle, Access Control Procedures, Network Configuration, Asset Inventory, Security Architecture Review, Privileged User Controls, Application Firewalls, Secure Development, Information Lifecycle Management, Information Security Policies, Account Management, Web Application Security, Emergency Power, User Access Reviews, Privacy By Design, Recovery Point Objectives, Malware Detection, Asset Management System, Authorization Verifications, Security Review, Incident Response, Data Breach Notification Laws, Access Management, Data Archival, Fire Suppression System, Data Privacy Impact Assessment, Asset Disposal Procedures, Incident Response Workflow, Security Audits, Encryption Key Management, Data Destruction, Visitor Management, Business Continuity Plan, Data Loss Prevention, Disaster Recovery Planning, Risk Assessment Framework, Threat Intelligence, Data Sanitization, Tabletop Exercises, Risk Treatment, Asset Tagging, Disaster Recovery Testing, Change Approval, Audit Logs, User Termination, Sensitive Data Masking, Change Request Management, Patch Management, Data Governance, Source Code, Suspicious Activity, Asset Inventory Management, Code Reviews, Risk Assessment, Privileged Access Management, Data Sharing, Asset Depreciation, Penetration Tests, Personal Data Handling, Identity Management, Threat Analysis, Threat Hunting, Encryption Key Storage, Asset Tracking Systems, User Provisioning, Data Erasure, Data Retention, Vulnerability Management, Individual User Permissions, Role Based Access, Engagement Tactics, Data Recovery Point, Security Guards, Threat Identification, Security Events, Risk Identification, Mobile Technology, Backup Procedures, Cybersecurity Education, Interim Financial Statements, Contact History, Risk Mitigation Strategies, Data Integrity, Data Classification, Change Control Procedures, Social Engineering, Security Operations Center, Cybersecurity Monitoring, Configuration Management, Access Control Systems, Asset Life Cycle Management, Test Recovery, Security Documentation, Service Level Agreements, Door Locks, Data Privacy Regulations, User Account Controls, Access Control Lists, Threat Intelligence Sharing, Asset Tracking, Risk Management, Change Authorization, Alarm Systems, Compliance Testing, Physical Entry Controls, Security Controls Testing, Stakeholder Trust, Regulatory Policies, Password Policies, User Roles, Security Controls, Secure Coding, Data Disposal, Information Security Framework, Data Backup Procedures, Segmentation Strategy, Intrusion Detection, Access Provisioning, SOC 2 Type 2 Security controls, System Configuration, Software Updates, Data Recovery Process, Data Stewardship, Network Firewall, Third Party Risk, Privileged Accounts, Physical Access Controls, Training Programs, Access Management Policy, Archival Period, Network Segmentation Strategy, Penetration Testing, Security Policies, Backup Validation, Configuration Change Control, Audit Logging, Tabletop Simulation, Intrusion Prevention, Secure Coding Standards, Security Awareness Training, Identity Verification, Security Incident Response, Resource Protection, Compliance Audits, Mitigation Strategies, Asset Lifecycle, Risk Management Plan, Test Plans, Service Account Management, Asset Disposal, Data Verification, Information Classification, Data Sensitivity, Incident Response Plan, Recovery Time Objectives, Data Privacy Notice, Disaster Recovery Drill, Role Based Permissions, Patch Management Process, Physical Security, Change Tracking, Security Analytics, Compliance Framework, Business Continuity Strategy, Fire Safety Training, Incident Response Team, Access Reviews, SOC 2 Type 2, Social Engineering Techniques, Consent Management, Suspicious Behavior, Security Testing, GDPR Compliance, Compliance Standards, Network Isolation, Data Protection Measures, User Authorization Management, Fire Detection, Vulnerability Scanning, Change Management Process, Business Impact Analysis, Long Term Data Storage, Security Program, Permission Groups, Malware Protection, Access Control Policies, User Awareness, User Access Rights, Security Measures, Data Restoration, Access Logging, Security Awareness Campaign, Privileged User Management, Business Continuity Exercise, Least Privilege, Log Analysis, Data Retention Policies, Change Advisory Board, Ensuring Access, Network Architecture, Key Rotation, Access Governance, Incident Response Integration, Data Deletion, Physical Safeguards, Asset Labeling, Video Surveillance Monitoring, Security Patch Testing, Cybersecurity Awareness, Security Best Practices, Compliance Requirements, Disaster Recovery, Network Segmentation, Access Controls, Recovery Testing, Compliance Assessments, Data Archiving, Documentation Review, Critical Systems Identification, Configuration Change Management, Multi Factor Authentication, Phishing Training, Disaster Recovery Plan, Physical Security Measures, Vulnerability Assessment, Backup Restoration Procedures, Credential Management, Security Information And Event Management, User Access Management, User Identity Verification, Data Usage, Data Leak Prevention, Configuration Baselines, Data Encryption, Intrusion Detection System, Biometric Authentication, Database Encryption, Threat Modeling, Risk Mitigation
User Access Management Assessment Dataset - Utilization, Solutions, Advantages, BHAG (Big Hairy Audacious Goal):
User Access Management
An Authorized Official oversees and approves access to resources, while an Access Manager is responsible for implementing and managing user access according to those approvals.
- Solution 1: Clearly define roles and responsibilities for both Authorized Officials and Access Managers.
Benefits: Reduces confusion and promotes accountability, ensuring proper user access management.
- Solution 2: Implement multi-factor authentication for high-risk or sensitive systems.
Benefits: Enhances security by requiring an additional form of verification for accessing critical systems.
- Solution 3: Conduct regular audits to review user access privileges and remove any unnecessary access.
Benefits: Reduces the risk of unauthorized access and ensures that users only have access to what they need to perform their job duties.
- Solution 4: Utilize a role-based access control system.
Benefits: Simplifies user access management by assigning permissions based on job roles, making it easier to maintain access levels.
- Solution 5: Implement a least privilege principle where users are only given the minimum access necessary to perform their duties.
Benefits: Minimizes the risk of data breaches or misuse of sensitive information by limiting access to only what is required for job responsibilities.
CONTROL QUESTION: What is the difference between an Authorized Official for the organization and an Access Manager?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
Big Hairy Audacious Goal: By 2030, User Access Management will have achieved a 100% success rate in preventing unauthorized access to critical organizational systems and data, becoming an industry leader in ensuring secure and seamless user access.
Difference between an Authorized Official and an Access Manager:
An Authorized Official (AO) is a designated individual within an organization who is responsible for managing the overall access to the organization′s systems and data. They have the authority to make decisions on granting or revoking access to specific users, departments, or applications based on their roles and responsibilities within the organization.
On the other hand, an Access Manager is a specific role within the User Access Management team. They are responsible for implementing and enforcing access control policies and procedures. They work closely with the AO to ensure that access is granted appropriately based on the organization′s policies and guidelines. They monitor access activity and detect any potential security breaches, taking prompt action to prevent unauthorized access.
While the AO has decision-making authority, the Access Manager is instrumental in implementing and maintaining a robust access management system as per the AO′s direction. Both roles are crucial in ensuring the security and integrity of the organization′s information assets while facilitating efficient and seamless user access.
Customer Testimonials:
"I can`t thank the creators of this dataset enough. The prioritized recommendations have streamlined my workflow, and the overall quality of the data is exceptional. A must-have resource for any analyst."
"I can`t believe I didn`t discover this dataset sooner. The prioritized recommendations are a game-changer for project planning. The level of detail and accuracy is unmatched. Highly recommended!"
"Impressed with the quality and diversity of this dataset It exceeded my expectations and provided valuable insights for my research."
User Access Management Case Study/Use Case example - How to use:
Case Study: User Access Management at XYZ Corporation
Introduction:
XYZ Corporation is a global technology company that provides software solutions for various industries. With a large workforce and operations in multiple countries, the company relies heavily on its IT infrastructure to carry out its day-to-day operations. As a result, managing user access to the company′s systems, networks, and data is crucial to maintaining data security and supporting business operations. In order to ensure a robust and efficient user access management process, the company decided to engage a consulting firm to provide expertise and guidance.
Client Situation:
The client, XYZ Corporation, faced several challenges in managing user access across their organization. Firstly, with its growing workforce and constantly evolving IT landscape, the company found it difficult to keep track of all user access permissions granted to employees and third-party vendors. This lack of visibility towards user access posed a significant risk to the security of sensitive data and critical systems. Additionally, as a global company, the client also had to comply with various industry regulations and international data privacy laws, making user access management even more complex and challenging.
Consulting Methodology:
To address the client′s concerns regarding user access management, the consulting firm employed a methodical approach that involved the following steps:
1. Assessment of current process: The first step was to gain a thorough understanding of the client′s current user access management process. This included identifying the various systems and applications used, the types of access granted to different user roles, and the policies and procedures in place.
2. Gap analysis: Once the current state was understood, the consulting firm conducted a gap analysis to identify the shortcomings in the existing process. This involved assessing the level of compliance with regulations, identifying potential risks, and evaluating the effectiveness of user access controls.
3. Design and implementation of a new system: Based on the findings from the gap analysis, the consulting firm designed a new user access management system tailored to the client′s specific needs. This involved implementing robust access controls, role-based access frameworks, and automated processes for user provisioning and de-provisioning.
4. Training and change management: To ensure a smooth transition to the new system, the consulting firm provided training to all relevant stakeholders and assisted in change management efforts.
5. Ongoing support: The consulting firm provided ongoing support to fine-tune the user access management process and address any issues that may arise.
Deliverables:
The consulting firm delivered the following key outcomes to the client:
1. A comprehensive user access management framework that aligned with industry best practices and complied with relevant regulations.
2. A centralized system for managing user access requests, approvals, and revocations.
3. Documentation of policies and procedures for user access management.
4. Training materials for employees on how to request and approve user access.
5. Ongoing support and guidance to continuously enhance the user access management process.
Implementation Challenges:
During the implementation of the new user access management system, the consulting firm faced several challenges, including resistance to change from employees and difficulty in integrating legacy systems into the new framework. To overcome these challenges, the consulting firm worked closely with the client′s IT and HR departments, providing training and support to ensure a smooth transition.
KPIs:
To measure the success of the user access management project, the consulting firm tracked the following key performance indicators (KPIs):
1. Number of user access requests processed per day/week/month.
2. Time taken to approve and provision new user access.
3. Number of unauthorized access attempts blocked.
4. Compliance with relevant regulations and industry best practices.
Management Considerations:
The successful implementation of a sound user access management process has several benefits for an organization like XYZ Corporation. Some of the key management considerations that the client should keep in mind are:
1. Regular audits and reviews of the user access management process to identify any gaps or issues that may arise.
2. Providing ongoing training and awareness to employees on the importance of following proper user access protocols.
3. Implementation of a robust user access review process to ensure that access permissions are regularly reviewed and updated as needed.
Difference between an Authorized Official and an Access Manager:
In the context of user access management, an Authorized Official (AO) and an Access Manager (AM) are two distinct roles with different responsibilities. An AO is typically a senior-level executive within an organization who has the authority to grant final approval for granting access to critical systems and data. They are responsible for ensuring that the organization adheres to relevant regulations and policies when granting user access permissions. On the other hand, an AM is responsible for day-to-day management of user access requests and approvals. They oversee the process of granting, modifying, and revoking user access based on their job role or responsibilities.
Conclusion:
A robust user access management process is vital to maintaining the security and integrity of an organization′s data and systems. With the help of a consulting firm, XYZ Corporation was able to successfully establish a centralized and automated user access management system that addressed their specific challenges and met compliance requirements. By understanding the differences between an Authorized Official and an Access Manager, the client can now effectively manage user access and mitigate the risk of unauthorized access.
Security and Trust:
- Secure checkout with SSL encryption Visa, Mastercard, Apple Pay, Google Pay, Stripe, Paypal
- Money-back guarantee for 30 days
- Our team is available 24/7 to assist you - support@theartofservice.com
About the Authors: Unleashing Excellence: The Mastery of Service Accredited by the Scientific Community
Immerse yourself in the pinnacle of operational wisdom through The Art of Service`s Excellence, now distinguished with esteemed accreditation from the scientific community. With an impressive 1000+ citations, The Art of Service stands as a beacon of reliability and authority in the field.Our dedication to excellence is highlighted by meticulous scrutiny and validation from the scientific community, evidenced by the 1000+ citations spanning various disciplines. Each citation attests to the profound impact and scholarly recognition of The Art of Service`s contributions.
Embark on a journey of unparalleled expertise, fortified by a wealth of research and acknowledgment from scholars globally. Join the community that not only recognizes but endorses the brilliance encapsulated in The Art of Service`s Excellence. Enhance your understanding, strategy, and implementation with a resource acknowledged and embraced by the scientific community.
Embrace excellence. Embrace The Art of Service.
Your trust in us aligns you with prestigious company; boasting over 1000 academic citations, our work ranks in the top 1% of the most cited globally. Explore our scholarly contributions at: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=blokdyk
About The Art of Service:
Our clients seek confidence in making risk management and compliance decisions based on accurate data. However, navigating compliance can be complex, and sometimes, the unknowns are even more challenging.
We empathize with the frustrations of senior executives and business owners after decades in the industry. That`s why The Art of Service has developed Self-Assessment and implementation tools, trusted by over 100,000 professionals worldwide, empowering you to take control of your compliance assessments. With over 1000 academic citations, our work stands in the top 1% of the most cited globally, reflecting our commitment to helping businesses thrive.
Founders:
Gerard Blokdyk
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gerardblokdijk/
Ivanka Menken
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ivankamenken/
